Not a day goes by lately without some politician, pundit, or other panjandrum calling out a political enemy, or some idea they don't like, as "a threat to our democracy." We also see an intensifying fever on the Left to abolish key institutions of our constitutional order-for example, the Electoral College, and the representational structure of the Senate-on the grounds that they are not "democratic" enough.
Meanwhile, others, including the young-adult website Vox, advocate giving children the vote. Why? Because democracy, apparently, is now understood to be such a good thing in and of itself that more of it can only be better. Is your society falling apart? Is factional strife tearing your nation to pieces? Is myopic political unwisdom leading to one ruinous unintended consequence after another? The answer, always, seems to be: more democracy!
[Ron: Giving children the vote is the logical but absurd extension of the democracy meme created by Talmudists as the means by which they could steal total global control of this planet and its inhabitants from monarchies.
David Lange, Methodist Minister and Labour Prime Minister of New Zealand wrote in his memoirs "when I was going to Parliament, I was going to change the world; when I got there I found I could change nothing".
The truth is, we actually cannot control or affect any major issues affecting our country because the power behind the government is already in place and is there not by election but by deception. The unseen power, granted authority by deception and who by manipulation, deceive us into believing that we are in control of our government. All that we can hope to achieve by toil and effort, is to effect minor domestic policy issues which have really very little serious impact on our lives. We are distracted by party politics and entertainment - an old trick, even used by the Romans; "throw another Christian to the lions while we plunder Rome". Most of you would prefer to watch TV, go to some stupid Hollywood movie or distract yourself with music and dance; these are the true opiates of the masses. While your mind is full of sloppy nonsense - the real job of controlling you is already underway; but you think you are free under democracy.
"Capital must protect itself in every possible way, both by combination and legislation. Debts must be collected, mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When, through process of law, the common people lose their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of the government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers. These truths are well known among our principal men, who are now engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world."
"By dividing the voters through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting for questions of no importance."
'It is thus, by discrete action, we can secure for ourselves that which has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished."
- Montagu Norman, Governor of The Bank of England 1924
Talmudists ie the "money changers" have been "the power behind the throne" for millennia. As populations began to become more conscious the Talmudists decided to change governance arrangements by encouraging populations to ditch monarchial rule and take on "democracy", a system under which people voted every few years for their "rulers" instead of having heritary elites decide who was to be King, ie "appointed by God" to rule. However, the underlying power structure didn't change. The banksters behind the scenes who used to control kingdoms and empires by manipulating Kings and Emperors simply started organising and manipulating politicians to control societies and nations via the ballot box.
Initially the change tended to be brutal and bloody. Cromwell's brief ascension to power in the 16th century was followed by the "Glorious Revolution" in the 17th. Particularly bloody though, was the Jews' Coup falsely labelled as the French Revolution in the 18th century and the mislabelled Russian Revolution by Bolshevik Jews in the early 19th century.
Perhaps the cleverist transition though, was the "American Revolution". In actuality, the United States is not a land or a place: ‘It is a corporation, a legal fiction that existed well before the Revolutionary War.’ [See: Republica v. Sween, 1 Dallas 43 and 28 U. S. C. 3002 (15)].
Arguably the true purpose of the Constitution was to create a business plan and to establish a Military Government for the protection of the Founding Fathers, the King’s commerce, protection of his Agents and the future control of his subject Slaves! Even the preamble of the U. S. Constitution is a clue to the lie and which states, “...to ourselves and our posterity!” See: The Matrix and the US Constitution - http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/The-Matrix.shtml
The CONSTITUTION is not for “We the People” and AMERICA is a Matrix of misinformation. See END NOTE 1.].
It was not always so. Once upon a time, not so long ago, [Ron: Before the Talmudists started propandising and organising for its introduction as a replacement for 'divine right of Kings' monarchies] democracy was not an end in itself; it was simply one of many possible means to a much higher aim: good government. It was well understood, moreover, that democracy, over the course of thousands of years, had a track record that was anything but encouraging. Clearly, despite its natural appeal, democracy had dangerous liabilities-and it had inevitably, throughout the centuries, descended into bitter faction, mob rule, and tyranny. As far back as the third century B.C., the Greek historian Polybius had identified a cycle by which this happens-and at the time of the American founding, two thousand years later, it had happened reliably ever since.
Democracy, then, is nothing more than one form of government: one of the possible engineering solutions by which political arrangements can be constructed. (Think of bridges: arch, suspension, cantilever, and truss designs all work fine; the choice of which to build is just a question of terrain, available materials, cost, navigation, and so on.) Now, however, democracy has become something much more than this in the popular imagination [Ron: infused via Talmudically controlled corporate governments and MSM propaganda] - and the understanding that forms of government are not ends in themselves, but are merely possible solutions to a higher-level problem, seems to have been almost completely forgotten.
The democratic form of government now enjoys sacred status, while all others, in the [Ron: Talmudically propagandized] minds of most Westerners, have been harshly and irrevocably deprecated [Ron: by ubiquitous demonic Talmudic propaganda]. It is as if we had decided that the box-girder bridge is now the only sort of bridge any decent person should ever consider building, and that we should, moreover, build as many of them as we possibly can.
[Ron: This is a poor analogy. Democratic governance is WORSE than that. Democracy as a governance mechanism was designed, promulgated and infused into Anglo-US and European nations by Talmudists as a useful adjunct to their corporatist-capitalist usurious monetary control ideology designed to enslave all gentile nations. Since it's inception following the so-called Glorious Revolution in England in 1688-9 and the subsequent establshment of the Bank of England in 1694, Talmudic banksters have covertly ruled all Anglo-US nations and gradually extended their covert control to most other nations on the planet, usually under the pretence of introducting democratic governance.
In my view Michael Rectenwald rightly says:
'The difference between state socialism and corporate-run socialism, then, is merely that a different set of monopolists are in control. Under state socialism, the monopoly is held by the state. Under corporate socialism, the monopolists are giant corporations. But both political economies are characterized by monopoly.'
And both systems use socialist-communist ideology - or the recent incarnations, ‘social justice' or ‘woke' ideology - to advance their agendas. For corporate socialists, corporate monopoly is the desired end and socialist ideology is among the means.
Socialist ideology works to the benefit of corporate socialists because it demonizes competition and the free market in an effort to eliminate them. This explains why capitalist corporations like Amazon and mega-wealthy capitalist donors like George Soros and Tom Steyer actually fund organizations with explicitly socialist agendas, like Black Lives Matter, and why Google, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, and other internet giants apparently favor leftist and even socialist over ‘rightwing' content and users.' See: Who Funds the Riotous American Left & Why ? The Globalist Billionaire class, Which Uses it to Build Corporate Socialism - http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/Who-Funds-the-Riotous-American-Left-Why-The-Globalist-Billionaire-class-Which-Uses-it-to-Build-Corporate-Socialism.shtml
For instance, the US federal government is a corporation pretending to be a democracy and US governance is corporate socialism, ie covert fascism, since all US federal and state governmental organs are privately owned corporations. controlled by Talmudic banksters and corporatists who also own or control most major global industrial and commercial corporations. See: The USA Isn’t a Country, It’s a Corporation! - http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/The-USA-Isn-t-a-Country-It-s-a-Corporation.shtml
The Socialism Of The Federal Reserve - http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/The-Socialism-Of-The-Federal-Reserve.shtml
The Oligarchy - The Black Nobility - The Illuminati - The Synarchy - http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/The-Oligarchy---The-Black-Nobility---The-Illuminati---The-Synarchy.shtml
The main difference between so-called democratic governments and overt Fascist governments like those run by Hitler, Mussolini and Hirohito, is that overt Fascist governments tend to retain control of money distribution and restrict the worst excesses of usury whereas, as could be seen in the pre-Trump US and the West, the secret bankster and corporatist controllers hiding behind the facade of "democracy" were (and still are) determined to totally enslave and impoverish the gentile population in order to segue their covert control into the Communist (Bolshevik), ie state socialist, model as a One World Government.
In fascist governments corporatists are in partnership with the political elite whereas in democratic governments the politicians are mere puppets who are secretly almost totally controlled by Talmudic corporatists. Politicians like JFK who resist covert Talmudic control are removed. The so-called "democratic" process is elaborate window dressing with the Talmudic banksters wielding an iron fist in a velvet glove that deceives the populace. Under Fascism the population knows it is being directed and coerced whereas democratic mechanisms and propaganda convinces a dumbed down population that voting for someone every two, three, four or five years somehow gives them a say in what happens to them. It doesn't. Both systems exercise centralised control of all major economic and socio-political activity. Fascist governments exercise power more or less openly whereas the hidden socialist controllers of democracies rely heavily on misleading social and political mechanisms.
Democracy controllers use falsified history and science and misleading rhetoric and propaganda promulgated by educational and university systems, the mainstream media, puppet religious leaders, Hollywood and other cultural forums to mind control the population from cradle to grave.That brain washing has most people believing democracies are sacred institutions designed to protect their interests when they are actually Talmudic slave plantation mechanisms. See eg: The Matrix, the Strawman and WHO You Are. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Ron_71/The_Matrix_the_Strawman_and_WHO_You_Are_3030.shtml
Ironically the result is similar to the divine right of Kings dogma iterated by Christian religions for many centuries.
The reason President Trump is hated and under constant attack is that he is exposing the false democracy meme for the farce that it is. Trump champions freedom of speech and genuinely free elections and is eliminating fascistic monopolies and graft and corruption in the US and internationally. He has also assumed control of the Federal Reserve system (the Fed) and in due course he will ensure that the US federal Treasury issues all US money and currency in accordance with the Constitution. That will eliminate covert control of the US and its governments by private banksters and restore republican governance arrangements in accordance with the Constitution.
The socio-political turmoil currently apparent in the US is due to the fact that President Trump and his supporters are striving to eliminate the US Corporation and the Fed and hence the covert control of the US by the Talmudists who own those corporations. Trump and his supporters intend to institute genuine republican governance in the US. They are also striving to free the rest of the world from control by Talmudic banksters. That will allow local republican government arrangements to be instituted everywhere.].
Perhaps the most important thing to understand about all of this is that, under any system of government, sovereignty lies somewhere. (It's like the bubble under the contact-paper: you can move it around, but it's always there.) In a monarchy, it lies with the king. A democracy, on the other hand, is just an inverted monarchy: the people are sovereign. The inversion is obvious if you look at the behavior of politicians and courtiers seeking access to the source of power: under monarchies, they flatter and cosset the king, while in democracies they court and fawn over the people. It's all the same game, though: to gain personal power, cozy up to the sovereign.
[Ron: I disagree. The Democratic governance mechanism is a covert monopolistic construct created and put in place by demonic controllers using Talmudists who have suborned Anglo-USan and other gentile elites. Arguably the British people and Anglo-US and European gentiles have been under covert demonic control since the reign of Queen Elizabeth I. See eg: Dr. John Dee: Occultist Behind the British Empire and Judaic New World Order - http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Dr-John-Dee-Occultist-Behind-the-British-Empire-and-Judaic-New-World-Order.shtml
True sovereignty vests in the Creator who infuses every ensouled human being with sovereignty by indwelling each HUman individual.].
There are important differences, nevertheless: unlike the unitary nature of monarchy, in which the sovereignty rests with a single will, the sovereign of a democracy is a diffuse mass, subject to faction and internal strife. Where is the "will" of a congeries of millions of individual citizens?
[Ron: The true "will" of HUmans lies in their conformance with the will of the Creator. When that freely occurs faction and strife disappears as all become ONE in loving community.].
The American founders, who knew their ancient and modern history, understood all of this. They had no reverence for democracy itself, and were keenly aware of its inherent liabilities-but the natural-law premises of their political philosophy offered no basis for vesting sovereignty, merely by birth, in any individual. (As Jefferson wrote at the end of his life, it wasn't as if some men are born "booted and spurred", and others "with saddles on their backs".) Somehow, the people had to find a way to govern themselves, without collapsing into faction, mob rule, and tyranny.
The framers, then, as they gathered in Philadelphia in 1787 to produce a new Constitution, had before them a specification: stable self-government by the consent of the people. To construct it, they had a toolbox containing all the forms of government that had so far been attempted. Finally, they had a specific stock of material to build with: the historically particular people who had settled themselves in the 13 colonies. The problem of the founding, in other words, was an engineering problem. And it was as engineers that they set about designing a solution.
Engineers know several important things. First, they know that there is rarely a perfect solution to any problem. They know also that everything is a tradeoff, and that good solutions are often hybrids of various techniques. They know, moreover, that every type of construction material has its own strengths and weaknesses. And all good engineers know in their bones that the real world, unlike the laboratory, is infinitely mischievous, and will find unforeseen ways to test-and even to break-your design.
The questions facing the Constitutional Convention were stubborn and difficult. Could they design a framework of government that would break Polybius' great cycle? Was it possible to create some sort of hybrid system that would be stable enough to avoid both mob rule and tyranny? How was it possible to satisfy the natural-law requirements of consent and self-government, which implied democracy, while avoiding the pitfalls of the divided will of the people, and protecting the natural rights of the minority against the predation of the majority? How could the "general will" of the people express itself in the making and execution of law and policy, without being paralyzed by the antagonisms of faction, or rendered hopelessly incoherent and inefficient by the diffusion of a multitude of opinions? How could they knit together thirteen independent nations-for that is what the colonies in effect had become at that point-into a unified whole, despite their broadly divergent cultures, interests, and folkways?
This and much more confronted the delegates to Philadelphia in the sweltering summer of 1787. What emerged from their deliberations was a hybrid design, full of trade offs and compromises. A pure democracy obviously would not do; it would immediately become, in a quote attributed to Benjamin Franklin, "two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for lunch." This problem affected not only numerical minorities in the population, but also the states themselves: small states would quickly be overwhelmed by big ones. Monarchy wouldn't do: a key specification for the new government was that sovereignty must rest, somehow, with the people. The new federal government needed to have enough power to carry out its mandates, and to present the new, stitched-together Union to the rest of the world as a coherent whole that other nations could do business with in confidence, while reserving for the individual states all powers that were not clearly required for managing the common interests of the collective.
The constitution that emerged at Philadelphia made a careful and complex balance of all of these competing requirements. Knowing that sovereignty is a zero-sum affair, the framers divided powers into what were intended to be non-overlapping parts, with all powers reserved to the states other than those they had explicitly delegated to the new republic. Because the new arrangement was both a compact between the states and an establishment of the people themselves, both were to be represented in separate and distinct ways.
[Ron: Arguably this was nominally true but not a reality. See END NOTE 1].
Because raw democracy was dangerously volatile, and a poor guarantor of natural rights, it had to be leashed and brought to heel. Of the three branches of government, only one half of a single branch-the House of Representatives-was to be directly appointed by popular vote. Because the more populous states could easily overwhelm the smaller ones, the states themselves were to be represented as coequal individuals in the Senate. The president, too, in order to execute the nation's laws in such a way as to protect the interests of all the members of this new compact, had to be above the fray. So the Electoral College ensured that the individual states, and not just the great clusters of the population, would have their say in his election.
The Constitution itself, meanwhile, needed to be defended from the changing passions of the masses. If it were subject to casual revision by popular whim, it could be of no enduring value. The amendment process, therefore, was made so difficult that any change would have to represent the overwhelming majority of the popular sentiment. The framers made certain here, too, that not just the federal legislature, but a large majority of the states themselves, would have to approve any changes.
Finally, after the great ratification debates of 1787 and 1788, it became clear that, even with all the protections written into the original Constitution, certain fundamental rights had to be put beyond the reach of the shifting moods of popular majorities. These protections were enumerated in the first ten amendments: the Bill of Rights.
This Constitution, then, like all engineered solutions to complex, real-world problems, is a "best effort" construction that sought to address requirements and stubborn realities that often pulled in opposite directions. The final result was not exactly what any of the delegates wanted; indeed three of them, George Mason and Edmund Randolph of Virginia, and Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, refused to sign it. What it most certainly was not, however, was an instrument of democracy. Had it made pure democracy its priority, it is safe to say the United States of America would have torn itself to pieces, and long ago ceased to exist.
Instead, it was an attempt to design a system whereby a particular sort of people-a proudly self-reliant, moral, and industrious polity, steeped in centuries of British common law, European philosophy, and Judeo-Christian ethical and religious tradition [Ron: There is no common ground between Judaic (Talmudic) ethics and religious traditions and the divine teachings of Jesus the Christ. See eg: Judaism and Christianity - Two Thousand Years of Lies - 60 Years of State Terrorism - http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Judaism-and-Christianity---Two-Thousand-Years-of-Lies---60-Years-of-State-Terrorism.shtml In fact that is the primary problem. Judaism IS Talmudism and Talmudism IS an atheistic, ethno-centric, nepotistic political ideology that requires its adherents to seek to subjugate themselves and all non-adherents to the will and control of the Talmudic leadership.] - could govern themselves under ordered liberty, so as to preserve and protect their inalienable [Ron: unalienable?] natural rights. The form they settled on was that of a confederation of states under a limited, representative republic, granting strictly enumerated powers to a central authority. Democracy was nothing more than one part of that design-a part the structural role of which was itself carefully limited.
Yet here we are, nearly two-and-a-half centuries later. Something has gone terribly wrong. The great edifice that the framers erected in Philadelphia seems on the verge of collapse. All around us we hear that the design itself is to blame: that the problem with the Constitution is that it isn't democratic enough. The great challenges that faced the delegates in 1787, and the lessons of history and enduring truths of human nature that informed their deliberations, are now understood only by a few-but what everyone now seems to know with unreflective certainty is that democracy itself is sacred: no longer a means, but an end.
[Ron: The 'Democracy' idea is fundamentally flawed. It has been accepted by gentile populations because of more than a century of Talmudic propaganda and indoctrination via governments, education systems, and the MSM and cultural mechanisms in most nations.].
What we seem to forget is a thing that the founders knew all too well: that anything we build is only as sturdy as the material out of which it is constructed. The durability of the nation depends upon the quality of its people.
Ask anyone you know why democracy is the only acceptable form of government, and they will be quick to explain: it's because other forms provide no remedy for corrupt or tyrannical rulers. But as we have seen, in the inverted monarchy we call democracy, the king's sovereignty rests, instead, with the people. What remedy, then, do democratic systems provide for a corrupt and tyrannical people? What bulwark do we have against that?
[Ron: Democracy is NOT inverted monarchy. In the absence of monarchy or dictatorship in ANY society in which social intercourse is dependent on a monetary system governance defaults to plutocracy - rule by a more or less hidden coterie of rich individuals. WHY? Because only plutocrats have enough money to buy propaganda agents, advertising and the votes needed to secure a majority. And if, perchance persons are elected who are not already compromised by dependence upon plutocratic support they are soon bribed, blackmailed or eliminated by moneyed interests. The real controllers of Democracies seek to have universal suffrage and seek, as is happening in the US today, to reduce the voting age into the mid teen years. This demonstrates the stupidity of democratic systems because democratic suffrage causes the votes of persons of mature age, experience and intellect to be swamped by large numbers of immature, ignorant, inexperienced and even criminal voters who are easily swayed by propaganda, emotive rhetoric and false promises.].
The answer is: nothing-nothing at all-but the Constitution. It is only words on paper, but for 242 years it nevertheless has been the bedrock of our public liberty. Beneath it, there is only the abyss.
In these darkening times, then, we should remember the words of Patrick Henry:
"Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel.
END NOTE 1
All of the Founding Fathers had two things in common. They all shared the gift of a good education or were gifted individuals, and they all came from families of business and/or substance. These men all suffered from “visions of grandeur!” They viewed America as their one opportunity to make themselves powerful and wealthy “..........to ourselves and our posterity!” Initially, their plan was to steal America away from the King, despite the fact that King George funded the exploration of the New World, which legally gave him first claim to all new continents discovered. The seizure of the Americas by the King’s explorers was not as it has been depicted in our history books, presented to us by our government, in our government-controlled public schools. Native Americans (the Indians) were murdered, their villages burned, many were enslaved, infected by diseases brought from England and their lands taken by force and the threat of force by these early explorers! The Indians were labeled savages by these immigrant explorers from England, but the true savages were our English ancestors!
One thing the Founding Fathers did not know, was that all of the King’s lands and all future acquisitions such as the AMERICAS, had been given and pledged by King John to Pope Innocent III and the Holy Roman Church by the Treaty of 1213. After that fact was proven to the Founding Fathers, King George and representatives from the Vatican decided to use the Constitutional draft created by the Founding Fathers to further their plan to control the Colonists. Control attained by bringing the Colonists to their knees in debt. Any way you read it, the Constitution was never written with the intent of benefiting the American people. Did you know that 98% of the Law Schools in America and England do not include Constitutional Law as a part of their law curriculum? The reason for this phenomenon is because Constitutional Law does not apply to, or affect, the enforcement of statutes, codes or administrative regulations, which have replaced constitutional law, the common law, public law and penal law and which have been designed to control you. For example, Constitutional Law is taught as an elective at Harvard, Yale and Cambridge, and only for students of law who are planning a future career in government. This should make sense to you as you read on.
In the true History of America, neither side WON the Revolutionary War. At first, the appearance of English troops in the Colonies was simply a show of force by King George, intended to intimidate the Colonists and force them to pay him taxes. Factually, back in England, English soldiers refused to take up arms against the Colonists because they were English citizens and relatives.
Mr. Mayer Amschel Bauer, founder of the Rothschild Banking Empire, by this time owned the King. Mr. Bauer had extended unlimited credit to the King and arranged contracts with him, which permitted the Rothschild Tax Collectors to represent and collect the King’s tax from the King’s subjects. [This is the origin of the concept behind the establishment of the IRS]. It was Bauer who suggested to King George that he enforce a tax against the Colonists in the New World, since the tax being collected in England was barely enough to pay the interest on the King’s loans. When English soldiers refused to fight, Mr. Bauer negotiated a contract with unemployed Russian/Germanic soldiers to fight for King George at a cost of 50¢ a day. Bauer then informed King George that he had hired these soldiers in the King’s name, but at a cost of $1.00 a day!
King George utilized these soldiers, dressed them in English soldier uniforms and ordered his career Officers to command them. When his show of force in the Colonies failed, Mr. Bauer suggested that King George finance the Colonists in their War efforts against him, and bring the Colonists to their knees in debt! The King succeeded in accomplishing this through his appointed civilian figureheads in charge of his government of France. Mr. Bauer wanted to expand his Banking Empire into the Colonies. He discovered that the Colonists didn’t trade in gold or silver but used script as the basis of their economy. The script money used were promissory notes printed by the Colonists. All the Colonists agreed that they would consider these notes the lawful currency of the colonies. Mr. Bauer wanted gold or silver and induced the King to demand that his Tax in the Colonies be paid in gold or silver. It was that condition “that broke the camel’s back” and caused the “Boston Tea Party.” “Whoever controls the money - controls the country!” [Rothschild]
Surreptitiously, King George infiltrated the Colonies and their feudal [futile?] attempt to form a new government, using spies composed of English lawyers and English aristocrats loyal to him. The spies’ assignment was to infiltrate the new government, carry out the plan to defeat the Colonists through debt and establish regular reports to the King. The Church also had its appointed representative in place to protect and ensure that its interest was being observed. Much of the loans received from the French went into the pockets of the Founding Fathers. The Founding Fathers eventually conceded to King George and the Holy Roman Church’s demands, by and through the intervention and persuasiveness of the King’s spies.
Ironically, the common denominator or glue that eventually bound King George, the Founding Fathers, the English lawyers and English aristocrats together was a secret society called the “Illuminati.” Even Paul Revere and Benjamin Franklin, were members of the Illuminati. This secret society had a criminal and deadly past in Europe, and in America they were eventually renamed “The Free and Accepted Masons.” The majority of the regular membership of the Free and Accepted Masons do not know about the “Illuminati influence” within their rank and file. The Illuminati members operate out of special secret societies separate from the regular Masonic membership and are found in every branch of the Free and Accepted Masons of the World. Think about the Colonists whom we have been taught to revere by our public school system! All of these individuals were members of this secret society and all were Traitors. Our history books also instruct us to apotheosize the Founding Fathers; but don't hold them in reverence, hold them in contempt! By and through their intervention, “Slaves you are and
Slaves you will ever be!"
An example of a man in history we have been taught to revere is Benjamin Franklin. Would it shock you to learn that he was on the King’s payroll and his many trips to England were actually to report on the colonial government to King George? The Declaration of Independence is another story omitted from our American history books. Of the fifty-one men involved in the creation of the Declaration of Independence, twenty-one were actually (traitors) and on the King’s payroll. During the Revolutionary War, English Officers were provided the names, addresses and family members of the thirty loyalists involved in the creation and signing of the Declaration of Independence. The English soldiers had been ordered to hunt down and murder all thirty loyalists, their wives, children and all relatives, with further instructions to burn their bodies inside their homes. The soldiers were to leave no trace of these men and their families, to wipe out their existence for an eternity! The history of civilizations has taught us all that martyrs are dangerous to men of power and King George didn’t want to leave any martyrs. It is pretty obvious who provided the detailed information about the thirty (loyalists), their family and addresses.
At first glance, it appeared that Guy Madison of Virginia was so concerned about lawyers holding any position in American government that he championed the 13th Amendment, which barred lawyers from holding any public office in government. The 13th Amendment was ratified, but never made it into print in our government-controlled school books and public classrooms. The Amendment was surreptitiously removed and replaced by the 14th Amendment. The 15th Amendment became the 14th and so on. Madison’s efforts appear admirable, but his later actions as a member of the 1st Congress suggest that his only real concern was to block lawyers from undermining the theft that he and his compatriots had planned for America.
Once the cost of the Revolutionary War sufficiently placed the Colonists in debt, the English soldiers were ordered to dispense with their efforts, recover their arms and within the next eight years they eventually returned to England. The Colonists were so glad to see the fighting stop that they allowed the soldiers to retreat and exit America peacefully. There is an old legal Maxim that states: “The first to leave the field of battle - loses.” Pursuant to this Maxim the Founding Fathers proclaimed the Colonists the victors! A Maxim is a legal truth that is time honored and incorruptible.
In reality, the War was just a diversion. The Colonists had no chance of succeeding in their efforts. Examine the facts for yourself. During this era, England had the largest Army and Navy in the world. King George owned England, Ireland and France, having a combined population of about 60 million subjects. The Colonists were poorly educated, poorly armed and composed of farmers, tradesmen, bonded slaves, women and children, and boasted a total population of only 3 million subjects. And considering the undermining that was occurring to their nation by the King’s spies and the Founding Fathers, the Colonists didn’t have a prayer of defeating the English! Americans have been indoctrinated by our federal and state governments and through government-controlled public schools and literature, government-controlled media and government-controlled churches [YES, EVEN THE CHURCHES] to believe that America defeated the English. We celebrate that victory and our so-called Independence each year on the 4th of July; and it is all a bunch of propaganda, a carrot to lead the horse and keep this society stupid and passive. We boast today that our country represents the finest schools in the world, but in reality, we’re no smarter than the first Colonists. We only know more about other things because of new technology developments during the last 250 years and yet the average IQ of America is 70.
Documented proof that the Constitution was not for us can be found at Padelford, Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah, [14 Georgia 438, 520]. This was a Court case wherein the Plaintiffs sued the City of Savannah for violating what they believed were their constitutionally-protected rights. The decision of the Judge says it all: "But indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in Court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution, the Constitution, it is true, is a compact but he [the private person] is not a party to it!" [Emphasis added]
The United States Constitution was converted into a Trust and the legal definition of a Trust is: “A legal obligation with respect to property given by one person (donor), to another (trustee), to the advantage of a beneficiary (Americans).” The property in this Trust includes all land, your personal possessions that you believe you own and your physical body. The donor of the Trust is the King of England and the Holy Roman Church. The Trustees are all federal and state public officials, which means that they truly are Agents of a foreign power: the King and the Vatican.
The reason the Constitution was converted into a Trust is because, as a non-trust business plan, The Constitution completely bound the hands of our government officials. By their converting it into a Trust, our public officials were then free to make any changes they desired to this government without their constituents’ knowledge. The rules of a Trust are secret and no trustee can be compelled to divulge those rules; and the rules can be changed by the trustees without notice to the beneficiary.
The one pitfall confronting them and their plan was the fact that by converting the Constitution into a Trust, our public officials had to legally assign a beneficiary; and the beneficiary chosen could not offend or be in contrast to the numerous International Treaties that were in force. Our public officials wanted to stay in control of the Trust as the trustees; however, a trustee cannot also be a beneficiary. So even though the Constitution was never designed or written for the Sovereign American people, they unknowingly became the beneficiary of this secret Trust and hence, the creation of the “propaganda” regarding our Constitutional Rights!
There are no remaining public federal employees in America. All employees whom you believe to be a part of America’s government are actually agents of a foreign government, and this definition includes the President. The federal elections are a joke on us! All of the candidates have been jointly pre-selected and pre-screened by the National Boards of the Republican and Democratic Parties well before the election process. All of our federally elected officials, appointed administrators, federal police and judges receive their paychecks through the Office of Personnel Management. OPM is a division of the International Monetary Fund, which is owned by the Rockefeller and Rothschild families and their Banking Empires, which operate in tandem with the United Nations. The IRS and Interpol are owned by the International Monetary Fund, which has been identified in an earlier version of the U. S. Army Manual as a Communist Organization.
Those Americans who do not know how to assert their beneficiary status are treated by the government and its courts as corporate fictions! The corporate governments and their courts have jurisdiction only over corporations. Corporations have no rights or jurisdiction over living people and are only provided considerations, which have been pre-negotiated in contracts by their directors. Otherwise, they’re governed totally by commercial law and so are you.
At this point, I believe I should address a “corporate fiction” for you by creating a situation you can relate to.
SITUATION: You’ve decided to go into business for yourself and you thought up a clever name for your business. Everything you’ve read and the advice received from a lawyer or friend suggests that you should incorporate your business. To incorporate is to create a business on paper. It isn’t real; it is a business in theory, which makes it a fiction. The lawyer or accountant you hired to prepare your corporation records your business with the state as a state corporation and identifies you as president of the board of directors, not the owner. Your business is now “a corporate fiction” and by recording the business as a state corporation, you no longer own it, the state owns it. You just gave your business away and made yourself an employee!
Our presumed government representatives have done the same thing to each of us. They changed each of us from “a sovereign” into “a corporate fiction.” Your corporate name is easily identifiable in that it is expressed in all capital letters on all your documents and all communications received from every government agency. [Ron: See eg: An Investigative Report Re the US Strawman UCC/Redemption Process By Barton A. Buhtz See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/An_Investigative_Report_Re_the_US_Strawman_UCC_Red_3358.shtml
The Matrix, the Strawman and WHO You Are - http://abundanthope.net/pages/Ron_71/The_Matrix_the_Strawman_and_WHO_You_Are_3030.shtml
The reason for converting every Sovereign American into a corporate fiction dates back to the Principal of Law under the King. The King is a Sovereign Monarch and dictator who, by his authority, creates the laws that govern his subjects. He is the Source of Law and therefore the law cannot be enforced against him. In America, the Source of Law is the Sovereign People and therefore no laws can be enforced against the Source, except for those specifically agreed to or defined by the original Constitution. Those laws are defined as Theft, Assault and Criminal Mischief; but since the Colonists never voted on the Constitution, none of these offenses are enforceable against a living Sovereign. They are enforceable, however, against a corporation or corporate fiction.
In theory and according to the common law, before any Sovereign can be arrested for one of these crimes a complaint must be filed with the elected Sheriff. The Sheriff, by his own authority, assembles a common law jury of the accused Sovereign’s immediate neighbors, called a Grand Jury. The neighbors hear the complaint and evidence presented to them by the complainant. They are permitted to ask questions of any witness and can subpoena anyone else who can shed light on the allegations. A majority must then decide if the accused Sovereign is to be tried by a court. All of this is done without a judge or prosecutor in attendance. This is a real Grand Jury proceeding, which is far removed from the joke perpetrated by our corporate government and courts today! What happened to our Grand Jury rights of old? The Bar Association has successfully stolen that right away from the Sovereign people, little by little, through rewrites of the Judiciary Act, so that now the American public believes that the Grand Jury is an instrument subject to the jurisdiction, right and whim of the prosecuting attorney. The prosecuting attorney controls the entire proceeding and who testifies. The judge then tells the jury what the law is and the members of the panel are always denied the opportunity to view the written law.
All of our governments are corporations and are responsible for the creation of about 800 thousand laws called statutes, which are designed to control the Sovereign people of America. Just like the King, these statutes cannot be enforced against the Source of Law, which are the living, breathing, flesh and blood Sovereign people. All of the Agents in power beginning with the King, the Vatican, the Founding Fathers and now our presumed public officials, wanted to obtain power and control over America, and the Constitution pretty much prohibited them from achieving those ends. So they began to devise ways to change the Sovereign Americans into corporate fictions.
These Agents also decided and reasoned that they cannot educate the masses without exposing their treachery, and so our private and public education must be controlled. Without any real Constitutional basis, the U. S. Department of Education was created. The Constitution made it the responsibility of each state to educate its people and several states challenged the Congress in the courts. The matter was eventually heard by the U. S. Supreme Court, which has never been a Constitutional Article III Court from its inception, which I will explain. The Supreme Court ruled that the federal government was entitled to oversee the educational requirements of “United States Citizens” by virtue of their Constitutional powers to regulate Commerce! Bad law is bad law, no matter how you turn the paper and that ruling gave the federal government the green light to initiate its “brainwashing” process of the American public.
Let me explain how the Court arrived at its ruling because these are not ignorant men. On every form you file to receive “government benefits” and even the “voter registration form” there is a question that asks: Are you a United States Citizen? YES / NO and everyone circles the YES answer. Didn’t you? Now look up the definition of a “United States Citizen” in a reputable law dictionary. You will discover that a United States Citizen is a phrase designed to identify a “corporate fiction.” Clever, isn’t it? You and every other American had no idea that you were admitting you were a corporate fiction when you circled that YES answer, and you did it under penalty of perjury!
The sovereign states had been abolished in 1790 by the adoption of Article 1 of the Statutes at Large, which converted all the sovereign states into federal districts and gave the federal government lawful jurisdiction everywhere. In consideration of the fact that the federal government is a corporation and that corporations can lawfully own other corporations and all the American subjects to be educated have admitted under penalty of perjury that they are corporations, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the corporate federal government. [See how sneaky and tricky lawyers can be? And all the more reason why lawyers should never be allowed to serve in government or in judgment of us.]
Under our corporate governments no Sovereign can lawfully be tried or convicted of any statutory crime. I recently discovered how to avoid prosecution under the Trust when a Sovereign is taken before a corporate prosecuting attorney or a judge:
First: “the Sovereign must inquire if we are on the record, and if not, insist upon it! Say nothing, sign nothing and answer no questions until you are convinced that the proceedings are being recorded!”
Secondly: all a Sovereign has to say for the record is: “I am a beneficiary of the Trust, and I am appointing you as my Trustee.”
Thirdly: the Sovereign then directs his Trustee to do his bidding! “As my Trustee, I want you to discharge this matter I am accused of and eliminate the record.”
Fourthly: if the Sovereign suffered any damages as a result of his arrest, he can direct that the Trust compensate him from the proceeds of the Court by saying; “I wish to be compensated for [X] dollars, in redemption.”
This statement is sufficient to remove the authority and jurisdiction from any prosecuting attorney or judge. The accused will be immediately released from custody with a check, license or claim he identifies as a damage. It doesn’t matter what the action involves or how it is classified by the corporate law as a civil or criminal action. It works every time! All of the Codes, Statutes and Regulations throughout the United States are a Will from the Masters to their Slaves. A Will is defined as, “An express command used in a dispositive nature.” When individuals in America are charged with a crime and warehoused in a jail, it is because they went against the Will of the Masters and not because they harmed another person. Remember that: The Will demands from us all that we are; keeps us in check; and promises us nothing!
The police officer who arrested you has been “brainwashed” into believing that he is doing the right thing, when in fact he is nothing more than an “armed slave acting as a henchman” and hired to bully and intimidate all other Slaves into submission of the Masters’ Will! This statement will probably offend most police officers, but this is fact and it is not their fault. Most police officers believe they are performing a public service and doing the right thing in the performance of duty. They have been lied to by the government and in most cases police officers are pumped full of lies more so than anybody else. Recently, the Police have all been ordered to complete paramilitary training and were told that this is essential because of the new threat of Terrorism! The people responsible for this training and brainwashing are the same people and foreign Agents who have been controlling all of us since our birth. NOTE: I’ll bet that nobody told these police officers that these suspected Terrorists may come at them from their very own government officials. So now our government officials have our police officers training to act as a military unit. [e.g.] Follow our orders and don’t think! They have succeeded in placing these officers on edge, so that their every reaction will be an over-reaction to the situation, just like Hitler’s Gestapo.
By Anon in: The Matrix and the US Constitution - http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/The-Matrix.shtml
[Some colour fonts, bolding, underlining and comments in square brackets added.].
Dr. John Dee: Occultist Behind the British Empire and Judaic New World Order - http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Dr-John-Dee-Occultist-Behind-the-British-Empire-and-Judaic-New-World-Order.shtml
The USA Isn’t a Country, It’s a Corporation! - http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/The-USA-Isn-t-a-Country-It-s-a-Corporation.shtml
The Socialism Of The Federal Reserve - http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/The-Socialism-Of-The-Federal-Reserve.shtml
How Venice Rigged The First, and Worst, Global Financial Collapse - http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/How-Venice-Rigged-The-First-and-Worst-Global-Financial-Collapse.shtml
Donald Trump Gets an Earful After Saying US-Italy Ties Go Back to Ancient Rome - http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/Donald-Trump-Gets-an-Earful-After-Saying-US-Italy-Ties-Go-Back-to-Ancient-Rome.shtml
Democracy, Deception, Deceit - they're all the same - http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Democracy-Deception-Deceit---they-re-all-the-same.shtml
The Matrix, the Strawman and WHO You Are. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Ron_71/The_Matrix_the_Strawman_and_WHO_You_Are_3030.shtml
Bankruptcy of The United States - http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/The_Bankruptcy_of_The_United_States_3135.shtml
And: Congressman Louis T. McFadden. -
http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Congressman_Louis_T_McFadden_1057.shtml And: A Modern Day Parable: The WIZARD OF OZ.http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/A-Modern-Day-Parable-The-WIZARD-OF-OZ.shtml
And: US Congress: House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933 -http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/US_Congress_House_Joint_Resolution_192_of_June_5_1_3312.shtml
And: Colonel Edward Mandell House Predicts the Creation of the STRAWMAN in the US
And: Bankruptcy of the United States. - http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/Bankruptcy_of_the_United_States_1771.shtml
And: Creation of the STRAWMAN in the US Context.- http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/Creation_of_the_STRAWMAN_in_the_US_Context_3150.shtml
BRITISH FINANCIAL WARFARE: 1929; 1931- 33 HOW THE CITY OF LONDON CREATED THE GREAT DEPRESSION. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/BRITISH_FINANCIAL_WARFARE_1929_1931-_33_HOW_THE_CI_3133.shtml
An Investigative Report Re the US Strawman UCC/Redemption Process By Barton A. Buhtz See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/An_Investigative_Report_Re_the_US_Strawman_UCC_Red_3358.shtml
The Application of Maritime Admiralty Law to US Citizens http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/The_Application_of_Maritime_Admiralty_Law_to_US_Ci_3072.shtml
THE USE OF BONDS. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/THE-USE-OF-BONDS.shtml
The Ficticious Legal Entity Called a 'Person'. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/The-Ficticious-Legal-Entity-Called-a-Person.shtmlStrawman USA: Memorandum of Law on the Name. see: http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/Strawman_USA_Memorandum_of_Law_on_the_Name_3537.shtml
INTERNATIONAL LAW ADMIRALTY / MARITIME PROCESS: ARE YOU LOST AT SEA. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/INTERNATIONAL_LAW_ADMIRALTY_MARITIME_PROCESS_ARE_Y_3528.shtml
THE MATRIX AND THE U.S. CONSTITUTION See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/THE_MATRIX_AND_THE_U_S_CONSTITUTION_3490.shtml
Who Owns You? See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Who_Owns_You_3361.shtmlhttp://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/Redeem_Your_Birth_certificate_and_Gain_Control_of__3359.shtml Redeem Your Birth certificate and Gain Control of your StrawmanBorn free to tacitly accept slavery. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/Born_free_to_tacitly_accept_slavery_3340.shtmlFive Usurys: Currency, Land, Patents, Intellectual Property and Tariffs.http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Five_Usurys_Currency_Land_Patents_Intellectual_Pro_3334.shtml
"Strawman Recapture": Regaining Legal Freedom. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Strawman-Recapture-Regaining-Legal-Freedom.shtml
The State's Control Through the Marriage Licence. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/The_State_s_Control_Through_the_Marriage_Licence_3096.shtml
Robb Ryder explains how to become a man instead of a fictional person. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/Robb-Ryder-explains-how-to-become-a-man-instead-of-a-fictional-person.shtml
Strawman: Catch-22. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/Catch-22.shtml
Understanding Strawman Redemption. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/Understanding-Strawman-Redemption.shtml
YOUR BIRTH CERTIFICATE = MONEY + FREEDOM.See:http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/YOUR-BIRTH-CERTIFICATE-MONEY-FREEDOM.shtml
Notice regarding the use of names bonded at birth and traded for value on the Stock exchange.See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Notice-regarding-the-use-of-names-bonded-at-birth-and-traded-for-value-on-the-Stock-exchange.shtml
Birth Certificate Bond--How to look it up on the stock market... See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/Birth-Certificate-Bond--How-to-look-it-up-on-the-stock-market.shtml
State child snatchers: As social workers hand back a child they falsely claim was abused, an investigation exposes one of the great scandals of our age. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/State-child-snatchers-As-social-workers-hand-back-a-child-they-falsely-claim-was-abused-an-investigation-exposes-one-of-the-great-scandals-of-our-age.shtml
Proof That Our Birth Certificate Value is on the Stock Exchange. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/Proof_That_Our_Birth_Certificate_Value_is_on_the_S_3360.shtml
MR. 'S' : US CORPORATE ´´Administrative Procedures Act´´, Title 5 USC (Updated May 3, 2010). See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/MR-S-US-CORPORATE-Administrative-Procedures-Act-Title-5-USC-Updated-May-3-2010.shtml
The Story of Your Enslavement. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/The-Story-of-Your-enslavement.shtml
Corporations Masquerading as Government in Australia & World Wide. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Corporations-Masquerading-as-Government-in-Australia-World-Wide.shtml
Australia and New Zealand governments illegitimate. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Ron_71/Australia-and-New-Zealand-governments-illegitimate.shtml
THE MONKEY OR THE ORGAN GRINDER? See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Ron_71/THE_MONKEY_OR_THE_ORGAN_GRINDER_2941.shtml
Australia - revealed. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Australia---revealed.shtml
Australian Constitution is invalid - Ex-Solicitor Wayne Leonard: Vinny Eastwood. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Australian-Constitution-is-invalid---Ex-Solicitor-Wayne-Leonard-Vinny-Eastwood.shtml
Australia: The Concealed Colony. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Australia-The-Concealed-Colony.shtml
Sovereignty and the Strawman in Australia. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Sovereignty_and_the_Strawman_in_Australia_3523.shtml
Australians' have the right to secede from the purported Commonwealth of Australia. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Australians_have_the_right_to_secede_from_the_purp_3529.shtml
The Modern Day Slavery Epidemic. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Human_Animal_Rights_104/The-Modern-Day-Slavery-Epidemic.shtml
Judaism and Christianity - Two Thousand Years of Lies - 60 Years of State Terrorism - http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Judaism-and-Christianity---Two-Thousand-Years-of-Lies---60-Years-of-State-Terrorism.shtml