DAVID CRAYFORD RESPONDS TO READERS QUESTIONS.
Below is my response to the two persons seeking answers to questions in the latest thread on RMN. Apologies for it being so long, but the situation / questions demands a more detailed explanation rather than a brief which then allows for misunderstanding or misinterpretation.
Readers respond, with questions for Mr. Crayford, and something from Candace of abundanthope.net
Posted By: MrFusion [Send E-Mail]
Date: Thursday, 6-Feb-2014 15:54:22
In response to your question, quote "Could Mr. Crayford please respond to the following: considering your belief about the prosperity programs and the dinar, are you saying that the information presented by Mr. Al Hodges, attorney for CMKX, and information presented by the group known as The White Hats, is incorrect, useless, and misleading. Thank you".
Mr Al Hodges, if my memory serves me correctly, is the lawyer acting for a Mr Cottrell who was working in conjunction with Leo Wanta. Mr Cottrell then went his own way but continuing along the same lines as Leo Wanta's claim against enormous sums of money that remained from the Black Ops that brought down communism in Russia and the former Eastern Block. The money gained to finance said Black Ops was gained from the illicit trading and unlawful use of assets of the Collateral Accounts. The amount in total amounted to several hundred trillion dollars with approximately 42 trillion USD remained. In reality it was in excess of $60 trillion that remained. That money which remained has been credited to the Collateral Accounts and will never be released to Al Hodges or Leo Wanta because they have no legal right to it. The reason they have no legal right to it is because it was generated from the unlawful use of assets of the Collateral Accounts and therefore in law it is the property of the Collateral Accounts. The initial action (unlawful use) was illegal whereby no matter what follows an illegal activity it can not be legalised with subsequent contracts / agreements or otherwise.
Mr Al Hodges can enter into whatever contracts or agreements he wants with the American Authorities or International Institutions, they legally mean nothing and hold no validity whatsoever. Another point on this is the fact that America, whether through its Government, any Authority or Agency thereof, or any party or organisation acting for and on behalf of the American Government, or in conjunction with the American Government (World Bank, IMF, BIS, and even parts of the UN) have no authority whatsoever over the Collateral Accounts, their use, disbursement, or otherwise. That power lies entirely with the International Treasury Controller who is the Legal Heir, Owner, and Sole Arbiter of the Collateral Accounts which legally is all attended to and covered by International Agreements / Treaties dated 1976, 1980, 1988, 1995, 2012, and even earlier Treaties.
Many have attempted to lay claim to the assets of the Collateral Accounts, in one form or another. All have failed.
The Collateral Accounts are accounts of many Trusts and Foundations around the world, all of which are held under the Master Trusts / Foundations known as Foundation Divine and Heritage International Trust. All this is held under International Treaties and Agreements dating back to the 1800's and all provable in law.
The White Hats is a slightly different situation. These are generally people who are trying to expose this matter to the public for the sole intention of allowing the public to know about these matters and also to bring these accounts out so that they can be used for the benefit of mankind.
The person most known of the White Hats is Lord David James of the UK.
The problem here is the fact that they can talk and argue all they want but they will never do any good because they do not hold any authority over the Collateral Accounts.
Another problem is the fact that they should be doing their best to make contact with the International Treasury Controller and working with that person, but they are not. They are creating embarrassment all around more so for themselves. They are also muddying the waters which really doesn't help anyone, least of all the people of the world who need the help.
They are in a way similar to the White Dragon Society, who have no money and claiming all sorts of things without actually having the knowledge or approval / authority to do anything. This is another organisation that should really be working with the International Treasury Controller, not trying to do it themselves by illegal and unlawful means.
I am not saying that all the information revealed by the White Hats or others is incorrect or misleading. What I am saying is that they have once piece of a very large Jigsaw puzzle, and they believe they have the whole picture. When they realise they haven't got all of the picture they start to generate a plausible story to surround that one piece of the puzzle, the majority of which is misleading, the wrong interpretation, or only a very small part of the truth, so small in fact it is almost insignificant.
That is what the people read or hear, and what people believe because it gives them hope, when in reality there is no hope in the manner in which these people are trying to achieve whatever it is they are trying to achieve.
Nothing can be achieved using illegal or unlawful means. It can be achieved if done correctly and legally. At the same time none of these people or organisations want to join forces with the real Legal Heir and Owner so one has to ask the question as to WHY?????? In most cases it is because they want the credibility and control. They want to be the White Knights riding over the crest of the hill to save the world. There is no need for that at all if they are really working for the people.
In response to Peter's question, quote "Do you know if Mr Crayford has an opinion on Zap/Poof, Karen Hudes, or for that matter the global economic meltdown which seems to be becoming more and more inevitable.
On a side - note I feel it worth commenting that the notion of banks being brought to order through fines is disingenuous at best. We all know that these fines are mere fractions of the revenues generated through their ongoing criminal activities.
Furthermore, that these activities are indeed crimes, fraud, market rigging - not just avarice, and that needless to say, resignations aren't close to being an appropriate sanction for these guys".
Attending to the latter parts of the question first.
I agree with you whole-heartedly reference to the subject of fines. It is a mere pittance in comparison to the revenues actually generated through highly questionable and corrupt practices. Unfortunately it is the law and the cost of enforcing the law which appears to have taken precedence on this matter. In reality there is no International Law which covers such matters so it all comes down to National Law. The way the American system, along with the UK system apply their laws is highly questionable which make it appear like "A slap on the wrist between friends, plus a fine and no more will be said".
Personally I like the Chinese way of doing things especially when it comes to things that affect the people of the world or people of any particular Nation. That is put them up against a war after a very quick trial. That resolves the problem and warns others that the same will happen to them when they are caught. I am not one for "walking on eggshells" in such matters.
The latter paragraph question has the same answer as above. Yes it is greed, criminal, fraudulent, corruption, and so on, but the problems are the same as stated above. The law, if it exists at all, is not severe enough nor is the willingness to see friends go to prison or be executed.
We (the ITC / OITC) can do nothing about this as this is a matter for the people of any country when electing their representatives. That is a responsibility that can not, and should not, be treated lightly or even discarded. However, the current situation on this matter appears that the people elect their representatives and then put up with the consequences until the next time they have to elect. What also is highly prominent is that people are either Red, Blue, or Yellow (Political Parties) so they vote according to their beliefs not what their representatives can actually and really do for them to improve their quality of life, etc. It is the Party Manifesto that matters most, and which in most cases is mere propaganda, lies, promises that possibly can not be achieved, or similar.
Like yourself Peter, people do need to start opening their eyes and realising just what it is, and how weak it is, that your Government and Representatives do for you. Then they need to start demanding change, whereby change that is good for all not just a select few, change that is long term and creates stability not short term policies that tend to be popular in character. Unfortunately Politicians are Politicians and until they are brought under control they will only work in their best interest and in the interest of those persons or parties who financed their political campaign.A good friend of mine calls it crony capitalism, and that is being polite to say the least.
In respect of Zap/Poof, Karen Hudes.
Zap / Poof appear sometimes to get hold of information which hits the nail right on the head. Other times they are nowhere near the mark, so far off that the truth is left on the starting blocks.
They are more mediocre that many others that have jumped on the bandwagon and deserve credibility for the way they approach things.
However, having stated that they are in reality just another one who has obtained, by whatever means, some information which has a portion of truth built in, but most people can not distinguish what is real and what is fiction.
As for Karen Hudes, I don't really have any time for here or her comments. She worked at the World Bank for 20 years and she must have been involved, as Senior Legal Counsel for the World Bank, within all the fraud and corruption committed by the World Bank yet she leaves it for 20 years before declaring that she is a Whistleblower and exposing a small amount, some of it totally incorrect and most is misleading; of what really is an enormous Volcano of fraud and corruption.
The information she has gained at the World Bank is based upon her own interpretation of the status of the World Bank, not what is reality in accordance with many International Treaties / Agreements that control all of this.
Based upon my own knowledge, documents in our possession and my experience, the World Bank works hand in hand within the American Government and IMF, is totally corrupt and has been conducting fraud against the Collateral Accounts for decades as if they actually own them, which in fact they DO NOT.
The point with all of this and the people of the World Bank, is that it appears they have no principles at all. They will keep their mouths shut just so they can keep their jobs. Yet all the time most of them are involved, one way or another, with the fraudulent and corrupt operations of the World Bank. Karen Hudes is no different, she waits 20 years before opening up and even them it is only based upon what information she has gained from her time at the World Bank, of which most of it is incorrect.
She claims that Wolfgang Struck is the signatory to these accounts. Where the hell did she ever get that information from because it is totally incorrect. The International Treasury Controller is the signatory and the ITC is definitely not Wolfgang Struck.
Karen Hudes can not get to the truth because she has no access to the "Top Secret" files on all of this. She therefore has to believe what knowledge or information she has gained from her time at the World Bank, much of it being wrong and based upon the fraudulent and corrupt activities of the World Bank over decades.
In my opinion she is a person with a Big Chip on her shoulder, for whatever reason, and she has to get her own back using what information (Most of it false and forged) she has gained from her 20 years at the World Bank.
She prompts people, as she was doing in the recent interview with Antal Feneke in Miami. If he wasn't saying what she wanted she would interrupt him. When he insisted or repeated what he was saying, she again interrupted and attempted to correct what he stated with her own version or interpretation.She is not even a good lawyer because people like me, also a lawyer, can see right through what she is doing whereby if she was in a court doing the same thing the Judge would have called her to the Bench or Chambers and given her a good dressing down for her actions.
She doesn't want to know the truth and she firmly believes she has the truth, when in fact she knows very little on the subject matter.
I am aware that an envelope marked "Top Secret" was sent to her from the ITC. She didn't even accept it and returned it unopened. In an email to the ITC she stated that she did not want to become involved in "Top Secret" matters. Well Ms Hudes needs to take notice that the whole subject of the Collateral Accounts, Assets, and other issues, is "Top Secret", so by not wanting to become involved in such matters (that is her own words) she will never know the real truth so she should not purport to know the truth on anything related to the Collateral Accounts, when, like others she only have one piece of a very large jigsaw puzzle which she then has to surround with plausible stories to give herself credibility.
Ms Hudes also hinges on the Green Hilton Treaty .The situation on this issue is that this is not a Treaty, it is an Agreement, one not even recognised by the US because the Presidential Orders leading to this Agreement were revoked by President Lyndon B. Johnston.
Once again I could go on and on but there is not point other than to say "These People will come and go, leaving the public in total and utter confusion; because they do not know the truth. When they do go more will follow telling the same or similar stories and so the saga will continue well into the future.
It is up to the people whether they believe or not. Many will always believe what they consider to be an escape route, or something that gives them hope, only to be eventually let down by these people.
Finally let me attend to one specific phrase within your question, quote "global economic meltdown which seems to be becoming more and more inevitable".
I, like many others, do not know whether the Global Economic Meltdown will actually occur, or if it does, when it will occur. There is a good possibility that this will happen but if it does then people need to be prepared for the severe chaos that follows it.
I can say that we and others are working very hard to prevent this from happening, but unless the real core of the problem is resolved, then there is a very good possibility of it happening. The real problem is not a new one at all, but an age old problem that no one appears to want to resolve. Instead those behind the present system just keep juggling with the problem by "Move it to the left, then move it to the right, apply patches here and there, shore it up if necessary in the best way that they can, and so on". Nothing is resolved that way, nothing at all.
The system has to be replaced whereby any new system needs to be regularly monitored and controlled so that what the world has experienced since 2007 / 8 is never able to reappear.
We stated back in 2008 that this financial crisis would last until 2014 at the earliest but more likely until 2018 or even longer, because it is so severe and during all this time the real core of the problem has not been resolved. To resolve such an enormous problem means taking the power away from specific parties and placing it in the hands of completely independent parties made up of people from all Nations of the world, not just one Nation as it is today.
Another problem is the fact that the present system is so convoluted and complex (probably designed that way) so that the average person doesn't really understand it. In fact one needs a Doctorate in International Finance and Economics to even begin to understand the present system, and that is a minimum qualification because many who have Doctorates do not even understand the present system.
Banks need to be controlled and company or corporate law right across the world needs to be strengthened. At the same time Politicians need far more regulations around them to control them and prevent them from over-spending Taxpayers money, forcing them to work within the limits of their revenues.
Some might say that such actions will strangle the financial systems of today and people will suffer. No, that is not the case at all. For 30 years minimum the world has gone so fast for growth that Governments needed to spend to keep up with it. However, growth, especially consumerism growth, can not continue at massive rates of growth indefinitely.
Just take a Mug of water and add sugar or salt. That water will only be able to absorb so much. That is a saturated solution. Now heat the water to boiling point and add more sugar or salt so that the water actually absorbs a lot more. That is a super-saturated solution whereby the water can not absorb anymore. Growth, especially consumerism growth is so similar. Eventually there can be no more growth, at least not on the scale that Governments what it so their tax revenues expand sufficiently to pay all the interest of the loans taken out years before hand.
A vicious spiral which can only end up in disaster and once again the people will suffer.
Years ago the UK basically destroyed its Manufacturing industry only to realise now that the UK needs more manufacturing. What short-sightedness and all by the people that are elected to manage and administer the country for the benefit of the people.
America basically did the same by exporting their jobs to more economical countries in the Far East, resulting in Dollars leaving America as fast as they are printed. Again, what short-sightedness by the people that are elected to manage and administer the country for the benefit of the people, but all done for the sake of corporate profits.
Pathetic and highly dangerous, and the result, in part, is the financial crisis, with this one being far worse that the Great Depression of the 30's but made to look less so by Quantitative Easing, and similar schemes that only appear to assist the Banks (Politicians friends) not the public, but which also devalues the applicable currencies making the situation far worse.
I think I have said enough for the time being, as this response is far longer than I anticipated, so let's leave it at that.
Thank you both for your questions.
David P. Crayford.