categoryMenu_new
 
  Home
  EXTRAORDINARY AH Teaching from Spiritual Hierarchy
  AbundantHope
  NEW READERS! Read Here First
  Supporting AH
  Leadership of AbundantHope
  Announcements
  Regional AH Sites
  Other Sites with AH material
  Contact Us
  Becoming A Messiah
  OUR PUBLIC FORUM IS OPEN TOO ALL
  Mission Ideas
  System Busting
  Cleric Letter/English
  Translations of Cleric Letter
  AH Member Writings
  Candace
  Ron
  Rosie
  Jess
  Brian's Poetry
  James
  Giuseppe
  Esteban
  Telepathic Messages
  Candace
  Jess Anthony
  Vince
  Leonette
  John
  Adam
  Bela
  Joyce
  Hazel
  Kibo
  Peter
  Rosie
  Johan
  Lucia
  Lucia G
  Rubens
  Shellee-Kim
  Ben
  Dorothea
  Solon
  Others
  Targeted Messages
  Hano
  Light Flower
  Changing The Face Of Religion
  - Phoenix Journals - PDF in German
  Candace on Religion
  Other Spiritual Pieces
  Spiritual Nuggets by the Masters
  Phoenix Journals
  Phoenix Journals - PDF
  Telepathic Messages PDF books
  Selections from the Urantia Book
  CMGSN Pieces
  THE WAVE
  David Crayford and the ITC
  Environment/Science
  Health and Nutrition
  Podcasts, Radio Shows, Video by AH
 
  Political Information
  True US History
  Human/Animal Rights
  The Miracle That Is Me
  Education
  Resources
  911 Material
  Books - eBooks
  government email/phone #'s
  Self Reliance
  Video
  Websites
  Alternative News Sources
  Art and Music
  Foreign Sites
  Health and Healing
  Human/Animal Rights
  Scientific
  Spiritual
  Vegan Recipes
  Translated Material
  Dutch
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Jess
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Candace
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Anderen
  Artikelen/berichten
  French
  Canal Jess
  Par Candace
  Other Channels
  Articles
  German
  Telepathische Nachrichten (Candace)
  Telepathische Nachrichten (Jess)
  Telepathische Nachrichten (div.)
  AH Mitgliederbeiträge (Candace)
  AH Mitgliederbeiträge (Jess)
  Spirituelle Schätze
  Italian
  Translations - Candace
  Translations - Jess
  Translations - Others
  Portuguese
  by Candace
  By Jess
  By Others
  Spanish
  Anfitriones Divinos
  Bitácoras Fénix
  Creadores-de-Alas (WingMakers/Lyricus)
  Escritos de Candace
  Escritos de Otros
  Monjoronsón
  Telemensajes de Candace
  Telemensajes de Jess Anthony
  Telemensajes de Otros
  Chinese
  By Candace
  By Jess
  By Others
  Korean Translations
  Hungarian Translations
  Swedish Translations

Search
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Political Information Last Updated: Feb 9, 2019 - 6:52:44 AM


War of Words: World Health Organization Sneaks Pro-abortion Language Into Resolutions
By Rebecca Oas PhD
Feb 8, 2019 - 11:21:59 PM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page Share/Bookmark

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/war-of-words-world-health-organization-sneaks-pro-abortion-language-into-re

Featured Image

February 8, 2019 (C-Fam) - The United States pushed back on attempts to insert abortion into the World Health Organization's resolution on universal health coverage at the agency's just concluded executive board meeting.

The executive board adopted the resolution on February 1st. The issue has become a priority for UN agencies.

The resolution mentioned existing international commitments to provide "universal access to sexual and reproductive health care services" and "integration of reproductive health into national strategies and programs." This sparked intense closed-door debate. After its adoption, the United States dissociated itself from "reproductive health terminology" which "has evolved to include abortion." The U.S. delegate's statement explained that such language has been used to pressure countries to change their abortion laws and normalize teenage sexual activity.

The resolution will be presented for adoption by the World Health Assembly, which meets in Geneva this May.

Abortion advocates were also disappointed with the resolution, which they said did not go far enough to promote universal access to abortion. Women Deliver declared that the discussion of universal health care would be "fruitless" if it did not include "sexual and reproductive health and rights" which "includes ... access to safe abortion [and] comprehensive sexuality education." That is a different formulation than the one included in the resolution.

Other abortion groups submitted statements to the executive board calling for governments to remove "laws that criminalize certain services, such as abortion [and] third party authorization requirements, such as parental or spousal consent."

Despite a flurry of editorials expressing their wish lists, feminists and abortion advocates admitted they failed to achieve most of their goals in the final resolution. For example, in the board meeting, the Netherlands was disappointed that the WHO report on achieving the UN's 2030 agenda, including the Sustainable Development Goals, referred to Goal 3 on health, but not Goal 5 on gender equality.

While some European countries and pro-abortion organizations were outspoken about the need to include SRHR, the enthusiasm was not widespread. The greater debate focused on issues such as balancing intellectual property rights with the provision of access to medicines for all.

Meanwhile, the fight over SRHR language will continue at the UN General Assembly. In December the UN resolved to hold its first high-level meeting on universal health coverage later in 2019.

The U.S. delegation's strong condemnation of "reproductive health" terminology accurately describes the way seemingly innocuous words in obscure resolutions can have harmful effects around the world. But the words remain in the resolution regardless. The U.S.'s dissociation from them does nothing to stop the WHO from promoting abortion in other countries. The phrase "reproductive health" is widely interpreted as including abortion, both in the U.S. and internationally. As an example, the recent state law in New York expanding abortion rights is titled the "Reproductive Health Act."

The United States took a similar position last year with the Astana Declaration on primary health care. While the phrase "reproductive health" appeared in the declaration, the U.S. insisted on the inclusion of a clarifying footnote. It recalled the caveat from the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development stating that "in no case should abortion be promoted as a method of family planning."

It remains to be seen whether the U.S. will go beyond making statements and disassociating from the language and block consensus on an agreement in order to make sure the controversial phrase gets deleted.

Published with permission from C-Fam.

[Colour fonts and bolding added.].




All writings by members of AbundantHope are copyrighted by
©2005-2019 AbundantHope - All rights reserved

Detailed explanation of AbundantHope's Copyrights are found here


Top of Page

Political Information
Latest Headlines
Who Owns New Zealand Now?
INDISPUTABLE EVIDENCE CONFIRMS: 9/11 Was Both An “Inside Job” and “Mossad Job”
Guatemala Intel Minister: Migrant Caravans Are ‘Well-Planned,’ Not Spontaneous
The Truth About Universal Credit Is Worse Than Being Reported
Facebook Tracks Ex-employees it Considers 'threats' – Report
The Grand Tour’s China Episode is a Surprising Breath of Fresh Air
Theresa May – Goes For Broke, Having Broken Everything Else
The Ukrainian Election: When No News Is Bad News
Do You Believe in the Deep State Now ?
McCabe, Rosenstein and the Real Truth About the 25th Amendment Coup Attempt
UK Mass Surveillance Challenge Will Go to Europe’s Highest Human Rights Court
Facebook “Exploring Additional Measures” to Fight Anti-Vaccine Information: Report
Revealed: The Dark-money Brexit Ads Flooding Social Media
The Heat Venezuela Crisis Pt 1
50 countries join Venezuela support group to back Maduro
In Caracas, Ordinary Venezuelans Speak to The Real News About Venezuela's Crisis
Vatican defrocks former US cardinal McCarrick for sex abuse
Why Are These Professional War Peddlers Still Around ?
US general: Troops to begin leaving Syria in weeks
US to remove all forces from Syria by April