Candace: A few comments are necessary here. The USA cloning factories are closed. However, there is a technique still available where a look alike can be given genetic material of the original, and in time the features will change. These I believe are labeled synthetics. This techique was discovered long ago when one kind of duck was injected with DNA from another kind, the purpose was to see if offspring would pick up traites. However, the receptient Duck changed before their eyes, and began to resemble the donor. It is difficult to prevent the use of this technique. It's too easy.
I have long suspected either this, or lookalikes with plastic surgery with Hilliary in particular. I have felt like there is more than one before us, and lately I am wondering a bit on Obama too. Some of you have seen the lady comedian on TV who impersonates Sarah Palin, it's NOT a stretch here to assume there are look alikes being used with makeup and modifications. John McCain was cloned years ago, and underwent a personality change from that and programming. He lost his "marveric." I remember him suddenly getting real supportive of Bush.
Also, regards our current Bush, I can still detect two different ones. Watch the ears and the makeup. Akso if you compare the clones to older pics of him, you will see implants in the front part of his ears, with apparent wires under the skin.
Hilliary looks almost totally different than she did when she was First Lady. I have tried to suggest this to others, but you all know the results of that! Ok, here's the piece. There are probably some good links in it. Understand whoever Alciun is, he just seems to follow the various stories out there, and then collects them to his website. I don't think he is any sort of insider. I didn't post it, so I haven't checked the links. Also, I added a few comments, in italics in this piece. It is otherwise quite good reading.
In recent months, USA Senator Hillary Clinton has been seen in two places at once on a number of different occasions. And not just in Iowa and New Hampshire.
Someone sees Hillary Clinton at a function across town at, say, 1.30pm. And then, when they compare notes with a Democratic Party co-worker later that day, they learn that Hillary was also seen back at the hotel at 1.30pm, three miles away. And her clothes were different, or her hair was different, or her makeup was different, and the people with her were different. Or, after a speaking engagement, the car drives Hillary Clinton away to Location A, where she is seen to get out of the car at, say, 10.45pm. But a co-worker sees her at 11.00pm at Location B thirty or forty miles away, except that Hillary Clinton and the car have not left Location A. And they couldn't drive that fast anyway, and Hillary's clothing or appearance is different, and the people with her are different. And the next day, arriving for an early morning meeting somewhere, Hillary comes from Location B, not from Location A. Meanwhile, she is seen having a late breakfast at Location A with different people. And so on.
How many different Hillary Clintons are there?
It is suggested that over half the USA Presidential hopefuls in 2008 are human clones. There are several of each of them. Is Hillary Clinton one of these or several of them? And how are the voters to discriminate?
A picture of the young Hillary Clinton can be seen here. Notice the physiognomy: the smile musculature, the cheek pouches, the placement of the nose bridge, the upper eyelid line. Now look at who the official Hillary for President campaign site wanted you to vote for in New Hampshire (picture here). The same woman, but older? Look at the right hand side of her mouth. Any moles visible? There are other pictures here and here and here and here. Same woman again, but older? Trick of the light maybe? Moles there notice, but no moles here. What about here? Moles or not? Now for the mystery woman. Who is this? Or this? Recognise the smile? Know the name from somewhere? The same as this perhaps? And where did this one come from? Or this, or this? In that run of pictures, there were fifteen images of which three were repeated. But how many different individuals were shown? Three? Four? When we and others first began running this story, the Hillary for President campaign immediately changed its lead picture from this to this. That image was then changed again after a bit. Their current favourite official regulation version of Hillary Clinton can now be viewed here.
And for afficionados, here is a picture of one of the Hillary Clinton clones taking instructions from a clone-handler called George McGlaris in Dover, New Hampshire, on Monday 7th January 2008.
A quote from the Hillary Clinton for President website is germane: "President Clinton writes about his life with Hillary and how she has been an agent of change for 35 years."
What is the major issue in election-alert America this year? It's the physiognomy, stupid.
The use of human clones in American political management is only now becoming apparent. The last USA President not to be cloned was John F. Kennedy. Usually, when a President or major American public figure ceases to be compliant to the demands of the controlling corporate elite, they are quietly killed, cremated and replaced with lookalike, mind-controlled clones. These days, at the Camp David human clone laboratories (Maryland) and elsewhere, it is possible to produce an adult human clone from originator DNA and matched tissue bank samples in less than 36 hours. (Candace: NO, this is closed down, but there is de-aging technology at a couple of hospitals and areas, that's how some of these ones are fixed up. Notice that McCain gets very much older, and is suddenly refreshed. I think he was called back to Washington recently for that purpose, at the time he suspended his campaign. He had a badly drooping right eye, very obvious, so this was covered up by the suspension story, is my logical guess, and suddenly he looked all better! Perhaps there are two or more McCains too, I don't really know, maybe bring one back to fix up and put the other back out!)
When President George Bush Snr left office in 1993, he was Clone Number 34 in his DNA originator line. Most of his previous 33 clones had been used and terminated at that point. (Candace: NO on this too. The original Daddy Bush is still in control, although he still has at least one clone left. I can easily tell the difference, the clone is older looking. )
When President Bill Clinton left office in 2001, he was Clone Number 21 in his line. (Candace: NO! Bill was NOT cloned until he went to the hospital for that heart surgery or whatever it was several years ago.)
When a President is terminated and cloned, it is standard practice to do the same with his close family members. If this is not done, they immediately notice the difference and cause difficulties.
Human clones are not ensouled and do not, therefore, have access to the higher dimensions through reflection, intuition and spiritual practice. No soul means no God-connection. And no God-connection means that clones have an inherent vulnerability to religious manipulation and deceit. (Candace: However, some clones do actually get Thought Adjusters, if they do something moral and demonstrate actual thinking. But this is rare in these laboratory made clones used in politics, because they are also mind controlled. Understand there are Good reasons to use clones, when one is to do a dangerous mission for example, or to replace a person who is needed. The original soul CAN move into the new body, and thus this is an ensoulment in this case. It is also important to state here, that those young souls experiencing the first human life, or several lives are not bright in general, but are still ensouled. Also, all animals have simple souls and reincarnate. When we are talking ensouled here, this usually means the soul has received a thought adjuster, and in many cases is actually fused with it, sometimes long, long ago, (ME for example, I am a very old soul. These unsouled factory made clones usually have No aura about them.)
The higher dimensional data-links which ensouled humans have, help them to appear quick, flexible and alert in conversation, particularly when stressed. The absence of this potential for minute-to-minute inspiration or revelation in clones gives rise to a simplistic body language and inappropriate physiognomic responses in complexly nuanced situations (picture example here). It also means that when faced with metaphorated questioning or elliptical comments, they can appear slow, dim or confused. Anything that human clones are confronted with which falls outside their specific day-to-day conditioning or expectation engenders childlike conflict-signalling and tantrums (picture example here). For this reason, two or three clones are kept up and running for each principal at any one time. They are very nearly identical in appearance, but some look younger or more innocent than others, and some have superficial tissue differentiations that cannot be concealed by makeup when viewed in close-up or under strong light.
If two different clones of one individual are interacted with at a conference on successive days by an ensouled human, the differences are often very evident. "Which George did you speak to today, Tony?"
Having no soul and no God-connection means that human clones have no spiritual processing power; they cannot function at the level of values, morals, ethics, compassion, honour or decency. Indeed, they have nothing within their intellection which energises or articulates such concepts in their consciousness. Human clones do, however, have a very powerful survival instinct. Under sustained pressure or threat they become amoral, manipulative fighting machines without spiritual stops or conscience. What you can get away with is what you do; lying is the core modus operandi; honesty about facts on the ground is self-injurious weakness; a spectrum of alternative views on an issue is a spectrum of aggressive enemy positions; unscrupulous elimination of opponents replaces dialogue. Human clones are perfect for politics, the armed forces, religion, schooling and theft. Easily mind-controlled by the hidden negative elite, clones are the visible drivers of systemic evil.
Human clones are also prone to making extraordinary bloomers when speaking in public, and not noticing their mistakes. George Bush Jnr has an extensive back catalogue of such infelicities. For example, speaking on Australian television in September 2007 about the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre in New York on the 11th September 2001, one of the Bush Jnr clones said: "And I believe those of us who live in liberty have a responsibility to promote forms of government that deal with what causes nineteen kids to get on airplanes to kill three thousand students." (See 3.44-3.55 on this YouTube video clip here)
.jpg?SSImageQuality=Full){kind=link}
