EXTRAORDINARY AH Teaching from Spiritual Hierarchy
  NEW READERS! Read Here First
  Supporting AH
  Leadership of AbundantHope
  Regional AH Sites
  Other Sites with AH material
  Contact Us
  Becoming A Messiah
  Mission Ideas
  System Busting
  Cleric Letter/English
  Translations of Cleric Letter
  AH Member Writings
  Brian's Poetry
  Telepathic Messages
  Jess Anthony
  Lucia G
  Targeted Messages
  Light Flower
  Changing The Face Of Religion
  - Phoenix Journals - PDF in German
  Candace on Religion
  Other Spiritual Pieces
  Gems from God Like Productions
  Spiritual Nuggets by the Masters
  Phoenix Journals
  Phoenix Journals - PDF
  Telepathic Messages PDF books
  Selections from the Urantia Book
  Illustrations For The Urantia Book
  CMGSN Pieces
  David Crayford and the ITC
  Health and Nutrition
  Podcasts, Radio Shows, Video by AH
  Political Information
  True US History
  Human/Animal Rights
  The Miracle That Is Me
  911 Material
  Books - eBooks
  government email/phone #'s
  Self Reliance
  Alternative News Sources
  Art and Music
  Foreign Sites
  Health and Healing
  Human/Animal Rights
  Vegan Recipes
  Translated Material
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Jess
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Candace
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Anderen
  Canal Jess
  Par Candace
  Other Channels
  Telepathische Nachrichten (Candace)
  Telepathische Nachrichten (Jess)
  Telepathische Nachrichten (div.)
  AH Mitgliederbeiträge (Candace)
  AH Mitgliederbeiträge (Jess)
  Spirituelle Schätze
  Translations - Candace
  Translations - Jess
  Translations - Others
  by Candace
  By Jess
  By Others
  Anfitriones Divinos
  Bitácoras Fénix
  Creadores-de-Alas (WingMakers/Lyricus)
  Escritos de Candace
  Escritos de Otros
  Telemensajes de Candace
  Telemensajes de Jess Anthony
  Telemensajes de Otros
  By Candace
  By Jess
  By Others
  Korean Translations
  Hungarian Translations
  Swedish Translations

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Political Information Last Updated: Mar 28, 2022 - 12:08:15 PM

By John Christian
Feb 22, 2010 - 7:35:06 PM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page Share/Bookmark


Source: John Christian

"COMMUNIST" COUNCILS IN NEW ZEALAND and their hidden Fabian Socialist
 2006 "Draft Ten Year Plan" to confiscate all freehold properties through rate
rises and taxes By John Christian © John Christian April 2006
A	The Basis of Local Government
B City of London Corporation
C The Beginning of Socialism in London
D Fabian Society
E Fabian Society "Five Year Plan"
F Fabian Society Privatization of the World
G "Sovietization" of Local Government in New Zealand
H Communist "Sustainable Development"
I World Conservation Bank
J Communist "SmartGrowth"
K Bribery of Local Government Politicians
L Pauperization of Pensioners and the Middle Class
M Borrowing Powers of Councils and the Stealing of Ratepayer's Properties

This 'paper' is written in the public interest, and may be freely reprinted
or republished, in full or in part, for profit or not, by whomsoever wishes
to use it.


The modern system of local and regional government can be directly
traced back to Babylon, when in King Nebuchadnezzar's time (605-562
B.C.), the city was divided up into ten distinct regions or districts
ruled by princes, under whom were mayoral governors, captains, judges,
treasurers, councillors and sheriffs. In modern times the system of
local government that we have throughout the world is derived
exclusively from the City of London Corporation.


The City of London Corporation is a Masonic, private, independent,
sovereign state occupying approximately one square mile within the
heart of the greater London area inside the old Roman walls of London.

It either directly or indirectly, controls all mayors, councils,
regional councils, multi- national and trans-national banks,
corporations, judicial systems (through Old Bailey, Temple Bar and the
Royal Courts of Justice in London), the IMF, World Bank, Vatican Bank
(through N. M. Rothschild & Sons London Italian subsidiary
Torlonia), European Central Bank, United States Federal Reserve (which
is privately owned and secretly controlled by eight British- controlled
shareholding banks), the Bank for International Settlements in
Switzerland (which is also British-controlled and oversees all of the
Reserve Banks around the world including our own) and last but not
least, the communist European Union and communist United Nations

The supreme ruler of the City is the Lord Mayor who is elected once a
year and lives in the Mansion House. The City has a resident population
of about 5,000 that rises to about two million during the week when
people surge in and out each day to work.

The financial centre of the world, it is often termed the 'wealthiest
square mile on earth. 'The full title of the Square Mile's governing
body is the 'Mayor, Aldermen and Commons of the City of London in
Common Council Assembled.'

Photo: The Lord Mayor 2006

The Court of leadership consists of the Lord Mayor, 25 Aldermen and 130
Common Councilmen.

All of the giant, largely Jewish international banks and corporations
in the City of London that control the world are members of one or
another of the Twelve Great Livery Companies domiciled in Guildhall (or
the Hall of the City of London Corporation).

As the result of a 'gentleman's agreement' between the sovereign and
the City merchants and bankers made many hundreds of years ago, the
Lord Mayor is officially head of the Corporation and is allowed to
operate independently of the sovereign. However, the wealth of the
world held in the Corporation ultimately is the Sovereign's, because,
should the gentleman's agreement break down, the sovereign has the
power to "rescind" the Corporation's independence.

The Queen sometimes refers to the Corporation as "The Firm."

While ostensibly the power of the monarchy appears to be diminishing as
the Queen voluntarily gives her Commonwealth countries their
independence and they become republics chartered to the United Nations,
and she actively works toward abolishing the sovereignty of Britain as
the UK is broken up and divided into regions of the European Union her
City of London Corporation multi-national banks and corporations are
quietly taking over the world.

In ancient times the City marshals and sheriffs were employed to ensure
that all the "council" rates and taxes were paid to the City on behalf
of the king.

After the conquest of William the Conqueror in 1066, who first brought
the Jewish bankers to London from France, the Jews developed written
credit agreements for the king, (in French called "mort-gages" mort
'death'gage 'bond') and it was the marshal's and sheriff's jobs to
ensure that all the interest payments of these "deathbonds" were paid
to the Jews on behalf of the king.

During the reign of Richard I (the Lionheart) after the serious
downturn in the economy as the result of the cost and tax impositions
of the Crusades, (read "Blondel's Song" by David Boyle to understand
how 25% of the wealth of England was required in standard Silver Ingots
to free Richard the Lionheart from not Saladdin but the Holy Roman
Emperor!") Many farmers, business people and peasants had defaulted on
their "mort-gages" throughout England.

As the result, the Jews promptly commenced seizing the commoner's
property for not paying the interest, rates and taxes to the City and

Subsequently, a rapid increase in hate against the "King's Jews" was
initiated. This led to the massacre of Jews at York in 1190. New York
in America was later named by British Jewish immigrant bankers in
memory of the event.

For 100 years the commoner's hate against the "King's Jews" fermented
until 1290, when, under pressure from the people, Edward III finally
suspended the Mayoralty and reluctantly banished all Jews from his
kingdom when 16,000 left England and didn't begin to return until
around the reign of Elizabeth I 1558-1603) when the enormous power of
the City really began to accelerate with the opening of the world's
first stock exchange in London and has continued unabated to the
present day.

While there have been rare occasions when the Lord Mayor and Commalty
of the City, as a result of their colossal wealth and power have been
able to subtly out-manoeuvre the monarch, as to their cost, Richard II,
Charles I and James II were to learn to their fate generally speaking
this has been the exception rather than the rule.

Ultimately, whoever successfully rules must have the "will" of the
people. Historically, in the City many although certainly not all
monarchs, have ruled with the "will" of their subjects.

But rarely, if ever, have the bankers, rich barons or knights been
respected in this position.

More often than not they've been consistently hated.

Even when monarchs have done a poor job, provided they have still had
the "will" of the people, the wealthy bankers' position has been
extremely "perilous" to say the least.

After forty years of misrule by Henry III, the Lord Mayor, Thomas
Fitzthomas (1261- 1264) and the Aldermen defied the king.

On this particular occasion the Lord Mayor ended up being thrown into
the Tower where he died.

Henry III vetoed nine Mayors in his long reign, and jailed another who
died in prison.

On one occasion the threat to the Lord Mayor's massive wealth and power
has not come directly from the monarch, but from the people themselves.

Mayor Nicholas Brembre (1383-1385) had been a king's man during the
peasant's revolt, and was knighted by Richard II for curbing the
ambitions of his uncle, John of Gaunt.

But Brembre had few friends among the common people having deposed the
popular Mayor Adam Stable, and when he re-imposed the hated Poll Tax
which had caused the revolt, the mob turned on him.

He was given a mockery of a trial and was then hanged, drawn and
quartered. Understandably, therefore, from the time of Richard II most
of the "Lord Mayors" in the City of London and others in the realm
became very "cautious" and "hesitant" about any proposal which could be
seen as an "unreasonable demand" to levy rates or taxes for the City
and king.

However, today these events have all but been forgotten. From the time
of William the Conqueror in 1066 up to the time of the Reformation the
City of London Corporation was Roman Catholic.

(The modern global "company" and "corporate" business system that we
know today grew out of the old Roman Catholic dioceses in England which
were the world's first "corporations").

During the reigns of Henry VIII (1491-1547) and Elizabeth I (1558-1603)
when the Church of England, knights and barons took over the assets of
the Catholic Church in England, the City then became Protestant.

Gradually, as the people of England apostatized and turned away from
the Protestant King James Bible and Christianity in general, both Roman
Catholic and Protestant, in the late 1800's the City and Monarchy
became rabidly Socialist.


The religion of Socialism is based primarily on the teachings of the
pagan Greek philosopher and writer Plato, and especially his book The
Republic, in which 400 years before the time of Christ he dreamed of a
"World Republic" headed not by a president, but by a royal "world
philosopher king" or "prince" like himself of course!).

Both Karl Marx and Hitler were great students of Plato. It is only
inevitable that the planned reformed United Nations and EU will one day
be headed by this "Philosopher Prince".

Socialism officially first began in 1880 in London when H. M. Hyndman
founded the Rose Street Club which was dedicated to the destruction of
Christianity in England.

In 1884 the group changed its name and came to be called the Social
 Democratic Federation.

Its early members deceptively called themselves "Christian Socialists".
Later the group's membership included the Jew, Karl Marx's daughter,
Eleanor Marx

and her husband Professor Aveling. Behind the scenes the group was
largely controlled by Engels, Karl Marx’s partner.

Because Hyndman would not obey the orders of Engels, Eleanor Marx and
her husband split off with William Morris the poet and others and
started an opposition group which they called the Socialist League.

On January 4, 1884, members and past members of the Social Democratic
Federation, the Socialist League and others founded the Fabian Society.


The first meeting of the Fabian Society was held at the home of Mr. E. R.
Pease, a member of the London Stock Exchange.

Two of the leading members were George Bernard Shaw and Sidney Webb.

Other early members were Eleanor Marx,
 theosophist and  occultist Annie Besant,
and author H. G. Wells.

The name of the society was suggested by
the Spiritualist, Frank Podmore, who named
it after the brilliant, elderly, third century
 Roman general, censor and consul, Quintus
 Fabius (Maximus Verrucosus 303-203 BC)
who was made a dictator in 221-217 BC and,
with his small band of fighting guerrillas and
superior cunning, successfully defended Rome
by defeating Hannibal's much bigger and mighty
 Carthaginian army through "gradualism"
and "terrorism" during the time of the second Punic War.

Initially he kept to the hills and cunningly hampered the enemy's
progress by cutting off their food and supply lines with "delaying
tactics" until Rome could assemble enough men to defend the city

During the war, his slow, "gradual," delaying tactics were greatly
disapproved of by his soldiers and the civilians and earned him the
name of 'Cunctator' the 'Delayer.'

But later, after the triumph, his skill and wisdom was highly appreciated.
He died in his 100th year in 203 BC.

The only difference between Fabian Socialism and Communism is that
Communists take your house by directly sending in the "secret police"
to knock your front door down Fabian Socialists do it much more subtly
and cleverly by "gradually" taking your individual rights away, by
"gradually" increasing property taxes and rates, and finally, when you
can't pay them, they send in their regional "council tax inspectors" to
take your house away but the end result is the same.

British PM Tony Blair and President George Bush Junior's
 globalist "war on terror" is a classic Fabian Socialist

The philosophy of the Fabian Society was written in
1887 and included the statement: "The Fabian Society
acknowledges the principal tenet of Marxism the
abolition of private property etc." (Of course this does
not apply to the elect oligarchy at the top who end up
 owning the lot!).

Fabian Socialism is a "mixture" of Fascism, Nazism, Marxism and Communism
all bundled together.

However, it is much more deadly because it is much more clever and
subtle. Sidney and Beatrice Webb published a book of 1143 pages in
defense of Bolshevism. It was entitled Soviet Communism: A New Civilization.

In April 1952 the Webbs were exposed before a US Senate Committee on
the judiciary when Soviet Colonel I. M. Bogolepov, a former Red Army
officer stated that the entire text had been prepared by himself in the
Soviet Foreign Office. Appropriately, the defiant coat of arms of the
Fabian Society (commissioned by author/playwright co-founder George
Bernard Shaw) today (now archived) is a "wolf in sheep's clothing."

Until recently it also appeared on the Fabian glass window (now
removed) in the Beatrice Webb House at Dorking, Surrey. Today the
Fabian Society is among other things the intellectual wing of the

British Labour Party.

Before Tony Blair became British Prime Minister in May 1997, he was
Chairman of the Fabian Society.

Since the 1997 British general election there have been around 200
Fabian MP's in the House of Commons, some of whom have formed almost
entire Labour Cabinets including Gordon Brown, Robin Cook, Jack Straw,
David Blunkett, Peter Hain, Patricia Hewitt, John Reid, Ruth Kelly,
Alan Milburn and Clare Short.

Headed by Tony Blair, Fabians now dominate the entire British government.

They are resident in all parties and sit on all important select
commissions and organizations allied to the government.

A good web-site on the subject is:

The Fabian Society literally controls the European Union. German-born
Gisela Stuart, the Labour MP for Birmingham Edgbaston since 1997, and
member of the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee, was
one of two House of Commons' Representatives on the European Convention
and a member of the Presidium of the Convention on the Future of Europe.

The Presidium was the drafting body that created the draft Constitution
for Europe. In her book, The Making of Europe's Constitution, published
in December 2003 by the Fabian Society, p. 20-21, Gisela writes: "In
the early months, the Presidium members would meet in a small room in
the Justus Lipsius Building some fifteen minute walk from the European

Attendance was limited to the thirteen members, the Secretary General
Sir John Kerr, his deputy and the press officer. Sir John Kerr, a
former Permanent Secretary of the British Foreign Office, conducted the
proceedings inside the Presidium and in the plenary sessions of the
Convention with deft diplomatic skill as might be expected from someone
who John Major called 'Machiavelli' in his autobiography.

The best description of his talents I heard was: 'When Kerr comes up to
you and asks for the time, you wonder why me and why now?'

On several occasions, we would retreat to the Val Duchess a small
palace used by the Belgian foreign minister. It was at one of the
dinners at Val Duchess that the skeleton of the draft constitution was
given to members of the presidium in sealed brown envelopes the weekend
before the public presentation.

We were not allowed to take the documents away with us.

Just precisely who drafted the skeleton, and when, is still unclear to
me, but I gather much of the work was done by Valery Giscard d'Estaing
and Sir John Kerr over the summer.

There was little time for informed discussion, and even less scope for changes to be made."

There is another important idea, a method more than a principle which becomes closely associated with Fabianism.

Sydney Webb called it 'permeation.' Today it would be called
'consensus.' Webb put it this way. Most reformers think that all they
have to do in a political democracy is to obtain a majority. This is a
profound mistake.

What has to be changed is not only the vote that is cast, but also the
mental climate in which Parliament and Government both live and work.

That I find to be an accurate description of the approach I and my
colleagues have tried to bring to the affairs of the nation in our
first term of office."

In the last century, members of the British Fabian Society dynastic
banking families in the City of London financed the Communist takeover
of Russia.

Trotsky in his biography refers to some of the loans from these British financiers going back as far as 1907.

By 1917 the major subsidies and funding for the Bolshevik Revolution
were co- ordinated and arranged by Sir George Buchanan and Lord Alfred


The British plan to take over the world and bring in a "New World
Order" began with the teachings of John Ruskin and Cecil Rhodes at
Oxford University.

Rhodes in one of his wills in 1877 left his vast fortune to Lord Nathan
Rothschild as trustee to set up the Rhodes Scholarship Program at
Oxford to indoctrinate promising young graduates for the purpose, and
also establish a secret society for leading business and banking
leaders around the world who would work for the City to bring in their
Socialist world government.

Rothschild appointed Lord Alfred Milner to implement the plan. At first
the society was called Milner's Kindergarten, then in 1909 it came to
be called The RoundTable. It was to work closely with the London School
of Economics founded in 1894 by

Fabian Socialist leader Sidney Webb (Lord Passfield).

Today former Rhodes Scholars (such as Bill Clinton), Fabian Business
RoundTable members, and graduates from the London School of Economics
(the primary Fabian Socialist training school in the world) dominate
the global banking, business and political systems in every country.

The British Fabian Society plan to takeover the world by the City of
London financial community was first published in a book entitled "All
These Things" by a New Zealand author and journalist, A. N. Field.

The book was first published in 1936 by Omni Publications in the United
States (and censored in New Zealand). The document, called "Freedom and
Planning" was secretly circulated in 1932 by the inner councils of the
members of the Political Economic Plan, otherwise known as "P.E.P." in

The then chairman of the organization was a City of London Jew, Israel Moses Sieff, who was the reputed author of the plan.

The headquarters of P.E.P. were at 16 Queen Anne's Gate, London.

Mr Sieff was also chairman and financier of Marks and Spencer's' chain stores and vice-president of the British Zionist Society.

Similar to the experiment carried out in the in the USSR, the whole
world would eventually be transferred into a Communist "United Nations"
World Soviet Socialist Republic, where each country would be
"regionalized" and ruled through "Regional Councils" through a United
Nations dictatorship called a "Parliamentary Assembly" which would be
just another name for a Soviet "Central Committee" and all independent,
sovereign, national governments would be totally abolished.

Centred around City of London Jewry's international financiers in the
Bank of England subsidiary, the Bankers Industrial Development Company,
the essence of the document "Freedom and Planning" was (and still is)
to gradually "Sovietize" the world based on their "Five Year Plan"
inaugurated in Moscow in 1927-28 in the Soviet Union.

Basically the plan involved the subtle transfer of the entire
productive capacity of each country throughout the world into a series
of great "State-owned" departments, which would then be "corporatized",
then "privatized" to City of London Corporation International banks and
corporations which they control.

Individual property ownership would be severely restricted, with most
of the land, sea, fisheries, rivers, lakes, ports, railways,
communications, media, roads, electricity, energy, food, water, waste
management, housing, farms, commercial property, schools, hospitals,
police, social welfare, Inland Revenue etc. transferred into statutory
corporations, companies or land trusts which indirectly would be owned
by City of London banks.

The "peasants" would still be allowed to own their own clothes, and
small assets like furniture, cars and boats etc., but the main assets
of each country would be owned by their multi-national corporations and

In essence the City of London Corporation would become the "One
World Earth Corporation" and would privately own the world.

Similar to the experiment carried out in the in the USSR, the whole
world would eventually be transferred into a Communist "United Nations"
World Soviet Socialist Republic, where each country would be
"regionalized" and ruled through "Regional Councils" through a United
Nations dictatorship called a "Parliamentary Assembly" which would be
just another name for a Soviet "Central Committee" and all independent,
sovereign, national governments would be totally abolished.


As the result of the P.E.P. Plan originally formulated in 1932, right
now every country's "State assets" (owned in trust by the State on
behalf of the people) are being frantically "privatized" by City of
London-controlled banks and corporations primarily under the directions
of two leading Fabian Socialist writers Sir Roger Douglas and John

Sir Roger Douglas's book "Unfinished Business" and John Redwood's book
"Public Enterprise in Crisis" are the primary handbooks being used by
central and local government finance ministers and officers all around
the world to sell off each nation's "family silver" and State assets
with the more "sensitive" public assets being transferred into
Fascist-type Public-Private Partnerships (PPP's) which are designed to
make the public masses and peasantry "think" that they have some degree
of control when in reality they have none as the real ownership of the
assets are held by the City of London banks and corporations who fund

Until relatively recently, John Redwood was head of N. M. Rothschild
& Sons London global Overseas Privatization Unit that is
coordinating the entire global privatization process.

Sir Roger has been contracted as a consultant by City of London Banks,
the World Bank and others to advise on national privatization programs
as well.

Fabian Society "Regionalization" of the World through UN and EU Control
of Regional and City Councils.

All of the countries in the world currently are being "regionalized".

Presently, for example, the whole of the United States is being
"regionalized" and the EU Committee of the Regions, based in Brussels,
is "regionalizing" every country in the European Union.

As the result of this radical "regionalization" process, Britain has
now already been effectively abolished, having been divided up into 9
separate regions of the EU, plus Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

This cunning process, which is being "gradually" implemented to destroy
the power of the central national government in each country, is
commonly referred to as "Devolution" by the Queen and Fabian Society.

Unlike the rest of the autonomous regions in the UK which, like most of
the other regions in the EU that have become virtually powerless
through their representation in the European Parliament which is now
only a "talking shop", the City of London Corporation as a separate
region by itself within the Union now rules it.

This is because all of the Commissioners are appointed (not elected) to
the European Commission by City of London-controlled business leaders
and bankers in their respective countries.

Right now throughout the UK all city councils and regional councils are
dramatically increasing their rate demand on their constituent's
properties, while at the same time they are quickly expanding their
debt levels for unaffordable capital works programs via loans from City
of London banks which policies are deliberately intended to prepare for
the councils' "privatization" whilst transferring the local government
in each country to "regional councils" which ultimately will become or
be controlled by "Regional Parliamentary Assemblies," identical to the
old structure in the former Soviet Union which first regionalized then
abolished the national governments before they set up their republican
socialist police state.


In New Zealand, the blatant UN "Sovietization" of the entire country was
implemented by the Hon. Dr. Michael Bassett, Minister of Local Government,
through the Local Government Amendment Act (No.2) in 1989.

This radical act reduced more than 600 different local authorities throughout
the country to 94: 13 regional councils, 74 district or city councils and
seven special authorities.

This new structure of local government deftly created by the act divided
the whole country up into 14 "Soviet-styled" regions governed by 13 regional
councils and a district council (with the Airborne Region being unique in
that its district council was also to become the regional council for that area).

Under the 1989 Act, the district and city councils were designed to continue
to provide essential services such as water supply, roads, sewage disposal
and rubbish collection (which all ultimately would be "privatized" or
transferred into "Public-Private-Partnerships (PPP's) which would finally
end up being foreign-owned) and the regional councils would take over many
of the responsibilities performed in the past by many special purpose
authorities formerly carried out by such agencies as catchment boards,
harbor boards, pest and noxious plant authorities etc.

Ultimately, this devious plan is to transfer many of the Central Government
tasks and responsibilities to regional councils as well, which will be further
subtly rationalized to become or be controlled by "Sovietized" Regional
Development Agencies and Regional Parliamentary Assemblies ­to rule their
unwary serfs and peasants under strict Communist United Nations and
Marxist EU socialist law.

These processes are now well advanced and are almost complete in Britain,
and are accelerating in all other countries,including the United States.

One could say that the Fabian Socialist global "cake is about 95% baked!"


1992 at the "communist" United Nations
Conference on the Environment and
Development (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil,
co-chaired by former Soviet Union President
Mikhail Gorbachev and N. M. Rothschild-London
agent Canadian billionaire Maurice Strong, the
UN unveiled a radical environmental
philosophical agenda which "inverted"
the traditional values reflected in the Bible,
Magna Carta and US Constitution (which put
man under God at the head of his creation and
dominion i.e. a man's rights were to have
superiority over those of animals, fish, plants,
 trees and forests etc.)

At the Earth Summit in Rio, an old pagan concept was introduced which
"inverted" all of our existing, constitutional, democratic, personal
and property rights and values espoused by Christianity and transferred
them to the environment and the religion of mother-earth Gaia worship.

In this religion, a tree becomes more valuable than a human being. A
rare bird more valuable than a hospital. This United Nations program of
action unveiled in Rio was called Agenda 21. It is 300 pages long and
is very complex.

Primarily it is designed to be implemented with other radical UN
documents such as the Global Biodiversity Assessment (1100 pages),
promoted by the UN Conference on Human Settlements, Habitat II.

The first Habitat conference was held in 1974 and specifically
identified private property ownership as a threat to the peace and
equality of the environment.

It proposed to revolutionize the development of the land and cities of
each country under strict "Soviet-style" environmental guidelines,
called "Sustainable Development."

The UN's communist secret agenda through "environmentalism" and
"sustainable development" is very cunning and has deceived a lot of
well-meaning people.

Most people genuinely want to protect the environment and ensure that
the earth's resources are "sustainable" for future generations there is
no doubt.

But the communist goal of "sustainable development" and
"environmentalism" has absolutely nothing to do with protecting the
environment or sustainability it is all about abolition of property
rights, and ultimately, collectivization of housing and farms under
corporate State control.

Under this system, farmers and property owner's rights would be
effectively extinguished and overridden by strict Environmental and
Sustainable Development resource consents and laws.

They would be told where they could farm, what "sustainable" land they
could "develop," (sustainable development) what trees they could plant
or cut down, what fertilizer if any they could apply, and they would
need "consents" and licenses for everything under the sun.

City dwellers would be in the same dire predicament, and have their
homes confiscated, or they'd be severely fined, if they cut down a
heritage tree, washed their car, boat or dishes using detergent, or
used the privatized corporation's water when they shouldn't, especially
if they were nabbed under their friendly "Neighbourhood Watch Scheme,"
which scheme, incidentally, was first implemented in the Soviet Union.

Socialism is very subtle.

The penalty for cutting a tree down without the appropriate government
consent would become worse than murder.

Not only would you have to license your dog, to own a dog you would have
to be licensed too.

Farmers would need to be licensed to operate their collectivized farms,
spray weeds, care for cattle and drive their tractors under new
Soviet-styled "health and safety" laws.

All tradesmen and professional workers would have to be accredited and
licensed, as would all Christian pastors and churches, and any other
persons or institutions that could be likely to criticize their Soviet

All potential young parents would need to have a license to have
children, and if there was any family genetic weakness of some sort in
their state-controlled doctor's medical records, no license would be

In the end you would need a license or permit to take your boat on a
lake, take your kid fishing off a wharf, or travel between towns or

In other words full-blown Marxism.

The United Nations policy of "Sustainable Development" introduced in
1992 at the UNCED at Rio de Janeiro, and implemented through Habitat II
and the UN World Commission on Environment and Development is taken
directly from the USSR Constitution, chapter 2, article 18, which reads:

"In the interests of the present and future generations, the necessary
steps are taken in the USSR to protect and make scientific, rational
use of the land and its mineral and water resources, and the plant and
animal kingdoms to preserve the purity of air and water, ensure
reproduction of natural wealth, and improve the human environment."

Not only was N. M. Rothschild agent, Maurice Strong, Secretary-General
of the UN 1992 Rio Earth Summit, he personally worked with UN
Secretary-General Kofi Annan to appoint three of his own Earth Charter
Commissioners to the 12-man advisory panel of the Johannesburg Summit.


In September 1987, the 4th World Wilderness Congress was held in
Denver, Colorado, USA, which established the World Conservation Bank.

The congress was setup by none other than London's (late) Baron Edmond
de Rothschild, chairman of Banque Privée Edmond de Rothschild, Geneva,
Switzerland, and one of the trustees of the International Wilderness
Foundation that sponsored the conference.

Approximately 1500 of the world's most powerful bankers and leaders
attended the congress, which was chaired by Rothschild agent and
Canadian multi billionaire, Maurice Strong.

At the congress, Edmond de Rothschild designated eminent financier I.
Michael Sweatman to be the first president of the World Conservation
Bank. Sweatman wrote the forward of the banks charter.

Leading insiders of the biggest banks and UN agencies in the world were
present, including Maurice Strong "Mr Sustainable," David Rockefeller
head of the ChaseManhattan Bank "Mr Development" and Mr David
Ruckleshaus head of the UN Environmental Protection Agency "Mr
Environment" of course!

The World Conservation Bank is destined to become the final World Bank
and the "de-coupling mechanism" for City of London parent banks to take
over the assets of every country of the world.

The essence of their secret plan is this: After an orchestrated period
of global financial chaos triggered by a major war in the Middle East
or man-made state of emergency or natural disaster, in which most of
the world's banks will be deliberately collapsed in the process,
(wiping everybody's savings out in the crash), key City of London
banking parent creditors, are going to take over all the "mort-gages"
(death-bonds) and assets of the world, and transfer them to the World
Conservation Bank.

The plan is very esoteric and cunning, and very difficult for most to
understand. Already most government treasury departments are preparing
for such an event.

As part of the preparation for this momentous event, all of the world's
individual currencies are to be merged into two or three major currency
groups, two of which are the euro and US dollar.

Finally, these currencies are to be replaced with the World
Conservation Bank's new electronic global currency, the "Earth Dollar."

This new currency is deceptively to be issued against the collateral of
34 percent of the Earth's surface that is presently being transferred
into huge UN Heritage Parks and Conservation areas in every country
across the globe, under the crafty deception "Sustainable Development."

In short, the biggest banking conspiracy and deception ever to face mankind!

George W. Hunt, (95 Camino Basque, Boulder, Colorado 80302, U.S.A.), a
US businessman, attended the congress and produced a video about it
exposing their wicked and incredibly deceptive plans. On his video he plays excerpts of key speeches recorded at the congress.

One such speech was made by David Lang, a leading US financier and
close personal friend and business partner of Maurice Strong, who said:
"When the auditor finally gets his hands into the balance sheet, I
suggest therefore that this be sold not through a democratic process.
That would take too long and devour far too much of the funds to
educate the cannon fodder unfortunately which populates the earth. We
have to take an almost elitist program that we can see beyond our
swollen bellies and look to the future in time frames and in results
which are not easily understood or which can be, with intellectual
honesty, be reduced down to some sort of simplistic definition."

"CANNON-FODDER!" this is what these leading, arrogant, banking
conspirators of the UN "Sustainable Development," "SmartGrowth," and
World Conservation policies think of the world general population.

THESE are the wicked men that all the millions and millions of naïve
local/central government politicians and business leaders throughout
the world are now following.


The main business facilitators and organizations of the UN Sustainable
Development policies in the Asia-Pacific Region are the Pacific Rim
Institute of Sustainable Management, the NZ Business Council for
Sustainable Development and the Melbourne-based Sustainable Investment
Research Group (SIRIS).

Equity in this group, SIRIS, coincidentally, is held by IOOF Funds
Management and broking house JBWere that provide research for N.M.
Rothschild & Sons' Ethical Share Trust based in London.

The 1995 session the United Nations General Assembly passed a number of
rules. Rule 61, 62 and 63 gave local government, civil organizations
and private citizens the right to participate directly in the
development and implementation of these documents. Directed by the IMF,
World Bank, UN, and Prince of Wales International Business Leaders
Forum, the philosophy of "sustainable development" basically says that
there are too many people on planet earth and there are not enough
resources to go around.

What we need to do is urgently reduce the population, preserve,
conserve, and "ration" the remaining resources and that the United
Nations is the only body that can do it.

The World Bank already has a huge statistical database on countries and
individuals what they produce and what resources they consume, water,
energy, food, raw materials, heat, waste, health, social services etc.

If the net figure is a plus, they are considered to be good productive
world citizens. If it is a negative, they are in line for liquidation.
These are all basically the same old Socialist/Communist ideas as the
"Marxist/Leninist" philosophy and "planned economy" that permeated the
old Soviet Union.

In 1992 at Rio, another key "Soviet-styled" strategy proposed by the
Agenda 21 Programme of Action from the United Nations Conference on the
Environment and Development (UNCED) was "SmartGrowth."

This agenda can be found in a UN companion book called "Global Biodiversity
 Assessment" published by Cambridge University Press.

It proposes to model all the cities of the world on the Israel Moses
Seif P.E.P plan, and the "planned" economic system of development used
by Lenin and Stalin under the old Communist Soviet system of local
government. The UN "SmartGrowth" legislation in the United States was
first passed in the State of Maryland in March 1997. Since then, it has
been gradually introduced by city and district councils all around the
worl. Of course, rarely if ever will you hear of the policy coming from
a foul brood of UN international bankers. While virtually all of the
general public are oblivious of this fact, usually individual councils
will be happy to credit themselves as authors of the plans.


Based on a City of London corporate banking formula, a policy to
provide "more appropriate rates of remuneration for council members"
was planned for in the Local Government Act (No.2) 1989. This was
essentially recommended to effectively "bribe" City Council, District
 Council, Regional Council and Community Board members throughout
New Zealand, particularly in the bigger councils, to implement the
Fabian Socialist policies from the Central Government and Treasury
 which aimed to dramatically increase property rates and taxes in the
 future, whetherratepayers or constituents agreed with them or not.
Subsequently, these sweeping remuneration changes were proposed by
 the politically appointed Higher Salaries Commission on April 2002
increasing1 Auckland Mayor John Banks annual salary from $47,007
to $146,107, a pay rise of $99,1002 Manukau Mayor Sir Barry Curtis
 a pay rise of $35,111,3 Hamilton Mayor David Braithwaite a pay rise of
$27,381,4 Auckland Regional Council Chairwoman Gwen Bull a pay rise
$37,872 and 5 Tauranga Mayor Jan Beange a pay rise of $9461. Since
April 2002, it is not just a coincidence that these are precisely the councils
 that have been amongst the biggest culprits who have demanded the most
 onerous rates rise from their struggling citizens. For example, Tauranga
 City's proposed average rate rise for the 2006-2007 year was leveled at
16.3 per cent (when inflation, wage rises, benefits, pensions etc. and the
 change in the consumer price index was running at about 3 per cent). Even
 a five year old kindergarten child knows that this huge disparity is entirely
 unfair and "unsustainable" for the majority of their citizens,yet these highly
 paid Lord Mayors, Councilors and UN vassals of the realmhave the cheek
and audacity to call their plans "SmartGrowth" and "Sustainable


Just as there is a "close relationship" between the remuneration rises
of leading local body politicians with the overall level of council
rate-rise demand, so there is a "close relationship" between the level
of council rate-rise impositions and the financial status of people
living in each council ward or constituency. The Fabian bankers already
"own" the properties held by ratepayers with a "mort-gage" on them.

This includes all private homes, farms, businesses and commercial
property, local and central government debt. All young people with
student loans and welfare beneficiary groups also come under this
category. By and large central bankers believe this group is not a
worry as they are already under their strict control and firmly in
their grip through welfare dependency or mort-gage "death-bond" fealty.
But the one group that Fabian Socialists hate the most are the
"freehold" property-owners. Hence, this group, more often than not, is
the "middle class" that is predominantly comprised of middle-aged
citizens and more particularly pensioners who are generally the most

As a result of this phenomenon, all global residential property
taxation and ratepayer tax policies are now being subtly targeted
against these particular groups to confiscate all their properties.
Essentially the Fabian City of London banks envisage this to be
achieved through a variety of measures.

M Borrowing Powers of Councils and the Stealing of Ratepayer's

[Ron: text unavailable]

See also

All writings by members of AbundantHope are copyrighted by
©2005-2022 AbundantHope - All rights reserved

Detailed explanation of AbundantHope's Copyrights are found here

Top of Page

Political Information
Latest Headlines
AJ DePriest Uncovers The Enormous Covid Bribes
Israel Stunned by Ukrainian neo-Nazis
Exodus: Jews Once Again Forced into Exile from Beloved Odessa
World Economic Controlled Demolition
Sitrep: UNSC On Biolabs In The Ukraine + Russia Transcript
Lebanon Busts Mossad Spy Ring
George Soros: United States, European Union Must Remove Putin And Xi From Power ‘Before They Can Destroy Our Civilization’
Tucker Carlson Outlines Biden Strategy to Blame Russia for Outcomes of White House Economic Policy
New York Times Reporter Privately Admits Jan. 6 Riot Exaggerated, Disorganized, FBI Informants Involved
Democrat Spending Bill Contains 'Serious Expansion of Federal Gun Control': Gun Rights Group
Fired ER Doctor Tells RFK, Jr. ‘We Just Bowed Down’ Instead of Practicing Science
Here’s How The Freedom Convoy Changed Canada For The Better
Russian MoD: Joint Coordination Headquarters for Humanitarian Response in Ukraine
US Tried To Fund Bio labs In Ukraine As Early As 2005, records show
History Rhyming, Biden Administration Constructs Familiar War Plan Using Qatar as Long-Term Mechanism to Fund Protracted War in Ukraine
Andrei Martyanov Report
W.H.O. Scolds Pandemic Disbelievers: ‘We Warned You’ About Coronavirus
Congress Just Gave Itself A 21 Percent Pay Raise With Pork-Packed Omnibus Bill While Surging Gas Prices, Inflation Hurt Americans
War or Peace: Uncle Sam's Dirty Role In The Ukraine Crisis
White House Briefing Tik Tok Battalion To Advance NATO War Effort in Ukraine