Ron
What is the role of Amnesty International?
By Ron Chapman
Mar 8, 2010 - 4:35:21 AM

What is the role of Amnesty International?

Question
What is the role of amnesty international? This is a difficult one for me, as I have worked for Amnesty a lot in the past, in the full belief that I am working for human rights. During the last few years it has been less though. They started sending out letters asking for donations on a very regular basis, and it struck me as being a carefully controlled operation.

Response

I get the impression that Amnesty is designed to concentrate, co-ordinate and direct the energies of millions of people (it claims a 2.7 million membership) who care about other humans beings and their individual and collective circumstances. Why? So that those energies will not be uncontrolled and thus tend to range freely around the full global socio-political spectrum. Why does that matter to the global matrix controllers? Because if people do that, some could possibly reach conclusions about the matrix and its controllers that are embarrassing to those controllers and could lead to actions that actually go to the heart of the global problems we confront daily. By getting people to focus on individuals, Amnesty distracts them from seeing the complex criminal systems and global context which spawns the abuse and enslavement of humanity globally.

Whether most members of Amnesty, including most of its employees and organisers, realise it or not (and they probably don't), Amnesty is designed to centralise control; and to direct the efforts of millions of people who want to make a difference to prevailing dysfunctional global socio-political and economic conditions. That centralised control benefits the matrix controllers. How? By organising would–be activists and getting them to focus on specified individuals and particular cases, and the minutiae relating to those individuals and cases, people are prevented from seeing the Big Picture and realising that to really make a difference they have to change global structures and organizations. To do that we have to focus on understanding how our global socio-political cum economic systems work and why they are dysfunctional.

Seeing individual dictators or governments as the problem means that we fail to perceive that they are merely replaceable puppets on the surface of a global tyranny which is being orchestrated by a hidden centralised global cabal.

To reduce the global culture of abuse of humans and their rights as sovereign beings we need to broaden our understanding of tyranny and its causes. By continually getting us to look at individual cases at local levels Amnesty does not help us to do that. To eliminate poverty, oppression and slavery in our world we have to see those conditions as part of a co-ordinated global control system that affects us all although it especially victimises individuals that refuse to accept domination and control. For instance getting our nickers in a twist year after year, decade after decade about the plight of Aung San Suu Kyi has done nothing to eliminate the oppressive military dictatorship in Myanmar (Burma) let alone alert the world to the fact that that dictatorship stays in power with the covert blessing of the US and the global bankster cabal.

To eliminate oppression we must see and understand the global power mechanisms and structures that create it. While we focus on disparate, individual cases and campaign to change the particular circumstances surrounding those cases, we fail to see the underlying similarity and connection between abusive control and enslavement mechanisms everywhere. For instance Amnesty doe not  campaign for the elimination of the totally corrupt International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank and their replacement by the Office of the International Treasury Controller (OITC) yet that would eliminate poverty and oppression globally in a very short time. So the obvious question is, ‘Why doesn’t Amnesty campaign for such changes?  If Amnesty’s management and controllers really wanted to change our world they would advocate such changes and organise their 2.7 million members to actively campaign for them to happen. Imagine the impact 2.7 million committed Amnesty members would have on global awareness on these issues IF Amnesty's controllers wanted to explain the truth on these matters to them.

Amnesty International proclaims that it is a worldwide movement of people campaigning to protect human rights. It says:'We have a vision of a world in which every person enjoys all of the rights stated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards.'

Well, economic freedom is the basis for all other freedoms. Why doesn't Amnesty focus on it?

To free humanity from oppression a critical mass of human individuals must realise the nature and extent of the mechanisms that create global injustice, inequality and poverty. By getting people to look ONLY at the nitty gritty of individual imprisonments, political murders and such, Amnesty diverts attention from core issues about the nature and consequences for ALL of humanity of global dependence on fiat money and usury (charging interest on fiat money), and the roles played by the IMF, World Bank and national  Central Banks in the creation and perpetuation of global poverty and the injustice and enslavement that it creates. Amnesty is therefore part of the problem. Arguing that its brief is restricted to protecting "human rights" as narrowly defined,  doesn’t wash because economic enslavement is a fundamental denial of human rights. Accordingly, in my view Amnesty operates to avoid awareness of the ROOT CAUSE of the global oppression of humanity.

Campaigning to "free" individuals from incarceration and/or bring some criminal henchmen of the banksters to justice does virtually NOTHING to change the system. The Strawman Illusion and global financial slavery etc remain in place. BUT people feel good about being Amnesty activists and especially when they have some limited local success. Sooo their nascent desire to bring about real change is distorted and diverted to lesser goals.

Amnesty volunteers probably do not realise that bringing the odd murderer to justice or whatever, does virtually nothing to change the system which creates the conditions within which such abuses of human "rights" flourish. The fact that a public outcry or whatever, leads to arrests and prosecutions and even convictions of a few matrix controlled criminals makes no difference to the banksters' control system because they have lots more minions and puppets to replace them. What people NEED to understand is that it is various societal accepted ideas and systems (eg. Creation of money out of nothing and charging interest on it (usury); the false notion that Western political systems are "democratic" and thus subject to control by the votes of peoples being governed when in truth the Hidden Bankster Controllers decide the leadership and policies of the US Rep/Dems; Oz Lib/Labs; Brit Lab/Conservatives, German Social Dems/Cons et al in every such system (because there is but ONE set of politicians divided into TWO TEAMs in all such cases); that MUST be changed. Part of this illusion is that the judiciary in "democratic" countries is impartial and separate from the Legislature and the Executive. Such carefully nurtured bullshit keeps the masses including Amnesty volunteers happy in the false notion that they live under "the Rule of (impartially administered) Law". They don't.

I do not say that Amnesty activists do not do valuable work. Most probably do. (1) But never the less I suspect that even when Amnesty is successful in exposing the truth or bringing some criminals to justice their achievement is twisted by the Bankster Controllers being able to use that achievement to falsely suggest (via the mainstream media) that the system is fine and functioning properly to achieve justice equality and the rule of law when it isn't. In fact the odd Amnesty victory is an exception that does not prove the rule and may well just intensify the matrix illusion.
**********************

The Australian Amnesty site says:

`Amnesty International's independence is a vital part of our effectiveness. We do not accept any money from governments or political parties, so we are free to criticise governments and others for abusing people's rights, or for failing to protect them. Because we are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion, we can take action to defend human rights wherever they are violated.’

So what action is Amnesty taking to emphasise the fact that Australia's military involvement in the unlawful invasion and occupation of Iraq constitutes a war crime and a crime against humanity? And why is Australian Amnesty silent about the war crimes being committed by Australian soldiers in Afghanistan? Why are the human right of Afghani children and even the right to LIFE itself not a matter on which Amnesty feels any need to campaign in Australia?  For example, at End Note 2 is a copy of a letter written to the Canberra Times on 7 March 2010 about Australian soldiers unlawfully killing Afghani children and other civilians.

Similarly, if Amnesty 'is free of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion inhibitions' WHY does it not campaign against the ethnic cleansing and genocidal policies being committed against the Semitic Palestinian people by the Khazarian Jews who control Israel and its armed forces?

In any event I have a problem with huge organizations like Amnesty saying that "we are independent … of political ideology" etc. The obvious question that arises is WHO is WE? Who and how many (of the 2.7 million Amnesty members) actually decide policy? And HOW are investigations and their results dealt with? WHO decides the emphasis Amnesty gives to any particular case? And WHY have the most high profile global cases of individual and collective abuse of human rights this decade – the overt invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq and the covert US invasion of Pakistan; the torture of huge numbers of the peoples of those (and other) countries AND the US directed abuse and torture of so-called terrorists at Guantanamo Bay, Bagram, Al Graib and many other places - not been an absolute priority for Amnesty International?

But, as with Avaaz, the biggest joke is the claim that this huge organization exists on donations from Joe and Jane Chardonnay et al because it does not accept any money from governments or political parties and is therefore free to criticise governments and others for abusing people's rights, or for failing to protect them. Since when did accepting money from corporations and trusts NOT come with strings attached? At least Avaaz has the presence of mind to also say it does not accept money from corporations. But even if Amnesty in fact does not accept corporate donations, it could and I suspect almost certainly does, receive money from one or more of the plethora of giant bankster controlled tax free charitable trusts, foundations and/or  “not for profit” organizations that are used to fund the activities of the bankster cabal globally.

Incidentally, when puppet individuals (like Saddam Hussein in Iraq, Noreiga in Panama, or Gaddafi in Libya) and their governments are considered to have "stepped out of line" or sought to pursue personal or nationally independent policies contrary to the desires of the matrix controllers, Amnesty and similar organizations can be particularly useful in publicising human rights abuse information that embarrasses and pressures the individuals and regimes concerned, and blackens their name globally. So it would be in the interests of the matrix controllers to secretly control Amnesty and similar organizations. Moreover, knowing the history of the Khazarian Jew banksters, I assume that they have done this. It would be extraordinary and absolutely untypical if they haven't!

It follows that I do not see a strong need to either prove Amnesty's culpability as regards secret bankster control AT THE TOP or to exonerate it. It is what it is and it keeps many concerned individuals feeling good about themselves. So be it.
********************
I note though, that Amnesty says:

`Amnesty International members in Australia are campaigning to ensure that the government meets its international human rights obligations. We highlight Australian issues within each of our global campaigns, including:

* Respecting the human rights of refugees and asylum seekers
* Addressing the most prevalent human rights violation - violence against women
* Protecting human rights and security in Australia
* Protecting the rights of Indigenous Peoples
*  A Human Rights Act for Australia
See: http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/

However, the most heinous current human rights abuses by the Australian government are its military support of the US occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan; its abuse of the rights of Australians “suspected” or accused of terrorism; and the current military intervention, occupation and control of Australian aboriginal settlements in the Northern Territory of Australia.
None of these issues is mentioned on Amnesty's Australian website

The Australian website does manage to carry a report on a big Copenhagen march and rally as part of a Global Day of Action [?!] though. The reporter says there were `thousands of people carrying placards and banners. I carried one that read "Climate Justice Now"’
The reporter doesn't say where or how s/he got this placard or why it was being carried.  Other placards said ambiguously meaningless things like "Planet not Profit", "Climate Change Kills" and "There is no Planet B". [I wonder who got the contract to make all the placards?] Presumably "Climate Justice Now" has greater priority than leaving Australia's original inhabitants unmolested in Northern Australia.

As ever, the test is `By their fruits you shall know them'. So the basic question seems to be: `What effect does Amnesty actually have on the manifestation of increased freedom and awareness on Urantia?' My answer would be: ‘Very  little.’

Namaste
Ron

PS I can't help feeling that the matrix controllers and their agents in organizations like Amnesty must get a real laugh out of dunning the conscientious global sheeple for money (donations) to carry on their "work". I tend to feel that these organizations have assumed the role of "religion" as `the opiate of the people' for that rather small conscientious segment of the human population that cares about other people. All in all, Amnesty, like Greenpeace, Avaaz, 'Get Up' and all the rest, seems to be a slick, tightly  controlled operation despite its huge and seemingly diverse membership.
*****************
End Notes

1.  Rational v Emotional Thinking

I do not question the good intentions of most Amnesty workers and volunteers but we all need to THINK rationally about what we do. The emotional thinking which says: `I am working FOR human rights (or some other obviously worthy cause) and so I don't have to think about what effect my activities (and that of those working with me) are actually having', has created the world we currently inhabit.

Having doubts about the top management and possible manipulation of the policies and activities of Amnesty and Greenpeace et al is not only appropriate but necessary to a balanced world view. A critical appraisal approach needs to be used when assessing ANY aspect of life on Urantia as it has been the playground of the Prince of LIARS for many thousands of years and the results are both obvious and devastating – but only to those who can "SEE". If everyone exercised their human ability to rationally decode and appraise the information coming to them about our 3/4D world we would be catapulted into 5D overnight, as it were.

The reason our world is ratshit is because people eschew rational thought in favour of their "feelings" when considering issues that can create cognitive dissonance.

We are not destined to be just right brain intuitive "experiencers". The heart controls our brains and our bodies but it is a "thinking" heart with some 60%-65% of its cells being neurons that are identical with those in the brain. IF we suppress the "thinking" aspect of our hearts we also distort the intuitive information being received through it. IMHO the tendency to allow feelings  (emotions) to dominate our thoughts and actions is just as harmful as the ideology that requires us to be mentalist and to filter all experience through the rational thinking processes of the left brain only. As I understand it, the aim of the ascension process is to integrate our left and right brain processes to achieve balance and hence an androgynous state of being.

No one is saying that the likelihood that Amnesty and Greenpeace et al are infiltrated such that their top level managements are corrupted or misdirected, also taints the work and INTENT of the mass of members who work diligently and genuinely for worthy goals within those organizations and their various campaigns. Clearly that is not the case. And "yes" much good is done thereby. But, if the efforts of those organizations are being subtly misdirected by bankster agents (however described), then it follows that much of the potential energy for "good" being expended by millions of members is being misdirected and largely wasted. For instance, imagine the potential effects on global consciousness if the membership of Amnesty, Greenpeace and Avaaz actually understood our global situation in terms of the Urantia book, the Phoenix Journals and the channelled advice being given to Abundant Hope by CM, Esu and other Celestials. Remembering of course that Hatonn and others have been quite explicit about the activities of the Adversary and the Khazars and their minions and agents, and the effects of their activities on the US and our world at large.

By all means trust yourself and your intentions, provided that you also use your intellect and rational ability to decode and interpret the signals coming to you from the outside world when doing so.

2.    Letters Editor, Canberra Times - 7/3/10

'I forward herewith a letter to the editor.

In “Soldiers made ‘mistake’ over deaths” (CT p2, 6/3/10) AAP says that on 12 February 2009 Australian soldiers killed a “suspected” insurgent and local nationals, including five children; wounding another two children and two adults while CLEARING a number of compounds ‘of interest’.

Sounds like a good night’s work. Are Australian soldiers still paid $175 a day tax free on top of their standard “compensation” package for this work? Is the bonus in lieu of overtime?

What IS a compound and what makes it ‘of interest’? Would we call a compound a home?

These killings occurred 13 months ago, why is one dead adult still called a “suspected” insurgent? His non-combat status must be obvious by NOW!

Why has no decision about laying charges for these unlawful killings been made? Justice delayed is justice denied.

If defence ‘expects’ a decision ‘soon’ why have none of the witnesses Dateline talked too been interviewed by Australian investigators?

How much compensation was paid for each death?

Terrorism isn’t a patsy with a firecracker in his underpants or shoe; IT IS FOREIGN SOLDIERS BREAKING INTO YOUR HOME AT NIGHT KILLING YOUR CHILDREN AND RELATIVES! And the fear engendered by having that happen all over the country for EIGHT years and counting.

Terrorism is having Hellfire missiles blow your home and relatives to smithereens without warning day or night, all over your country.

Terrorism is having Mossad plant micro nukes in culverts outside nightclubs and killing tourists at Port Arthur, Dubai et al.

Enough is enough!

Sincerely RC
…7 March 2010
**********************

***************************