May 11th 2021
This Just In... Face Masks Reduce COVID-19 Infection Rate By An Insignificant 3/10ths Of One-Percent; But Who Is Going To Change Policy At Retail Stores?
According to Catherine Austin Fitts, who once held a position at the Department of Housing & Urban Development, the big banks are behind the GREAT RESET that is being foisted upon the American public. The Central Bankers approved a plan in August of 2019 approved a plan called "The Going Direct Reset," just prior to the COVID-19 coronavirus outbreak.
The bankers are intentionally taking down the economy to force the public to beg for a reset, and culling the population of senior Americans in nursing homes that account for most of the COVID-19 associated deaths.
This is because the bankers and life insurance companies along with the federal government cannot meet their social contract with Americans to provide healthcare and Social Security checks to a growing population of retirees.
Fitts: "Beginning in fiscal 1998 fantastic tranches of money began disappearing from the American government." It is now impossible for taxes to continue to meet all of the federal government's obligations.
Fitts says: "We now have a war between the people who print money and the people who know how to earn money."
In Fitts' mind, the war is between JP Morgan & Associates with their digital money scheme vs. the American Constitutional, free enterprise/freedom of religion system.
Blackrock, the largest investment house that is now doing contract work for the US Treasury Department, says it advocates for a financial reset "to avoid the disruptions to income streams as a result of the contrived coronavirus pandemic." But opposite is occurring. Laid-off restaurant employees are being paid more than the current rate of pay NOT TO WORK! There will be no restaurants for waiters to return to.
The bankers are the behind-the-scenes agents to force America out of paper money and coins and into digital money that will be issued directly to Americans in the form of universal basic income from the US Treasury Department and will in turn control purchases and therefore everyone's lives. Examples: refuse vaccination and your digital money account will be closed; donate to church and it will be denied because church is a racist, white-dominated, terrorist organization.
American retailers as front men
The bankers use American retailers as the front men. Notice how the idea paper money harbors the COVID-19 coronavirus was spread via retailers who refused to accept legal tender and asked for the help of Americans because of an allege shortage of coins, which is really a way to turn in all the coinage before digital currency is forced on America. Then we got the requirement to wear face masks to enter retail stores.
Science isn't going to get retailers to cease its face mask requirements. Regardless of the science, which is overwhelmingly negative for face masks, American medicine has a difficulty adhering to the science and objecting to face masks. Here is the most recent study.
Face masks: the latest science
A group of 3030 participants who spent more than 3 hours/day outside their home were given a box of 50 surgical face masks and were assigned to wear them for 60 days with COVID-19 testing by antibody, PCR or hospital diagnosis at 30 days. The study was conducted in a community where face masks were uncommonly worn. Only 7% of participants did not wear face masks as directed.
The results of the test were as follows:
- 42 of 3030 participants habitually wearing face masks were infected, 1.8% (1.8 in 100).
- 53 of 2009 control participants who did not wear face masks were infected, 2.1% (2.1 in 100).
- Difference: 3/10ths of one percent (3 people in 1000)
Source: Annals Internal Medicine March 2021
In the face mask group, 9 participants (0.5%) were found to develop any of 11 other respiratory viral infections compared to 11 (0.6%) in the no-face-mask group. Again, this was not statistically significant nor meaningful clinically.
The results of the study were not considered to be applicable to the formation of public health measures because it was not known how many participants were actually exposed to the virus at home during the study. However, the observed infection rate was similar to that reported in other large studies.
Authors of the study conclude: "Our results suggest that the recommendation to wear a surgical mask when outside the home among others did not reduce, at conventional levels of statistical significance, the incidence of COVID19 infection in mask wearers in a setting where social distancing and other public health measures were in effect..."
A critical commentator wrote that the false-positive rate would produce ~19 in each group, which would confound the results, and infection at home when face masks were not being worn would also be confounding. This reveals the circus-type of science being conducted. It is just being done for show. This is a political pandemic, not a biological one.
Is infection bad?
Another issue that goes unmentioned is that infection among healthy individuals would result in the production of antibodies and T-cells and long-term immunity. In the mind of modern medicine, infection is bad if it was acquired naturally, but good if it was acquired via vaccination.
What happened to flattening the curve?
Face masks at best only serve to delay and slow infection, which was their original intent, to keep hospitals from being overwhelmed until vaccines became available. There was no comment regarding the fact ~98% of face mask wearers received no benefit because the infection rate was low (~2%).
The flip side of the issue is that those who were infected developed some sort of future immunity. That would be good, not bad.
And then again, because of mutant viral strains, even if immunity was achieved, it would only be for a short time until exposure to a mutant strain.
This data points more towards efforts to improve the effectiveness of the immune system as exposure and infection is likely inevitable, you know, vitamins A, C, D, trace minerals zinc, selenium and the amino acid lysine. There has been no discussion that since vaccines have now become available, that there is no longer any need to slow the rate of infection.
[Ron: Arguably HCQ and Ivermectin are vaccines because they prevent disease, BUT the Pfizer and Moderna concoctions are not.].
Modern medicine struggles to come to the defense of face-masks in the middle of a pandemic. And now that COVID-19 has become endemic, must we wear face masks perpetually? Even for low-low risk groups like children?
In another trial, face mask wearers actually experienced an increased risk for infection. So what? Face masks are obviously not about health, they are about social control.
Americans will have to overcome their imagined fears
There will be no abandonment of face masks until the public overcomes its fears. The case-to-fatality ratio of COVID-19 infection ranges from 0.00% to 1.63% (median 0.23%). In other words, the risk for COVID-19 related death is remote, about the same as the flu, and far lower than many other infectious diseases and diseases in some countries. The fear is not based on truth.
America is being destroyed from within
If all this was about a "woke" generation, why are more than half of black owned business expected to be out of business by April 2021? It is difficult for Americans to believe that their own elected officials are covertly allowing the destruction of free enterprise. Police are instructed to stand down as rioters have burned down businesses in 200 American cities.
Local control can prevail over federal corruption
We cannot leave the credit and money-creating responsibilities to central bankers, says Fitts. She advises Americans to take their money out of big banks and shift to community banks, and to create community currencies. Otherwise, Americans will be wearing face masks perpetually and living in financial chains.
Woe to the vaccinated: choose whom ye shall believe
As for the reported 30% of Americans who have elected to be inoculated, they face both immediate and long-term side effects and no immunity from mutant coronavirus strains. This was by design. The substitution of a nucleotide (pseudo-uridine in place of uridine) in RNA in RNA-vaccines was intentionally manipulated to reduce symptoms but not surveillance by the immune system (imperfect vaccination) that then permits shedding of the virus to uninfected others. Vaccine critics now say the vaccinated should be quarantined as super-spreaders! Licensure of these vaccines will only be accomplished by public health authorities overlooking their many side effects, some mortal. Everyone should posit in their mind that vaccines don't work without an operable immune system that requires zinc, vitamin C, vitamin D, selenium, lysine. Maybe natural immunity is superior to synthetic vaccines.
[Some colour fonts, bolding and comments in square brackets added.].
Copyright © Bill Sardi, writing from La Verne, California. This article has been written exclusively for www.LewRockwell.com and other parties who wish to refer to it should link rather than post at other URLs.