From AbundantHope.net

True US History
MR. 'S' : US CORPORATE ´´Administrative Procedures Act´´, Title 5 USC (Updated May 3, 2010)
By Mr 'S' & Others
May 6, 2010 - 3:58:35 AM

MR. 'S' : US CORPORATE ´´Administrative Procedures Act´´, Title 5 USC (Updated May 3, 2010)

. ...codifies the ´law´ by which and under which ALL US corporate functions must operate by and within and are limited to only the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.  That includes all US corporate ágencies´and ´´instrumentalities´´, ie. the federal STATES OF the UNITED STATES - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, which overlay the de jure American states.  This Act is consistent with 28 USC 3002 and 26 USC 7701, wherein the UNITED STATES is defined as a federal corporation, agency or instrumentality thereof, and that it is defined under Title 26 as meaning ´´only the District of Columbia´.   This, then, goes to the nature of ´franchises´ setup in the name of each American Citizen of the American states, which as franchise ´citizens of the United States´are also, first and foremost,  wholly owned and operated ´´vessels´´ of the UNITED STATES admiralty fleet....16 USC 2432?? I think.  I have lost some of my recollection of the latter cite, but all ´´US citizens´´ are defined ´´at law´´ as corporate ´vessels´.   Wonder why the Q Bee is so intent on perfecting her claim on DoC??  That´s where all of our admiralty ´birth´ registration ´´certificates´´ and ´bonds´´ are deposited.
¨¨S¨¨
----- Original Message -----
From: Mr. 'S'
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 10:45 AM
Subject: US CORPORATE ´´Administrative Procedures Act´´, Title 5 USC
#1 (Reply)
----- Original Message -----
From: TS
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 1:18 PM
Subject: Please add to link

NOTE: Of the 50 titles, only 23 have been enacted into positive (statutory) law. These titles are 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 17, 18, 23, 28, 31, 32, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 44, 46, and 49. When a title of the Code was enacted into positive law, the text of the title became legal evidence of the law. Titles that have not been enacted into positive law are only prima facie evidence of the law. In that case, the Statutes at Large still govern.

wonder why title 26(IRS code of conduct) and title 12(bank and banking) are not in there?

#2  (Reply)

----- Original Message -----
From: GP
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 5:59 PM
Subject: Per the comment to S

...codifies the ´law´ by which and under which ALL US corporate functions must operate by and within and are limited to only the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.  That includes all US corporate ágencies´and ´´instrumentalities´´, ie. the federal STATES OF the UNITED STATES - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, which overlay the de jure American states.  This Act is consistent with 28 USC 3002 and 26 USC 7701, wherein the UNITED STATES is defined as a federal corporation, agency or instrumentality thereof, and that it is defined under Title 26 as meaning ´´only the District of Columbia´.   This, then, goes to the nature of ´franchises´ setup in the name of each American Citizen of the American states, which as franchise ´citizens of the United States´are also, first and foremost,  wholly owned and operated ´´vessels´´ of the UNITED STATES admiralty fleet....16 USC 2432?? I think.  I have lost some of my recollection of the latter cite, but all ´´US citizens´´ are defined ´´at law´´ as corporate ´vessels´.   Wonder why the Q Bee is so intent on perfecting her claim on DoC??  That´s where all of our admiralty ´birth´ registration ´´certificates´´ and ´bonds´´ are deposited.

NOTE: Of the 50 titles, only 23 have been enacted into positive (statutory) law. These titles are 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 17, 18, 23, 28, 31, 32, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 44, 46, and 49. When a title of the Code was enacted into positive law, the text of the title became legal evidence of the law. Titles that have not been enacted into positive law are only prima facie evidence of the law. In that case, the Statutes at Large still govern. wonder why title 26(IRS code of conduct) and title 12(bank and banking) are not in there?

It is true that certain statutes have not been legislated into positive law. However, when one is considered a vessel/person under the Administrative Code, the agencies and courts presume that one’s status is within the jurisdiction of the “administrator” and therefore liable. Thus, the argument must first be addressed to break the presumption that public policy (non positive law/prima facie) is not applicable to one’s status. That is most difficult in this day and age with adhesion and implied contracts and most of all, ignorance of the public and its “servants”.

GP

#3  (Reply)

----- Original Message -----
From: EW
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 11:51 AM
Subject: MR. 'S' : US CORPORATE ´´Administrative Procedures Act´´, Title 5 USC
Patrick,
GP is correct in that the 'administration of slaves' falls under the Medieval 'master/servant law', which is under the 'property right'. In this case, the people of America are made slaves by the provisions of the corporate US CON-stitution Amendment 13, and the corporate  UNITED STATES is granted the right to own 'plantation slaves'  in Amendment 14, with the US CON-stitution being the 'Articles of Incorporation' for the corporate UNITED STATES. Thus, the laws within the property right trump statutory law that is codified, as per Title 5 USC. Title 26 (IRC)and title 12(bank and banking) are within the realm of 'property right' rules.
And, it needs be known that Americans have slavery status imposed because of their being 'convicted criminals' (13th Amendment) because they use and identify themselves as being the 'legal identity name' without authorization of the owner of that 'intellectual property',  which is the corporate State, which are sub-corporations of the corporate UNITED STATES  in the 'fascist' system that has been imposed upon America by the Vatican (behind veils),  such as the city/state of Columbia (DC) and the City/state of London.
And, people still spout the false story that the 'legal name' is created by using 'all cap' letters. That only indicates that the 'legal name, and any man who identifies himself as being, are pledged chattel in bankruptcy of the corporate body. The 'legal name' is created by changing  the family/clan name to a man's primary name (surname) , and thus making the given names of the child mere referential names to the surname. This is done openly in one's military name, that shows as a 'war name/nom de guerre', where the family name is shown first, and then  the given names or initials.
My suggested solutions:
1. Do not consent to be 'identified' by any name. (Accept no 'Beanie Baby' label imposed  upon your body.)
2. Declare by affidavit that you use the legal name under private necessity to sustain your life.
3. Declare within the affidavit that you only use the legal name as you 'agent in commerce  in dealing with all corporate bodies, whereby in that contract of agency, you are an  undisclosed principal, as you have no name to which to be identified as a 'disclosed principal'.  (An undisclosed principal is not liable for any obligations placed upon the agent, except where  harm or damage, by the principal, to others can be proven.)
Found at:

All writings by members of AbundantHope are copyrighted by
©2005-2017 AbundantHope - All rights reserved