EXTRAORDINARY AH Teaching from Spiritual Hierarchy
  NEW READERS! Read Here First
  Supporting AH
  Leadership of AbundantHope
  Regional AH Sites
  Other Sites with AH material
  Contact Us
  Becoming A Messiah
  Mission Ideas
  System Busting
  Cleric Letter/English
  Translations of Cleric Letter
  AH Member Writings
  Brian's Poetry
  Telepathic Messages
  Jess Anthony
  Lucia G
  Targeted Messages
  Light Flower
  Changing The Face Of Religion
  - Phoenix Journals - PDF in German
  Candace on Religion
  Other Spiritual Pieces
  Gems from God Like Productions
  Spiritual Nuggets by the Masters
  Phoenix Journals
  Phoenix Journals - PDF
  Telepathic Messages PDF books
  Selections from the Urantia Book
  Illustrations For The Urantia Book
  CMGSN Pieces
  David Crayford and the ITC
  Health and Nutrition
  Podcasts, Radio Shows, Video by AH
  Political Information
  True US History
  Human/Animal Rights
  The Miracle That Is Me
  911 Material
  Books - eBooks
  government email/phone #'s
  Self Reliance
  Alternative News Sources
  Art and Music
  Foreign Sites
  Health and Healing
  Human/Animal Rights
  Vegan Recipes
  Translated Material
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Jess
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Candace
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Anderen
  Canal Jess
  Par Candace
  Other Channels
  Telepathische Nachrichten (Candace)
  Telepathische Nachrichten (Jess)
  Telepathische Nachrichten (div.)
  AH Mitgliederbeiträge (Candace)
  AH Mitgliederbeiträge (Jess)
  Spirituelle Schätze
  Translations - Candace
  Translations - Jess
  Translations - Others
  by Candace
  By Jess
  By Others
  Anfitriones Divinos
  Bitácoras Fénix
  Creadores-de-Alas (WingMakers/Lyricus)
  Escritos de Candace
  Escritos de Otros
  Telemensajes de Candace
  Telemensajes de Jess Anthony
  Telemensajes de Otros
  By Candace
  By Jess
  By Others
  Korean Translations
  Hungarian Translations
  Swedish Translations

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Political Information Last Updated: Mar 28, 2022 - 12:08:15 PM

The Assault on Gender and the Family: Jewish Sexology and the Legacy of the Frankfurt School, Part One
By Andrew Joyce, Ph.D.
Dec 29, 2015 - 4:47:57 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page Share/Bookmark


The Assault on Gender and the Family: Jewish Sexology and the Legacy of the Frankfurt School, Part One

Andrew Joyce, Ph.D.

“Sexual morality — as society, in its extreme form, the American, defines it — seems to me very contemptible. I advocate an incomparably freer sexual life.” - Sigmund Freud, 1908.

“There will be other forms in addition to our classic marriage…We will experience a broader spectrum of socially accepted forms of sexual life.” Volkmar Sigusch, 2015.


Volkmar Sigusch

Volkmar Sigusch (1940- ) may not be a familiar name to TOO readers, but for those concerned about the modern assault on traditional attitudes to gender and sexuality it should be. You might have encountered the term ‘cisgender,’ a Sigusch creation that is rapidly gaining traction in common speech. For those unfamiliar with it, it has come to replace “normal” and even the more deviant-friendly term ‘heterosexual.’ Specifically, the term refers to those “who feel there is a match between their assigned sex and the gender they feel themselves to be. You are cisgender if your birth certificate says you’re male and you identify yourself as a man.” The goal behind inventing such a bizarre and convoluted label for that which is natural and healthy is, of course, to further dilute the identity of the present and coming generations, and convince us all that there is no “normal,” only different positions within an ever more colorful spectrum.

By undermining the meaning of what it is to be male and female, one undermines the healthy concept of the family. And when the healthy concept of the family possessed by a given group is undermined, that group is pushed ever closer to genocide via (using the United Nations lexicon) “deliberate infliction of conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part,” and “imposing measures intended to prevent births.” The bumper crop of terms like ‘cisgender’, cooked up with alarming frequency by the “sexologists,” helps reduce marriage between a man and a woman and the raising of children within that union, to a mere “option” on a veritable menu of possible sexualities, gender identities, and family structures. In this brave new world there is no “normal” or “ideal” since all “models” are allegedly valid and equal.

This ideology, militant in both theory and execution, stands in opposition to the fact that healthy sexual relationships between males and females stand so far above the other “options” as to represent a gulf, rather than a spectrum, in human behavior. As F. Roger Devlin has so incisively pointed out, heterosexuality is “the natural life cycle of our species” (and all other species) while homosexuality is merely “a way for a few people with exotic tastes to achieve orgasm.” Any argument of equivalence must necessarily be preoccupied with endless abstractions, particularly abstractions surrounding the nature of romantic love, in order to push the debate away from this all-consuming biological fact.

In the same way that we witnessed the tremendous push for “marriage equality,” we have also witnessed the recent championing of those individuals who suffer from the unfortunate delusion that they have been born into the wrong body. While “transgenderism” is a severe mental illness by any definition of the term, the healthy and the normal are now lowered to the same level as these, and other, extremely dysfunctional people. Cultural relativism, once tactically deployed within the West in order to create an artificial parity between Western greatness and the meagre achievements of less advanced races and cultures, is now being deployed within our race and culture to create an artificial parity between the healthy, and the lifestyles of the degenerate and the insane. Much as in the promotion of degenerate art, the end result in both instances is the lowering of the healthy and the superior, and the raising up of the deformed, the sick, and the demented.


The image on the left is that of a pregnant woman suffering from the delusion that she is male. This “family” of the future is intended to achieve parity with, if not superiority over, the healthy family unit of old pictured on the right — the very key to our existence.

But who precisely is introducing these terms and ideas, and thus engineering dramatic change in Western society? In our attempt to answer this question, we might first return to Volkmar Sigusch. Sigusch, a German, is a self-described “sexologist,” physician and sociologist. As founder and co-editor of Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung (Journal for Sexual Research), and Director of the Institut für Sexualwissenschaft (Institute for Sexual Science) at the Goethe University in Frankfurt from 1973 to 2006, Sigusch has been described by Der Spiegel as “one of the main thinkers behind the sexual revolution of the 1960s.” The reasons why the young would-be physician evolved into a cultural radical are quite easy to surmise. After fleeing East Germany, Sigusch studied medicine, psychology and philosophy at Frankfurt. I posit the argument that it was the latter discipline that truly shaped Sigusch and did most to determine his future work. I argue this because he studied philosophy under none other than Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno, both of whom had by that date returned from the United States and re-established the notorious Frankfurt Institute for Social Research. Sigusch, a pioneer in the ongoing sexual revolution, is a Frankfurt School protégé.

The following analysis is concerned with the ongoing role of the Jewish-dominated “Culture of Critique” in advancing theories and trends designed to atomize our society. In particular it focusses on Jewish intellectual and political support for the sexually abnormal and explains it as an extension and product of the Frankfurt School’s view that “the unique role of Judaism in world history was to vindicate the concept of difference against the homogenizing forces thought to represent the essence of Western civilization. (My emphasis) ”[1] Kevin MacDonald has noted that the Frankfurt School categorized healthy Western norms, nationalisms, and close family relationships as an indication of psychiatric disorder. By contrast, in the last few decades of the nineteenth century Jewish intellectuals began championing Western society’s outcasts and non-conformers. Using these outcasts, Jewish intellectuals could fight a proxy war against Western homogeneity, and wage a clandestine campaign for the acceptance of pluralism.

By subtly supporting the position of the socially and sexually deviant, these Jewish figures could gain acceptance or inconspicuousness in the newly atomized society, while simultaneously undermining the very health of the homogenous nation. As MacDonald has noted, the Frankfurt School offered one major prescription for the sick Western world: “radical individualism and the acceptance of pluralism. People have an inherent right to be different from others and to be accepted by others as different. Indeed, to become differentiated from others is to achieve the highest level of humanity.”[2] Following from this, in a society that has succumbed to Frankfurt School ideology one would expect to find endless terms for endless identities, genders, lifestyle choices, cliques and subcultures.

An excellent example of this nightmare becoming reality is one of the latest terms concocted within our atomized society:  Otherkin. According to Google, Otherkin are people who identify as partially or entirely non-human. Some say that they are, in spirit if not in body, not human. In any normal, healthy society this nonsense would be regarded as puerile or insane, and it certainly wouldn’t be indulged. But today, in the wake of Frankfurt School victory, the Otherkin community is just one of several growing realms for the bizarre.

Equally, in a society that has succumbed to Frankfurt School ideology one would expect to find that those most markedly different from the normal and healthy would be held up as alleged examples of the best of humanity. In this regard we need only point to the astonishing and gratuitous plaudits heaped upon Bruce Jenner, and his selection as “Woman of the Year” by Glamour magazine. These developments should rightly be seen as the triumph of the Frankfurt School. However, alongside, and running through, the Frankfurt School were several other Jewish intellectual currents. Among the most important were Freudian psychoanalysis and Jewish sexology. It is to the twisted and complex history of the latter that we now turn our attention, and we will follow its path from its deepest origins to the activities of Volkmar “Cisgender” Sugusch in the present. It is the history of the engineered decomposition of a once healthy society.

Sexology: Its Non-Jewish Currents

As with several Frankfurt school protégés, Volkmar Sigusch found himself being steered into precociously high positions from a young age. In 1972, he became the then-youngest German professor of medicine at the University of Frankfurt, when he was awarded the first-ever professorship in “sexology.” The “discipline” of sexology itself deserves some discussion. Firstly, it cannot be described as a “Jewish discipline” in the same way that psychoanalysis can be. Rather, it was a discipline that started with both Jewish and non-Jewish roots, being eventually fully co-opted by Jews and used for the furtherance of Jewish interests. The first serious academic study involving sexual pathology and psychiatry is generally attributed to the Austro-German psychiatrist Richard von Krafft-Ebing (1840–1902) and his Psychopathia Sexualis (1886). In this work, Krafft-Ebing classified homosexuality as a perversion and “most sexologists following his lead judged it pathological.”[3] One of those following Krafft-Ebing’s lead, and consequently one of the founders of modern sexology was the Englishman Havelock Ellis (1859–1939).

Havelock Ellis

Havelock Ellis pioneered the non-Jewish strand of sexology by building on the roots of the earliest German-language writing on sexual behavior among humans. Among the most crucial of these early writings was that of von Krafft-Ebing. In Psychopathia Sexualis the German set the tone and structure for non-Jewish investigations into homosexuality by arguing that there were essentially four stages of “sexual inversion,” his term for homosexuality.[4] The first stage is a simple perversion of the sexual instinct, which results in no deformity of the personality itself. As an example of this type we might point to contemporaries like Douglas Murray or Jack Donovan who exhibit no noticeably unusual character traits beyond the inversion of their sexual instinct. The second stage involves defeminatio in which the whole personality of the individual undergoes a change of disposition in harmony with the changed sexual instinct. In these cases we see the effeminate, conspicuously perverted, types who are the main vectors of sexually transmitted diseases among inverts. The third stage involves a transition to metamorphosis sexualis paranoica, in which the subject at times suffers from the delusion that there has been an actual change of sex. Finally, von Krafft-Ebing argued that the fourth stage was full-blown metamorphosis sexualis paranoica, involving systematic delusions as to change in sex. In this category we may place the now much-celebrated Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner.

What united the early German scholars and the slightly later English-language pioneers of similar studies was the categorization of these behaviors as psychological disorders. Additionally, these studies were carried out during periods when birth rates were declining and, as such, the field merged more than a little with that of eugenics. Havelock Ellis himself was Vice-President of the Eugenics Education Society, the forerunner of the Galton Institute. Ellis took von Krafft-Ebing’s work further in his own Sexual Inversion (1901), in which he argued that homosexuals and those experiencing metamorphosis sexualis paranoica were (v) “congenital subjects of abnormality,” and “suffering intensely from abnormal organization.” Ellis concurred with von Krafft-Ebing (37) that such a disorder was “a functional sign of degeneration, as a partial manifestation of a neuropathic and psychopathic state.”

Ellis also went further than von Krafft-Ebing by attempting to explain why efforts should be undertaken by the state to prevent such behaviors becoming accepted and thus more commonplace. In other words, he opposed the public culture of homosexuality that has become increasingly pre-dominant since the 1960s counter-cultural revolution. Like many modern-day conservative commentators, and indeed the state of Russia today, Ellis argued that sexual inversion was “organic” only in very few cases but that its prevalence could be exacerbated in a given society due to environmental factors, particularly propaganda indicating to the otherwise normal, young, and impressionable that such behaviors and lifestyles are fashionable. One of these factors was urban life itself which (30) “renders easier the exhibition and satisfaction of this as of all other forms of perversion.” Also, although both Parmenides and Aristotle argued that heredity played a large role in the homosexuality of the Greeks, and more especially the Dorians, Ellis argued that the prevalence of sexual inversion in Greek society was rooted more in the human “herd instinct” and was due more (29) to a “state of social feeling that, however it originated, induced a large proportion of the ordinary population to adopt homosexuality as a fashion.” Once a society adopted this fashion, it contributed (239) to the “demoralizing of the manhood of a nation,” and was a sign of impending national or civilizational collapse into decadence and despondency. The goal was thus to avoid a situation in which such behaviors were “normalized” and, more crucially, to prevent the behaviors associated with these psychological disorders from becoming fashionable.

Ellis’ approach to the abnormality of sexual inversion was far from totalitarian. He argued (193) that little could be done to help the congenital invert but that “sound social hygiene should render difficult the acquisition of homosexual perversity.” Homosexuals should be prevented from coming into close contact with children since his studies showed (199) that this reduced the incidence of “acquired perversity in others” via abuse and ensuing psychological disturbance. Adhering even to just this measure would act rapidly to reduce “artificial homosexuality among the general population.” Ellis argued that it was both cruel and undesirable for society to make congenital inverts act like those around them, and especially undesirable for them to be encouraged to procreate. Ellis collected data showing (198) that the descendants of sexual inverts tended to constitute families of “neurotic and failing stock.” Rather Ellis believed (198) that occurrences of sexual inversion may be a way for Nature to begin closing a faulty branch of the family tree: “The tendency to sexual inversion in eccentric and neurotic families seems merely to be Nature’s merciful method of winding up a concern which, from her point of view, has ceased to be profitable.” For sexual inverts, according to Ellis, “the inadvisability of parenthood remains.”

For Ellis, debates about the tolerance of homosexual behavior should be lifted from the moral and religious sphere and placed squarely in the sphere of demographics and national health. However, he noted that the two spheres (206) overlapped in times of demographic crisis:

Wherever the enlargement of the population becomes a strongly-felt social need — as it was among the Jews in their exaltation of family-life, and as it was when the European nations were constituted, — there homosexuality has been regarded as a crime, even punishable with death. The Incas of ancient Peru, in the fury of their devastation, even destroyed a whole town where sodomy had once been detected. [5]

Particularly relevant to our contemporary society, Ellis also astutely pointed out (206) that “there seems to be a certain relationship between the social reaction against homosexuality and against infanticide. Where the one is regarded leniently and favorably, there generally the other is also; where the one is stamped out, the other is usually stamped out.” Ellis’ astute remarks on the context behind the Jewish outlawing of homosexuality, and the use of violence against it by ancient cultures such as the Peruvians, bear further reflection. This is particularly the case given that there is a strain of inverts within our movement who propagandize their cause by weakly arguing that antipathy towards sexual inversion is due to the influence of “Judeo-Christian morals” rather than ethnically universal concerns around demographic health.

This demographic concern was vital to the interpretations and views of non-Jewish sexologists. Since homosexuality, permitted to spread via fashion, leading to “acquired perversion” in the young, is socially linked to acceptance of abortion and infanticide, it acts to “check the population” and should thus be controlled and quarantined in a state that wishes to improve its demographic health.

The means of quarantine suggested by Ellis were not harsh or unreasonable. Society should refrain (215) from crushing the subject of abnormality with shame but, in an eerie premonition of the “Pride parades,” he argued that society should never allow the invert to “flout his perversion in its face and assume that he is of finer clay than the vulgar herd.” Since the genetic dead-end facing inverts was, in Ellis’ view, penalty enough, society should confine its approach to the sexually abnormal to the “protection of the helpless member of society against the invert.” Essentially, Ellis’ advice was to decriminalize the behavior of inverts and end societal shame surrounding it, but also to prevent inverts from flouting their abnormality, and from having physical, pedagogical or ideological access to children. Such was the approach of a broad swathe of opinion in mainstream (non-Jewish) sexology up to Weimar period. And this is largely the position taken by the Russian state today.

The research and theories on homosexuality initiated by Kraft-Ebbing and Ellis are more than a century old, so there is no reason to take them as gospel truth. However, this strain of research, had it retained its dominance, may well have perpetuated an adaptive public culture that privileged heterosexuality, male-female bonding, and the rearing of children.

There was, however, another strain of thought within the embryonic field of sexology, and it is to this strain that the modern toleration and promotion of sexual delinquency owes its most significant debt. This strain can be identified as a Jewish intellectual concoction because its four key thinkers and ethnically activists were the nineteenth-century German-Jewish psychiatrists Albert Moll, Iwan Bloch, Magnus Hirschfeld and Albert Eulenberg, with able support from other Jewish figures like Hermann Joseph Lowenstein, Julius Wolf, Max Marcuse, and Eduard Bernstein. Despite some occasional minor disagreements between them, these Jewish sexologists and social commentators were united in advancing theories of sexual inversion that moved away from interpretations involving themes like degeneration, demographic decline and biological reality, and instead towards Talmudic abstractions involving the nature of romantic love and the allegedly fluid nature of gender and sex. As one might predict, running through all of their works is a clear preoccupation with the need for “tolerance” and social pluralism, the denial of human difference, and a fanatical opposition towards non-Jewish attempts to develop racial science. It is to the specific theories and machinations of these individuals that we now turn our attention.

Go to Part II.

[1][1] K. MacDonald, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth Century Intellectual and Political Movements (2002), 161.
Ibid, 164.
E. Mancini, Magnus Hirschfeld and the Quest for Sexual Freedom: A History of the First International Sexual Freedom Movement (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), 7.
R. von Krafft-Ebing, Psychopathia Sexualis (Eighth Edition, 1893), 188.
[5] For Ellis as an evolutionist, a good indication of the pathology of homosexuality is that it is a reproductive dead end. Homosexuality has always been a puzzle to evolutionary biologists given that same-sex attraction would tend to lower reproductive success. However, since homosexuality has generally been stigmatized in historical societies, men with homosexual tendencies often married and procreated in order to avoid the penalties of being publicly homosexual — Ellis’ example of Orthodox Judaism being a case in point given the very intense pressures to have children combined with official condemnation of homosexuality in traditional Jewish society. This would tend to keep genes for homosexuality in the population, and perhaps even result in high levels of homosexuality, as some observers have noted to the case among Jews. In the contemporary world where homosexuality has become far more accepted, pressures for marriage and family are greatly lessened, constituting a selection pressure against genes predisposing for homosexuality. Ironically therefore, the public culture of homosexuality actually results in selection against genes predisposing for homosexuality, even while (if Ellis is correct) encouraging some to be homosexual who would not be so inclined if the culture retained sanctions against homosexuality.


45 Comments to "The Assault on Gender and the Family: Jewish Sexology and the Legacy of the Frankfurt School, Part One"

  1. December 28, 2015 - 3:09 am | Permalink

    I am a Man . My closest Friends are Men. Men with whom i would not hessitate to engage in a warring ” Maenner-bund” , should the situation call for it , joining in Trust and Spiritual Comradship for a common Goal. But to have some of these Men put his Dick in my Ass-hole or Mouth , would be as revolting to me as to them and any suggestion of such would immidiately end all friendship , however horny ( testosterone – reeking ) we would be . Men evaluate each other based on Skills ,Mutual Tact and Trust .. not based on Erotic Attraction . That is reserved for Females except when joking about that Gender and the Sexual Act . I find the discussion a bit boring and approaching manipulation of Realities among Men ..with an Errand , one could even suspect. As a humouristic Ex Father in Law , being in Pain after having undergone Hemorhoidectomia reflectively mumbled: ” I wonder what is so funny about homosexuality “. Apart from that .. I agree .. we need “Maenner – Bunds” comprised of young men with Martial Skills .. more than ever, willing to fight the White European Cause . The problem is.. where do we find these ? The Fundamentalist Invasion Hordes seem to have plenty such Spear-heads.

  2. Sam J.'s Gravatar Sam J.
    December 27, 2015 - 10:31 pm | Permalink

    “…As F. Roger Devlin has so incisively pointed out, heterosexuality is “the natural life cycle of our species” (and all other species) while homosexuality is merely “a way for a few people with exotic tastes to achieve orgasm.”…”

    A good practice when referring to any of the alternate sexuality would be to refer to them as “Wankers”.

    Example,”My daughter is a lesbian”. You’re reply,”oh she’s a Wanker”. Same goes for homosexuals, etc.

  3. Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
    December 27, 2015 - 9:55 pm | Permalink

    I hope that through genetic engineering homosexuality can one day be eliminated. No one wants to be born a homosexual, nor should they be.

  4. Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
    December 27, 2015 - 7:06 am | Permalink

    I wish that Andrew Joyce would publish a book of his collected essays.
    “Cultural relativism, once tactically deplyed within the West in order to created an artificial parity between Western greatness and the meager achievements of less advanced races and cultures is now being deployed within our race and culture to created an artificial parity between the healthy and the lifestyles of the degenerate and the insane.” All of the slaves must be equal on the Global Plantation, otherwise the Tribes exalted position as overseers could be made difficult.

    • Andrew Joyce's Gravatar Andrew Joyce
      December 27, 2015 - 8:56 am | Permalink

      Many thanks for your interest Karen – I am nearing completion of an edited volume.

      • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
        December 28, 2015 - 10:32 am | Permalink

        I can’t wait for this to come out. Not much $$$ in our household, but I will sure put some aside now.

  5. L. A. Waddell's Gravatar L. A. Waddell
    December 27, 2015 - 1:52 am | Permalink

    Havelock Ellis is a very interesting author. He was much more intelligent than the evolutionary psychologists of today with their pseudo-scientific banalities.

  6. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 26, 2015 - 5:37 pm | Permalink

    “genes for homosexuality” I suspect are a mirage. The over-abundance of male versus female homosexuals points to hormonal irregularities in the developmental phase that sees the embryo go from its default female template to the male, a convoluted and delicate one where male physical and mental sexual orientation is laid down. It may well be that the secular decline in serum testosterone across all human population groups is also contributing to a rise in the incidence of male homosexuality.

    The deliberate exaltation of fringe behaviour repellent to the majority I believe is designed to elicit a popular reaction and thereby offer a pretext for the ramming-through of hate legislation, the Pharisees hiding safely behind the gay shield.

    • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
      December 27, 2015 - 8:41 am | Permalink

      It may well be that the secular decline in serum testosterone across all human population groups is also contributing to a rise in the incidence of male homosexuality.

      After all is said & done, it seems that some homos are indeed “born that way” and some are lured into it for social and psychological reasons.

      Male homos of all ages aren’t necessarily testosterone-deficient and neither are their fathers; there’s no proof of this. Something went wrong during gestation that is far more complicated, from what I read.

      However, it is true that effeminate-type males who are definitely attracted to girls are easier to convince into a homosexual way of life.

      It’s not all one thing with one cause, not in my judgment in any case.

      • AnotherAmalektie's Gravatar AnotherAmalektie
        December 27, 2015 - 12:44 pm | Permalink

        BarkingMad wrote:

        effeminate-type males who are definitely attracted to girls are easier to convince into a homosexual way of life

        Really. So, define “effeminate”.
        There is no way anyone could ever convince me to do something like that. I’m calling bullsh*t on you.

        Using myself as an example:
        Born in Europe (some noticeable European mannerisms, so I’ve been told)
        Occasionally cross my legs when sitting (mostly due to lower back and leg pain)
        Sit down to pee (easier than cleaning up splatter)
        Slender (up until a few years ago, now I have a gut)
        Fairly articulate
        Single (never married)
        Generally prefer the company of older women, instead of younger ones (guys, you know where I’m coming from)
        Owner of two cats
        House almost paid off
        Don’t drink (for all intents and purposes)
        Don’t smoke (cigarettes ;-) )
        Don’t hang out with “the guys” (no bar scene, yuck)
        Like computer and boardgames
        Occasional sense of humor
        I don’t know what else…

        The talk at work a few years ago got so bad I finally had to come out of the closet as a straight man. Goddammit.

        • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
          December 28, 2015 - 10:38 am | Permalink

          I should have mentioned that I was referring to boys and teenagers. It is not so much “effeminacy” but maybe lack of popularity, etc. among girls that make them surefire victims of older, confirmed homos. I was told (yes, I really was) that if you are a virgin male, shy, can’t get the hang of things, etc. and some older guy comes along, courts you pretending to be “just friends”, then gives you the busiiness, you will stop trying to get the girls interested in you. Because there is no shortage whatsoever of older homos who’ll treat you real good, for awhile, anyway. I have a relative (by marriage) who confided this in me and I was so shocked I could not even speak. He had called me up looking for my approval for what he had done. (Or should I say, was talked into.)

      • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
        December 27, 2015 - 2:08 pm | Permalink

        If a man is attracted to girls, effeminate or not, it would be quite a job attracting him to homosexuality. In my personal experiences prior to marriage, I found that men considered effeminate were actually either sophisticated and/or well-educated and were mocked as effeminate by less endowed men who actually, though they’d never admit it, envied them.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        December 27, 2015 - 2:20 pm | Permalink

        @ Barking:
        It’s the amount of testosterone and the timing of its introduction into the developing embryo that sets out life-long physical characteristics and sexual orientation not the adult testosterone level.

        The secular decline in average serum testosterone affects of American males – homo and heterosexual – is not yet understood.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        December 27, 2015 - 2:51 pm | Permalink

        I’m not convinced by the argument that culture is transforming heterosexual men into homosexuals. I see the promotion of the gay lifestyle just as a way of demoralizing the majority. The writer Theodore Dalrymple sums it up thus:
        “In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is…in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.”

  7. nom nom nom's Gravatar nom nom nom
    December 26, 2015 - 2:10 pm | Permalink

    I’m a rich man born in a poor man’s body.

    What’s that called?

    • December 26, 2015 - 6:41 pm | Permalink

      How about a Jew (Volkmar Sigusch?) born in a honest man’s body?

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      December 26, 2015 - 8:31 pm | Permalink


    • T. Juana's Gravatar T. Juana
      December 26, 2015 - 10:27 pm | Permalink

      A Poverty of Riches.

    • AnotherAmalektie's Gravatar AnotherAmalektie
      December 27, 2015 - 7:59 am | Permalink

      Danny DeVito?

    • December 27, 2015 - 9:37 am | Permalink

      Later – we’re studying genitalia right now.

  8. Richard Cley's Gravatar Richard Cley
    December 26, 2015 - 1:44 pm | Permalink

    This is a very well written article for what it is, but the perspective is too narrow and does not cover the ‘vision’ aspect of our new society and how we get to the start point.

    Ending homosexuality because it is either morally wrong or it harms us demographically is only half the story. And ending it, which could only now be achieved in a long convoluted battle with perverse Jewish science, would be self defeating.

    We need a ‘vision’ to work towards and it needs to be more than the end of a Jewish dictatorship over our people. It needs to be more than the repatriation of all invaders. It needs to be greater than a return to past glories.

    Historically homosexuality has been vital to the health of all European peoples prior to the advent of Christianity. It has been first that Christianity ‘officially’ demonised it and secondly that Judaism now promotes it to deconstruct Christianity.

    Prior to Christianity homosexuality had a specific purpose across all of Europe, the Slavic world and Scandinavia. Even across Russia as far as the Urals was the practise essential. (Moscow was originally a Viking settlement).

    The key area homosexuality held sway was the mannerbund, that warrior society devoted to young fighters who ‘died for Odin’ in English, though you might be more familiar with the German ‘Totem fur Wotan’ (used today by the Misanthropic Division and many smaller Heathen groups).

    The mannerbund was the ancient glue that held our societies together. It practiced brotherhood through spiritual commitment to the Gods of the community and physical commitment to all other warriors within the mannerbund through training in martial arts.

    The mannerbund also produced the famed berserkers who went in to battle naked and fought to the bitter end. Their fight was as much spiritual and physical and their martial prowess overawed all other fighters.

    The society, however, needed physical comfort. Women were not permitted consequently men within the mannerbund to male partners. No matter how abhorent this may be to modern readers this was how pre-Christian European society was and it was these warriors that fought and won their people’s freedom.

    Thus we must turn to the ‘Vision’. What our society lacks most of all are ‘martially trained men’ who have both a spiritual connection with our Heathen ambitions and the physical homogeneity that a warrior band must have to fight effectively.

    While our ‘Vision’ is a wholesome future with man-woman families and no homosexuality within the broader society, it may well be that to insure our independence from the wider Jewish dominated world we will need mannerbunds to provide us with the ‘most beneficial’ warriors. In that case homosexuality in some form may actually be a vital ingredient to our independence from the Jew!

    May I ask you to not be so hasty in your outright condemnation of this topic?

    • Andrew Joyce's Gravatar Andrew Joyce
      December 26, 2015 - 3:22 pm | Permalink

      Here we have an excellent example of the kind of pro-homosexual/pederasty “mannerbund” propaganda that occasionally circulates in our movement. Thank you for providing it. For the healthy: take note and then ignore.

      • T. Juana's Gravatar T. Juana
        December 28, 2015 - 11:26 am | Permalink

        Sounds like an attempt to turn a vice into a virtue.

        “Without jewish skills all would collapse” is similar.

    • Wishful Thinking's Gravatar Wishful Thinking
      December 26, 2015 - 3:40 pm | Permalink

      homosexuality has been vital to the health of all European peoples prior to the advent of Christianity.

      The key area homosexuality held sway was the mannerbund, that warrior society devoted to young fighters

      Is there any compelling argument for this? While homosexuality appears to be a somewhat common occurrence in all cultures, the idea that ancient European warrior bands were held together by homosexuality seems to rest on little actual evidence, buttressed by a whole lot of wishful thinking on the part of homophiles.

      It practiced brotherhood through spiritual commitment to the Gods of the community and physical commitment to all other warriors within the mannerbund through training in martial arts.

      Homosexuals often seem to project homosexuality on any male bonding, but it appears that “homoeroticism” is in the eye of the beholder.

      It’s quite a stretch to suggest that practicing martial arts together is somehow homosexual.

      Women were not permitted consequently men within the mannerbund to male partners.

      Again, this seems to be wishful thinking. The evidence that the warrior bands were “denied” women partners and instead bonded with each other through homosexuality seems completely lacking.

      Even in the well known Greek cultures that practiced pederasty did not deny normal marriage to the members.

      it may well be that to insure our independence from the wider Jewish dominated world we will need mannerbunds to provide us with the ‘most beneficial’ warriors. In that case homosexuality in some form may actually be a vital ingredient to our independence from the Jew!

      I’ve read quite a bit of James O’Meara’s work, but he’s never really made any compelling arguments for his ideal of the “mannerbund.” The original authors about the mannerbund which he references second or third hand had next to nothing to say about homosexuality in the mannerbund, according to every author that references them, with the sole exception of O’Meara.

      Perhaps ironically, it’s the celibate Catholic priesthood that seems closest to his idea of a “gay brotherhood.”

      • December 27, 2015 - 12:38 pm | Permalink

        I agree that the proposal that homosexuality was a general characteristic of the mannerbunde needs a lot more support than I have ever seen. These were predatory groups of men, and women were often the spoils of conquest, as among the Vikings, where concubinage of women seized in their raiding seem to have occurred. Evolutionists have documented how women have often been seized in warfare, from the Mongols to the Yanomamo.

        • December 27, 2015 - 1:22 pm | Permalink

          Just came across a Breitbart article on St. Thomas Aquinas’s views of Islam illustrating again the idea that women were often spoils of war:

          Aquinas contrasts the spread of Christianity with that of Islam, arguing that much of Christianity’s early success stemmed from widespread belief in the miracles of Jesus, whereas the spread of Islam was worked through the promise of sensual pleasures and the violence of the sword.

          Mohammad, Aquinas wrote, “seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasure to which the concupiscence of the flesh goads us. His teaching also contained precepts that were in conformity with his promises, and he gave free rein to carnal pleasure.”

        • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
          December 28, 2015 - 2:14 pm | Permalink

          When the Troy war ended, all the princesses of Troy became slaves and concubines of the victorious Greek kings.
          The Romans seized the Sabines to found Rome.
          So, I mean, not only Vikings had concubines who were prey of war.

    • Richard Cley's Gravatar Richard Cley
      December 26, 2015 - 9:06 pm | Permalink

      The problem with people who deny the validity of the mannerbund in western society while at the same time preserving certain roles to the sexes, which the owner of this site does, is that such a position prevents a tendency (homosexuality) to healthily express itself in a controlled way.

      This is very short sighted because it promotes the perversion to be hidden by authorities that practice homosexuality, such as priest with choir boy. Further it promotes corruption in that the choir boy is held in thrall or will fail in the eyes of a spiritual entity through which the boy had access via the priest.

      Quite simply if you deny the existence of the homosexual perversion which readily manifests itself in single sex environments, then you clearly have some latent homosexual pattern within your own make up that you have failed to face up to.

      And your inability to admit this means that in your ‘vision’ you will create the very circumstances you (and I) abhor. It will repeatedly raise its head because you have given no outlet for it to manifest itself.

      It is very easy for you to put down my mannerbund comment. Your first missive from my first post was positive,your second dismissive because I disagree with your unwritten personal view. Make up your mind: either welcome all comment or cancel all comment so you don’t have to disagree with it.

      It is a bit pathetic if no opposite comment is permitted because it shows up a weakness in your ‘vision’: an inability to accept debate without your ‘negative provisor to read and ignore’. This implies there is no debate in your ‘vision’. No alternative within your ‘vision’.

      Just how long will your ‘vision’ last after your death? And is your rigid one path ‘vision’ even viable? No it is not. History tells us that the one constant in life is adapting to circumstances: one specific feature of life that most nationalists can’t cope with…which is why I take a solitary path from the terrifyingly narrow mindedness of most modern National Socialists.

      Totem fur Wotan…as I am wont to say.

    • PaleoAtlantid's Gravatar PaleoAtlantid
      December 27, 2015 - 4:29 am | Permalink

      Your description applies more to ancient Sparta than Viking warriors.

      • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
        December 28, 2015 - 2:25 pm | Permalink

        It is true pederasty and homosexualty were present in the classical world ( Greek-roman), but they were never prevalent nor promoted, at least in the classical periods ( V-III centuries BC for Greece, VIII BC- II AD centuries for Rome). Furthermore they distinguished between men who behaved like men ( taking) and those behaving like women ( giving), those being despised, ridiculed and kept at the margins of the “high” society. One can read some Plato or Cicero and see by himself.

    • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
      December 27, 2015 - 8:51 am | Permalink

      The society, however, needed physical comfort. Women were not permitted consequently men within the mannerbund to male partners. No matter how abhorent this may be to modern readers this was how pre-Christian European society was and it was these warriors that fought and won their people’s freedom.

      So, I guess the reason the Japs lost the war was that they preferred to use “Comfort Women” instead of porking each other? My, my, who’d have thought!

  9. December 26, 2015 - 10:32 am | Permalink

    Jews are master wordsmiths who have transformed western language into a polyglot of inane terminology and acronyms. The purpose of the acronym is to create jargon that can only be understood by “insiders”.

    Yet when the intention is for the acronym to be more or less widely understood, it is assigned a cutesy or maudlin code, e.g. the intentionally misnamed “Patriot Act”. Look at the perverse twisting it took to fit the name of that act into the desired acronym: P-roviding A-ppropriate T-ools R-equired to I-ntercept and O-bstruct T-errorism. Who could remember the actual name? Yet the maudlin acronym always strikes a deep chord within the subconscious minds of the American sheeple.

    In fact the acronym is little more than an open extension of the Jew’s penchant for secrecy, an absolute necessity if they are to survive among their hosts.

    As the Soviet Union was a society defined by its secrets, America is now a nation of secrets. “Need to know” is a favorite phrase among military people who embrace the concept of secrecy as if, like breathing, is an absolute necessity for survival. Those on the “inside” of such military and government secrecy are invariably smug in their “secret knowledge.” Yet such people are truly idiots, as they fail to realize that their knowledge is as every bit as compartmentalized as any outsider access they guard against.

    These low level “insiders” in fact only know a tiny portion of the overall secrets they guard so jealousy. The classic example of this was the unusually, appropriately named “Manhattan Project”. Most of the lower level technicians had no idea of the ultimate design of the device they were constructing, knowledge that was only provided on a “need to know basis.”

    While top-level scientists well knew and understood the destructive capabilities of the device, they had no idea of where it might be used or who would be on the receiving end of their efforts. Once again, such knowledge was only provided to the military personal with a “need to know.” Is it any wonder that from the very beginning, the world’s nuclear development programs have been shot through with Jews manning (peopling?) the highest level positions?

    In fact, only those at the very top levels of control have the overall picture. Thus the only people with a full, top to bottom picture of where nuclear technology was heading, were those funding the project – that would be the people creating and controlling the nation’s money supply.

    Even presidents like FDR and Harry Truman had no real idea of what Jews were up to with their nuclear program. These presidents were privy only to the briefest explanations of the technology. By the time Truman was sworn into office, Hiroshima and Nagasaki had long been the established targets to test the effects of the “A-bomb”.

    The proof in this is that from the very beginning of the war, bomber crews were told not to target these cities. Of course they had no need to know the reason for this order was because project financiers wanted empirical data from two “virgin” cities to validate the results of their massive investment.

    Thus, such levels of secrecy go beyond the very highest levels of government, as the Jews distrust everyone who is not one of their tribal insiders. This penchant for secrecy goes back to the secret ceremonies of the Temple.

    For example, despite the prohibition of consuming blood, Temple priests regularly drank sacrificial blood within the inner sanctum of the Tabernacle and later Temple. The consumption of blood is reflected in ceremonies like the Eucharist and the “blood liable” where the blood of sacrificial Christians, typically children, is mixed with dough to make “Hamantashen”, a pastry consumed during the Purim festival. Is it any wonder Jew’s demand for secrecy surrounds virtually all their activities?

    Such ceremonial secrecy was later transferred to secret societies set up for goyim, like the Masons and Illuminati. One of the foundations of Jewish culture is the B’nai Brith. This translates to the rather innocuous sounding “Children of the Covenant”. However, these “Children” of the Covenant were actually an all male, secret brotherhood defined by a special mark known as the “bris” or cut. Thus, B’nai Brith actually translates to “Brotherhood of the Cut”. Their special mark, the “cut”, was in fact circumcision. How much more secret can a physical mark be?

    Once again, this penchant for secrecy is merely a reflection of the Jew’s neurosis of having their gentile host discover their destructive policies. One finds the penchant for secrecy and secret ceremonies rampant in every Judeaized society. Because Jews have embraced and promoted secrecy with concepts like “national security”, the gullible goyim have forgotten that secrecy is truly an anathema to a free society – just ask any former Soviet citizen.

    Interestingly the Soviet Union was the first modern state deluged with cryptic acronyms, GPU, NKvD and so forth. The acronym didn’t really catch on in America until the post WWII era. Today confusion reigns when one is required to continually stop to decode cryptic acronyms. People listening in and hearing unfamiliar acronyms, are essentially listening to a foreign language that requires translation.

    As with their other culturally destructive policies, such as “gay rights” and “transgenderism”, the Jew’s destruction of our language has left us unable to communicate effectively within a homogeneous cultural framework. The inability to communicate ideas effectively or to be excluded from “secret” knowledge provides yet another method of loosening and dissolving the social bonds that bind our culture.

    My personal pet peeve is the idiotically misnamed C.E. and B.C.E.. Common era? What era would that be and what is “common” to, or about, this undefined era? What about B.C.E., what went before the “common era,” an uncommon era?

    This literary gymnastic feat is nothing more than Jews wrecking the language because of their hatred for all things Christian. Jews find terms like B.C. – Before the Christian era and A.D. -anno Domini or “in the year of the lord” intolerable and have therefore replaced them with terms that have no real meaning or purpose other than to assuage the Jew’s neurosis and since Jews own and control the press and publishing houses, they can easily pervert the language to suit their needs and desires.

    Essentially the idea is total moral, cultural and linguistic relativism that will ultimately be defined by – guess who. The goal is a complete lack of standards. As with the Jew’s economic platitude that nothing has intrinsic value, value can only be determined by “what the market will bear”, (translate as “what the sucker will pay”), ultimately the goal is to both establish and/or reject all cultural, legal, economic, political and religious standards to serve the Jew’s destructive agendas.

    Perhaps the most glaring example of this trend was the insipid, moral relativism exhibited by Bill Clinton during the Lewinsky affair. The most current example is how Jews define the Christmas tree as a religious symbol. As such the tree, cannot be displayed as a “Christmas tree” on public property, yet the Menorah is not a religious symbol and therefore can be displayed on public property in forms like the fifty foot version dumped front of the Black House (Hey! Redefining the culture works both ways!)

    Only the densest idiot could come to grips with such obviously absurd claims and definitions. Judging by the Jew’s success in promoting such definitions and concepts, America is inundated with naves and fools.

    • Richard Cley's Gravatar Richard Cley
      December 26, 2015 - 9:42 pm | Permalink

      Your comment about FDR and Truman is incorrect. Every president since the founding of the Federal Reserve has been abundantly clear minded about the Jewish involvement in US governance.

      John Kennedy passed a law permitting his government to issue debt free currency straight in to the economy. He, just as all previous Presidents, was aware of the detrimental effect of state sponsored usuary upon the nation.

      Look at Colonel House and his adoption of Jewish (and Zionist) ideas in the treaty negotiations in Versailles in 1919 promoted by Dulles. The latter was a Jew and his family had open access to and influence within, all the higher echelons of the US administration over the following three decades.

      To claim FDR and Truman had no knowledge of the Jewish influence is naive at best and shows a clear lack of historical knowledge despite your rather verbose Jewish language style.

      The Russians believe a Jewish banker gave Hitler $2billion to reconstruct Germany. The Jews were the first to declare war on National Socialist Germany. It was in all the major newspapers. Kristal nacht occured 7 days after this declaration of war and was a direct response to the Jewish war mongering.

      To claim US presidents were not aware of the Jewish involvement in US politics shows up your ignorance of international affairs and domestic issues. And I am English and never studied US history but know this about your nation.

      • December 27, 2015 - 12:37 pm | Permalink

        Evidently my statements about the presidents was unclear. I never intended to imply these men were unaware of Jewish influence in American politics.

        What I was trying to impart was how unaware they were of the details surrounding the Jew’s top secret nuclear project known as “Manhattan.” The Federal Reserve central bankers funding the Manhattan project kept everyone, including presidents, congressmen and other top politicos on a need to know basis, not only about the technical details of the project, but the overall direction the program was intended to take.

        The presidents were provided only the briefest outline necessary to understand the immediate situation concerning the intended use of the weapon. The overall direction and design the technology would eventually take would remain hidden from the goyim for some time, e.g. feeding A-bomb technology to the Jew’s Soviet terrorist state as well as to the state that would eventually become known as Israel,

        Bernard Baruch, one of FDR’s most trusted advisers, used to have his morning meeting with the president while he was bathing. During these morning meetings the president would make statements like, “Well Mr. Baruch, what shall we set the price of gold at today?”

        Baruch stated he was appalled at FDR’s political and economic ignorance (now there’s a clue if ever there was one). With stories like this from major Jewish sources, how could anyone possibly think FDR had been unaware of Jewish involvement in American politics?

        The Jew’s private central bank, known as the “Federal Reserve”, was ratified in 1913. How could Wilson have missed that major turning point in Jewish influence over America’s economy?

        Concerning Colonel House, while I have long suspected he was of Jewish descent, I have never been able to find any references to his ethnic origins.

        Like the Russians, I am quite certain Jewish bankers funded Hitler’s nascent National Socialist party. Realizing their mistake and feeling that Hitler had double-crossed their political ambitions for Germany, world Jewry immediately declared war on National Socialist Germany.

        While you are quite correct that the fabled Kristal Nacht occurred shortly after the Jews declaration of war, you are incorrect in stating the event was “a direct response to the Jewish war mongering.” Krystal Nacht was a false flag fomented by Jews to advance their cause against Germany.

        Just at it is typically Jews who paint swastikas on synagogues and Jewish landmarks, it was Jews who began smashing windows of Jewish shops in Germany. Of course, the average German citizen, victimized and impoverished by Jewish speculators, soon joined in the fun, despite orders from top Reich officials that the violence was to stop immediately.

        Just as the attack on the trade towers was designed to inflame American passions against Muslims and provide reason for a declaration of war on Iraq, Krystal Nacht was a false flag operation designed to stir up anti-German passions among Americans and other western nations and provide an excuse to declare war on Germany. This should be quite clear to anyone who has studied these events. When assessing questionable history, the first question should always be “Cui Bono.”

        As for my “rather verbose Jewish language style” I suppose it might have come from my upbringing within a heavily Judeaized culture. As they say, when one lies with the dogs they wake up with fleas. However, if you knew my background, you would realize how absurd the notion is that I might be Jewish.

        In any event, I am grateful someone is paying attention and calling out perceived inaccuracies on my part. Thanks for taking the time to read and comment on my thoughts and keep nailing down those inaccuracies.

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          December 27, 2015 - 3:49 pm | Permalink

          Concerning Colonel House, while I have long suspected he was of Jewish descent, I have never been able to find any references to his ethnic origins.

          Whatever Arch Stanton may suspect, Richard Cley never specifically wrote above that House was a Jew. Rather, he made the even more poorly founded claim that John Foster Dulles was a Jew and, what is more, that the entirety of the Dulles clan was Jewish—presumably including Wilson’s wartime Secretary of State, Robert Lansing, J. F. Dulles’s uncle by marriage.

          Life would be ever so much simpler if every egotistical maniac, every man with a plan to rule the world with a rod of iron—for its own good, of course, and with benevolence to be assumed by the ruled no matter how thin the evidence of benevolence, whether of execution or intent, might lie on the ground—could simply be slotted away as a Jew, with nothing more to be said in the matter!

          Whether such sandbox fantasies are more or less futile than Mr. Cley’s hardly original dream-caricatures of the Norse and Germanic Männerbund as a queers-in-clover utopia I leave to others to decide. That it is a transparently tendentious rationale, as Dr. Joyce adumbrated in his appropriately curt dismissal of Mr. Cley’s other comment, certainly goes without saying.

        • December 27, 2015 - 9:32 pm | Permalink

          As I wrote “I have never been able to find any references to his (house’s) ethnic origins.” Therefore I never assigned any ethnic status to Colonel House, but his actions are quite comparable to later Jewish presidential handlers like Aurthur Krim – LBJ, Bernard Baruch – FDR and Rahm Emmanuel – Obama, which is why he is suspect. However, all evidence I have found points to the fact he was simply a Texan who had once lived in Houston.

          While it is true not every egotist, megalomaniac or psychopath is a Jew, there is ample evidence that an unusually large proportion of Jews do fit those “clinical” descriptions. And these Jews are the vectors responsible for the dissolution and destruction of all Western civilization.

          While non-Jews hold a certain responsibility for their actions, in this regard, they would never have the chance were it not for Jews opening up the west’s social systems to the normalization of criminality.

          After all, name another race that has constructed and forced a lie on the magnitude of the Hallowedhoax. How many rank and file Jews fall into line in the continued advancement of that lie? What other race can pool so many of its average members to knowingly support such a monstrous lie? I have never found evidence of another.

          National Socialist Germany was a prime example of what a white nation is like without the Jew’s pernicious influence gnawing away at the host culture.

    • PaleoAtlantid's Gravatar PaleoAtlantid
      December 27, 2015 - 9:08 am | Permalink

      The main reason Jews were hugely involved in the Manhattan Project is because the A-Bombs were intended to be used on women and children in Germany. Jews such as Oppenheimer were literally creaming their jeans over that murderous prospect. Fortunately the war in Europe ended a bit early, so the blood lust of the tribe was slated by picking a Christian city, Nagasaki, for destruction.

      • T. Juana's Gravatar T. Juana
        December 27, 2015 - 12:05 pm | Permalink


        • PaleoAtlantid's Gravatar PaleoAtlantid
          December 27, 2015 - 4:24 pm | Permalink

          Ok, a bit of exaggeration.

      • December 27, 2015 - 12:39 pm | Permalink

        Spot on. I only wish my thoughts and comments could be so brief and succinct.

  10. December 26, 2015 - 5:11 am | Permalink


    There’s some kind of SJW movement afoot attempting to have black socks banned due to their inherent racism.

    More here, …

  11. Jas's Gravatar Jas
    December 26, 2015 - 2:47 am | Permalink

    In fact in the second edition of Psychopathia Sexualis it remove homosexuality as a form of perversion. I personally think homosexuality harmful propaganda (along with asexual).It lowers demographics and does not allow a good selection of offspring.But it can not believe homosexuality comparable to other forms of sexuality more harmful.

    • Andrew Joyce's Gravatar Andrew Joyce
      December 26, 2015 - 8:59 am | Permalink

      The second edition was edited by the Jewish sexologist Albert Moll. In Part Two I discuss the significance of this.

  12. K.K.'s Gravatar K.K.
    December 26, 2015 - 2:05 am | Permalink

    I suspect that another reason for the rise of all kinds of sexual perversions, specifically regarding white males, is the opting out of the natural man-woman pettern by weak pathetic ‘men’ who feel inadequate or insufficiently confident in getting with a (desirable) woman.

    A couple of weeks ago I’ve spent a week in Louvain, a (still) beautiful Belgian student town where I’ve lived and studied for a couple of years some 6 years prior. I was horrified at how this once 99% White town has been flooded by all kinds of Arabs and Blacks, majority of them young men, in the span of just a few years. Even more horrifying is the amount of race-mixing I’ve witnessed. Without exaggerating, the prettiest girls between 14-20 years were shockingly often accompanied by some Black or Arab of similar age or slightly older, something which was virtually unheard of not even a decade ago when I studied there. I’m confident that back then such intermixing wouldn’t have taken place even if the invaders were already there, as ‘my generation’ of male students was still quite confident, manly (and therefore often good looking) etc. Generally, ‘we’ went to the gym, were willing and able to fight if necessary, were confident (and active) with girls etc. Not many girls would’ve gone for some invader with what was available of Belgian boys back then which, again, was not even a full decade ago.

    On the other hand, the boys who are app. 14-20 years old now, that I’ve observed in Louvain, are shockingly meek, weak, passive, insecure, geeky etc. As a result they’re often to be seen without any girl in sight. Seeing so many attractive young girls strolling with groups of non-Whites, often with some pathetic wigger thrown in there, and so many weak, geeky White Belgian boys strolling by themselves, I remember wondering just how the latter released their sexual tensions, which are obviously at their peak at that age. Porn is one answer of course, but I suspect some of them will also develop some kinds of alternative perversions as they’re virtually locked out of the sexual market.

    Needless to say this visit, which should’ve been very pleasant, made me sick to my stomach. It can’t be stressed enough how important it is for young White boys to start working out and preferably learning some (effective) martial art already at a young age, as it raises a boy’s confidence, his testosterone, improves his looks a.s., and doing so, I suspect, insures healthy, natural sexual tendencies later on.

    • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
      December 27, 2015 - 7:12 am | Permalink

      My niece, an attractive blonde, after three months at University decided she was a lesbian. Several months later she decided that she wasn’t a lesbian afterall and so began dating a negroe. I feel your pain.



Albert Moll (1862–1939), who would go on to be “a great influence on Freud,”[1] came from a Polish Jewish merchant family and “belonged to the Jewish religious community.”[2] Typical of his ethno-religious group, Moll frequently utilized his position within the field of medical psychology to form an oppositional bloc against prevailing opinions in nineteenth- and early twentieth-century non-Jewish society. Indeed, large numbers of Jews tactically ambushed several medical disciplines during this period for precisely this reason. Historian Elena Macini writes that “Jews flooded medicine at this time not only for social standing, but also in an era that witnessed the efflorescence of race science, for the opportunity of self-representation. … The presence of Jews in the medical sector in general, and in race science in particular, allowed them to assert Jewish equality and very often moral superiority.”[3] With Berlin as the center of German medicine, and Jews comprising one third of doctors in the city,[4] the domination and re-orientation of entire disciplines was not only feasible but disturbingly easy.

A key aspect of advocating for Jewish equality and moral superiority was the Jewish advocacy of social, racial and religious pluralism. This position often came into conflict with non-Jewish efforts to promote Nationalism, particularly ethnically-based Nationalism, and corresponding efforts to confront social and cultural decay. A universal theme in Albert Moll’s works were arguments against German attempts to reckon with late Imperial and Weimar-era social and biological degeneration via eugenic programs. For example, in his Handbuch der Sexualwissenschaften (1911) Moll expressed the hope that mooted plans for sterilization programs would “not be implemented and that our race-improvers do not get too much influence on our legislation.” When German science in the late 1920s became concerned with degeneration and decline, gravitating even further towards eugenics, Moll preceded Boas in rejecting the findings of behavior genetics, arguing that “the fact we find so many valuable people, despite the hereditary burden, is caused by regeneration in countless cases. …  We can hardly ever say something about the condition of offspring with any certainty at all.” Moll was therefore the quintessential Jewish physician: political and ethnic interests were never far from his dubious practice of medicine.

Also typical of Jewish intellectuals, Moll exhibited highly aggressive and assertive personality traits and had a flair for self-promotion. Although he began his career with a focus on hypnotism, Moll wasn’t long in utilizing these traits to gain professional closeness to sexology’s experts, particularly von Krafft-Ebing. He then masterfully orchestrated his own eclipse of von Krafft-Ebing to such an extent that Moll himself came to be considered, and largely remains considered, the pioneer of the field. However, Moll’s activity in sexology went far beyond stealing the limelight. From the beginning of his drift into sexology he adopted the same oppositional role that he occupied in relation to other German attempts to reckon with social decay. In particular, Moll worked tirelessly to persuade leading non-Jewish scholars like von Krafft-Ebing to reject the idea that sexual abnormality was the result of biological and psychological disorder. In his Freud: Biologist of the Mind, Frank J. Sulloway writes that “Krafft-Ebing’s decision around the turn of the century to separate the doctrine of degeneration from the theory of homosexuality was in response to the thinking of his younger and more critical colleague Moll.”[5] However, there is significant reason to doubt the validity of Krafft-Ebing’s personal change of perspective given that the most pertinent, later, editions of Psychopathia Sexualis that showcased this change were in fact edited by none other than Moll himself. Volkmar Sigusch even writes that Moll “completely overhauled the work.”

Moll’s work centered on the argument that there were alternative, valid, “identities,” and as such he argued that homosexuality was a “valid sexual identity.”[6] Whereas earlier non-Jewish psychiatrists observed “unsavory and often contemptible personal characteristics” among sexual inverts (including their tendency to be liars, their moodiness, love of gossip, and vanity and envy), Moll argued instead that “homosexual men were not corrupt, but merely womanish,”[7] comprising a kind of “third sex” — a theory that would later be advanced much further by co-ethnic Magnus Hirschfeld. In Sex, Freedom and Power in Imperial Germany, 18801914, E.R. Dickson remarks that Moll’s theories were popularized and given substantial sympathetic coverage in Germany by the predominantly Jewish Social Democratic press during the trial of Oscar Wilde in England in 1895 (re the contemporary scene, see Brenton Sanderson’s “Jewish media influence as decisive in creating a positive public culture of homosexuality“). Dickson writes that “public policy towards homosexuality was also one more issue Social Democrats could use to point to the hypocrisy of bourgeois sexual mores, and to elaborate on their own naturalist alternative. Social Democrat Eduard Bernstein, for example, did precisely that in his reporting for German audiences on the Wilde case in London (where he was living as a journalist).”[8]

Even more radical than Moll was Magnus Hirschfeld (1868–1935). Like Moll, Hirschfeld came from a family of Jewish merchants and, also like Moll, he advanced theories of social and sexual behavior amounting to “the existence of fundamental irreducible sameness in human beings.”[9] Elena Macini writes that Hirschfeld’s Jewishness was “a socially and politically determinant aspect of his life.”[10] A common feature of his work was the hatred he had for Christianity. Indeed, his critique of that religion resembled in many respects that concocted by Freud. To Hirschfeld, Christianity was “essentially sadomasochistic, delighting in the pain of ascetic self-denial.”[11] Western Civilization had thus been “in the grip of anti-hedonist exaggerations for two thousand years,” thereby committing “psychic self-mutilation.”[12] It was therefore Western society, rather than homosexuals and other outsiders, that was sick and degenerate, and Hirschfeld’s prescribed cure was sexual hedonism and the acceptance of a wide array of “identities” and “sexualities.” Although coming from a close-knit, observant, Jewish community, and possessed of an abiding hatred for Christianity, Hirschfeld superficially advocated a “pan-humanistic” outlook and was fond of declaring himself “a world citizen.”[13] (I might agree with Hirschfeld to a certain extent since he appears to me a perfect example of what Henry Ford called an “international Jew.”)

Magnus Hirschfeld: International “World Citizen”

Magnus Hirschfeld: “World Citizen”

Although there were few ideological differences between Moll and Hirschfeld, their egos clashed and there was a subtle disparity in approach. Whereas Moll was content to publicize his ideas from books and newspapers, the homosexual Hirschfeld was intent on a more direct form of activism in the fight to break down Western social and sexual mores. Like the Moll-popularizer Eduard Bernstein, Hirschfeld was a “socialist and an active member of the Social Democratic Party.”[14] Hirschfeld, described by Mancini as “cosmopolitan to the core,” essentially created the first homosexual “communities,” beginning in Berlin where the Hebrew “transvestite” (a term he coined) was known as “Aunt Magnesia” by the city’s sexual inverts. Hirschfeld organized homosexuals, encouraging them to openly flaunt their predilections and get involved in the growing campaign for “emancipation” that was developing under the auspices of the Scientific Humanitarian Committee which he had formed in 1897. Hirschfeld pioneered modern Social Justice Warrior tactics by urging celebrities and high-profile politicians to add their names in support of the campaign for “sexual equality.”

Hirschfeld and his protégés produced a vast number of books, manuscripts, papers, and pamphlets concerning sexuality, transvestitism, “transgenderism” (another Hirschfeld term) and fetishes. Through his work with the Scientific Humanitarian Committee, Hirschfeld published the 23-volume Yearbook for the Sexual Intermediates, the first periodical devoted to “homosexual studies.” Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Science (Institut füer Sexualwissenschaft) was the world’s first gender identity clinic and his staff performed the first known transsexual surgeries. Through the Institute for Sexual Science which he founded in 1919, Hirschfeld also documented thousands of cases of sexual inversion and further bolstered his theory of the “Third Sex.”

Despite the labels attached to his committees and journals, Hirschfeld’s work rested largely on political argument rather than legitimate scientific investigation. Scholar Edward Dickson argues that Hirschfeld’s field was “characterized by unresolved and often speculative arguments.”[15] Whereas many of the early non-Jewish sexologists had a background in zoology and the sexual behavior of animals, particularly primates, Hirschfeld rejected such strictly biological or evolutionary interpretations of human sexual behavior. Following from this, the methodology he employed was extremely close to that employed by Freud — this is the “science” of patient interviews and circular reasoning rather than statistics and empirical observation.

Despite the bankruptcy of his science, the dramatic success of the Committee at mobilizing large sectors of German and European society on behalf of homosexuals was due to Hirschfeld’s personality. Like Moll, he was an aggressive and relentless agitator. Respecting few social codes, he was the darling of the Social Democrats and the reviled enemy of Weimar conservatives (Hitler referred to Hirschfeld as “the most dangerous Jew in Germany”). By the end of the 1920s Hirschfeld’s activism meant that Weimar Germany saw homosexuality less as a medical disorder and sign of degeneration than as a major cause célèbre. Hirschfeld’s perverse bonanza came to an end in 1933 when on May 6th Nationalist German student organizations and columns of the Hitler Youth attacked the Institute for Sexual Science. The Institute library was liquidated and its contents used in a book burning on May 10. The youths also printed and disseminated posters bearing Hirschfeld’s face complete with the caption: “Protector and Promoter of pathological sexual aberrations, also in his physical appearance probably the most disgusting of all Jewish monsters.” Hirschfeld himself had been on an international speaking tour since 1931. He lived in exile in France until he died of a heart attack in 1935.

Jewish Sexology Reduced to Ashes

Jewish Sexology Reduced to Ashes

In terms of theory, Hirschfeld had “subverted the notion that romantic love should be orientated toward reproduction,” arguing instead for the acceptance of homosexual lifestyles and hedonistic, non-reproductive, sexual relations in general.[16] A key element of Hirschfeld’s theory was the deployment of “love as a primary weapon in his ethical and philosophical campaign for the liberation of same-sex relationships.”[17] However, love as a concept was itself altered by Hirschfeld, who imbued it with transcendental and cosmic qualities in an effort to distance it as much as possible from biological, reproductive drives. Mancini writes that “the idea that love had the potential to not only lift the individual but to enrich the broader mission of humanity was articulated in Hirschfeld’s condemnation of theories of racial hygiene and his appeal to Panhumanism to extinguish the hatred among nations and races.”[18]

Such romantic theorizing, of course, had little to do with the actual content of sexological studies of the sexually inverted, where love featured significantly less than pederasty, promiscuity and disease. But it was the idea and “feeling” that mattered most in creating a homosexual movement and public support behind it. As strategy it corresponded perfectly with efforts to achieve “Jewish emancipation.” In this respect Richard Wagner put it most astutely and succinctly when he wrote that “when we strove for emancipation of the Jews we were really more the champions of an abstract principle than of a concrete case: … Our zeal for equal civil rights for Jews was much more the consequence of a general idea than of any real sympathy; for, with all our speaking and writing for Jewish emancipation, we always felt instinctively repelled by any actual, operative contact with them.” One could easily substitute “homosexuals” for “Jews” and achieve significant insight into the basic psychological processes at work, with Hirschfeld’s “general idea” being a florid abstraction of love around which the fashionable and easily duped may gravitate. It can’t be emphasized enough that Jews have been very adept at framing their arguments in emotional or moral terms that appear to have a unique pull on the consciences of Europeans, and such strategies are very difficult to unseat. One need only acknowledge that Hirschfeld’s work in this regard retains great potency in the present, with the recent “marriage equality” debate neatly side-stepping biological and social imperatives in favor of Hirschfeld-like maudlin non sequiturs about “love.”

Hirschfeld’s Ghost: Hedonism and Perversion Triumphant under the Banner of “Love”

Hirschfeld’s Ghost: Hedonism and Perversion Triumphant under the Banner of “Love”

Hirschfeld’s use of the weaponized concept of love was itself a legacy of Hirschfeld’s “scientific mentor” and co-ethnic Iwan Bloch (1872–1922). Like Moll and Hirschfeld, Bloch had no background in zoology, evolutionary studies or animal behavior. Trained as a dermatologist, Bloch was also attracted to the cause of “sexual minorities” and became an ardent campaigner on their behalf. He joined with Moll and Hirschfeld in attacking the non-Jewish consensus that sexual inversion was pathological and coined the term sexualwissenschaft or sexology to give academic and medical respectability to what was essentially a Jewish intellectual reaction against non-Jewish efforts to categorize harmful social and sexual pathologies. He was also a keen promoter of perversion and pornography. He was the “discoverer” of the Marquis de Sade’s manuscript of The 120 Days of Sodom, which had been believed to be lost, and published it under the pseudonym Eugène Dühren in 1904. In 1899 he had published Marquis de Sade: His Life and Works under the same pseudonym. In 1906 he wrote The Sexual Life of Our Time in its Relations to Modern Civilization, for which he gained the praise of Sigmund Freud for attacking “bourgeois” (non-Jewish) sexual mores, attacking the perception of sexual inverts as pathological, and calling for Europeans to adopt a more pluralistic and hedonistic sexual life.

Iwan Bloch

Iwan Bloch

By the time Moll, Hirschfeld and Bloch had essentially co-opted and redirected the study of human sexual behavior, Jews were flooding the new “discipline” in increasing numbers. Albert Eulenberg (1840–1917), with a background in neurology and electrotherapy, began styling himself a sexologist. With Bloch and Max Marcuse (1877–1963) he co-edited the Zeitschrift fur Sexualwissenschaft (Journal for Sexology) and with Hirschfeld he co-founded the Berlin Society for Sexual Science and Eugenics.[19] The eugenics aspect of the society’s name was of course a clever piece of deception, intended to ingratiate it with non-Jewish eugenic societies for the purposes of eventual subversion with Jewish oppositional ideas. Nor was the tactic new. Eulenberg, Hirschfeld and Moll all claimed to be eugenicists but, like the Jewish-dominated German League for Improvement of the People and the Study of Heredity, astute Nationalists perceived the attempt at co-option from within, and all were attacked by National Socialist publisher Julius F. Lehmann as “part of a targeted subversion on the part of Berlin Jews.”[20]

But time for the sexologists was beginning to run out. Following the destruction of Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Science in 1933, the list of homosexual activists held by Hirschfeld’s organization fell into the hands of the police where it assisted the prosecution of thousands of sexual inverts under the Penal Codes, and the subsequent internment of these individuals in concentration camps. The journals and organizations of the Jewish sexologists were gradually shut down until, in 1938, the Jewish grip on several disciplines were categorically broken when the Nuremberg laws stripped thousands of Jewish physicians of their licenses. Albert Moll, once the haughty promoter of degeneracy, was among those who lost their medical licence and was thereby banned from the medical profession. He was forced to adopt the middle name Israel. In one of the strange coincidences that history sometimes bequeaths to us, he would die lonely and impoverished on the same day as his fellow warrior against the Europeans, Sigmund Freud. Baptized for social expediency in the 1890s, access to the local church cemetery was refused; the pastor in charge refused to speak at Moll’s grave.

Jewish sexology, it seemed, was on the brink of extinction. But it would live on in exile, along with other poisonous doctrines, with the Frankfurt School. After the war it would return, with Horkheimer and Adorno, to Frankfurt, where the Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Science would be re-established and then led by their protégé Volkmar Sigusch. Since taking on the leadership of the Institite, Sigusch has acted as a theorist and expert on social policy issues, and he has played a key role in liberalizing Germany’s laws penalizing homosexuality. Until 2006, Sigusch led Frankfurt University’s Institute for Sexual Science and its associated sexual medicine clinic. In 2005, he published Neo-sexuality: On the Cultural Change of Love and Perversion. In early March 2011, he released his new book Searching for Sexual Freedom. Despite his non-Jewish ethnicity, these works reveal that he is the spiritual and ideological son of Moll, Bloch, Hirschfeld and Eulenberg.

Surveying the contemporary social and cultural landscape in Western society, we see a much more radical departure from the measures advocated by Ellis, one of sexology’s founding fathers. And more than a century following from the first efforts of Moll to bring about a sexual revolution, we find ourselves once more wrestling with the hydra of Jewish sexology. As hinted at above, the modern Russian state has probably come closest to implementing measures in line with Ellis’ recommendations. Homosexual relations were decriminalized in 1993, but the state has consistently refused permission for “Pride” parades (the “flouting” warned against by Ellis) to take place. Most importantly, since 2006 Russia has also introduced legislation restricting the distribution of materials promoting sexually inverted lifestyles and behaviors to children as an extension to existing child protection laws. Homosexual couples cannot adopt children and cannot marry. While Russia has been harshly criticized and even fined by the European Court of Human Rights for these measures, the country is still remarkably lenient by Ellis’ standards. Single homosexuals are permitted to adopt children, sexual inversion was declassified as a mental illness in 1999, and those suffering from metamorphosis sexualis paranoica have been indulged with surgery and permitted to change their legal gender since 1997. One suspects that Russia will continue to be portrayed as a “civil rights” boogeyman by the sexologists and their agents until they fall into line with the pluralist zeitgeist.

To conclude, it may be worth remarking on the discussion of the desirability of there being homosexuals in the Nationalist movement. I don’t speak for The Occidental Observer, but I do speak for myself when I advise against the involvement of sexual inverts in the movement. Since arguments in favor of such involvement have been advanced, I feel that it is only fair that the opposite argument should also be given consideration. In this movement we are concerned with racial, biological and demographic fitness, and key to this is the preservation of traditional norms regarding marriage and relationships between the sexes. There can be no distraction from this focus, and no concession on any ground. I view any argument to the contrary as a mere echo of the claims of Moll et al. that they were “eugenicists.” There can be no subversion here. In this age of promiscuity, hedonism, abortion, and impending demographic oblivion, our future depends on it.

[1] F.J. Solloway, Freud, Biologist of the Mind: Beyond the Psychoanalytic Legend (Harvard, 1979), 314-5.

[2] V. Roelcke, Twentieth Century Ethics of Human Subjects Research: Historical Perspectives From Steiner Verlag (Stuttgart, 2004), 26.

[3] E. Mancini, Magnus Hirschfeld and the Quest for Sexual Freedom: A History of the First International Sexual Freedom Movement (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), 29.

[4] A. Killen, Berlin Electropolis: Shock, Nerves and German Modernity (University of California Press, 2006), 63.

[5] Solloway, Freud, Biologist of the Mind: Beyond the Psychoanalytic Legend (Harvard, 1979), 300.

[6] E.R. Dickson, Sex, Freedom and Power in Imperial Germany, 1880-1914 (Cambridge University Press, 2014), 155.

[7] Ibid, 156.

[8] Ibid, 157.

[9] Mancini, Magnus Hirschfeld and the Quest for Sexual Freedom, 30.

[10] Ibid, 4.

[11] Ibid, 160.

[12] Ibid.

[13] Ibid, 4.

[14] Ibid.

[15] E.R. Dickson, Sex, Freedom and Power in Imperial Germany, 1880-1914 (Cambridge University Press, 2014), 249.

[16] Ibid, 7.

[17] Ibid, 5.

[18] Ibid, 6.

[19] A. Killen, Berlin Electropolis: Shock, Nerves and German Modernity (University of California Press, 2006), 63.

[20] J. Glad, Future Human Evolution: Eugenics in the Twenty-First Century (Hermitage, 2006), 133.

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter



25 Comments to "The Assault on Gender and the Family: Jewish Sexology and the Legacy of the Frankfurt School, Part Two"

  1. T. Juana's Gravatar T. Juana
    December 28, 2015 - 9:30 pm | Permalink

    The author is Andrew Joyce, not Joyce Andrews.

  2. AnotherAmalekite's Gravatar AnotherAmalekite
    December 28, 2015 - 7:57 pm | Permalink

    I read the first part of this article, not the second, mainly because the subject matter just doesn’t interest me very much.

    I do find the comments interesting, as usual, in particular the ones from people who seem to be convinced that homosexuality is simply a matter of choice (mostly comments in Part 1), or that an otherwise normal (heterosexual) person can be convinced or talked into becoming a homo- or bi-sexual, or at least “experimenting”. I find this notion patently absurd and laughable.
    (As an aside and using myself as an example once again, the only way something like that would ever happen to me is if I wound up in prison with a 6’4″ excessively muscular cellmate named Bruce. Even then, it goes without saying it would be under severe protest and in no way consensual. Still not something I would voluntarily “choose”, that’s just ridiculous.)

    I’m firmly in the camp of opinion that sexuality is not a matter of “preference” or “choice”, but is pretty much hardwired into a person’s mental and/or physical being, the cause(s) of which currently remain a mystery to science and medicine. Any deviation from “normal” I think is caused by mental or physical abnormalities, or mental abnormalities caused by physical ones (chemical imbalances affecting the brain, etc.). My guess in this regard is as good as anyone else’s.

    Here’s the point of my comment.
    I get the impression that, at least within the white advocacy movement, some people like to adopt the “choice” position perhaps because of two simplistic reasons:

    Firstly, by adopting the notion that deviance from sexual normality is simply a matter of choice, they avoid having to deal with an issue for which science and medicine hasn’t found a cause. No one knows what causes sexual variances in humans and claiming that it is simply a matter of choice avoids this mystery, which some people find unpleasant and would simply prefer not to have to deal with or even recognize.

    Therefore and secondly, by adopting the notion of choice, it conveniently and simplistically places fault on the individual who supposedly made the choice and removes it from being a question that science, medicine and society as whole should or needs to deal with. It then becomes a matter of simply convincing the person that he/she has made the wrong choice. Again, it’s a nice tidying up of an unpleasant loose end.

    Finally, would it be unreasonable to perhaps question the sexuality of those people who adopt the notion of “choice”? Perhaps they don’t realize that it might be only they who think it’s a matter of choice, without realizing that it isn’t at all a matter of choice for normal, heterosexual people.
    In other words, if it’s as easy for you as simply making a choice, maybe there’s something “wrong” with you.

  3. Deep North's Gravatar Deep North
    December 28, 2015 - 6:55 pm | Permalink

    Anecdotal, but here it is anyways: Two of my co-workers are homosexual. One is your stereotypical obese Liberal. He constantly bashes Christianity while ignoring the way homosexuals are treated by Muslims. There is nothing worse in his mind than a Christian. Some people handle their depression by taking drugs and abusing alcohol. Some homosexuals are depressed IMO enjoy being gay because its fashionable and gets them attention. The other worker has probable mental health issues. He sits down like a woman to go to the bathroom when standing up would get the job done. He is very disgusted by the sight or thought of a woman’s reproductive system.

    There always has and always will be people who are attracted to the same sex for various reasons. I take issues in the way its promoted as being normal or equal. If every ideology is equal, than none can be superior. Homosexuals aren’t equal to normal people at all: they cannot naturally reproduce the species. There is something unique about a man and woman each contributing half of their DNA to make a new human being; and the woman raising the child in her body for 9 months. Gay “parents” have to adopt and raise children that really aren’t theirs. Or in case of MM, find a surrogate mother. With Lesbians, one gets artificially inseminated. In either case only one gay “parent” is the natural parent. This is no comparison compared the normal way to raise a real family.

  4. Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
    December 28, 2015 - 3:53 pm | Permalink

    Many years ago, in an early anti-smoking campaign, one of the statements was that smokers were not born, they were recruited.
    It struck me then, and still does today, that the same logic applies, to a large extent, to homosexuals. In spite of all of the medical discoveries, including DNA sequencing and determining which genes or mutant genes, cause diseases, no “gay” gene has been discovered. It is reasonable, therefore, to conclude that homosexuality is not “normal”.
    In support of that, while I have often debated with others, I note that children are born with Downs Syndrome, spina bifida, cleft palate, tetralogy of Fallot, cystic fibrosis, and other afflictions. Medically speaking, these are considered normal abnormalities. No one would consider a child with one of these afflictions to be normal, but the afflictions are not uncommon. There are, undoubtedly, homosexuals who meet this definition, but I suggest they are relatively few in number. The “growth” in homosexuality has come with the advertising/packaging of it as being a lifestyle choice. This is on par with shopping for a new sweater, displaying your “choice” of style and colour.
    Another aspect of the medical side of homosexuality that has been studiously avoided is the question of chemical imbalance. Mood altering drugs used in the treatment of psychological disorders are purportedly for the purpose correcting chemical imbalances in the body. Why has there been no investigation in this vein?
    There have been recent promising developments in treatment of neurological disorders such as MS using “Paleo” diets with the focus on micronutrients that the body lacks. Could this be another avenue of investigation for homosexuality?
    There is much we do not know about this subject, but I believe that I am relatively safe in stating that the overwhelming majority of those who visit this site would conclude that homosexuality is not normal.

    • AnotherAmalekite's Gravatar AnotherAmalekite
      December 28, 2015 - 8:21 pm | Permalink

      I first of all want to say that my comment, right above yours, Curmudgeon, is not directed at you specifically. I just happened to submit my comment shortly after yours was posted and I hadn’t read yours.

      I agree with your opinion regarding the (as yet unproven and possibly largely unexplored) medical and/or psychological causes of sexual variance, but disagree with your opinion that there has necessarily been a “growth” in homosexuality in recent decades. I think it only seems that way because they’ve become more vocal and, yes, empowered (as much as I hate to use that politically correct word).
      I doubt I will ever buy into the notion that normal heterosexual people can be “recruited” or “talked into” a different sexuality. Like I wrote in my own post above, the idea to me is laughable.

    • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
      December 28, 2015 - 8:28 pm | Permalink

      Decades ago I read an article by a healer from the far east who said that it was micronutrients lacking during gestation that could predispose a person to homosexuality.

      Another doctor, this one a westerner, said the proper term is “homosexual behavior”. It was your actions that made you homosexual was his point: a person one way or another felt an uncontrollable urge to “do” certain things in an attempt to duplicate normal man-woman sex. Just having feelings was not enough to define you as a homo.


  5. Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
    December 28, 2015 - 3:18 pm | Permalink

    Andrew Joyce, “I don’t speak for The Occidental Observer, but I do speak for myself when I advise against the involvement of sexual inverts in the movement.”

    In the justification that follows, it appears Joyce’s concern is actually closer to mine and specifically the question of queer activism by gay White Nationalists within White Nationalist circles – but is there any?

    For when I see American New Right B.S from Counter-Currents Publishing about how we need to choose between the homo and the negro; queer power B.S. from James O’Meara about how puffs are the best of us; New Right Spencer/Alt Right Johnson forcing a consensus that an anti-nationalist poofter, Jack Donovan, is the ideal model of White Nationalist masculinity, followed closely by Oscar Wilde … I don’t see White Nationalists subverting the movement. I see White Nationalists like Kevin MacDonald associating themselves needlessly with subversive ideas and personalities who are not White Nationalists.

  6. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    December 28, 2015 - 3:08 pm | Permalink

    I in no way mean to sound defeatist, but the opponent won a major battle in the 1960′ and 70’s by calling our unborn sub-human (a fetus). No proof is needed after something nearing one hundred million abortions in Europe and the Diasporas.

    The opponents semantics aside, what we are seeing now is a “next step” in controlling the genetics of the West.

    What to do? I think our best efforts might be directed toward creating an environment in which all European males have a viable reproductive strategy (and consider such just another weapon).

  7. Dave Bowman's Gravatar Dave Bowman
    December 28, 2015 - 12:02 pm | Permalink

    I feel the need to say a grateful, heartfelt Thank You so much, to Dr Joyce, for yet another two brilliant, masterful articles focussing hard on the origins of the extreme moral corruptions in our society. The self-seeking, utterly fraudulent, disgusting Jewish degeneracy masquerading as sexual “research” which took hold so long ago in Germany and Austria beneath the laissez-fair attitudes of a sleeping people continues to corrode and destroy White moral values across Europe and the west-facing world today long after the war which reduced Berlin to rubble, and their gross moral turpitude – now supported across the West by a mass of ill-conceived, unlawful, Jewish-bribed appeasement legislation – will eventually succeed in doing exactly what it was doing in Weimar Germany if not prevented. I am convinced that nothing less than truly radical and draconian measures to root out this bestial Jewish filth once and for all must inevitably come – by one means or another. Just as the spreading Jewish-backed sexual decadence and corruption of the dying Weimar Republic was in fact the main and strongest social platform on which the National Socialists originally campaigned – now wholly and conveniently forgotten courtesy of Jewish re-writing of German history – so today in both Europe and the United States we have a struggling against the self-same morally-destructive poison, from the same ethnic root source. As an organisation of the present and for the future, we should make one of our key public focuses the extreme moral damage which rampant, degenerate Jewish “sexology” has always done – and will always continue to do – to its host Western populations, for prior to their modernist Jewish corruptions, normal moral hygiene in sexual matters has always been of the most strongly-held (though intensely-private) convictions of White peoples – and thereby a stronghold of a strong, proud society. This is, of course, precisely why it has been so ruthlessly attacked by the “learned” specialists of uncontrolled Jewry.

    For my own part, I find myself spending more and more of my time trying to think of ways to widely and freely publicise this academically-heavy but wonderfully-perceptive, targeted information to likely recipients, without being arrested, in order to draw more public attention always back to the names, faces and ethnic identity always behind the evil. I am convinced this has to be the underlying strategy, and will both open the eyes of, and hugely comfort the hearts of, those hundreds of millions of normal, well-balanced, morally-sound, heterosexual White people who are crying out for an explanation of our current disaster – and a way forward to a better future.

  8. December 28, 2015 - 12:02 pm | Permalink

    For their rich trove of references and historical surveys, these have been entertaining and useful articles. Like some of the other commenters however, I demur at some of the author’s reasoning. It is very difficult to separate the strands of sexological research from those of psychology and psychiatry. It seems as though Mr Joyce wants a blanket condemnation of all research pertaining to sexuality. That is as bizarre and pointless as banning research into gastronomy. Some of the targets in these pieces are just a little too easy. Magnus Hirschfeld, for example, has been done to death for over eighty years because of his supposed obsession with and popularization of sex perversion. But his work was not significantly different from that of Havelock Ellis and Krafft-Ebing, or (to take a later example) Kinsey and Pomeroy. When Magnus Hirschfeld came to America on a speaking tour in the 1930s, he was hosted by G. S. Viereck and Harry Benjamin, both of whom were quite far removed from—opposed to, I would say—Frankfurt School Marxism and Leftism in general. It should be possible to make an informed criticism of Hirschfeld’s work without resorting to finger-wagging and reductionist arguments about Jewish conspiracies against the family. Speaking of which, the leap from Moll and Hirschfeld to modern homosexual emancipation is just a bridge too far. A ‘gay rights’ movement of some kind would have come into being in recent decades regardless of the Frankfurt School and Weimar-era sexual licentiousness. The really crucial factor is not that Gay Lib existed, but that it was subverted (like Feminism) by those cultural marxists who will opportunistically burrow into and exploit any available social trend or political movement.

    Closing the mind to intellectual inquiry about sexuality and affectional preferences is just not a wise strategy; it leads not to healthy thinking but to a cult mentality. This realization is why Nationalist organizations today are often open-minded or agnostic on the subject of homosexually-oriented members. Making those inclinations a major issue of discussion, or a bar to participation, is a prescription for making a movement as ineffectual as “social conservative” groups have proven to be. Finally, there are assorted errors and misinterpretations in these essays. E.g.,metamorphosis sexualis paranoia is not an old term for transsexualism as Mr Joyce seems to think, but rather is a delusion (Krafft-Ebing, 1877) that one’s body is transforming itself spontaneously even though no change takes place.

    • December 28, 2015 - 12:28 pm | Permalink

      I do not read Dr. Joyce as rejecting research, only as pointing out that the tradition of sexology covered in Part II was politically/ethnically motivated and has had destructive effects on Europeans and their cultures. I think we would be in a very different place if the research discussed in Part I had continued.

    • Andrew Joyce's Gravatar Andrew Joyce
      December 28, 2015 - 2:24 pm | Permalink

      “Gay lib”? Terms like that telegraph sexual inversion. BTW, a systematic delusion as to change of sex seems a pretty straightforward description, and one used by Ellis himself. Transgenderism doesn’t exist except within the warped mind of the sufferer. I am certain Bruce Jenner truly believes he is now, despite his DNA and chromosomes, physically a woman. Try again.

  9. Director's Gravatar Director
    December 28, 2015 - 10:04 am | Permalink

    This is one of the narratives that makes me extremely angry about Pink Nazi narratives.

    It’s pretty obvious that the Nazis were reacting to and anticipating demands for things like Gay Marriage etc.

    The idea that the Nazis were closeted fags must have been dreamt up to get ordinary men to fight them. And to die doing it.

    I had no idea that Weimar was that fucked up.

  10. Armor's Gravatar Armor
    December 28, 2015 - 4:14 am | Permalink

    In France, the state-subsidized and largely Jewish newspaper Le Monde had a lighthearted article just yesterday about zoophilia. The conclusion of the article seemed to be that the reason why we all dream of sleeping with cows, horses and dogs is that it puts innocence back into our sexuality (“partageant avec nous tous ce rêve d’une animalité qui soudain, rendrait la sexualité innocente” – sharing with ALL OF US that dream of an animality that suddenly would make sexuality innocent).

    They like to say that Le Monde is France’s “journal de reference” (just like the Jew York Times was supposed to be the jewspaper of record). Le Monde is also well known for once publishing a petition by French (=Jewish and Jewishy) intellectuals to lower the age of sexual consent.

  11. Jacob's Gravatar Jacob
    December 28, 2015 - 2:20 am | Permalink

    “urveying the contemporary social and cultural landscape in Western society, we see a much more radical departure from the measures advocated by Ellis, one of sexology’s founding fathers. And more than a century following from the first efforts of Moll to bring about a sexual revolution, we find ourselves once more wrestling with the hydra of Jewish sexology. As hinted at above, the modern Russian state has probably come closest to implementing measures in line with Ellis’ recommendations. Homosexual relations were decriminalized in 1993, but the state has consistently refused permission for “Pride” parades (the “flouting” warned against by Ellis) to take place. Most importantly, since 2006 Russia has also introduced legislation restricting the distribution of materials promoting sexually inverted lifestyles and behaviors to children as an extension to existing child protection laws. Homosexual couples cannot adopt children and cannot marry. While Russia has been harshly criticized and even fined by the European Court of Human Rights for these measures, the country is still remarkably lenient by Ellis’ standards. Single homosexuals are permitted to adopt children, sexual inversion was declassified as a mental illness in 1999, and those suffering from metamorphosis sexualis paranoica have been indulged with surgery and permitted to change their legal gender since 1997. One suspects that Russia will continue to be portrayed as a “civil rights” boogeyman by the sexologists and their agents until they fall into line with the pluralist zeitgeist.”
    Which makes russia backwards:
    By claiming that homosexuality destroyed families, which isn’t accurate at all, you demonize the Jews who punshed for sexual freedom.

    • mari's Gravatar mari
      December 28, 2015 - 12:17 pm | Permalink

      This is not a comment. Its just a clip and paste from the article.

  12. December 27, 2015 - 7:43 pm | Permalink

    A very characteristic Jewish trick is simply to flood some topic or interest with vast numbers of similar tracts, books, lectures etc. Ralph Miliband (‘Belgian Jew’) in a book ‘Marxism and Politics’ (published 1977; I believe he was a professor in Leeds, Oxford University Press publishing his worthless book). He stated in it that the German Social Democrats had no less than 4,000 different publications in German in about 1900. With little interest in objectivity, or in abstract truth or justice, Jews often dominate with their massive output of low-grade material.

  13. Henry's Gravatar Henry
    December 27, 2015 - 5:36 pm | Permalink

    A brilliant article sealed with a most welcome conclusion.

    FKA Max mentions Douglas Murray as a homo (invert) of worth. I disagree. Murray speaks out because he is a homo in fear of Islam. But not because he is a white man in fear for his white children’s future: for Murray has no such children and never will.

    What say Murray of the Jewish involvement in his nightmares…

    Yes. His silence is deafening.

  14. FKA Max's Gravatar FKA Max
    December 27, 2015 - 4:29 pm | Permalink

    Mr. Joyce,

    thank you very much for your research and your honesty and frankness in regards to the Homosexual Question.
    I partly agree with your conclusion. However what I have found, is that homosexuals have been some of the most effective and vocal opponents of the Islamic invasion of Europe e.g. Douglas Murray. While we should not welcome them with open arms, on the other hand I do not want to make them our enemies either. Non-Whites are my main concern. In the EU this is mostly Muslims, in the USA it is still mostly Hispanics/Latinos, who we need to be most concerned about.
    While the ”enemy of my enemy is my friend” approach is not recommended, and should not be applied to Jews when it comes to Muslims, I see White homosexuals as more aware of the Islamic Question, out of self-interest and self-preservation, than the average White person.
    Professor MacDonald wrote a short blog post on this issue in October:

    For Jews, ethnic interests are the ultimate value, trumping trivial issues like sexual orientation. Homosexual Jews still have ethnic interests as Jews, and the ethnonationalist right seems to appreciate that fact — while sensibly not advocating a public culture of homosexuality.

    I personally am in the camp of being open to homosexual contributions in our movement, but you are correct, they should not hold any leadership positions within the movement and promote their sexual preference/perversion, and we should make this clear to them in the beginning, and if they still want to join and accept these limitations, that they will not be able to rise all the way to the top within the movement and openly advocate for the acceptance of their sexuality, then we should open the door to them, in my opinion. For me personally, no Jews and no Muslims and no Han Chinese within the movement is the most important factor. Homosexuals are a secondary concern to me. Most homosexuals are pretty well-educated, cultured and dress well, etc.
    I think going after White homosexuals too severely could result in shooting ourselves in the foot. I see the same happening with the Britain First movement in the UK, which is calling for the death penalty for pedophilia:

    Britain First will always support capital punishment for paedophiles.
    This distracts from their main purpose and goal in my opinion, and truly is self-sabotage on their part and on their platform and their wider appeal to especially Whites, which otherwise is very good and appeals to many Britons in my opinion. This turns them into a Christian Taliban in the eyes of many Whites unfortunately, due to their rigid stance on certain issues
    As much as we cannot be subverted by sexual degeneracy, we should also be very careful not to fall into the trap of being religiously subverted. Otherwise there is no difference between us and reactionary/medieval Muslims or Third World Christians. Would you not want to abort a White child if you knew, that it had Down Syndrome, or would you want to prevent a white woman/girl from aborting a child, after she was raped or impregnated by a non-white person? Patrick LeBrun wrote a very good and important piece on this on Counter-Currents titled ”White Nationalists Need Planned Parenthood, Not the Pope”
    My recommendation is to not focus on homosexuality, abortion, pedophilia, transgenderism, etc., but to focus on the Jewish, Muslim, and immigration questions exclusively and not get sidetracked by social wedge issues.
    We cannot afford to convolute and conflate nationalistic, patriotic and racial issues with sexuality, etc.
    I am sure you are currently discussing these issue within the British Renaissance organization and membership.
    Ann Coulter is a one issue voter and activist. Stopping and reducing non-European immigration is all she cares about.
    The K.I.S.S. approach and principle can truly do wonders in my experience: Muslims, Jews, and immigration should be the main focus, otherwise, as I said, things get too convoluted in my opinion.
    White advocacy (Amren), patriotic immigration advocacy (Vdare) and the Jewish Question (TOO) combined are the sweet spot and the winning combination in my opinion. If you can duplicate these organizations and combine all these issues in one organization, British Renaissance, you have a winning team and approach in the UK, in my opinion.

  15. Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
    December 27, 2015 - 3:24 pm | Permalink
    • December 27, 2015 - 9:20 pm | Permalink

      That site makes you wonder why they don’t promote an Ugly Liberation Front.

      • T. Juana's Gravatar T. Juana
        December 28, 2015 - 12:48 am | Permalink

        If You Wanna Be Happy Jimmy Soul [1963]

        If you wanna be happy
        For the rest of your life,
        Never make a pretty woman your wife,
        So from my personal point of view,
        Get an ugly girl to marry you.

        A pretty woman makes her husband look small
        And very often causes his downfall.
        As soon as he marries her
        Then she starts to do
        The things that will break his heart.
        But if you make an ugly woman your wife,
        You’ll be happy for the rest of your life,
        An ugly woman cooks her meals on time,
        She’ll always give you peace of mind.

        Don’t let your friends say
        You have no taste,
        Go ahead and marry anyway,
        Though her face is ugly,
        Her eyes don’t match,
        Take it from me she’s a better catch.

        Say man.
        Hey baby.
        Saw your wife the other day.
        Yeah, she’s ugly.
        Yeah, she’s ugly but she sure can cook.
        Yeah?. Okay.

        • FKA Max's Gravatar FKA Max
          December 28, 2015 - 11:02 am | Permalink

          What would be the most advantageous game theory strategy to advance our cause? What risks are worth taking? How can we apply this knowledge to the Homosexual Question within the movement? Does race trump beauty and sexuality? I think it does. Would you rather have a family with a stunning looking Hispanic or a mediocre looking European White? Would you rather ally yourself with a heterosexual Jew, Hispanic, or African American person, or with a homosexual White person?

          Nash Equilibrium
          Video Link:
          Uploaded on Oct 20, 2007

          One of my favourite moments in A Beautiful Mind.

          It has also been used to study to what extent people with different preferences can cooperate (see battle of the sexes), and whether they will take risks to achieve a cooperative outcome (see stag hunt).

          The original stag hunt dilemma is as follows: a group of hunters have tracked a large stag, and found it to follow a certain path. If all the hunters work together, they can kill the stag and all eat. If they are discovered, or do not cooperate, the stag will flee, and all will go hungry.

          The hunters hide and wait along a path. An hour goes by, with no sign of the stag. Two, three, four hours pass, with no trace. A day passes. The stag may not pass every day, but the hunters are reasonably certain that it will come. However, a hare is seen by all hunters moving along the path.

          If a hunter leaps out and kills the hare, he will eat. However, it results in the trap laid for the stag to be wasted, and the others will starve. There is no certainty that the stag will arrive; the hare is present. The dilemma is that if one hunter waits, he risks one of his fellows killing the hare for himself, sacrificing everyone else. This makes the risk twofold; risk the stag never coming, or risk another man taking the kill.

        • December 28, 2015 - 1:47 pm | Permalink

          An interesting applied social science project would be to design an Ugly Liberation movement along Jewish lines. Slogans: beauty is from within, perhaps. Cis- Trans- meta- (or other science based prefixes) of appearancism, shallowism, surfacism. Appeals to better natures: Do not treat the ugly as beneath you! Pity the ugly! Uglies are human too! And titles for magazines: Metropolitan Style? Reformed Deformed? … The Uglies are your oyster? Choose to Loose?

  16. L. A. Waddell's Gravatar L. A. Waddell
    December 27, 2015 - 3:00 pm | Permalink

    I’m surprised you didn’t mention the work of Hans Blüher, Adolf Brand or the Gemeinschaft der Eigenen. They were fierce critics of Herschfeld and Jewish sexology

[Colour fonts and bolding added.].

Related Articles:

Homosexuality: A Perversion Without End. See:

Psychiatrists and prostitutes: 5 sad similarities. See:

America's leading psychiatrist convicts himself of crimes against humanity. See:

Psychiatrists and prostitutes: 5 sad similarities. See:

Psychiatric ‘Bible’ Advisors Report Conflicts of Interest. See:


New Boy Scouts president: Gay scout leaders acceptable. See:

How The ‘Gay’ Jihad Normalized A Filthy Practice. See:

The Radical Homosexual Movement Is Run By Jews. See:

Eustace Mullins, The Curse of Canaan. pp. 16-22 (

The Deconstruction of Marriage. See:

ACLU’s Homosexual Assault On State Rights. See:

Homosexuality is morally protected behavior, judge rules in striking down Texas marriage amendment. See:


The revolution of the family: the Marxist roots of ‘homosexualism’. See:

The homosexual activist tyranny is growing and it is a real tyranny. See:

The revolution of the family: the Marxist roots of ‘homosexualism’. See:

Should the Jews be the ones to stop Putin’s anti-gay crusade? See:

ACLU’s Homosexual Assault On State Rights. See:

The Sexual Exploitation of White Children by the Jews. See:


Hell Arrives: Camp Designed to Indoctrinate Little Boys into Homosexuality. See:

Schulman: ‘Gay Rights movement is Jewish’. See:


The Radical Homosexual Movement Is Run By Jews. See:


Conference aims to normalize pedophilia. See:

Has the normalizing of pedophilia begun? See:

They're mainstreaming pedophilia. See:

Media's Relentless Promotion of Lesbianism Continues. See:


Inherent Autonomy "Girlie Man" Culture of Government Schools. See:

Schulman: ‘Gay Rights movement is Jewish’. See:

Homosexual activists pressure Ireland, Serbia, Kosovo, Russia, Nigeria, Uganda, India and Malta. See:

Vladimir Putin: gay people at Winter Olympics must 'leave children alone'. See:

The Deconstruction of Marriage. See:


Vladimir Putin: gay people at Winter Olympics must 'leave children alone'. See:

The homosexual activist tyranny is growing and it is a real tyranny. See:

Should the Jews be the ones to stop Putin’s anti-gay crusade? See: SEXUAL DEVIANTS USING SCIENCE TO DEBUNK THE BIG LIE. See:


Bad Blood: The Gay Drive to Donate. See:

Sexual Perversions and the Jewish Connection:

Porn: The new narcotic. See:

Where Did Today's Mafia Start? See:

Pedophiles want same rights as homosexuals. See:

They're mainstreaming pedophilia. See:

The corruption of a generation: Our daughters are facing sexualisiation from primary school age. See:

Masters of Porn: The Systematic Promotion of Sexual Deviance. See:


The Radical Homosexual Movement Is Run By Jews. See:


The Sexual Subversion of America, Parts 1 & 2. See:

25 Signs American Women Are Being Destroyed By The Sexual Revolution And Our Promiscuous Culture. See:

Which STD Factory Are You Dating? See:

Media's Relentless Promotion of Lesbianism Continues. See:


Wikipedia is controlled by Jews ie Canaanites whose primary directive is:“do not speak the truth.". See:

Why I Cannot Blame Russia and India for Taking on the Gays {Ron: ie homosexuals]. See:

The Jews Behind Michael Sam See:

UN defends report calling on Church to renounce its moral teachings on sexuality. See:

A Moral Wrong Is Not A Civil Right – Black Pastors Fight Homosexual ‘Marriage’ See:

Strange Color Revolution: More ‘Gay Protests’ at Russia’s Sochi Olympics. See:

The bigger the lie: Fund-raising video invents '$3000 fine for being gay in Russia'. See:

Uganda's Yoweri Museveni puts anti-gay legislation on hold. See:

How a Pope called Pius turned the confessional box into a paradise for paedophiles: From a leading Catholic writer, a devastating exposé of a Vatican ruling. See:

Mexico conference on overcoming same-sex attraction cancelled after homosexualist campaign. See:


America Vanquished - Parts 1 & 2. see:

Mass psychosis in the US. See:

John Maynard Keynes: Bolshevik, Lavender, Pervert, Pedophile: SUGAR KEYNES. See:



Jewish porn star: The Jews are better than everyone else. See:

Morris Herman - absent a title. See:

Bill Gates and the Pansexual Agenda. See:

Pornographic ecological group raises money with sex and orgies. See:

The Transhumanist and Police State Agenda in Pop Music. See:

Doda and Vintage: Bringing the Illuminati Agenda to Eastern Europe Pop. See:

John Todd: Ex Illuminati Satanist - (The Witchcraft of Rock & Roll. See:

The Myth of a Judeo-Christian Tradition -

Jews: A Religious Community, a People, or a Race? See:

THE PROTOCOLS of the Learned Elders of Zion, Pdf. see:

Tales of the Tribe - PART 8 The ghost of Ezra Pound. See:

The Jewish Siege Of Europe. See:

Ezra Pound's formula for preventing Jewish conquest from within -- peaceful methods derived from the Byzantine Empire. See:

Six Zionist Companies Own 96% of the world's Media. See:

Jewish Extremism and Its Media Cover Up: Chabad Lubavitch. See:

EXPOSED This is how Israel controls your media EVERYONE SHOULD SEE THIS. See:

The truth behind the child abuse cover-ups. See:

David Icke: Zionism and Jewish People Are Not Interchangable. See:

Revealed: Tape that shows BBC chief 'did know of Savile probe. See:
Savile’s Travels: How Sir Jimmy Was Fingered as Peter Sutcliffe’s Accomplice. See:

Are UK Social Services complicit in child sex abuse procurement networks. See:

The Power of Paedophile connections in Europe and the United Kingdom. See:

Jimmy Savile to be canonised after miracle of how he got away with it for so long confirmed. See:

MI5 and Special Branch 'covered up Cyril Smith's abuse of boys': Police dossier handed to prosecutors in 1970 'went missing for four decades'. See:

Child Sacrifice and Royalty. See:


Jill Dando murdered by the State to keep lid on elite paedophile Ring. See:

59 pages and no apology: Anger at West Yorkshire Police report on Jimmy Savile affair which failed to address why officers were blinkered by his celebrity. See:




Celebrity arrests could soar after horrified police discover Jimmy Savile's secret lair at record shop. See;

Paedophile Politicians Are Above The Law says EU! See:



US and EU push Africans once more on abortion and homosexuality. See:

Disney's Frozen is 'very evil' gay propaganda, says Christian pastor See:

US Forsakes Gay Saudi Diplomat: A Story of Western Hypocrisy. See:


British Muslim group gets a “gay patron”. See:

European Parliament votes to impose heavy sanctions against pro-family African nations. See:

As Pope marks first year, Italian archbishop says the ‘new paradigm’ opens Church to homosexuality. See:

"Who am I to judge?” -- The tombstone of any pro-family legal battle. See:

Sex And The Public Schools. See:

Scathing UN report demands Vatican 'immediately' act against child sexual abuse. See:




All writings by members of AbundantHope are copyrighted by
©2005-2022 AbundantHope - All rights reserved

Detailed explanation of AbundantHope's Copyrights are found here

Top of Page

Political Information
Latest Headlines
AJ DePriest Uncovers The Enormous Covid Bribes
Israel Stunned by Ukrainian neo-Nazis
Exodus: Jews Once Again Forced into Exile from Beloved Odessa
World Economic Controlled Demolition
Sitrep: UNSC On Biolabs In The Ukraine + Russia Transcript
Lebanon Busts Mossad Spy Ring
George Soros: United States, European Union Must Remove Putin And Xi From Power ‘Before They Can Destroy Our Civilization’
Tucker Carlson Outlines Biden Strategy to Blame Russia for Outcomes of White House Economic Policy
New York Times Reporter Privately Admits Jan. 6 Riot Exaggerated, Disorganized, FBI Informants Involved
Democrat Spending Bill Contains 'Serious Expansion of Federal Gun Control': Gun Rights Group
Fired ER Doctor Tells RFK, Jr. ‘We Just Bowed Down’ Instead of Practicing Science
Here’s How The Freedom Convoy Changed Canada For The Better
Russian MoD: Joint Coordination Headquarters for Humanitarian Response in Ukraine
US Tried To Fund Bio labs In Ukraine As Early As 2005, records show
History Rhyming, Biden Administration Constructs Familiar War Plan Using Qatar as Long-Term Mechanism to Fund Protracted War in Ukraine
Andrei Martyanov Report
W.H.O. Scolds Pandemic Disbelievers: ‘We Warned You’ About Coronavirus
Congress Just Gave Itself A 21 Percent Pay Raise With Pork-Packed Omnibus Bill While Surging Gas Prices, Inflation Hurt Americans
War or Peace: Uncle Sam's Dirty Role In The Ukraine Crisis
White House Briefing Tik Tok Battalion To Advance NATO War Effort in Ukraine