Pedophiles want same rights as homosexuals
Claim unfair to be stigmatized for sexual orientation
by Jack Minor –
Using the same tactics used by “gay” rights activists, pedophiles have begun to seek similar status arguing their desire for children is a sexual orientation no different than heterosexual or homosexuals.
Critics of the homosexual lifestyle have long claimed that once it became acceptable to identify homosexuality as simply an “alternative lifestyle” or sexual orientation, logically nothing would be off limits. “Gay” advocates have taken offense at such a position insisting this would never happen. However, psychiatrists [Ron: A Jew created profession dominated by Jews.] are now beginning to advocate redefining pedophilia in the same way homosexuality was redefined several years ago.
In 1973 the American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality from its list of mental disorders. A group of psychiatrists with B4U-Act recently held a symposium proposing a new definition of pedophilia in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders of the APA.
B4U-Act calls pedophiles “minor-attracted people.” The organization’s website states its purpose is to, “help mental health professionals learn more about attraction to minors and to consider the effects of stereotyping, stigma and fear.”
In 1998 The APA issued a report claiming “that the ‘negative potential’ of adult sex with children was ‘overstated’ and that ‘the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from childhood sexual abuse experiences.”
Pedophilia has already been granted protected status by the Federal Government. The Matthew Shephard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act lists “sexual orientation” as a protected class; however, it does not define the term.
Republicans attempted to add an amendment specifying that “pedophilia is not covered as an orientation;” however, the amendment was defeated by Democrats. Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fl) stated that all alternative sexual lifestyles should be protected under the law. “This bill addresses our resolve to end violence based on prejudice and to guarantee that all Americans, regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability or all of these ‘philias’ and fetishes and ‘isms’ that were put forward need not live in fear because of who they are. I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of this rule.”[Ron: Sooo, what about the children they abuse? WHY aren't they a protected species?!].
The White House praised the bill saying, “At root, this isn’t just about our laws; this is about who we are as a people. This is about whether we value one another – whether we embrace our differences rather than allowing them to become a source of animus.”
Earlier this year two psychologists in Canada declared that pedophilia is a sexual orientation just like homosexuality or heterosexuality.
Van Gijseghem, psychologist and retired professor of the University of Montreal, told members of Parliament, “Pedophiles are not simply people who commit a small offense from time to time but rather are grappling with what is equivalent to a sexual orientation just like another individual may be grappling with heterosexuality or even homosexuality.”
He went on to say, “True pedophiles have an exclusive preference for children, which is the same as having a sexual orientation. You cannot change this person’s sexual orientation. He may, however, remain abstinent.”
When asked if he should be comparing pedophiles to homosexuals, Van Gijseghem replied, “If, for instance, you were living in a society where heterosexuality is proscribed or prohibited and you were told that you had to get therapy to change your sexual orientation, you would probably say that that is slightly crazy. In other words, you would not accept that at all. I use this analogy to say that, yes indeed, pedophiles do not change their sexual orientation.”
Dr. Quinsey, professor emeritus of psychology at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario, agreed with Van Gijseghem. Quinsey said pedophiles’ sexual interests prefer children and, “There is no evidence that this sort of preference can be changed through treatment or through anything else.” [Ron: Sooo it's all OK then? What are the "objects of the "sexual interests" of pedophiles complaining about?! After all the Talmud says its OK and Jews rule the US and the world don't they?]
In July, 2010 Harvard health Publications said, “Pedophilia is a sexual orientation and unlikely to change. Treatment aims to enable someone to resist acting on his sexual urges.”
Linda Harvey, of Mission America, said the push for pedophiles to have equal rights will become more and more common as LGBT groups continue to assert themselves. “It’s all part of a plan to introduce sex to children at younger and younger ages; to convince them that normal friendship is actually a sexual attraction.”
Milton Diamond, a University of Hawaii professor and director of the Pacific Center for Sex and Society, stated that child pornography could be beneficial to society because, “Potential sex offenders use child pornography as a substitute for sex against children.”
Diamond is a distinguished lecturer for the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in San Francisco. The IASHS openly advocated for the repeal of the Revolutionary war ban on homosexuals serving in the military.
The IASHS lists, on its website, a list of “basic sexual rights” that includes “the right to engage in sexual acts or activities of any kind whatsoever, providing they do not involve nonconsensual acts, violence, constraint, coercion or fraud.” Another right is to, “be free of persecution, condemnation, discrimination, or societal intervention in private sexual behavior” and “the freedom of any sexual thought, fantasy or desire.” The organization also says that no one should be “disadvantaged because of age.”
Sex offender laws protecting children have been challenged in several states including California, Georgia and Iowa. Sex offenders claim the laws prohibiting them from living near schools or parks are unfair because it penalizes them for life.
Comments on this article include:
There is a long history of paedophile groups being involved with the LGBT lobby. Some examples:
* The man regarded as the founder of the modern gay-rights movement, Harry Hay, was an ardent supporter of NAMBLA, the North American Man-Boy Love Association.
* This group has taken part in LGBT parades.
* The Campaign for Homosexual Equality appointed to its executive the head of the Paedophile Information Exchange.
* Another group, Paedophile Action for Liberation, shared premises with the Gay Liberation Front.
* The gay-rights sub-committee of the National Council for Civil Liberties invited both of the above-named paedophile groups to become affiliated to it, which they did.
I could go on and on, but I’ll just make this statement: the LGBT and paedophile lobbies have always been inextricably linked.
August 18, 2012 at 4:32 pm
It’s only a matter of time. Without a fixed moral standard anymore, there is no reason to object to this. Everything is relative, see? That’s the mentality we have no in this country and those who hold to the eternal verities are sneered at. We will see this come to pass and worse.
Yes, one trick the child molesting sodomites use is lowering the age of consent. Some countries it’s down to 12 years old.
No, Susan, you are ignoring several facts. You missed the top quotes in this article that got the truth directly from the horse’s mouth and went straight for the pro-family quotes to call this page a “lie”. Furthermore, you ignore one piece of rational questioning, what good is it for the LGBT movement to use arguments that are interchangeable for justifying any sort of behavior that any potential advocate may wish to cheer for? They may or may not be deliberately cheering for such things but doing so creates such undeniable byproducts. Also, read “After the Ball” by one of the founders of the movement and tell me that this is not on their agenda because the tactics from that manual are still in use even today.
This is an ancient problem, but the modern argument in favor of this kind of thing started with Kinsey. http://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=6036
I agree with the coment made by EastSide Hunky on Aug 23rd ,, And would like to add once society starts accepting abnormal sexual preferences,,and even alows them to celebrate that they are so proud of the odd sexual preferences where do you stop ??? think about it ,,, If you can understand and accept that it is o.k for someone to have sex with the same sex or both sexes because for them thats what turns them on ,, well then what if another person says well I am really turned on by little children ,,thats abnormal too but thats what makes them feel good,,Hmmmm or maybe someone says they are only turned on by an animal why should they not be understood too ,, where do you draw the line on these unnatural practices ,, or do you not discrimanate and just allow every thing ??? And think about this ,,The structure and design of a man and woman is such that the man has a perfectly designed organ to fit inside a perfect designed organ on the woman to impregnate her and give both parties pleasure and a closer bond,,and to then provide a father and mother to care for the offspring,, and they both have an anus for the humane body to eliminate excrement,,,Anything abnormal like man on man woman on woman man on child man on animal ,, I think is a mental issue ,,and a perversion ,, but there are now a multitude of people very happy that it is accepted my most of you now,,It won’t be long before being a man and woman in love will be weird ,,I think acceptance in this world has gone way to far,,
“National Coalition of Gay Organizations Convention 1972″
“Repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent.”
“Platform of the 1993 March on Washington for
Lesbian, Gay, and Bi Equal Rights and Liberation”
“[...] that the definition of family includes the full diversity of all family structures.[...]
An end to [...] discrimination against youth.
Pedophiles are RAPISTS! Should RAPE be classified as a SEXUAL ORIENTATION?!? When there is a VICTIM INVOLVED, I THINK NOT!!!
[...] access to safe and affordable abortion and contraception [...] without restriction and regardless of age [...]
access to unbiased [...] information about the full range of reproductive options[...] regardless of age.”
Sounds like the same thing, only now someone’s obfuscating by verbal landslide.
sexual abuse wounds never heal fully and each unrepentant pedophiles deserves a bullet letting one group of abnormal sexual behaviour get positive status is truly a slippery slope…. (and before you jump on the “you don’t know what i am going through born this way and all that other crap, i am a former lesbian/atheist who lives a hetero life very fulfilled)
[Colour fonts, bolding and comments in square brackets added.].
Philip Schofield David Cameron This Morning - Red faced Equatorial Cameron Responds to list. see: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Philip-Schofield-David-Cameron-This-Morning---Red-faced-Equatorial-Cameron-Responds-to-list.shtml