categoryMenu_new
 
  Home
  EXTRAORDINARY AH Teaching from Spiritual Hierarchy
  AbundantHope
  NEW READERS! Read Here First
  Supporting AH
  Leadership of AbundantHope
  Announcements
  Regional AH Sites
  Other Sites with AH material
  Contact Us
  Becoming A Messiah
  OUR PUBLIC FORUM IS OPEN TOO ALL
  Mission Ideas
  System Busting
  Cleric Letter/English
  Translations of Cleric Letter
  AH Member Writings
  Candace
  Ron
  Rosie
  Jess
  Brian's Poetry
  James
  Giuseppe
  Esteban
  Telepathic Messages
  Candace
  Jess Anthony
  Vince
  Leonette
  John
  Adam
  Bela
  Joyce
  Hazel
  Kibo
  Peter
  Rosie
  Johan
  Lucia
  Lucia G
  Rubens
  Shellee-Kim
  Ben
  Dorothea
  Solon
  Others
  Targeted Messages
  Hano
  Light Flower
  Changing The Face Of Religion
  - Phoenix Journals - PDF in German
  Candace on Religion
  Other Spiritual Pieces
  Gems from God Like Productions
  Spiritual Nuggets by the Masters
  Phoenix Journals
  Phoenix Journals - PDF
  Telepathic Messages PDF books
  Selections from the Urantia Book
  Illustrations For The Urantia Book
  CMGSN Pieces
  THE WAVE
  Environment/Science
  David Crayford and the ITC
  Health and Nutrition
  Podcasts, Radio Shows, Video by AH
 
  Political Information
  True US History
  Human/Animal Rights
  The Miracle That Is Me
  Education
  Resources
  911 Material
  Books - eBooks
  government email/phone #'s
  Self Reliance
  Video
  Websites
  Alternative News Sources
  Art and Music
  Foreign Sites
  Health and Healing
  Human/Animal Rights
  Scientific
  Spiritual
  Vegan Recipes
  Translated Material
  Dutch
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Jess
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Candace
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Anderen
  Artikelen/berichten
  French
  Canal Jess
  Par Candace
  Other Channels
  Articles
  German
  Telepathische Nachrichten (Candace)
  Telepathische Nachrichten (Jess)
  Telepathische Nachrichten (div.)
  AH Mitgliederbeiträge (Candace)
  AH Mitgliederbeiträge (Jess)
  Spirituelle Schätze
  Italian
  Translations - Candace
  Translations - Jess
  Translations - Others
  Portuguese
  by Candace
  By Jess
  By Others
  Spanish
  Anfitriones Divinos
  Bitácoras Fénix
  Creadores-de-Alas (WingMakers/Lyricus)
  Escritos de Candace
  Escritos de Otros
  Monjoronsón
  Telemensajes de Candace
  Telemensajes de Jess Anthony
  Telemensajes de Otros
  Chinese
  By Candace
  By Jess
  By Others
  Korean Translations
  Hungarian Translations
  Swedish Translations

Search
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Political Information Last Updated: Sep 18, 2021 - 3:16:53 AM


The Covid Era’s Politicization of Expertise Means We Now Have Medics Lecturing Us on Climate Change
By Norman Lewis
Sep 18, 2021 - 3:13:56 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page Share/Bookmark

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/535115-covid-medics-lecturing-climate-change/



Norman Lewis is a writer, speaker and consultant on innovation and technology, was most recently a Director at PriceWaterhouseCoopers, where he set up and led their crowdsourced innovation service. Follow him on Twitter @Norm_Lewis

17 Sep, 2021 13:40 Get short URL

The Covid era's politicization of expertise means we now have medics lecturing us on climate change

Doctors for Extinction Rebellion during a march towards the WHO headquarters © Fabrice COFFRINI / AFP

Follow RT onRTWould you go to a geologist for a cancer diagnosis? Of course not. So why should we listen to 200 medical journal editors pontificating about the climate emergency? Their intervention in the debate is unwelcome and unnecessary.

When 200 medical journal editors publish an apocalyptic and misleading joint editorial about the dangers of temperature rises, which the Wall Street Journal's editorial team correctly noted "could have been ghost written by Greta Thunberg," it reveals that the politicization of expertise we have seen during the Covid pandemic is now limitless.

The intervention by the medical journal editors in the climate debate and its impact on public health ought to be welcomed. We certainly need a broader discussion. But when such an intervention is more about politics than medical science, in the words of the stricken Apollo 13 crew, "Houston, we have a problem."

The main problem with these journals joining the climate lobby is that they are not doing so to provoke or advance the science of climate change. They have shown themselves to be far from open to debate during the Covid crisis in their field. Many are guilty of having suppressed critical discussions in their pages during the pandemic, from the origins of the original virus, through the effectiveness or not of masks and of social distancing, to the cost of lockdowns.

High Street is dead: Covid-19 and lockdowns leave once-bustling cities like empty husks, as jobs, housing and opportunity vanish

READ MORE: High Street is dead: Covid-19 and lockdowns leave once-bustling cities like empty husks, as jobs, housing and opportunity vanish

They have been the gatekeepers, the medical experts who have maintained a monopoly on what they have chosen to be the truth - truths that we were simply expected to defer to.

Now, encouraged by their new elevated status - a status which is very much the outcome of the failure of politicians to exercise judgement over experts during the pandemic - they feel it their duty to go beyond their expertise to stoke fear ahead of the UN climate change conference COP26 in November.

As the WSJ points out, there are many dubious claims in the joint editorial, including the suggestion that no temperature rises are "safe" and that higher temperatures are linked to dire health outcomes. To back this up, the joint editorial cites a recent British Medical Journal meta-analysis of studies that examine links between extreme weather and health. They fail to discuss that most of these findings haven't been replicated, and many conflict. At best, it provides correlations which, as even schoolchildren know, does not prove causation. As the WSJ wryly comments, "obesity has increased at the same time temperatures have. That doesn't mean heat is making people fatter."

In reality, extreme cold kills more people each year (1.3million) than extreme heat (356 000), according to a study published in The Lancet last month. Deaths from cold weather have decreased as population rates have increased, mainly because more of the world's population has had more access to heating.

They need more, which means what they need is more development and access to cheaper energy.

As the WSJ points out, "about 10% of the world's population currently doesn't even have electricity, and a third still cook with stoves that use wood, coal, crop waste or dung, which "kill millions each year." If the medical journal editors were genuinely concerned about health outcomes, they would be demanding the greater use of nuclear energy, which would give poorer countries access to the cheap and clean energy they need to combat poverty, which kills more people than anything else.

But there is no mention of nuclear energy. Why not? Because this would be a powerful counterpoint to climate alarmism which sees the limitation of consumption and the lowering of development aspirations as the only solution to what they all agree is a man-made climate catastrophe.

This simply highlights that this medical profession intervention has little to do with fighting for better public health. One can only assume that their motivation has more to do with virtue signalling and opportunism. By joining the climate lobby, they are attempting to insert themselves into a debate in which they have no right to claim any authority in.

ALSO ON RT.COMForget about QAnon and other conspiracy theorists. The EU now peddles Covid-19 vaccine misinformation to undermine Brexit UK

And herein lies the real danger. By exploiting the politicization of expertise, the medical profession is now in danger of undermining the authority of science and knowledge. You do not need a doctorate in sociology to understand why conspiracy theories that are rooted in the mistrust of the so-called experts are growing as they are.

By going beyond their expertise to add political support to a one-sided and misanthropic debate about climate change, the medical profession is in danger of itself becoming a threat to public health.


Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

 




All writings by members of AbundantHope are copyrighted by
©2005-2021 AbundantHope - All rights reserved

Detailed explanation of AbundantHope's Copyrights are found here


Top of Page

Political Information
Latest Headlines
Is the FDA Worthy of Trust ?
A message to all Original peoples across Australia and around the world.
British Propaganda Campaign Incited Mass Slaughter of Communists In Indonesia in 1960s, Declassified Papers Reveal
Q - WE ARE THE PLAN
"Cash Is Not A Crime": The Raw Tyranny Of Civil Asset Forfeiture
The ‘Plandemic’ and the Great Awakening
Sunday Talks, Lee Smith: Autocratic Scrutiny Begins Right Here at Home
UN Lobbies To Criminalise Opposition To Trans Extremism
PM Trudeau and Canadian Government Ban Phrase “Let’s Go Brandon” From Any Government Correspondence
Biden Calls For The Prosecution of Anyone Refusing Subpoenas in The January 6th Riot Investigation
Yes, Virginia, There Is A Deep State
Behind NATO’s ‘cognitive warfare’: ‘Battle for your brain’ Waged by Western Militaries
Leaked Audio: Army Doctor Tells Retiring Soldier With Medical Issue to 'take vaccine or face court martial'
The Fed Is Bailing Out The Wealthy As Everyone Else Pays The Price
Oligarchic Empire Is Working Harder To Bolt Down Our Minds In Service Of Its Agendas. And THAT gives us hope...
Navy To Separate Unvaccinated Officers Under Same Category Used For Drug Offenders and Sexual Deviants
Philanthropy Is A Scam
Sunday Talks – No You’re Not Crazy, YOU are a Doer
Pope Francis Compares George Floyd To Biblical ‘Good Samaritan,' Praises BLM Rioters For Being ‘Social Poets'
Global Public Debt Hits Record High of $88 TRILLION – IMF