EXTRAORDINARY AH Teaching from Spiritual Hierarchy
  NEW READERS! Read Here First
  Supporting AH
  Leadership of AbundantHope
  Regional AH Sites
  Other Sites with AH material
  Contact Us
  Becoming A Messiah
  Mission Ideas
  System Busting
  Cleric Letter/English
  Translations of Cleric Letter
  AH Member Writings
  Brian's Poetry
  Telepathic Messages
  Jess Anthony
  Lucia G
  Targeted Messages
  Light Flower
  Changing The Face Of Religion
  - Phoenix Journals - PDF in German
  Candace on Religion
  Other Spiritual Pieces
  Gems from God Like Productions
  Spiritual Nuggets by the Masters
  Phoenix Journals
  Phoenix Journals - PDF
  Telepathic Messages PDF books
  Selections from the Urantia Book
  Illustrations For The Urantia Book
  CMGSN Pieces
  David Crayford and the ITC
  Health and Nutrition
  Podcasts, Radio Shows, Video by AH
  Political Information
  True US History
  Human/Animal Rights
  The Miracle That Is Me
  911 Material
  Books - eBooks
  government email/phone #'s
  Self Reliance
  Alternative News Sources
  Art and Music
  Foreign Sites
  Health and Healing
  Human/Animal Rights
  Vegan Recipes
  Translated Material
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Jess
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Candace
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Anderen
  Canal Jess
  Par Candace
  Other Channels
  Telepathische Nachrichten (Candace)
  Telepathische Nachrichten (Jess)
  Telepathische Nachrichten (div.)
  AH Mitgliederbeiträge (Candace)
  AH Mitgliederbeiträge (Jess)
  Spirituelle Schätze
  Translations - Candace
  Translations - Jess
  Translations - Others
  by Candace
  By Jess
  By Others
  Anfitriones Divinos
  Bitácoras Fénix
  Creadores-de-Alas (WingMakers/Lyricus)
  Escritos de Candace
  Escritos de Otros
  Telemensajes de Candace
  Telemensajes de Jess Anthony
  Telemensajes de Otros
  By Candace
  By Jess
  By Others
  Korean Translations
  Hungarian Translations
  Swedish Translations

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Political Information Last Updated: Mar 15, 2021 - 10:28:00 PM

What Is Anti-Semitisim ?
By Michael Neumman with comments by Ron
Mar 29, 2018 - 12:22:17 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page Share/Bookmark

March 27, 2018 "Information Clearing House" - Every once in a while, some left-wing Jewish writer will take a deep breath, open up his (or her) great big heart, and tell us that criticism of Israel or Zionism is not antisemitism. Silently they congratulate themselves on their courage. With a little sigh, they suppress any twinge of concern that maybe the goyim-let alone the Arabs-can't be trusted with this dangerous knowledge.

Sometimes it is gentile hangers-on, whose ethos if not their identity aspires to Jewishness, who take on this task. Not to be utterly risqué, they then hasten to remind us that antisemitism is nevertheless to be taken very seriously. That Israel, backed by a pronounced majority of Jews, happens to be waging a race war against the Palestinians is all the more reason we should be on our guard. Who knows? it might possibly stir up some resentment!

I take a different view. I think we should almost never take antisemitism seriously, and maybe we should have some fun with it. I think it is particularly unimportant to the Israel-Palestine conflict, except perhaps as a diversion from the real issues. I will argue for the truth of these claims; I also defend their propriety. I don't think making them is on a par with pulling the wings off flies. [Ron: Yabba, yabba, rabbinical irrelevance, yabba.].

"Antisemitism", properly and narrowly speaking, doesn't mean hatred of semites; that is to confuse etymology with definition. It means hatred of Jews. [Ron: WHY? After all "Jews' aren't Semites and they twist the term to refer to themselves ie to Khazarians, Sephardics and various other ethnic groups who call themselves "Jews"!]. But here, immediately, we come up against the venerable shell-game of Jewish identity: "Look! We're a religion! No! a race! No! a cultural entity! Sorry-a religion!" When we tire of this game, we get suckered into another: "anti-Zionism is antisemitism! " quickly alternates with: "Don't confuse Zionism with Judaism! How dare you, you antisemite"

[Ron: Esu Immanuel (aka Jesus the Christ) told us that the Synagogue of Satan are LIARS and that their g-d is the father of lies.  Not only are those who call themselves Jews NOT Shemites, they are NOT a race nor are they a religion. Jews have self chosen that name AND the political ideology that characterises them as an collectivist, supremicist, parasitical, genocidal tribe. For eg:  Tribalist - And: Israeli Ministry Sets Sights on Millions of ‘Potential Jews’ to Improve Country’s Image and Fight BDS -].

Well, let's be good sports. Let's try defining antisemitism as broadly as any supporter of Israel would ever want: antisemitism can be hatred of the Jewish race, or culture, or religion, or hatred of Zionism. Hatred, or dislike, or opposition, or slight unfriendliness.

But supporters of Israel won't find this game as much fun as they expect. Inflating the meaning of ‘antisemitism' to include anything politically damaging to Israel is a double-edged sword. It may be handy for smiting your enemies, but the problem is that definitional inflation, like any inflation, cheapens the currency. The more things get to count as antisemitic, the less awful antisemitism is going to sound. This happens because, while no one can stop you from inflating definitions, you still don't control the facts. In particular, no definition of ‘antisemitism' is going to eradicate the substantially pro-Palestinian version of the facts which I espouse, as do most people in Europe, a great many Israelis, and a growing number of North Americans. [Ron: Really? and your evidence is..?].

What difference does that make? Suppose, for example, an Israeli rightist says that the settlements represent the pursuit of aspirations fundamental to the Jewish people, and to oppose the settlements is antisemitism. We might have to accept this claim; certainly it is difficult to refute. But we also cannot abandon the well-founded belief that the settlements strangle the Palestinian people and extinguish any hope of peace. So definitional acrobatics are all for nothing: we can only say, screw the fundamental aspirations of the Jewish people; the settlements are wrong. We must add that, since we are obliged to oppose the settlements, we are obliged to be antisemitic. Through definitional inflation, some form of ‘antisemitism' has become morally obligatory.

It gets worse if anti-Zionism is labeled antisemitic, because the settlements, even if they do not represent fundamental aspirations of the Jewish people, are an entirely plausible extension of Zionism. To oppose them is indeed to be anti-Zionist, and therefore, by the stretched definition, antisemitic. The more antisemitism expands to include opposition to Israeli policies, the better it looks. Given the crimes to be laid at the feet of Zionism, there is another simple syllogism: anti-Zionism is a moral obligation, so, if anti-Zionism is antisemitism, antisemitism is a moral obligation.

What crimes? Even most apologists for Israel have given up denying them, and merely hint that noticing them is a bit antisemitic. After all, Israel ‘is no worse than anyone else'. First, so what? [Ron: rabbinical bullshit.]. At age six we knew that "everyone's doing it" is no excuse; have we forgotten? Second, the crimes are no worse only when divorced from their purpose. Yes, other people have killed civilians, watched them die for want of medical care, destroyed their homes, ruined their crops, and used them as human shields. But Israel does these things to correct the inaccuracy of Israel Zangwill's 1901 assertion that "Palestine is a country without a people; the Jews are a people without a country". It hopes to create a land entirely empty of gentiles, an Arabia deserta in which Jewish children can laugh and play throughout a wasteland called peace.

Well before the Hitler era, Zionists came thousands of miles to dispossess people who had never done them the slightest harm, and whose very existence they contrived to ignore. Zionist atrocities were not part of the initial plan. They emerged as the racist obliviousness of a persecuted people blossomed into the racial supremacist ideology of a persecuting one. [Ron: bullshit! Read the Torah and the Talmud.]. That is why the commanders who directed the rapes, mulilations and child-killings of Deir Yassin went on to become prime ministers of Israel.(*) But these murders were not enough. Today, when Israel could have peace for the taking, it conducts another round of dispossession, slowly, deliberately making Palestine unliveable for Palestinians, and liveable for Jews. Its purpose is not defense or public order, but the extinction of a people. True, Israel has enough PR-savvy to eliminate them with an American rather than a Hitlerian level of violence. This is a kinder, gentler genocide that portrays its perpetrators as victims.

[Ron:  Not only does this author pretend that the US atomic bombing of Hiroshima  and Nagasaki; and the  carpet fire bombing of Dresden, Hamburg, Berlin, Tokyo and ALL of the cities of Germany and Japan in WWII, was 'kinder and gentler' than Germany's essentially legitimate methods of warfare in WWII; he also ignores the fact that the Jew controlled US military has bombed back to the Stone Age Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia and large portions of Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and many other nations, genociding tens of millions of people in the process. Moreover, he iterates the Jews' mantra about Hitler and an alleged 'Hitlerian level of violence' which is a subtle repetition of the Jews' BLOOD LIBEL of the German nation. Germany didn't foment or start WWII, global Jewry did. The actual start of WWII, according to uncensored history, did not occur on September 1st, 1939 with the invasion by the Germans into Poland, but rather, on the 24th of March1933,* with the first of the some 58 declarations of war against Germany commenced. Indeed, the very first worldwide declaration of war was the one published in the British Daily Express of the 24th March, 1933.

British historian Basil Liddell Hart confirms this assessment. He writes: “Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other way around. Hitler wanted peace with Britain, as the German generals admitted. (Basil Liddell Hart, The Other Side of the Hill, 1948, Pan Books 1983).

France attacked and occupied Germany's Saar region some eight months before Germany invaded France. See eg: NEW YORK TIMES SHOCK HEADLINE SEPTEMBER 7, 1939 'FRENCH INVADE REICH -

As regards Operation Barbarossa, Hitler had little choice but to attack the Soviet Union to preempt Stalin's intended invasion of Germany and Western Europe. See eg: Did Adolf Hitler Save Europe From Communism? -

Jason Collett says 'Hitler came to power in Germany with two main aims, the rectification of the unjust provisions of the Versailles Treaty and the destruction of the Soviet/ Communist threat to Germany. Strangely enough, contrary to the mythology created by those who had an opposing ethnic agenda, he had no plans or desire for a larger war of conquest. Professor AJP Taylor proved this in his book The Origins of the Second World War, much to the annoyance of the professional court historians. Taylor says: “The state of German armament in 1939 gives the decisive proof that Hitler was not contemplating general war, and probably not intending war at all” (p.267). And again: “Even in 1939 the German army was not equipped for a prolonged war; in 1940 the German land forces were inferior to the French in everything except leadership” (p. 104-5).

* 58 Declarations of War against Germany:

The complete historical list of all of the declarations of war against Germany during the 2nd World War, 1939-1945 is:

1.) March 24, 1933 The Jews declare war on Germany (in the British newspaper 'Daily Express': "Judea Declares was on Germany“ This was the first of three Jewish declarations of war, which obviously were not directed against any "Nazis", but against the whole of Germany! These facts are always hidden and censored in public histories.

2) September 1, 1939  Poland declares war on Germany
3) September 3, 1939 Britain declares war on Germany
4) September 3, 1939  Australia declared war on Germany
5.) September 3, 1939  New Zealand.
6) September 3, 1939 France
7) September 6, 1939  Union of South Africa
8) September 10, 1939 Canada
9) April 9, 1940 Norway declared war on Germany
10) April 9, 1940 Denmark
11) May 10, 1940 the Netherlands
12.) May 10, 1940 Belgium
13.) May 10, 1940  Luxembourg
14.) April 6, 1941 Yugoslavia declared war on Germany
15) April 6 1941  Greece 
Plus some 35 others. “Has anything comparable ever happened?

Has there ever been, in the course of human history, a situation in over 50 nations declared war upon one, and then afterwards, declared that the loser was the one who which was solely responsible? Until today, in March 2018, Germany has still been denied the usual formal peace treaties by 53 of these countries. Are we to believe that this is a very normal process of war and peace? Germany is therefore still an occupied country.

Be aware also, that although Jews represented less than one percent of the German population in November 1938, they STILL OWNED A THIRD OF ALL THE PROPERTY IN GERMANY. That gives the LIE to Jewish claims of anti-semitic persecution and despoilation of German Jews by the National Socialist government. The truth is that Jews disloyal to the German nation were encouraged to leave and take their wealth with them. See eg: The Haavara agreement from August 1933 - emigration of German - See also: Kristallnacht The real story -].

Israel is building a [Ron: criminal pseudo] racial [Ron: deologically apartheid] state, not a religious one. Like my parents, I have always been an atheist. [Ron: As most Jews ARE, and those who are not, worship the Jewish collective. So Judaism is NOT a religion]. I am entitled by the biology of my birth to Israeli citizenship; [Ron: GOT THAT goyim?! Talk about deluded chutzpah!] you, perhaps, are the most fervent believer in Judaism, but are not. Palestinians are being squeezed and killed for me, not for you. They are to be forced into Jordan, to perish in a civil war. So no, shooting Palestinian civilians is not like shooting Vietnamese or Chechen civilians. The Palestinians aren't ‘collateral damage' in a war against well-armed communist or separatist forces. They are being shot because Israel thinks all Palestinians should vanish or die, so people with one Jewish grandparent can build subdivisions on the rubble of their homes. This is not the bloody mistake of a blundering superpower but an emerging evil, the deliberate strategy of a state conceived in and dedicated to an increasingly vicious ethnic [Ron: tribalistic pseudo] nationalism. It has relatively few corpses to its credit so far, but its nuclear weapons can kill perhaps 25 million people in a few hours.

Do we want to say it is antisemitic to accuse, not just the Israelis, but Jews generally of complicity in these crimes against humanity? Again, maybe not, because there is a quite reasonable case for such assertions. Compare them, for example, to the claim that Germans generally were complicit in such crimes. This never meant that every last German, man, woman, idiot and child, were guilty. It meant that most Germans were. Their guilt, of course, did not consist in shoving naked prisoners into gas chambers. It consisted in support for the people who planned such acts, or-as many overwrought, moralistic Jewish texts will tell you-for denying the horror unfolding around them, for failing to speak out and resist, for passive consent. Note that the extreme danger of any kind of active resistance is not supposed to be an excuse here.

[Ron: As usual with Jews, the sting is in the tail (or more accurately,'the LYING DETAIL IN THE TALE') in this lying pile of Judaic propagnada excrement. There was NO holocaust of Jews by Germany during WWII. See eg: Official German Record of all Prisoners in Auschwitz Concentration Camp from May of 1940 through December of 1944. See:

Holocaust Deprogramming Course II -

Well, virtually no Jew is in any kind of danger from speaking out. And speaking out is the only sort of resistance required. If many Jews spoke out, it would have an enormous effect. But the overwhelming majority of Jews do not, and in the vast majority of cases, this is because they support Israel. Now perhaps the whole notion of collective responsibility should be discarded; perhaps some clever person will convince us that we have to do this. But at present, the case for Jewish complicity seems much stronger than the case for German complicity. So if it is not racist, and reasonable, to say that the Germans were complicit in crimes against humanity, then it is not racist, and reasonable, to say the same of the Jews. And should the notion of collective responsibility be discarded, it would still be reasonable to say that many, perhaps most adult Jewish individuals support a state that commits war crimes, because that's just true. So if saying these things is antisemitic, than it can be reasonable to be antisemitic.

In other words there is a choice to be made. You can use ‘antisemitism' to fit your political agenda, or you can use it as a term of condemnation, but you can't do both. If antisemitism is to stop coming out reasonable or moral, it has to be narrowly and unpolemically defined. It would be safe to confine antisemitism to explicitly racial hatred of Jews, to attacking people simply because they had been born Jewish. [Ron: Bullshit! Being Jewish is a CHOICE just like being Catholic, Protestant, Communist, Bolahevik, Feminist or any other ideological choice is ]. But it would be uselessly safe: even the Nazis did not claim to hate people simply because they had been born Jewish. They claimed to hate the Jews because they were out to dominate the Aryans. [Ron: Which the Jews in Germany did during the Weimar Republic.]
Clearly such a view should count as antisemitic, whether it belongs to the cynical racists who concocted it or to the fools who swallowed it.

There is only one way to guarantee that the term "antisemitism" captures all and only bad acts or attitudes towards Jews. We have to start with what we can all agree are of that sort, and see that the term names all and only them. We probably share enough morality to do this.

For instance, we share enough morality to say that all racially based acts and hatreds are bad, so we can safely count them as antisemitic. [Ron: WTF?! this author is saying that all racially based acts are "bad" and can safely be considered antisemitic" THAT IS ABSURD! Moreover, in its original meaning "racist" simply meant love and affirmation of one's own race and culture. It did not mean hatred or denigration of other races. THAT meaning has been given to the term by neo-Pharisees who call themselves Jews and it has been weaponised tand used against Germans and all gentiles, as exampled by the typical Libtard, anti white male rhetoric in the US today.].

But not all ‘hostility towards Jews', even if that means hostility towards the overwhelming majority of Jews, should count as antisemitic. Nor should all hostility towards Judaism, or Jewish culture. [Ron: Yadda, yadda,yadda.].

I, for example, grew up in Jewish culture and, like many people growing up in a culture, I have come to dislike it. But it is unwise to count my dislike as antisemitic, not because I am Jewish, but because it is harmless. [Ron: IF this author not only "dislikes" but actually rejects Jewish culture" he has ceased to be a Jew since being a Jew is a CHOICE to accept Talmudic culture.]. Perhaps not utterly harmless: maybe, to some tiny extent, it will somehow encourage some of the harmful acts or attitudes we'd want to call antisemitic. But so what? Exaggerated philosemitism, which regards all Jews as brilliant warm and witty saints, might have the same effect. The dangers posed by my dislike are much too small to matter. [Ron: sooo, he clings to the Talmudic culture then?]. Even widespread, collective loathing for a culture is normally harmless. French culture, for instance, seems to be widely disliked in North America, and no one, including the French, consider this some sort of racial crime.

Not even all acts and attitudes harmful to Jews generally should be considered antisemitic. Many people dislike American culture; some boycott American goods. Both the attitude and the acts may harm Americans generally, but there is nothing morally objectionable about either. Defining these acts as anti-Americanism will only mean that some anti-Americanism is perfectly acceptable. If you call opposition to Israeli policies antisemitic on the grounds that this opposition harms Jews generally, it will only mean that some antisemitism is equally acceptable.

If antisemitism is going to be a term of condemnation, then, it must apply beyond explicitly racist acts or thoughts or feelings. But it cannot apply beyond clearly unjustified and serious hostility to Jews. The Nazis made up historical fantasies to justify their attacks; [Ron: This is typical delusional Jewish propaganda. National Socialist Germany had good reason to "dislike Jewish nepotism and culture and to seek to have Jews who refused to become patriotic Germans emigrate.] so do modern antisemites who trust in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. [Ron: This is typical LYING Jewish propaganda. See my discussion above.]. So do the closet racists who complain about Jewish dominance of the economy. This is antisemitism in a narrow, negative sense of the word. [Ron: NO it isn't. Complaints about Jewish dominance of global banking and many governments and mega corporations is valid and justified. Pretending that Jews didn't dominate life in Weimar Germany and don't dominate world governance and trade today is a LIE.] It is action or propaganda designed to hurt Jews, not because of anything they could avoid doing, but because they are what they are. It also applies to the attitudes that propaganda tries to instill. Though not always explicitly racist, it involves racist motives and the intention to do real damage. Reasonably well-founded opposition to Israeli policies, even if that opposition hurts all Jews, does not fit this description. Neither does simple, harmless dislike of things Jewish. [Ron: This author speaks with a forked rabbinical tongue.].

So far, I've suggested that it's best to narrow the definition of antisemitism so that no act can be both antisemitic and unobjectionable. But we can go further. Now that we're through playing games, let's ask about the role of *genuine*, bad antisemitism in the Israel-Palestine conflict, and in the world at large.

[Ron: Frankly I'm tired of this author's "playing games". his rabbinical treatese is full of prevarications and half truths and pretend concessions to reason. I won't waste my time by reading any further.].

Undoubtedly there is genuine antisemitism in the Arab world: the distribution of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the myths about stealing the blood of gentile babies. This is utterly inexcusable. So was your failure to answer Aunt Bee's last letter. In other words, it is one thing to be told: you must simply accept that antisemitism is evil; to do otherwise is to put yourself outside our moral world. But it is quite something else to have someone try to bully you into proclaiming that antisemitism is the Evil of Evils. We are not children learning morality; it is our responsibility to set our own moral priorities. We cannot do this by looking at horrible images from 1945 or listening to the anguished cries of suffering columnists. We have to ask how much harm antisemitism is doing, or is likely to do, not in the past, but today. And we must ask where such harm might occur, and why.

Supposedly there is great danger in the antisemitism of the Arab world. But Arab antisemitism isn't the cause of Arab hostility towards Israel or even towards Jews. It is an effect. The progress of Arab antisemitism fits nicely with the progress of Jewish encroachment and Jewish atrocities. This is not to excuse genuine antisemitism; it is to trivialize it. It came to the Middle East with Zionism and it will abate when Zionism ceases to be an expansionist threat. Indeed its chief cause is not antisemitic propaganda but the decades-old, systematic and unrelenting efforts of Israel to implicate all Jews in its crimes. If Arab anti-semitism persists after a peace agreement, we can all get together and cluck about it. But it still won't do Jews much actual harm. Arab governments could only lose by permitting attacks on their Jewish citizens; to do so would invite Israeli intervention. And there is little reason to expect such attacks to materialize: if all the horrors of Israel's recent campaigns did not provoke them, it is hard to imagine what would. It would probably take some Israeli act so awful and so criminal as to overshadow the attacks themselves.

If antisemitism is likely to have terrible effects, it is far more likely to have them in Western Europe. The neo-fascist resurgence there is all too real. But is it a danger to Jews? There is no doubt that LePen, for instance, is antisemitic. There is also no evidence whatever that he intends to do anything about it. On the contrary, he makes every effort to pacify the Jews, and perhaps even enlist their help against his real targets, the ‘Arabs'. He would hardly be the first political figure to ally himself with people he disliked. But if he had some deeply hidden plan against the Jews, that *would* be unusual: Hitler and the Russian antisemitic rioters were wonderfully open about their intentions, and they didn't court Jewish support. And it is a fact that some French Jews see LePen as a positive development or even an ally. (see, for instance, "`LePen is good for us,' Jewish supporter says", Ha'aretz May 04, 2002, and Mr. Goldenburg's April 23rd comments on France TV.)

Of course there are historical reasons for fearing a horrendous attack on Jews. And anything is possible: there could be a massacre of Jews in Paris tomorrow, or of Algerians. Which is more likely? If there are any lessons of history, they must apply in roughly similar circumstances. Europe today bears very little resemblance to Europe in 1933. And there are positive possibilities as well: why is the likelihood of a pogrom greater than the likelihood that antisemitism will fade into ineffectual nastiness? Any legitimate worries must rest on some evidence that there really is a threat.

The incidence of antisemitic attacks might provide such evidence. But this evidence is consistently fudged: no distinction is made between attacks against Jewish monuments and symbols as opposed to actual attacks against Jews. In addition, so much is made of an increase in the frequency of attacks that the very low absolute level of attacks escapes attention. The symbolic attacks have indeed increased to significant absolute numbers. The physical attacks have not.(*) More important, most of these attacks are by Muslim residents: in other words, they come from a widely hated, vigorously policed and persecuted minority who don't stand the slightest chance of undertaking a serious campaign of violence against Jews.

It is very unpleasant that roughly half a dozen Jews have been hospitalized-none killed-due to recent attacks across Europe. But anyone who makes this into one of the world's important problems simply hasn't looked at the world. These attacks are a matter for the police, not a reason why we should police ourselves and others to counter some deadly spiritual disease. That sort of reaction is appropriate only when racist attacks occur in societies indifferent or hostile to the minority attacked. Those who really care about recurrent Nazism, for instance, should save their anguished concern for the far bloodier, far more widely condoned attacks on gypsies, whose history of persecution is fully comparable to the Jewish past. The position of Jews is much closer to the position of whites, who are also, of course, the victims of racist attacks.

No doubt many people reject this sort of cold-blooded calculation. They will say that, with the past looming over us, even one antisemitic slur is a terrible thing, and its ugliness is not to be measured by a body count. But if we take a broader view of the matter, antisemitism becomes less, not more important. To regard any shedding of Jewish blood as a world-shattering calamity, one which defies all measurement and comparison, is racism, pure and simple; the valuing of one race's blood over all others. The fact that Jews have been persecuted for centuries and suffered terribly half a century ago doesn't wipe out the fact that in Europe today, Jews are insiders with far less to suffer and fear than many other ethnic groups. Certainly racist attacks against a well-off minority are just as evil as racist attacks against a poor and powerless minority. But equally evil attackers do not make for equally worrisome attacks.

It is not Jews who live most in the shadow of the concentration camp. LePen's ‘transit camps' are for ‘Arabs', not Jews. And though there are politically significant parties containing many antisemites, not one of these parties shows any sign of articulating, much less implementing, an antisemitic agenda. Nor is there any particular reason to suppose that, once in power, they will change their tune. Haider's Austria is not considered dangerous for Jews; neither was Tudjman's Croatia. And were there to be such danger, well, a nuclear-armed Jewish state stands ready to welcome any refugees, as do the US and Canada. And to say there are no real dangers now is not to say that we should ignore any dangers that may arise. If in France, for instance, the Front National starts advocating transit camps for Jews, or institutes anti-Jewish immigration policies, then we should be alarmed. But we should not be alarmed that something alarming might just conceivably happen: there are far more alarming things going on than that!

One might reply that, if things are not more alarming, it is only because the Jews and others have been so vigilant in combatting antisemitism. But this isn't plausible. For one thing, vigilance about antisemitism is a kind of tunnel vision: as neofascists are learning, they can escape notice by keeping quiet about Jews. For another, there has been no great danger to Jews even in traditionally antisemitic countries where the world is *not* vigilant, like Croatia or the Ukraine. Countries that get very little attention seem no more dangerous than countries that get a lot. As for the vigorous reaction to LePen in France, that seems to have a lot more to do with French revulsion at neofascism than with the scoldings of the Anti-Defamation League. To suppose that the Jewish organizations and earnest columnists who pounce on antisemitism are saving the world from disaster is like claiming that Bertrand Russell and the Quakers were all that saved us from nuclear war.

Now one might say: whatever the real dangers, these events are truly agonizing for Jews, and bring back unbearably painful memories. [Ron: Total bullshit! There was NO Holocaust of Jews during WWII. Moreover, Germany sought to protect disloyal Jews by placing them in internment work camps in the countryside away from the genocidal Allied fire bombing of German cities. See eg

Official German Record of all Prisoners in Auschwitz Concentration Camp from May of 1940 through December of 1944. -


And for some balance, see:
GRUESOME HARVEST The Costly Attempt To Exterminate The People of Germany

And: The Zionist Destruction of Germany -].

That may be true for the very few who still have those memories; it is not true for Jews in general. I am a German Jew, and have a good claim to second-generation, third-hand victimhood. [Ron: Barf! Barf!] Antisemitic incidents and a climate of rising antisemitism don't really bother me a hell of a lot. I'm much more scared of really dangerous situations, like driving. Besides, even painful memories and anxieties do not carry much weight against the actual physical suffering inflicted by discrimination against many non-Jews.

This is not to belittle all antisemitism, everywhere. One often hears of vicious antisemites in Poland and Russia, both on the streets and in government. But alarming as this may be, it is also immune to the influence of Israel-Palestine conflicts, and those conflicts are wildly unlikely to affect it one way or another. Moreover, so far as I know, nowhere is there as much violence against Jews as there is against ‘Arabs'. So even if antisemitism is, somewhere, a catastrophically serious matter, we can only conclude that anti-Arab sentiment is far more serious still. And since every antisemitic group is to a far greater extent anti-immigrant and anti-Arab, these groups can be fought, not in the name of antisemitism, but in the defense of Arabs and immigrants. So the antisemitic threat posed by these groups shouldn't even make us want to focus on antisemitism: they are just as well fought in the name of justice for Arabs and immigrants.

In short, the real scandal today is not antisemitism but the importance it is given. Israel has committed war crimes. It has implicated Jews generally in these crimes, and Jews generally have hastened to implicate themselves. This has provoked hatred against Jews. Why not? Some of this hatred is racist, some isn't, but who cares? Why should we pay any attention to this issue at all? Is the fact that Israel's race war has provoked bitter anger of any importance besides the war itself? Is the remote possibility that somewhere, sometime, somehow, this hatred may in theory, possibly kill some Jews of any importance besides the brutal, actual, physical persecution of Palestinians, and the hundreds of thousands of votes for Arabs to be herded into transit camps? Oh, but I forgot. Drop everything. Someone spray-painted antisemitic slogans on a synagogue.

* Not even the ADL and B'nai B'rith include attacks on Israel in the tally; they speak of "The insidious way we have seen the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians used by anti-Semites". And like many other people, I don't count terrorist attacks by such as Al Quaeda as instances of antisemitism but rather of some misdirected quasi-military campaign against the US and Israel. Even if you count them in, it does not seem very dangerous to be a Jew outside Israel.

[Colour fonts, bolding, underlining and comments in square brackets added.].

Michael Neumann is a professor of philosophy at Trent University in Ontario, Canada. He can be reached


This article was originally published by "Counterpunch" -

The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect those of Information Clearing House.



Israeli Ministry Sets Sights on Millions of ‘Potential Jews’ to Improve Country’s Image and Fight BDS -

Tribalist -

Churchill And Hitler...And History. See: Churchill And Hitler...And History. See:
WORLD WAR II The JEWS Declared War - AGAINST Germany! NOT the Other Way Around! See:


Did Adolf Hitler Save Europe From Communism? See:

The Haavara agreement from August 1933 - emigration of German - See also: Kristallnacht The real story -

Germany’s Declaration of War Against the United States: Hitler’s Reichstag Speech of December 11, 194. See:

Dirty Little Secrets Of WWII The Hidden, Awkward Origins Of World War 2. See:

There Was No Need For World War II. See:

Rudolf Hess: The Führer’s Deputy. See:

England Instigated World War Two. See:
Winston Churchill Was the Bankers' Go'fe. See:

Hitler and the Banksters: The Abolition of Interest-Servitude. See:

Jewish Lies about the German Nation: Fraudulent Nazi Quotations. See:

Historical Facts About Hitler's Germany Ignored By US And British Commonwealth Media. See:

Behind the Holocaust: What was Hitler’s unforgivable sin? See:

Hitler’s freedom from International Debt Slavery. See:

Early Hitler letter on Jews unveiled. See:

MONEY: NOW & LATER - Part III (Germany)

PJ #13 " SKELETONS IN THE CLOSET ", chapter 11 & 12. See:

PJ #13 " SKELETONS IN THE CLOSET ", chapter 9 & 10. See:

EXPLOSIVE DOSSIER ON HITLER by Jewish German Professional Historian. See:

Adolph Hitler – Part 3/4. See:

Behind the Holocaust: What was Hitler’s unforgivable sin? See:

Historical Facts About Hitler's Germany Ignored By US And British Commonwealth Media. See:

The Nazi & Jewish Affair to Remember (November 2010). See:

Crystal Night in 1938 – The Third Reich's 9/11? See:

Zionism And The Third Reich. See:

Charles Lindbergh: A Courageous American’s Prophetic Voice. See:

Official German Record of all Prisoners in Auschwitz Concentration Camp from May of 1940 through December of 1944. See:


GRUESOME HARVEST The Costly Attempt To Exterminate The People of Germany

The Zionist Destruction of Germany -


Comments (32)

Except Jews are not a race anymore than Christians are a race. Jews, like most religions comprise all races and hundreds of nationalities.

Jews, like all religions can claim to be a people as religious metaphor but that is it.

What is also overlooked is that even during WWII most Jews lived safely in many countries around the world and still do. Israel does not represent Jews or Judaism unless Jews and Judaism allow it to claim it does without a response.
6 replies · active 6 hours ago
Kofi's avatar

Kofi · 12 hours ago

Michael Neumann is Jewish and a human being of high integrity. We need more people like him to help us understand and make this a better world.
6 replies · active 7 hours ago
There is always talk about the persecution of Jews through history and this is taken to mean all Jews were always persecuted. They were not. Having traced the Jewish ancestors in my family, who thankfully gave up the religion in the late 19th century, well, the males did, their sisters had no such freedom, back for 300 years in England, it doesn't look as if much persecution went on.

Neither were they particularly successful, just generally poor like most of my ancestors. When they emigrated to Australia they suffered no persecution and indeed, have lived relatively ordinary, peaceful lives as part of the broader community, even for those who kept the religion.

Indeed, most Jews do not, have not and will never live in UN Mandated Israel or Occupied Palestine and to talk of a need for a State for followers of Judaism, bears no semblance to reality. The most dangerous place for Jews to live today is in Israel and Occupied Palestine.

However, even if all Jews had always been persecuted, that would not give Jews today the right to subjugate and abuse others in the name of that suffering as happens in Palestine.

The few Jewish Israelis who see it as the writer does [Ron: but doesn't] , do live in fear for their lives if they speak out. I know some of them. But Jews outside of UN Mandated Israel and Occupied Palestine do not. If they do not separate themselves from Israel then they are as guilty as those who commit the crimes.

It is not anti-semitic to say that, anymore than it is anti-Japanese to talk about the atrocities that country committed as a colonial ruler.
Kofi's avatar

Kofi · 12 hours ago

Bravo, Roslyn. It is imperative that people of conscience speak out.

"The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been one of the most significant sources of global instability for over fifty years. It is the core conflict in the Middle East and is intimately connected to the “war on terror"
Alison Weir
"The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is central to grave events in the world—and in our nation—today."
vicenr's avatar

vicenr · 11 hours ago

Israel is a very, very sick society. Its supporters are as well.
Leslie's avatar

Leslie · 11 hours ago

A brilliant, humorous article. Well Done!
"Israel is building a racial state, not a religious one."

Jews are not a race. Jews with Levantine roots are more closely related to their brothers and sisters the Palestinians than to European or Ethiopian Jews.

"Supposedly there is great danger in the antisemitism of the Arab world."

Arabs are Semites, so if they are anti-Semite they are anti- themselves.

What Israel is building is a myth; humans love myths.
3 replies · active 9 hours ago
Khalid's avatar

Khalid · 10 hours ago

Mr Neumann

I have a feeling, just a feeling that either you parents or grandparents came from Germany-Al-Mania.

I could not finish your. Very long article. It’s very confusing to decern from your article if your for/ against labeling any/ someone criticizing Any Jew for what’s Israeli government/ citizens violent act towards Palestinians.?

You’re not clear with your position. You dance a very unfamiliar dance to defend who partially criticize Israel/ Jews for their inhuman treatment of Palestinians? Am I correct!

You know it deep in your heart that today’s jews( white European) Are Not True jews.

Semetites come from Adam’s son lineage Sam.
Today’s Arabs Have More Clame than Jews to be called Semetits. So when Israel & its supporters accuse any Arabic to criticize Israel being an antisemetic is truely a Joke. It’s a new way/form to more intimidation and accusations to instill fear in hearts of any one dares to criticize Isreali government action in dehumanizing the Palestinians.

You claim that you are an Atheist Jew!!! . But deep inside your heart you’re defending Jews. Nothing wrong for being a proud Jew, just take a Very Clear side. Thanks
1 reply · active 6 hours ago
American's avatar

American · 8 hours ago

Actually almost all jews today are neither Semites nor Hebraic jews. The Ashkenazi jews, 99% of modern jews, originated in central Asia and converted to the Jewish faith in the 8th and 9th centuries AD for political reasons, then immediately abandoned the Torah and adopted the Talmud as their scripture. The term anti-Semite would apply to the Arabs, but not to the Israelis or other jews.
Uncle Shmuel's avatar

Uncle Shmuel · 8 hours ago

Ummm..Le Pen is a woman--a she, not a he.
1 reply · active 7 hours ago
OyVeyZheTruth's avatar

OyVeyZheTruth · 7 hours ago

"Anti-Semitism" is a disease: you catch it from Jews. Millennia of despicable Jewish behavior accounts for why they are and always have been the most loathed, loathsome people on planet Earth.
"Israel has committed war crimes. It has implicated Jews generally in these crimes, and Jews generally have hastened to implicate themselves. This has provoked hatred against Jews." It seems that the over use of the word is designed to provoke just this outcome. Perhaps even to go beyond hatred?! I don't even think these zionazi anti-Semitism shouters know what it means... after all it sounds great donnit?! If you can scare someone into retracting criticism then hey, use it for everything. Your hair is blue? You're anti-Semitic. It's ridiculous and it's becomexa convenient distraction and weapin to silence critics
Marilyn Shepherd's avatar

Marilyn Shepherd · 4 hours ago Here is a more useful treatise than this nonsense.
The author writes: "In short, the real scandal today is not antisemitism but the importance it is given."
While penning an extremely lengthy, and to my mind rather boring, article on the subject.
Anti-Semitism is the cowardly and paranoid Jewish response to anyone on planet Earth who has taken the red pill and now sees the Matrix for what it is. Once anyone awakens and sees the truth about the Jewish Mafia and its agenda to completely dominate global financial policy, one is instantly "labeled" an anti-semite because now you are a threat ; you have broken free from the MSM narrative full of self-loathing lies. Anyone who sees the true history of jewish aggression and its continued quest to annihilate every other race on Earth, is instantly an anti-Semite. It's pathetic really. Here we have a race of liars, psychopaths, looters, nation-wreckers, subverters, murderers, pedophiles, organ harvesters, all doing their very best to hide their activities and intentions, when all their intentions are plain to see by anyone who is even remotely awake. The Jews need to come clean, but they cannot. One slip, one mistake, one admission, and the entire game is over, and so the hatred, the lying, the genocides must continue until Israel is vanquished by the world, until the Jews are put out of their misery like the rabid dogs that they are. Anti-semites are any persons who know the TRUTH about these pernicious, unwanted, and vile criminals.

All writings by members of AbundantHope are copyrighted by
©2005-2021 AbundantHope - All rights reserved

Detailed explanation of AbundantHope's Copyrights are found here

Top of Page

Political Information
Latest Headlines
Christian Atrocities: Centuries Of Pagan Persecution
'Stick Your Vaccine Mandate Up Your A**' Anthem Spreads
Parents of 9/11 Victims Put Up Billboard Next to NY Times, Accusing Them of ‘Lying About 9/11’
Israeli Airstrikes Target Syria's Lifeline Port
Israel To Urge Biden To Attack Iranian Sites In Series Of Washington Meetings
Mentally Fragile State Department Officials Broke Down Over Disastrous Afghanistan Withdrawal
Q Called It!: Deep Staters Are Dropping Like Flies
Federal Law Authorized ‘covert agents’ Within The US Weeks Before COVID-19
Impactful Video Showcases Hollywood Vaccine Propaganda as Contrast Against Adverse Vaccine Outcomes
Austria’s Lockdown Enforcer Sworn In As Chancellor As Country Braces For Mandatory COVID Vaccines
Italian Govt Strips Unvaccinated of Freedoms over Christmas Holidays
Revealed: The Locations of Australia’s Eleven Quarantine Camps | Exclusive
Australian State Bans life-saving Organ Transplants For The Unvaccinated
Senior Tory MP Accuses Own Govt of ‘Waging’ Coronavirus ‘Propaganda War’
The Big Tech Empire Worried About The Rise of the Alternative Media Platforms and The Rebel Alliance
Doctor Banned For Questioning Efficacy Of Masks Wins High Court Case
Biden Surgeon General: Even Tripled Vaxxed Still Have To Wear Masks Indoors
People Across the World Protest Undemocratic Restrictions Imposed on Australians
FOIA: Newly Released ICE Data Reveals Deportations Have Dropped By 90% Overall Under Borderless Biden Regime
Escape From New York – NYC Announces Compulsory Vaccinations For All Private Sector Workers, and Vaccine Passports for All Public Entry