Whistleblower and OITC
WhistleBlower answers Director (again) of RMNs
By WhistleBlower
Mar 8, 2010 - 9:48:05 AM

Candace: My goodness, 4d what we are in is getting really obvious isn't it, as the dark dig in, having given up fencesitting.   Director's entire post I think is covered in here with Whistleblower. Director seems to continue to need to manufacture lies.

WHISTLEBLOWER ......................RESPONSE TO CGI's DIRECTOR

Dear Candace,

Please allow me to respond to CGI's Director's article as reference below and posted to RMN:-

CGI's Director to Whistleblower: "THE FACTS AS THEY ARE"

Posted By: hobie <Send E-Mail>
Date: Friday, 5-Mar-2010 02:31:14

In Response To: E-mail from WHISTLEBLOWER: RESPONSE TO CGI's DIRECTOR (hobie)

Dear Director, In relation to your rather aggressive response dated and referenced as above, let me please attend to the points on a one by one basis.

a).        WHISTLEBLOWER, It is well stated within the documentary, the History of Banking that OITC made an ATTEMPT to take control of the World's Heritage assets from those who lawfully own and control their assets.

Well, I have to admit that I must be totally blind, or so tired because of the work load that I have been unable to locate anywhere in the "History of Banking" article that you have referred to, where it actually states that the OITC made an attempt to take over control of the World's Heritage Assets.

From what I have read, Director, this statement by you is based upon your own perception and interpretation of what is stated within the said article, whereby you, and only you have automatically, by association based upon those personal perceptions and interpretations, linked the OITC to the criminal operation / hard liners, that are referred to within the said article.

Perhaps you would care to actually state what page, or pages, within the said article where it definitively refers to the fact that "the OITC made an attempt to take over control of the World's Heritage Assets". If you can't do this I will request that you publicly withdraw your own statements, assumptions, perspective, interpretations on the grounds that such a statement is defamatory in nature and could, if it hasn't already done so, caused damage to the OITC with the consequential effects of deterring some countries from ever benefiting from the objectives of the Nations of the World and the OITC from the utilisaztion of the Collateral Accounts.

b).        Whistleblower, your own comments are attached to the documentary History of Banking, that has been posted on Rumor Mill News and other public information web sites and you have never denied the authors reference that OITC MADE AN ATTEMPT TO TAKE CONTROL AND REPLACE THE LAWFUL OWNERS OF THE HERITAGE ASSETS.

I am fully aware that my email responses to Connie McBean are included within the whole article, without my permission I add, whereby if you read my responses correctly you will notice that I have clearly indicated that there were discrepancies within the article and that more specific information or deeper information would be required to allow the public a far better insight into the whole issue, but at the same time, I did point out that such information was still Classified and therefore could not be reveal publicly.

As for denying the authors reference that "the OITC MADE AN ATTEMPT TO TAKE CONTROL AND REPLACE THE LAWFUL OWNERS OF THE HERITAGE ASSETS", there was, in my opinion absolutely nothing to deny because there was no such reference by the author, as you claim, so one can not deny something that doesn't exist.

Perhaps Director, you can enlighten me?

c).      All the claims you state in reference to the authority issued by all the world powers to OITC and Mr. Dam are all unsubstantiated by any fillings of legal documentation, including legal documentation that would not require the security clearances that you claim are needed. I would suggest you present the readers with any viable legal documentation from any legal world agency that would support your quotes that you have posted.

Director, I have already posted substantial information in respect of documentation that is legally verifiable by any person subject to the correct Security Clearance level. If you haven't got that Security Clearance level than unfortunately you will not be able to verify same. I assume that the latter is the very position that you find yourself in and therefore are frustrated by the fact that you can not verify the OITC or anything to do with H.E. Dr. Dam, so instead you proceed to publicized your own perspective and interpretation of the situation.

Why you can not be honest with the public at large as just openly say, "That you are not, and never have been, in a position whereby you are able to verify, or otherwise, the facts surrounding the OITC / H.E. Dr. Dam, on the basis that you do not hold, or carry, the relevant security level clearance that is applicable.

d).      The matters before the International Court of the Hague in regards to the World's Heritage Assets where all private matters relating to the legal owners and controllers of those assets, therefore, neither OITC nor Mr. Dam had any involvement in those court proceedings.

Let me explain something to you Director. The comments I made in a previous response article, referenced to claimants / custodians of the Heritage assets, which was in response to your very own previous statements about the World Court; was in fact "Entrapment" to see if you really knew of what you spoke about.

I will now quote from the International Courts of Justice own information documents and their Web site:-

ICJ Information

The Court has a twofold role: to settle, in accordance with international law, legal disputes submitted to it by States (Contentious cases ) and to give advisory opinions (Advisory proceedings) on legal questions referred to it by duly authorized United Nations organs and specialized agencies.

Only States may apply to and appear before the International Court of Justice. International organizations, other collectivities and private persons are not entitled to institute proceedings before the Court.

Since States alone have capacity to appear before the Court, public (governmental) international organizations cannot as such be parties to any case before it. A special procedure, the advisory procedure, is, however, available to such organizations and to them alone.

The Court can only deal with a dispute when the States concerned have recognized its jurisdiction. No State can therefore be a party to proceedings before the Court unless it has in some manner or other consented thereto.

Advisory proceedings begin with the filing of a written request for an advisory opinion addressed to the Registrar by the United-Nations Secretary-General or the director or secretary-general of the entity requesting the opinion.

the Court's advisory opinions have no binding effect. The requesting organ, agency or organization remains free to decide, by any means open to it, what effect to give to these opinions.

List of ALL Cases since 1947  - http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=2

                        ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It stands to reason therefore that your claims, repeated in your latest article, quote:-

"The matters before the International Court of the Hague in regards to the World's Heritage Assets where all private matters relating to the legal owners and controllers of those assets, therefore, neither OITC nor Mr. Dam had any involvement in those court proceedings,

were in fact, ALL PRIVATE MATTERS, which you will observe from the 7 stating items above in Green type print, can not be handled by the International Court of Justice, unless these claims were brought by the Sovereign States that are members of the United Nations.

Having read through the various cases, there is only one case that may apply, being Lichtenstein v Germany which relates to claims against properties and buildings, with one claim against a Painting, confiscated from Lichtenstein in the war years by Germany, and declared as property of Germany under the War Reparations Acts following the war. This case we are aware of, as with a case Lichtenstein v Czechoslovakia.

All other cases that may be, or may have been applicable, are advisory only and not binding upon the parties.

It stands to reason therefore as to why neither the OITC nor H.E. Dr. Dam. had any involvement in such court Advisory Proceedings, because it was not relevant at any time, as such cases were not brought before the ICJ by a Sovereign Nation who was a member of the United Nations.

It also stands to reason that no such cases, being PRIVATE MATTERS, as stated by you, were ever accepted by the ICJ either for hearing on Contentious Matters, or Advisory Matters.

Perhaps Director, it would be advisable for you to quote all the relevant case numbers, dates, Plaintiffs, Defendants, etc, so it could be determined if these cases were in fact held within the ICJ, or maybe a Nationsl Court operating under International Law, in which case the latter has absolutely no relevance whatsoever.

e).      WHISTLEBLOWER, your question as to what I am up to is......I despise the lies of disinformation and misinformation that the known shadow governments of the world continue to use to deceive the unknowledgeable people of the world in regards to the TRUTH.

Who is to say it is all lies, disinformation and misinformation, is it you Director, a person who does not carry the requisite Security Level Clearance and can not get any further than the local library. Come on Director, this is only your own perception and interpretation of what you read, or may having limited knowledge of, and you put this out publicly as if you are an authority on the subject matter. Dear me, I would quickly find better things to do with my time, if I was you.

f).      A better question is... What are your and OITC motives by making unsubstantiated claims in the public domain under yourself proclaimed shield of secrecy?

Unsubstantiated Claims. As stated earlier, you need to start to prove that such claims are unsubstantiated, or can not be substantiated because of your own lack of access to "Secret" information.

You appear to have a "Chip on your Shoulder" Director, for whatever reason!!!!

If OITC is doing all the good in the world that you claim they are doing, but under secrecy conditions that cannot be legally verified in the public domain, why are you posting your claims in the public domain?

Why Not?  We are posting as much as we dare post considering the constraints of "Secrecy" we work under. Our opinion is that people have a right to know. However, we do appreciate that what they can know may be limited at this juncture, but that will all change in time. Like anyone else, we can not perform miracles, but we are letting people know some of the facts.

It seems to me that you and OITC should be doing all your good work in secrecy. You quote that all the powers to be in the world have been notified of your existence.

Do I really need to answer this question, as I would have thought it was obvious even to a blind man. Let me repeat myself. We do not like all the secrecy that surrounds us, but that can only change in time. People complain about all the secrecy that surrounds them in their own lives, with their own Governments (Local or National) failing to let the people know.

We are attempting to let the people know the truth, the truth about what our forefathers did all those years ago, and what the crooks have done since, so that the people are aware of facts, otherwise this just becomes another issue destined for the archives where it will be eventually forgotten, or even lost.

Another issue on this is that the Theft and Plunder of assets around the world, which is substantial. Most of this is not actually undertaken by the "Big Boys" who organize it, but by people who get coerced for large sums of money, or military people just undertaking orders etc. If they are made aware of the fact that they are involved, maybe innocently, in International Fraud against every country of the World, they might just think hard about whether they continue to do these things.

In fact, I can say that many have already contacted us on this matter and are working with us in tracking the real crooks and recovering the assets or the Bank accounts holding the money from the deposal of assets.

So you see Director, people do take note, and they do start to understand just how they have been conned by others on this issue, or coerced into Theft and Fraud by the more powerful parts of the world's society.

What need is there for you or OITC to publicize in the public domain, when you already have stated that OITC cannot be involved in the problems between governments and their citizens?

I have already answered this question above, but you further state, quote:-

 "that OITC cannot be involved in the problems between governments and their citizens?

You appear to be totally confused Director. The OITC can not, and will not become involved with the internal affairs of any country. That is a matter between the Government and its people. This is a United Nations protocol that is applied at all times.

This has nothing at all to do with what we publicize, unless of cause it relates to the Assets of the Collateral Accounts, whereby this is then outside of the UN protocols and comes under International Treaty Law for which the UN, and all other Countries and such other institutions, must also abide by.

Two completely different things for which your simple and singular approach has tended to combined all factors of a very complex subject stretching over 150 years +, into one, which is a very dangerous thing to do as it will not answer questions correctly nor will it portray the truth.

It does appear that you do have a rather simplistic approach to life, for which I do actually admire you. Unfortunately life and history are not than simple at all. I personally wish it was as we would all be living in paradise, however, and as I stated in my email response to Connie McBean one needs to be very carefully to ensure that facts and figures quoted publicly are correct, otherwise the public will allow their own perceptions to run wild, and then what ...... total confusion and absolute misunderstanding.

g).     I will not longer post on Rumor Mill News until such time that Truth and Transparency has been announced to the world.

Your prerogative Director, we will all be waiting a very long time to see you post again, won't we.

However, I had noticed that you are not so true to your word because 24 hours later you are still posting on other matters.

                        -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, I will refer to the actual article "History of Banking" as prepared by the person referred to as Connie McBean.

Although a high percentage of the details is factual, there are still important parts missing. Those parts can not, at this juncture, be publicized.

At the same time, although it is a good piece of work, it is not of ‘Authoritative" work and must therefore be read as an informal appraisal of just specific parts of this whole puzzle, structure by a person or persons who have some knowledge but obvious limited access to information. It also focuses on the Asia side (Indonesia) far more so than other parts of the world and fails to accommodate the various International Treaties / Agreements applicable to this subject matter.

As I have previously stated, this is a highly complex issue which would take volumes of books, probably greater in number than Encyclopedia Britannica, to explain the majority of factors, so it should therefore be clearly understood that it is a brief only, contained within a small number of panels using MS Powerpoint, together with copy documents from Congressman McFadden, and email responses from myself. It is therefore  not a 100% portrayal of the full detailed issue surrounding the Assets of the Collateral Accounts, and certainly should not, would not, be considered as evidence in a court of law.

WHISTLEBLOWER.