President Trump's ongoing purge of the intelligence community, along with Bernie Sanders' surge in the Democratic presidential race, has triggered an unprecedented intervention of U.S. intelligence agencies in the U.S. presidential election on factually dubious grounds.
Brennan charges, "Trump is abetting a Russian covert operation to keep him in office for Moscow's interests, not America's." But congressional representatives, both Democratic and Republican, who heard a briefing by the intelligence community about the 2020 election earlier this month say the case for Russian interference is "overstated."
On February 21, it was leaked to the Washington Post that "U.S. officials," meaning members of the intelligence community, had confidentially briefed Sanders about alleged Russian efforts to help his 2020 presidential campaign.
Special prosecutor Robert Mueller documented how the Russians intervened on Trump's behalf in 2016, while finding no evidence of criminal conspiracy. Mueller did not investigate the Russians' efforts on behalf of Sanders, but the Computational Propaganda Research Project at Oxford University did. In a study of social media generated by the Russia-based Internet Research Agency (IRA), the Oxford analysts found that the IRA initially generated propaganda designed to boost all rivals to Hillary Clinton in 2015. As Trump advanced, they focused almost entirely on motivating Trump supporters and demobilizing black voters. In short, the Russians helped Trump hundreds of thousand times more than they boosted Sanders. ( proof ? ) Brian
The leak to the Post, on the eve of the Nevada caucuses, gave the opposite impression: that help for Trump and Sanders was somehow comparable. The insinuation could only have been politically motivated.?
What's driving the U.S. intelligence community intervention in presidential politics is not just fear of Trump, but fear of losing control of the presidency. From 1947 to 2017, the CIA and other secret agencies sometimes clashed with presidents, especially Presidents Kennedy, Nixon and Carter. But since the end of the Cold War, under Presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama, the secret agencies had no such problem.
Under Trump, the intelligence community has seen a vast loss of influence. Trump is contemptuous of the CIA's daily briefing. As demonstrated by his pressure campaign on Ukraine, his foreign policies are mostly transactional. Trump is not guided by the policy process or even any consistent doctrine, other than advancing his political and business interests. He's not someone who is interested in doing business with the intelligence community.
The intelligence community fears the rise of Sanders for a different reason.The socialist senator rejects the national security ideology that guided the intelligence community in the Cold War and the war on terror. Sanders' position is increasingly attractive, especially to young voters, and thus increasingly threatening to the former spy chiefs who yearn for a return to the pre-Trump status quo.A Sanders presidency, like a second term for Trump, would thwart that dream. Sanders is not interested in national security business as usual either.
In the face of Trump's (alleged) Brian. lawless behavior, and Sanders' rise, the intelligence community is inserting itself into presidential politics in a way unseen since former CIA director George H.W. Bush occupied the Oval Office. Key to this intervention is the intelligence community's self-image as a [Ron: allegedly but risibly]disinterested party in the 2020 election.
Former House Intelligence Committee chair Jane Harman says Trump's ongoing purge of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence is a threat to those who "speak truth to power."As the pseudonymous former CIA officer "Alex Finley" tweeted Monday,
the "‘Deep state' is actually the group that wants to defend rule of law (and thus gets in the way of those screaming ‘DEEP STATE' and corrupting for their own gain)."
[Ron: With the MSM and ALL laudatory commentary about the US "intelligence" complex and its operatives, THINK MIRROR! In other words understand that what they say is the opposite of reality, ie they are talking about themselves and their own motives and activities and PROJECTING THEM ONTO OTHERS.].
Self-image, however, is not the same as reality.When it comes to Trump's (alleged) Brian.corruption, Brennan and Co. have ample evidence to support their case.
[Ron: WTF?! There is NO evidence of corruption by President Trump! The Muller inquiry found nothing after more than two years of fruitless investigation. DITTO re the fiasco of the recent FAUX Impeachment Inquiry. Stupid allegations are NOT evidence!].
But the CIA is simply not credible as a "defender of the rule of law."The Reagan-Bush Iran-contra conspiracy, the Bush-Cheney torture regime, and the Bush-Obama mass surveillance program demonstrate that the law is a malleable thing for intelligence community leaders.A more[Ron: biased and totally un-]realistic take on the 2020 election is that the U.S. intelligence community is not a conspiracy but a self-interested political factionthat is seeking to defend its power and policy preferences.
[Ron: HOW is that not a conspiracy! The US nation elected President Trump NOT the US "intelligence community"].
The national security faction is not large electorally.It benefits [Ron: ie uses and abuses the national security meme] from the official secrecy around its activities. It is assisted by generally sympathetic [Ron: ie, biased and traitorous] coverage from major news organizations [Ron: That are owned and controlled by dual citizen Jews who generally admit that they support a foreign political entity namely Israel.].
The problem for Brennan and Co. is that "national security" has lost its power to mobilize public opinion. On both the right and the left, the pronouncements of the intelligence community no longer command popular assent.
[Ron: And the reason for that is that almost all US "Intelligence agencies" are controlled by Deep State traitors to the US nation.
Notice also, This author's use of the disinformational terms "right and left". Use of those terms pretends that virtually all US political opinions are represented by just two parties, the Democrats and the Repulicans. That is not only false but ridiculous. The US, like other nations, is composed of people with a multipilicity of attitudes, needs and opinions, NOT just two. Moreover, until President Trump was elected it was almost impossible for any third party individual seeking political office to get elected. Worst still, the FAUX "two party" system was really one group of politicians superficially divided into two pseudo competing political factions covertly controlled by a plutocratic cabal of Talmudic banksters and corporatists. The controlling cabal simple ensured that the 'two parties' alternated in power to give the electorate the impression of change in governance when in fact there was no real change at all.].
Trump's acquittal by the Senate in his impeachment trial was one sign. The national security arguments driving the House-passed articles of impeachment were the weakest link in a case that persuaded only one Republican senator to vote for Trump's removal. Sanders' success is another sign.
In the era of endless war, Democratic voters have become skeptical of national security claims - from Iraq's non-existent weapons of mass destruction, to the notion that torture "works," to "progress" in Afghanistan, to the supreme importance of Ukraine - because they have so often turned out to be more self-serving than true.
The prospect of a Trump gaining control of the U.S. intelligence community is scary. So is the intervention of the U.S. intelligence community in presidential politics.
[Ron: This author is either ignorant or a shill. Under the US Constitution President Trump is duty bound to control the US intelligence community AND all other organs of the US Federal government. THAT is his responsibility as the ELECTED President. He is also elected to be responsible for the national security of the USA. The US Constitution does not even mention the so-called "US intelligence community" so what possible basis does this author have for saying a US President who was democratically elected under the US Constitution should not control all aspects of the Federal Administration? Next he'll be bemoaning the fact that President Trump is draining the swamp and eliminating the traitorous officials that compose the Deep State.].
[colour fonts, bolding and comments in square brackets added.].