The strongman in the Kremlin is aided and abetted by American operatives and helpers, working all across the federal government—even in the White House.For his part, the U.S. president, a New Yorker by background, seems unable or unwilling to stop the espionage.
Yes, that’s the way it is—or should we say, that’s the way it was, back in the 1940s. You see, during the administration of our 32nd president, Franklin D. Roosevelt, a Democrat, the Soviet Russians, working for Josef Stalin, had penetrated deeply into Washington, DC.
One could even say that the Soviets had deeply penetrated the Deep State; that is, the layer of un-elected federal officials, mostly in the executive branch, who carry out the day-to-day functions of the government.This concept of a Deep State is important, because as we shall see, the Deep State has a mind of its own—and power of its own.
[Ron: I disagree. Arguably the Deep State is a creation of Talmudic Western banksters and corporatists. Rothschilds' banksters and their Masonic operatives were active in the US colonies even before the War of Independance (see eg: Donald Trump Gets an Earful After Saying US-Italy Ties Go Back to Ancient Rome -http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/Donald-Trump-Gets-an-Earful-After-Saying-US-Italy-Ties-Go-Back-to-Ancient-Rome.shtml ) and their influence steadily increased during the 18th Century as the attempted assassination of President Andrew Jackson and the actual assassination of Abraham Lincoln attests. And of course Rothschilds' banksters caused the so-called American Cvil War, funding both sides.
Peter Beter says:
'Thus little known tiesbegan developing after the Civil War between the Rockefellers,the Morgans, and the Carnegies of America and the Rothschilds and other power brokers of Europe and the world. Shortly before theSpanish-American War, a quiet revolution took place in Americanforeign policy--thanks to these secret international connections. Washington's dream for America was exchanged for the nightmare ofMachiavellian politics. Soon the Spanish-American War was on,brought about by the deliberate sacrificing of American lives inthe explosion of the Battleship Maine. The fact that Spain hadbeen genuinely trying to avoid a war, made no difference...Most Americans were too pleased with America's new prestige toworry about the immorality of what we had done. And with that,80 years ago the American people began to sell their soul.' (Audio Letter No. 26. -http://www.peterdavidbeter.com/docs/all/dbal26.html).
The solidification of the nucleus of the Deep State was probably accomplished by John D. Rockefeller (in tandem with Andrew Carnegie) in the late 19th century when, after being initially funded by the Rothschilds, he set out to re-make US society according to a Rockefeller blueprint. He developed a massive tax exempt series of allegedly philanthropic Foundations embracing a corporate industrial, financial and media empire. To achieve this he probably organised and controlled elements of the Masonic Rothschilds' agents structure already in the US.His major long term goals were financial, media and educational system control designed to dumb down the US population which has now been accomplished. For his education initiatives See eg: Dumbing Down US Education: Part II Wundtian Psychology & Rockefeller Finance - http://abundanthope.net/pages/Ron_71/Dumbing_Down_US_Education_Part_II_Wundtian_Psychol_3877.shtml
In the area of so-called philanthropies, theRockefeller and Carnegie interests were intertwined and graduallythey all came completely under the Rockefeller umbrella. But onJanuary 26, 1917, Senator Chamberlain of Oregon rose to give awarning on the floor of the United States Senate. He said:
"The Carnegie-Rockefeller influence is bad. In two generations they can change the minds of the people to make them conform to the cult of Rockefeller or the cult of Carnegie, rather than to the fundamental principles of American democracy."
'In my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 8 for January 1976, I revealed that since at least 1954 there has been an official butsuper-secret White House policy, quote:
"...to so alter life in the United States so that it can becomfortably merged with life in the Soviet Union."
'This is why we see an unending stream of apparent mistakes, concessions, and blunders by the modern outlaw band that masquerades as "our Government." These are not errors at all but deliberate steps in the Rockefeller march toward dictatorial world domination with their Soviet allies; and this includes the Sovietization of family life, the last great bulwark against total world domination.
It is not hard to see, of course, that American family life isunder great pressure because the evidence is everywhere; it'scommon knowledge. The divorce rate is rising, the birth rate isfalling, and the Census Bureau claims that the average familysize is now at a record low level, and still dropping. Individuals are becoming more and more isolated. But few peopleknow that we are seeing the fruits of a deliberate war on theAmerican family; and fewer still know that this is an integralpart of the Rockefeller drive for dictatorship.'
This attack on family life is well-organized, heavily funded, and multifaceted; but the most important, most diabolical part of it all is an intense but sugar-coated campaign now underway to gain control of your children. The objective: to break down your control over your children and place them instead under the supervision and control of the community--that is, the government. In other words, they are to be Sovietized.
One aspect of this attack on your children is the subtle useof familiar, already available avenues of communication inEDUCATION. Take, for example, that famous children's program"Sesame Street." Have you watched it lately? Financed primarilyby Rockefeller-controlled foundations and the federal government, Sesame Street has followed the standard Rockefeller philanthropic formula that emerged over 70 years ago. It established its haloin the public eye by early programming, but has progressivelyturned its efforts in more sinister directions under theprotection of that halo. Arguments, bad temper, hurt feelings,and even cartoons with an air of unreality are prominent today onSesame Street--and you will look in vain for any trace of anidentifiable family image. Meanwhile the impressionable youngSesame Street audience is treated with such things as a recentepisode showing all about how easy, painless, and perhaps even fun, it is to use a tourniquet and syringe--all of it moreexplicitly than you will see on nighttime adult programming! Harried young mothers trusting in the 'spotless reputation ofSesame Street' often allow their children to watch with little orno supervision, not realizing that concepts like this which pavethe way for early and easy drug addiction are being burned intotheir children's minds. Sesame Street is a product of the"Children's Television Workshop", whose president is Joan Ganz Cooney. She is a Rockefeller insider who a year ago signed the"Bicentennial Declaration" which I mentioned earlier, launching the Rockefeller "Second American Revolution" to bring in theirsecret new Constitution.'
Such childrens' indoctrination seems like "child's play" compared to todays vicious LGBTQ+ chidren's indoctrination in homosexuality, gender fluidity and Drag Queen story time in local libraries etc. The rest of Topic #1 needs to be read to appreciate why US family life and childrens' education is as it is today.].
Back in the ’40s, the Deep State’s thinking was greatly shaped by communism.The most notorious of these Deep State communists was Alger Hiss, a top State Department official who played a key role in the creation of the United Nations in 1945.(Later, in the ’50s, Hiss went to prison for perjuring himself about his pro-Soviet activities.)
Yet in addition to outright Hiss-type spies, the feds employed a larger number—measured in the tens of thousands—of “fellow travelers.”These officials might not have have been outright “reds”; many of them were mere “pinks”—that is, they thought that Stalin and Soviet communism were okay, and so it was fine to help a bit, even if only by looking the other way as espionage occurred.
Of course, it’s worth bearing in mind that from 1941 to 1945, the U.S. was allied with the U.S.S.R. in World War Two, and so many Americans naturally thought that the Russians were to be counted among the good guys.The truth, of course, was much different; yes, we were allies, but the Soviets were still nogoodniks.Indeed, the evil reality of the Soviet government had been evident all along—and quite visible, even during the war.For instance, in 1944, the Russians further revealed themselves in their mendacious handling of Operation Frantic, a doomed American attempt to coordinate bombing runs with the Russkies; here at Breitbart News five years ago, Virgil wrote about that disaster.
Moreover, U.S. government officials should know that basic rules about maintaining the security of state secrets always apply—and these were routinely violated by top bureaucrats, before, during, and after the war.
Still, the defeat of Nazism signaled a new era; in 1946, Winston Churchill delivered his famous “Iron Curtain” speech in Fulton, Missouri—and President Harry Truman, more alert to the communist threat than his predecessor, FDR, introduced the legendary speaker.
Indeed, by the the end of the decade, a series of tough moments—the toughest of which being the 1949 victory of Mao Zedong’s communists in China—had convinced most Americans to shift from their mildly pro-Soviet attitude during World War Two to a strongly anti-Soviet stance in what was now known as the Cold War.
Yet here’s something interesting: Throughout the decade of the ’40s, significant elements of the U.S. government continued to help the Soviets, as well as the communist cause overall.[Ron: This is standard Talmudic bankster proceedure; Fund and support both sides in order to divide and conquer.]
To put it another way, the Deep State was deeply enmeshed with communism.
That secret alliance between the Rockefellers and the Soviet Bolsheviks continued at the expense of USans throughout WWII and until the US lost the Battle of the Harvest Moon on 27 September 1977. Although, in the 1970s the Rockefeller brothers started planning to double cross the Bolsheviks and when the Kremlin realised this they started planning for the USSR to double cross the Rockefeller controlled US in turn. The Rockefeller plan was to instal particle beam weapons on the Moon that could destroy targets on this planet in a couple of seconds. By 1977 a Christian Russian sect had secretly ousted the Bolsheviks from the Kremlin and so, without the Bolsheviks or the Rockerfeller Brothers understanding what was happening, the Christians in the Kremlin also developed particle beam weapons and placed them in cosmosphere space craft in orbit around this planet and used them to eliminate the US Moon base just before that base became operational.
At that time the fact that Christian Russians had ousted the Talmudic Bolsheviks from power in the Soviet Union became apparent to the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers and the Cold War became real.The Bolsheviks ousted from the Soviet Union were welcomed into the US by the corporatist Rockefellers. That was a big mistake because the Bolsheviks then killed the four Rockefeller brothers and took over much of their dominant control mechanisms in the USÂ See egDr. Peter David Beter - Audio Letter No. 26. ff. - http://www.peterdavidbeter.com/docs/all/dbal26.htmlAnd:Audio Letter No. 29. Topic #3; And: Audio Letter No. 42. Topic # 1;And Audio Letter No. 43.ff.
The Bolshevik usurpation of the Rockefeller's control of much of US Inc and the Pentagon resulted in the cultural Marxist (Communist) controlled Democrat Deep State governance we see in the US today. The actual Bolshevik control in the US started in 1979, ie about 40 years ago. BUT it was built on the Sephardic Rockefellers' comprehensive Talmudic control apparatus that was developed for some hundred years before that.].
These events, neglected by most historians, were ably recalled by M. Stanton Evans in his 2007 book, Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America’s Enemies.As the title suggests, the work is mostly a defense of Joe McCarthy (1908–1957), and yet the Wisconsin senator doesn’t make a substantive appearance until nearly 200 pages into the 600-page volume.Prior to that, Evans outlines the depths of red penetration of what we now think of as the Deep State.
For instance, in 1938, the FBI—the one government agency, according to Evans, that the Soviets never penetrated—caught Russian agent Mikhail Gorin picking up confidential data from a civilian employee of the U.S. Navy.The American was sent to prison for four years, but the Russian walked free.Why?According to the presiding judge, the Russian’s release was “on recommendation of the Department of State, and through the authorization of the Attorney General.”
Then, in 1941, another Russian spy, Gaik Ovakimian, was similarly nabbed and, once again, let go, thanks to orders from on high.As Evans puts it, these cases were among many “instances in which the policy of the averted gaze toward members of the Communist Party was extended even further—to spies sent here from Moscow, spotted by the FBI, but shielded by some higher power.”
Such Deep Statist interference didn’t just help Russian communists; it also helped Chinese communists.In June 1945, the FBI raided the Manhattan headquarters of a magazine called Amerasia; its staffers had been observed receiving classified documents from State Department officials—one of whom, John Stewart Service, was also arrested, having been caught red-handed on wiretaps.
Yet even though the Bureau found plenty of evidence pointing to the extreme guilt of those arrested and implicated—including a special studio at Amerasia for photographing pilfered documents—the Justice Department mysteriously quashed the case.
[Ron: This 'mysterious quashing' is only a mystery if you don't understand that the Rockefeller Brothers who controlled the US were in secret alliance with the Bolsheviks in the USSR. That is also the reason that Joe McCarthy was demonised and treated in much the same way that President Tump is today. Joe was right and so he had to be shut down and his memory excoriated. And it has been.].
In those days, other government agencies, too, were affected by reds influence.For instance,in the middle of World War Two, the Office of Naval Intelligence, the Navy’s counter-espionage unit, mysteriously shredded its Soviet files.How convenient!
As for theOffice of War Information (OWI), which served as Uncle Sam’s worldwide communications arm, it wasn’t just affected, it was infested.In 1943, New York Times columnist Arthur Krock observed, in a moment of candor, that the views of the OWI “have been closer to the Moscow than the Washington-London line.”In another column, Krock added that OWI was intent on changing American policy, “seeking to re-shape it according to the personal and ideological views of Communists and fellow travelers in this country.”
Most definitely, these ideas had consequences.As Evans details, during World War Two, the American comrades working within the government had a ready template for shaping our policy toward post-war Europe; regularly, in official cables and memos, the communist factions in countries such as Poland and Yugoslavia were praised, while non-communist factions were smeared.And since most top policymakers relied on these “trusted” channels of communication to help inform their decisions, U.S. policy ended up tilting away from American interests and toward those of the Soviet Union.
We can note that this systemic manipulation of U.S. policy toward Europe culminated in the Yalta Conference in February 1945.At that session in Soviet Crimea, an ailing Roosevelt (he would be dead just two months later) signed off on Stalin’s domination of Eastern and Central Europe.In attendance at Yalta, we might add, was the selfsame communist agent Alger Hiss, still then a golden boy of the Establishment.
In fact, the same pro-communist template worked in China, too, even after the Cold War had made Americans[Ron: but not the Rockefellers who controlled the US] suspicious of the Soviets.Up until Mao’s takeover in 1949, the State Department’s duplicitous experts—the aforementioned John Stewart Service and the so-called “China Hands”—were doing all they could to guide Mao to victory.
…The Deep State Now
Mindful of the past history of Deep State power, and realizing that career bureaucrats and associated D.C. lifers were mostly not fans of Donald Trump, Virgil first wrote about the Deep State three years ago, on December 12, 2016.
And that was a month before the Deep State demonstrated its power yet again, when a phone call from Trump’s first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, was recorded and leaked to the Washington Post on January 12, 2017.
Another Trump White House official who had a painful brush with the Deep State early on was K.T. McFarland, who briefly served as deputy national security adviser. As she said later, “I experienced the Deep State personally. … They know exactly how to subvert the president.”Indeed, in the nearly three years since, we’ve seen a steady procession of leaks and rumors emanating from the shadowy “permanent government,” mostly aimed at discrediting—and now, destroying—the Trump administration.
Taking stock of all these Deep State doings, in September 2018, Rep. Kevin McCarthy, now the House Minority Leader, wrote, “It has been clear for many years that there is a permanent political class in Washington that believes that it has a divine right to rule the American people … a Deep State.”
[Ron: IMHO this statement misrepresents the situation in that it fails to acknowledge the fact that Deep State minions are controlled and directed by demonic beings who use a tiny cabal of Talmudic banksters and corporatists to act as their global agents and overseers.].
For a while, the Deep State’s allies in the Main Stream Media denied that there wasany such thing as a Deep State; it was typical for MSM-ers to say that anyone who worried about the Deep State was a paranoid demagogue, practicing the dreaded McCarthyism.(The late Stan Evans, whom we met earlier, wrote sympathetically about Joe McCarthy, but he has been badly outnumbered by the anti-McCarthy forces.That doesn’t make Evans wrong, of course.)
Yet now that the Ukraine “whistleblower,” apparently a career CIA man friendly with ex-CIA chief John Brennan, succeeded in triggering impeachment hearings, the MSM has taken on a new line; it takes public pride in the Deep State.As Michelle Cottle wrote in the New York Times on October 20,“President Trump is right: The deep state is alive and well.”Cottle declared that the Deep State was, of course, a good thing; it consists, she wrote, of “patriotic public servants—career diplomats, scientists, intelligence officers and others.”She added,“For the sake of the nation, the American public should be clamoring for more patriots to join the conspiracy.”
On November 13, Robert Kuttner, writing for The American Prospect, added a piece headlined, “Let’s Hear It for the Deep State.”Kuttner added, “The deep state along with the Democratic House is our essential check.”We can note that close linkage: Deep State + Democrats. And oh yes, + MSM.
Yet even within the MSM, some voices are raising concerns that an un-democratic and un-accountable governmental force is seeking to remake America, starting with the removal of Trump.After all, one doesn’t have to be a fan of Trump to see an ominous trend here, as well as a scary precedent for the future—what will an empowered Deep State do next?
[Ron: The answer is obvious. If successful the US Deep State will seek to emulate their predecessors in the JOO's Coups mislabelled as the French and Russian Revolutions.].
Thus Vanity Fair’s T. A. Frank, no conservative, added his note of warning:
The existence of an administrative coup inside the White House should be sobering, whether you’re pro-Trump or anti-Trump.It’s tempting to see the establishment as moderate or technocratic, but we’ve learned, since Trump’s rise, that it’s not.It’s fiercely ideological, but, most of the time, invisibly so, because it has been unaccustomed to having its assumptions challenged.[emphasis added]
We can, indeed, pause over the key words in that last sentence—“fiercely ideological.”
So what, exactly, is the Deep State’s ideology?Well, these days, it’s hard to define.Back in the ’40s, it was easy: Deep Statists were sympathetic, at least, to communism. But nowadays, there aren’t many believers in the communism of, say, Cuba, China, or Venezuela.Yes, bureaucrats believe in higher taxes, more spending—and, of course, more bureaucrats—but they stop there; they don’t want to see their local Whole Foods, stocked with costly organic goods, turned into an empty-shelved People’s Kitchen #1.So yes, capitalism is fine, so long as it is suitably Woke.Deep Statists also likely believe in some sort of gay-friendly green globalism,and yet these days, there’s no central commander of a central command, as was the case when Stalin ruled in Moscow.
[Ron: 'Wokeness' is just another Talmudic ideology espoused by 'useful idiot' Deep Staters and others. Arguably most Deep State bureaucrats and paid Talmudic minions in NGOs and cultural Marxist 'fronts' like Antifa and LGBTQ+ organisations don't have a clue as to the identity of their real bosses or what the real motives are of the globalist New World Order matrix they serve. Most are probably in it for the money or the pathetic sense of power and prestige serving their anonymous Talmudic masters gives them. And of course many minions are coerced or blackmailed to assist in the destruction of their society. Also as discussed above, the task of recruiting 'useful idiots' has been made much easier by the effective dumbing down of most USans by the Rockefeller de-education system.].
In fact, there’s probably only one issue that truly unifies today’s Deep State: Getting rid of Trump.
The Deep State Rises
The public impeachment sessions on Capitol Hill have featured a parade of career officials, including William Taylor, George Kent, and Marie Yovanovitch.And soon enough, we’ll be hearing from others who have already testified in private, including Alexander Vindman, Fiona Hill, and David Holmes—and no doubt many others, too. Thus we’ll get to see the Deep State, surfaced.
The common thread running through all these testimonies is, of course, U.S. dealings with Ukraine.And as useful context for current Ukrainian-American relations, we might recall a revealing headlinefrom Politico, dated January 11, 2017.Since Rachel Maddow will never cite it, Virgil will:“Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire: Kiev officials are scrambling to make amends with the president-elect after quietly working to boost Clinton.”That’s Hillary Clinton, of course.
That Politico article from nearly three years ago scooped on the activities of one Alexandra Chalupa, a former Clinton White House staffer who also worked for the Democratic National Committee.By her own account, Chalupa had been coordinating with elements of the Ukrainian government to undermine Paul Manafort, who for a time was Trump’s campaign manager.And so, of course, by extension, Chalupa was working to undermine the entire Trump 2016 presidential campaign.
Today, it’s impossible to separate that recent history from the current Ukrainian state of play.In the words of Rep. Devin Nunes, a thorough investigation of whatever has been happening in Ukraine must include testimony from Chalupa:
Given President Trump’s documented belief that the Ukrainian government meddled in the 2016 election to oppose his candidacy, which forms the basis for a reasonable desire for Ukraine to investigate the circumstances surrounding the election and any potential Ukrainian involvement, Ms. Chalupa is a prime fact witness who can assist Congress and the American public in better understanding the facts and circumstances surrounding Ukrainian involvement in the 2016 election.
Of course, Deep Statists are not happy about any curiosity concerning Chalupa & Co., coming either from Trump or from congressional Republicans.
Instead, the Deep State and its friends and fans want to keep the focus squarely on Trump’s alleged interference in their Ukrainian business-as-usual.For instance, in his October 29 testimony on Capitol Hill, Vindman seemed, uh, deeply determined to protect the way that the bureaucracy had been handling Ukraine matters.In particular, Vindman praised the work of his “interagency colleagues”; the implication was clear: It was the interagency colleagues, not Trump, who should be setting Ukrainian policy.
As Vindman said in his opening statement, “In the spring of 2019, I became aware of outside influencers promoting a false narrative of Ukraine inconsistent with the consensus views of the interagency.”So the “interagency” is what matters, Vindman believes, and “outside influencers” must be rejected, because they are a threat to the work of him and his colleagues.
In the sympathetic words of the Washington Post, Vindman was “deeply troubled by what he interpreted as an attempt by the president to subvert U.S. foreign policy.”Yes, you read that right:Vindman was deeply (there’s that word again!) troubled by the thought that Trump would “subvert” our foreign policy.Most people would say, of course, that the U.S. president, the commander-in-chief, is supposed to be the one making our foreign policy.And yet the Deep State has a different view; from its perspective, the president—especially this president—is a mere interloper, potentially violating the sanctity of “the interagency.”
[Ron: This is a superficial if not a disinformational analysis.The issue is NOT what the Deep State minions of the Talmudic global controllers SAY in their treasonous rhetoric about this matter. The real question is WHAT ARE THE REAL REASONS THEIR TALMUDIC PAYMASTERS HAVE FOR OPPOSING PRESIDENT TRUMP AND HIS ADMINISTRATION?].
As Mark Hemingway headlined his November 1 piece in The Federalist, this is a case of “Donald Trump Versus ‘The Interagency Consensus.’”In such a fight, we know who the Deep State is rooting for.
[Ron: No we don't, if this assessment is any indication!].
Of course, some might wonder if there’s more going on here than just bureaucrats protecting their bureaucratic ways.That is, the Deep State might have other purposes beyond just protecting its perks and power.
Why, some might even ask if there’s some deeper secret here, perhaps concerning Hillary Clinton, or even, who knows, George Soros.Joe diGenova raised the issue of Soros’ influence on Fox Business the other night, and John Solomon has gone further, formulating some pointed questions which might yet be posed to Marie Yovanovitch, including this challenging query:
The State Department helped fund a nonprofit called the Anti-Corruption Action Centre of Ukraine that also was funded by George Soros’ main charity. That nonprofit, also known as AnTac, was identified in a 2014 Soros foundation strategy document as critical to reshaping Ukraine to Mr. Soros’ vision.Can you explain what role your embassy played in funding this group and why State funds would flow to it?And did any one consider the perception of mingling tax dollars with those donated by Soros, a liberal ideologue who spent millions in 2016 trying to elect Hillary Clinton and defeat Donald Trump?
Others too, of course, should be asked about Soros, and AnTac, and all the rest, including Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, and former secretary of state John Kerry.
The Ukraine investigation is far from over.Indeed, by the time it is over—or when the essential facts, at least, are clear enough—the skullduggery of the last decade might start to resemble the skullduggery of the 1940s.
Yes, the names have changed, but the Deep State has endured.
[Ron: More relevantly though, the Talmudic actors who control the Deep State are still using it and other 'USEFUL IDIOTS' in an attempt to control and enslave this planet and its inhabitants.].
[Colour fonts,bolding and comments in square brackets added.].