Candace
Pakistan is the Most Dangerous Place in the World?????
By Candace
Dec 29, 2007, 10:30

Pakistan is the Most Dangerous Place in the World???

By Candace

December 29, 2007

On December 27, 2007 I awakened to the news of the assassination of Benazir Bhutto. The whole day and most of the next was used to coverage of this event on CNN. Some of you have written to ask what happened? And so this piece is an attempt to discern that, as I write it after gathering more information yesterday. My what a game has been played. TV is practically making a goddess out of this woman, and I have felt, at a gut level since she returned to Pakistan in  October of this year, that something is very wrong with this picture. Too much fanfare by the American press, which is a giveaway of a game to be played.

I suspected she had returned to control Musharraf, who despite what some put out in the press and on the Internet is no true friend of United States and the Zionists. I don’t know who was behind the bloodless quiet coup that put him in place. Some say the US did it, and he is a puppet, but in recent years, when he is on TV I do not sense he is a Zionist puppet. I do sense he wants to return his people to a state of peace, and that is a mighty difficult job and he must walk a tight fence to keep his country alive also.

While no supporter of Bush, he must cow to Bush in order to not have his country harmed. Remember this, which I took off of Wikipedia, and which was covered by US press when Musharraf was visiting:

During a September 24, 2006 interview with Steve Kroft on 60 Minutes, Musharraf said that then-U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage had called Musharraf's intelligence director shortly following the 9/11 attacks and threatened military action if Pakistan did not support the U.S.-led "war on terror". According to Musharraf, Armitage warned: "Be prepared to be bombed. Be prepared to go back to the Stone Age."^[87] Furthermore, during an interview with Jon Stewart of The Daily Show on September 26, 2006, Musharraf stated that then-Secretary of State Colin Powell also contacted him with a similar message: "You are with us or against us."

Musharraf must also deal with India, a country he fled long ago after the partition that created Pakistan. Now I agree that Pakistan is a big mess, because of Zionist influence, which includes through India, which was a colony of Britain before it won it’s freedom gratis the great man Ghandi. Musharraf I think is bright, but has trouble knowing how to say no. He has been given a great deal of money by our government, and it’s hard to know what this money has paid for. When I observe him on TV I see a compassionate man who cares for his people, and has this big problem of Zionist control that he must deal with.

Pakistan developed nuclear power plants and subsequently supposedly tested a nuclear bomb in in I believe 1999. However, the controlled US media hypes that this is a great risk to the world now. Say what? They don’t have the ability to get them very far from Pakistan. At most they would use them in self defense against India. I do not believe, after my bit of study that there is any other intent, and so possibly having “the bomb” will serve to hold off India, because India also has the bomb and I think India is somewhat a greater risk to the world than Pakistan, because I do belief India is a Zionist used country.

I would wish that both India, China and Pakistan would leave Kashmir alone and let that area be self determinate in its affairs. It has recourses apparrently all countries fighting for ownership of it desire to have control over. In this world it is always taking the tribal zionist anti christ approach to the solving of problems for resources and that will simply continue to be the preferred method unless the world stands against it.

It would seem that Musharraf is resisting it, because at some point here, he has fallen out of their control. He had too, otherwise he would not have revealed what he did, about being told he would join this false game on terror or risk his country being returned to the stone age. Pakistan in several places is apparently quite modern, except for the regugee camps. The man also has a considerable problem with fundamental Islam in his country, which again is the result of Zionist black ops folks that go around the world inflaming religionists as a tool for their use to control, and divide people.

Just a brief issue here, during our media blitze over the assassination, it was heavily covered that Mr. Musharraf has failed to nail Osama as he promised. Will, Osama is rather dead and there is nothing Musharraf can do to raise him from the grave.

This man walks quite a tight rope as above, and so I reserve my judgment of him, because he must do the best he can, under the conditions in which he must exist. I will comment more later. For the time being, I will place this material on him from Wikipedia. Wikipedia doesn’t always allow truth to be told, but it’s certainly easy to use, and there are lots of facts posted. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pervez_Musharraf

Following the September 11, 2001 attacks, Musharraf sided with the United States against the Taliban government in Afghanistan after an ultimatum by U.S. President George W. Bush. Musharraf agreed to give the United States the use of three airbases for Operation Enduring Freedom. Secretary of State Colin Powell and other administration officials met with Musharraf. On September 19, 2001, Musharraf addressed the people of Pakistan and stated that, while he opposed military tactics against the Taliban, Pakistan risked being endangered by an alliance of India and the U.S. if it did not cooperate.^[75] In 2006, Musharraf testified that this stance was pressured by threats from the U.S.,^[76] and revealed in his memoirs that he had "war-gamed" the United States as an adversary and decided that it would end in Pakistan losing such a conflict, especially since archrival India would also join in such an attack.^[77]

Denunciation of extremism

On January 12, 2002, Musharraf gave a landmark speech against Islamic extremism. He unequivocally condemned all acts of terrorism and pledged to combat Islamic extremism and lawlessness within Pakistan itself.

He has also used it to ban funding of madrasas and mosques from outside the country.^{[citation needed]} At the same time as banning foreign funding of Islamic educational institutions, he made it compulsory for them to teach a whole host of additional subjects such as computing. This meant that many had to close due to the halt of funds from Pakistanis working abroad resulting in not being able to teach the additional subjects that he had made compulsory. Musharraf also instituted prohibitions on foreign students' access to studying Islam within Pakistan, an effort which began as an outright ban but was later reduced to restrictions on obtaining visas.

In 1961, he entered the Pakistan Military Academy at Kakul, graduating 11th in his class. He was commissioned in 1964 in the Artillery Regiment. Later he joined the Special Services Group and was posted to Field Artillery Regiments. A graduate of the Command and Staff College, Quetta, and the National Defence College, Rawalpindi, Musharraf is also a graduate of the Royal College of Defence Studies of the United Kingdom. Musharraf revealed in his memoirs that in 1965 he was charged with taking unauthorized leave and was about to be court-martialed for it, but was excused due to the war with India.^[6]

As  bolded above, I fully support this, because these Islamic fundamental radicals want to greatly restrict learning, often reducing study to mostly the Quran and related islamic literature.

Now, I must spend a bit of time on the lady Bhutto. I instinctively so not trust this woman. She has great beauty, but I personally feel that she serves the Zionist Agenda. So let me, just to save on my typing, place again, some more material from Wiki about her. Please each of you with an interest in this topic, do you own research. But I myself going with my “gut” and I found reason to go with my “gut.”  Below is my selections taken from Wiki, and is not the entire posting.

Benazir Bhutto June 21, 1953 – December 27, 2007) was a Pakistani politician who chaired the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), a centre-left political party in Pakistan affiliated to the Socialist International. Bhutto was the first woman elected to lead a Muslim state, having been twice elected Prime Minister of Pakistan. She was sworn in for the first time in 1988 at the age of 35, but was removed from office 20 months later under the order of then-president Ghulam Ishaq Khan on grounds of alleged corruption. In 1993 Bhutto was re-elected but was again removed in 1996 on similar charges, this time by President Farooq Leghari.

Bhutto went into self-imposed exile in Dubai in 1998, where she remained until she returned to Pakistan on 18 October 2007, after reaching an understanding with President Musharraf by which she was granted amnesty and all corruption charges were withdrawn.^[2]

She was assassinated on 27 December 2007, by two gunmen as she was entering her sport utility vehicle after a gathering of the Pakistan People's Party. Shortly thereafter, a suicide bomber exploded in the crowd, killing 14 people and injuring many others. On December 28 it was announced that a member of Al-Qaeda was believed to have masterminded the attack.  Reported above as correct and then later said she was in her car with her head out of the roof thingy and shot  in two places that implied more than one gunman.

After completing her early education in Pakistan, she pursued her higher education in the United States. From 1969 to 1973 she attended Radcliffe College, and then Harvard University, where she obtained a Bachelor of Arts degree with cum laude honors in comparative government.^[5] She was also elected to Phi Beta Kappa.^[4]

The next phase of her education took place in the United Kingdom. Between 1973 and 1977 Bhutto studied Philosophy, Politics, and Economics at Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford. She completed a course in International Law and Diplomacy while at Oxford.^[6] In December 1976 she was elected president of the Oxford Union, becoming the first Asian woman to head the prestigious debating society.^[4]

On 18 December 1987 she married Asif Ali Zardari in Karachi. The couple had three children: Bilawal, Bakhtwar, and Aseefa.

On 6 August 2003, Swiss magistrates found Bhutto and her husband guilty of money laundering.^[22] They were given six-month suspended jail terms, fined $50,000 each and were ordered to pay $11 million to the Pakistani government. The six-year trial concluded that Bhutto and Zardari deposited in Swiss accounts $10 million given to them by a Swiss company in exchange for a contract in Pakistan. The couple said they would appeal. The Pakistani investigators say Zardari opened a Citibank account in Geneva in 1995 through which they say he passed some $40 million of the $100 million he received in payoffs from foreign companies doing business in Pakistan

In 2006, Interpol issued a request for the arrest of Bhutto and her husband.

Nonetheless, as of mid-2007, the US appeared to be pushing for a deal in which Musharraf would remain as president but step down as military head, and either Bhutto or one of her nominees would become prime minister.^[50]

On 11 July 2007, the Associated Press, in an article about the possible aftermath of the Red Mosque incident, wrote:

Benazir Bhutto, the former prime minister and opposition leader expected by many to return from exile and join Musharraf in a power-sharing deal after year-end general elections, praised him for taking a tough line on the Red Mosque. I'm glad there was no cease-fire with the militants in the mosque because cease-fires simply embolden the militants," she told Britain's Sky TV on Tuesday. "There will be a backlash, but at some time we have to stop appeasing the militants."^[51]

This remark about the Red Mosque was seen with dismay in Pakistan as reportedly hundreds of young students were burned to death and remains are untraceable and cases are being heard in Pakistani supreme court as a missing persons issue. This and subsequent support for Musharaf led Elder Bhutto's comrades like Khar to criticize her publicly.

Al-Qaida spokesman Mustafa Abu Al-Yazid claimed responsibility for the attack, describing Bhutto as "the most precious American asset."^[89] The Pakistani government stated that it had proof that al-Qaida was behind the assassination

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benazir_Bhutto

There is a great deal more posted on Wiki about the possible illegal activities of this woman and her husband. It is not a pretty picture. I believe she was returned by the Corp USA government to Pakistan in order to control Musharraf. Now why and who did the assassination. I believe it was a black ops job by the Zionists. It matters not that it was done by a Pakistani. Her party, the PPP is a Zionist controlled organization, and the democracy we are supposedly bringing to the world, is nothing more than a game of control. Parties are used to control, nothing more, nothing less. To control and cause dissent where desired.

As to the idea it was Zionist Black ops, probably from within he US government that carried this out, is mostly to me a strong gut reaction. It’s what I immediately thought. Why? I think in part, it was known that her poor history was going to come out, so murder her and place her on a platform, which surely we have seen the last couple days, in addition to all the coverage over this past fall. Also, what better way to destabalize Pakistan further, without bombing them back to the stone age, than to murder the idol of the PPP.

Some have written on the net that she and Mursharraf were willingly going to cooperate, and I saw both points of view. Cooperate to serve Zionisn, or cooperate to truly serve Pakistan. This is certainly a way to nail Musharraf, since she put out with Wolf Blitzer this fall that if she was found dead, Musharraf would certainly be behind it.

However,  the US zionists to claim Al Qaeda did it. I am noticing in the press the use of both Al Qaida and Al Qaeda as spelling which is interesting. Al Qaida is the spelling of “the list”, of those participating in Islam in revolution. Al Qaeda is the term used when meaning Zionist Black Ops did it. So I think the dark ones are telling us, that Al Qaeda the black ops Zionists, carried it out through an Islamic group, that serves them. This group doesn’t need to know who it serves, as black ops is very quiet in how it works.

It could be that even Bhutto thought she was serving lighted ones, in lighted intent, but I really don’t think so, but we do have to keep that idea on the table, because it would allow them to use her. But folks, she was schooled in Catholic schools growing up and completed her education at the elitist schools of Radcliff, Harvard and Oxford. Particularly the schooling at Oxford says a great deal. Some that work for the beast know it, and others don’t, but given the legal trouble of financial issues etc, I think she knew damn well the game the she played. While some saw a beautiful woman wanting to serve her people as placed with Wolf Blitzer, I saw instead somebody conniving.

Wolf Blitzer?? Interesting name. A Wolf that serves to blitze the public with the propaganda of the Zionist machine. I  think so. And again, we saw a game he and Bhutto played this past fall, setting this all up. Whether she truly saw her murder coming by Zionists, I don’t know. While I am at it, I remember something. Wolf interviewed Ron Paul, who said we need to stop meddling there. Also comments have been posted by CNN by most of the other candidates and they all support the Zionist ideas around poor little Pakistan.

Now to get back to the murder. The first reports on TV are usually the correct ones. First we heard that she was shot with 2 bullets, and since these wounds came one in two directions, we assume two shooters. One of these bullets came through her back and excited her front chest. The other hit her neck, I believe on the right, and injured her spinal cord. Then we hear she died of hitting her head when she fell against a lever? While indeed this may have caused injury, she would have fallen at some force for it to kill her, and that force it it happened would have been from possibly the explosion of the supposed suicide bomber?  However, when I listed to the actual supposed film CNN presented of this doctor who examined her and found she died of head injury, he did NOT say she had no other wounds on her body. What is all of this game, who knows, smacks of stuff played like that lone bullet that killed Kennedy and wound it’s way somehow to harm Connelly too. Who knows!?

Either she was murdered because she failed the Zionists and formed a real partnership with Musharraf, or they set her up, to point a finger at him, and/or further destabalize the country. Now what should Musharraf do? He must either turn and run tail, or he must stand against them, in this blatant attack aimed at him. I think he will not compromise, but I really don’t know.

The man has an issue with the “Red Mosque” incident. A lot of students died in that. I remember posting something to the forum about it. However, he is sick and tired of the games being played to destabilize his country. Perhaps he has made a lot of errors in trying to find the right road, or at least keep his country from as little harm as possible. The man hold The Turkish leader of the early 1900’s in great esteem, Mushafa Ataturk, who freed Turkey from the planned Zionist control after World War I.  I think he want’s this for Pakistan also.

I hope he stays and puts up a good fight. Without doubt he is also scheduled to be murdered in some way, its been tried before. If he runs, he will need to expose everything and he will be dead for that too. I hope he will gather some trust folks around him. I hope this murder said something to those in his administration and they will form a co hesive group and do something to stand up. I think at this time the Bush administration will have trouble with the idea of returning Pakistan to the stone age. It will be obvious if they try that, but these crazy people will try anything.

It is being said that he is not holding up to Pakistan’s constitution and I haven’t read the thing to know if it is a worthy constitution or not. But I do know, that here in America we have a mostly worthy original constitution before it was messed with after the Civil War, and when the dark side created CORP USA in 1881 or thereabouts when the DC area was created. And we are not seeing to it, in any great numbers that we return to the correct version of long ago now.

There are times and places and reasons for a coup, and we in the United States have long needed to overthrown this government, which took over in a quiet coup with the rigged election of Bush in 2000, and continuing with the 911 event used to further strip our rights. Where are those that should have ousted this government? Of course, in general they serve Corp USA, and were sworn in under that gold fringed flag, to defend the compromised Constitution. So there will be no coup, unless a few stand forth and do the right thing. I doubt we will see this until after stasis. It would be nice to see it before. And this was hoped for. It would have been good for the American public (and the rest of the world)  to see the right thing being done, by Americans who uphold our real Constitution. Where are those powerful churches, who could have amassed the power to remove these ones? Still for the most part I suggest, asking God to support Mr. Bush. Can’t prove that, I can’t stand to visit these places anymore.

And to go back the title I chose for this paper, taken from CNN, there is NO way, that Pakistan is the most dangerous place in the world. I think maybe the most dangerous places in the world are most truly within the confines of several countries that serve the New World Order. Maybe I have misunderstood the game play with Pakistan and this murder, and you are entitled to take your own views. I like to listen to my “gut”, as so often it is correct.  Take care, Candace

PS. Some little gremlin or virus got my computer this morning and my word processor is unable to find the files that correct spelling, so there are probably a lot of spelling errors I am not finding in this piece. I ask your patience.