EXTRAORDINARY AH Teaching from Spiritual Hierarchy
  NEW READERS! Read Here First
  Supporting AH
  Leadership of AbundantHope
  Regional AH Sites
  Other Sites with AH material
  Contact Us
  Becoming A Messiah
  Mission Ideas
  System Busting
  Cleric Letter/English
  Translations of Cleric Letter
  AH Member Writings
  Brian's Poetry
  Telepathic Messages
  Jess Anthony
  Lucia G
  Targeted Messages
  Light Flower
  Changing The Face Of Religion
  - Phoenix Journals - PDF in German
  Candace on Religion
  Other Spiritual Pieces
  Spiritual Nuggets by the Masters
  Phoenix Journals
  Phoenix Journals - PDF
  Telepathic Messages PDF books
  Selections from the Urantia Book
  Illustrations For The Urantia Book
  CMGSN Pieces
  David Crayford and the ITC
  Health and Nutrition
  Podcasts, Radio Shows, Video by AH
  Political Information
  True US History
  Human/Animal Rights
  The Miracle That Is Me
  911 Material
  Books - eBooks
  government email/phone #'s
  Self Reliance
  Alternative News Sources
  Art and Music
  Foreign Sites
  Health and Healing
  Human/Animal Rights
  Vegan Recipes
  Translated Material
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Jess
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Candace
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Anderen
  Canal Jess
  Par Candace
  Other Channels
  Telepathische Nachrichten (Candace)
  Telepathische Nachrichten (Jess)
  Telepathische Nachrichten (div.)
  AH Mitgliederbeiträge (Candace)
  AH Mitgliederbeiträge (Jess)
  Spirituelle Schätze
  Translations - Candace
  Translations - Jess
  Translations - Others
  by Candace
  By Jess
  By Others
  Anfitriones Divinos
  Bitácoras Fénix
  Creadores-de-Alas (WingMakers/Lyricus)
  Escritos de Candace
  Escritos de Otros
  Telemensajes de Candace
  Telemensajes de Jess Anthony
  Telemensajes de Otros
  By Candace
  By Jess
  By Others
  Korean Translations
  Hungarian Translations
  Swedish Translations

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Political Information : True US History Last Updated: May 29, 2020 - 5:50:50 AM

Two Can Play Section 230 Game: Trump’s EO uses key statute against social media censorship
By Nebojsa Malic for RT
May 29, 2020 - 12:43:16 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page Share/Bookmark

28 May, 2020 22:23
Get short URL

Two can play Section 230 game: Trump's EO uses key statute against social media censorship

US President Donald Trump is accusing social media platforms (Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, etc) of stifling speech based on viewpoint ©  REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst;  REUTERS/Dado Ruvic

Social media giants have long hid behind a law shielding them from litigation to censor content they did not like. President Donald Trump's executive order just reminded them that laws can also be used as a sword.

Though the First Amendment to the US Constitution prohibits the government from restricting freedom of speech, social media platforms have long argued this does not apply to them as private companies. The executive order signed by Trump on Thursday points out that their status as platforms, and immunity from endless civil lawsuits, depends on their removal of controversial content being done "in good faith."

The order instructs federal agencies to focus on that qualifier when considering Section 230 (C) of 47 US Code to social media companies, noting that this clearly does not apply when their practices are "deceptive" or "pretextual," inconsistent with their own terms of service, and used to stifle viewpoints with which they disagree.

ALSO ON RT.COMTrump signs social media executive order challenging platforms' liability protections

Until now, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and others could have it both ways, insisting they were "platforms" and therefore not liable for user-generated content, while acting as "publishers" and actively deciding which content they would allow, using entirely arbitrary and ever-changing rules.

The issue became political after 2016, when Trump used social platforms to bypass the establishment media that overwhelmingly favored - and endorsed - his opponent. The ‘Russiagate' conspiracy theory wasn't just used in an attempt to get Trump out of office, but also to pressure social media giants to censor viewpoints the establishment did not like - overwhelmingly targeting Trump supporters, but also purging dissident voices on the left.

It made little difference whether the companies did so internally, or by outsourcing it to third parties - such as Facebook did recently - the people making these decisions invariably turned out to be passionately partisan.

ALSO ON RT.COMA red-baiter, an anti-Trumper & a libertarian walk into a bar: Facebook angers conservatives & liberals alike with oversight picks

The fact that Trump specifically called out Twitter's "head of integrity" and referenced the presence of a Democrat impeachment witness on Facebook's Oversight Board indicates that Thursday's order did not come out of the blue. The advanced copy leaked to friendly journalists earlier in the day likewise suggested that the White House has been laying the groundwork for such a measure for years, just waiting for the right moment.

Remember when a federal judge ruled that Trump is not allowed to block trolls on his personal account, because Twitter was a "designated public forum" and he is an elected official? Trump does, and he's using the same logic to put the responsibility on social media to act as such.

Critics, of course, claimed that Trump was only acting now - after years of doing nothing and "monitoring the situation" - because Twitter dared "fact check" his opinions on mail-in ballots this week.

Attempting to shield his employees from Trump's ire, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey argued that the president's tweets "may mislead people into thinking they don't need to register to get a ballot."

Trump called this "ridiculous" and "stupid." Think of him what you want, but in this instance he's correct - Dorsey is really reaching here, and insulting the intelligence of millions of Americans in the process.

ALSO ON RT.COM‘Election process will become badly tainted & laughingstock': Trump doubles down on mail-in voting in heated tweet

Perhaps one of the most absurd features of the Trump era is the extent to which his critics have openly sacrificed their own publicly professed principles in order to oppose him. Thus the self-styled civil libertarians on the left suddenly decided they actually love private corporations and hate government regulations, coming out in support of purging "hate speech" (a nonexistent category in US law).

All of a sudden, the First Amendment applied only to the government - but not to Twitter, Facebook or YouTube. Nor did they bother protesting when those companies applied German, Pakistani or Chinese laws to silence Americans. But now the American Civil Liberties Union is reacting to Trump's order by shrieking "He can't do that!"

Except that yes, he can. Ensuring US laws are faithfully executed is literally his mandate (Article II, Section 3). Trump is not revoking Section 230 - only Congress can do that - but he is clearly issuing new guidance as to how it is to be enforced. The federal government may not even need to do much - Trump seems to be well aware of Saul Alinsky's Rule 9:"The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself."

The mere prospect of being stripped of Section 230 protections and facing costly litigation as a result may prompt these companies to rethink their behavior. Or they could decide their commitment to the ideology of "social justice" and connections to one party in the US political system trump business concerns, so to speak. We'll see what happens.

The trouble with the latter approach is that Joe Biden, the Democrat nominee facing off against Trump in November, has just recently called for abolishing Section 230 altogether - making Trump's position the more moderate and reasonable one by comparison, from their standpoint.

As I've argued before, the battle has never been over a particular tweet or two, but over who gets to be the arbiter of truth - the American people, or the establishment and its allies in legacy and social media.

At the end of the day, that's what this executive order is all about.

[colour fonts and bolding added.].

Nebojsa Malic

is a Serbian-American journalist, blogger and translator, who wrote a regular column for from 2000 to 2015, and is now senior writer at RT. Follow him on Twitter @NebojsaMalic

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

All writings by members of AbundantHope are copyrighted by
©2005-2020 AbundantHope - All rights reserved

Detailed explanation of AbundantHope's Copyrights are found here

Top of Page

True US History
Latest Headlines
Is Black Lives Matter Marxist ? Yes... And No
Was The American Revolution A Mistake ?
COVID: what was the plan all along?
Forced Vaccination Plan Unveiled
The COVID-19 Testing Surge to Justify Lockdowns and Massive Payouts
MUST READ: Body Cam Transcript Tells a Different Story on the Death of George Floyd
Catholic Church Received Up to $3.5 Billion in COVID Aid as Clergy Sex Abuse Costs Pile Up
THE BIDEN DECEPTION—Incredible But Likely True !
NFL Races To Sign Supreme Court Justices Called World’s Best Punters—World War III May Happen First
Pedophilia in High Places: The Jewish Connection
Biden-Sanders “Unity Task Force” Reveals Radical Freedom-killing Climate Agenda
And The Nobel Prize For Medicine Goes To... Bill de Blasio, who has discovered Covid-19 spreads everywhere except at BLM protests
"Defund The Police" Just Means "I'm Rich & White"
"I Could Live With That": How The CIA Made Afghanistan Safe For The Opium Trade
Is George Washington in Heaven ?
Penn State Deletes Tweet Welcoming Conservative Students After Outcry
"Our Children Should Be Educated, Not Indoctrinated" - Trump Threatens Tax-Exempt Status Of Leftist-Biased Colleges
In Their Eagerness to Destroy Trump, Dems Are Destroying Black Lives and Black Futures
‘Tainting’ Public Opinion ? Minneapolis Court Issues GAG ORDER in George Floyd Trial After Lawyer Tells Cop’s Side of Story