911 Material
Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction
By Dr. Steven Young and others
Apr 26, 2008, 10:43

Hi everyone, Steven Jones, the Physics Professor retired (because of his activities) from Bringham Young University in Utah,  and a few others have been trying to 'tackfully" work with other scientists who buy into the false story put out in the media and by NIST, to reconsider and re think. They have been trying to get credible publications to pubish, the truth and are constantly rejected. Using a new method, they have found a bit of success, in this posting in the The Open Civil Engineering Journal. Go to:

http://www.bentham.org/open/tociej/openaccess2.htm  then click on Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction         
  pp.35-40 (6) Authors: Steven E. Jones, Frank M. Legge, Kevin R. Ryan, Anthony F. Szamboti, James R. Gourley  

Then click the button: Open Access, which brings up another page, and then click download to be able to read it on your computer. Be sure to save it!  This is a copyable pdf file and I so copied it, but it pastes really funny and not very readable, even in my word processor, so it is better to journey to the site and download a copy.

This is only 6 pages and very readable to the non scientific trained reader and worthy, because it may offer you the ability to argue with any of your engineering and other "educated" friends, and this simple article, if they will consider reading it, might assist them coming out of the box.

Whenever you are talking with anyone, always try to get them to look at what was put out on NOVA about the supposed lack of a central core. NIST actucally admits there was a central core. This was not a "tube" that collapsed, this was a tube within a tube, because of the central core. If you can get any professionals, or anyone still wanting to accept the false lies, and believe that the government by using NIST is telling truth, this piece might help dispell that. However how many people actually have read the NIST report? No one pretty much.

This article, by "agreeing" with NIST on 14 points, nicely points out many falacies in the supposed thinking by those of NIST, including the one where NIST states it was NOT necessary to spend the taxpayers money researching whether there was evidence of explosives used!  It is made clear in this, that based on SAFETY issues alone, in studying what happened on 911, that all investigations of failure of any building must have proper investigations to learn, so the public might be protected in the future from faulty construction techniques.

I have had several conversations with supposed intelligent and educated science friends and strangers,  who insist that the science allowed these buildings to collapse, and they are satisfied. Means they do NOT understand their own science studies, because if one accepts the false story, as fact, it means alll the laws of science were broken and of course, God himself must have then brought down these buildings! Nature never breaks its own laws. And man can't break them either.