"Strawman Recapture": Regaining Legal Freedom
By Peter Andrew Nolan
Oct 11, 2010 - 11:16:10 PM
"Strawman Recapture": Regaining Legal Freedom
October 11, 2010
by Peter Andrew Nolan (left)
In November 07, I had gone into the Family Courts system in Ireland and Australia being told, and believing, that they were far more fair today than they had been in the past. I was lied to.
The Family Courts are nothing but criminal enterprises meant to destroy the family usually by way of destroying the man. Despite being one of the best fathers, husbands, law abiding citizens, professional workers around with a 25-year track record I had many crimes committed against me. No-one seemed to want to help me remedy those crimes. This was my 'awakening' to the Illuminati.
After I recovered from being suicidal at the prospect of dis-owning my former children, I vowed to create 'Fair Laws In Australia'.
My research led me to find out that in all the former British Empire Colonies the Common Law based on the Ten Commandments, the Bible, and the history of cases over thousands of years, are still in force. It surprised me even more that 'governments' are corporations (THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA is a registered legal entity on the US SEC) and they operate under Uniform Commercial Code. And it surprised me more to find out Common Law is superior to the UCC in places like Australia.
So. Rather than having to get the 'legislation' made fair, my project for 'Fair Laws in Australia' became one of proving that the Common Law was superior and would be recognized as such. The Attorney General, Robert McClelland has said so in a speech, but making it happen was another matter.
So I learned how to perform a 'Strawman Recapture'. The scanned versions of the documents I used are here: http://www.peternolan.com/Sovereign/ScannedDocuments/tabid/535/Default.aspx
This process performs the following basic steps:
- You rescind your implied and presumed consent to be governed.
- You declare your sovereignty and document that to pass the documentation to people so that you clearly communicate you are a sovereign and not a slave.
- You create a suite of contracts between the 'strawman' that was created at the time of your birth and your 'human being self'. These contracts protect you from their legal system.
- You transfer all the property of the 'strawman', actually owned by the state, across to yourself, the human.
I then went into the Australian Federal Magistrates Court and denied the Jurisdiction of the Courts and the video recording of that is here: http://www.youtube.com/user/peternolan1109
I had given copies of my Common Law Claim to the court Registrar, Paul Le Large, and Paul told me before this video was recorded that David Dunkley was given these documents. Therefore David had full lawful documentation of my claim to my property which was superior to his claim he could disperse my property. My claim to my property has not been rebutted at time of writing.
The annotated transcript and the associated 'order' issued by the man calling himself David Dunkley are here:
The video was sent to Kevin Rudd and he was told to sort the situation out. He didn't. So I have taken it upon myself to inform the good people of Australia as to the crimes being committed by their legal fraternity and have David Dunkley tried for his crimes against me.
Clearly, it can be seen from the transcript, that the video proves it is real, and the order, that David Dunkley committed the common law crime of theft as he had no rights to my property.
Since publishing all this material has 'upset' the Illuminati control. Australian Government agents from Australia's 'Intelligence' service ASIO have been running smear campaigns against me including a 'hate site'.
These agents were dumb enough to identify themselves on the removal of the video on you-tube by using an ASIO email address. Thus they also involve you-tube in a crime. So I have written to Julia Gillard and Eric Schmidt and proposed they remedy these crimes or face possible accusation of accessory after the fact. The letters are here:
I believe I am the first man in the world to bring video evidence to back up the transcript of the crimes being committed inside the Family Courts, in this case Australia. I have worked very hard for very long pretty much on my own dime to do this. But I feel this is the right thing to do because this site (http://www.dadsontheair.net/csa ) makes the estimate that about 4,000 men a year kill themselves from the abuse of the Family Courts and Child Support Agency in Australia. The scene is similar in all western countries.
I am working in collaboration with many brave souls to take on the Illuminati by way of bringing Common Law Courts to Ireland and Australia. We will put on trial all those judges and magistrates like David Dunkley who committed crimes. We will also put on trial women like my ex-wife who committed crimes like perjury, kidnapping, extortion and theft.
Warning! (from anonymous) [Ron: WHY is this warning anonymous?!]
The federal prisons are full of victims of this scam.
It truly is one of the worst cons that's been floating around the "tax" movement for over a decade.
It has zero legal basis and gets people indicted time after time after time.
The people pushing the crap called "Stawman" should be indicted for peddling such fraud. So many good, decent and desperate people have lost everything by falling for it while the ones promoting make off with the victim's last dollar.
Constitutional attorney Larry Becraft and a hundred other attorneys keep trying to get people to stop falling for that sickening scam:
The "Straw Man" Sight Drafts (posted September 18, 1999)
(amended July 12, 2008) [Ron: amended by WHOM?]
There is a "theory" floating around the movement which is absolutely crazy, yet it is promoted as "the hot new solution." This new theory has its origins with a fellow named Roger Elvick, who has been involved with some con jobs in the past; see Bye v. Mack, 519 N.W.2d 302 (N.D. 1994). Roger Elvick was years ago "into" the idea of sending forms 1099 to the IRS for its agents who stole your constitutional rights. This was a part of his "redemption process" back then and if you wish to learn about what happened to one party who followed Elvick's advice, readUnited States v. Wiley, 979 F.2d 365 (5th Cir. 1992). Many others who followed Elvick's advice also went to jail; seeUnited States v. Dykstra, 991 F.2d 450, 453 (8th Cir. 1994)("He voluntarily made the decision to purchase and use Roger Elvick's 'redemption program,' and he admitted that he did not pay any of the purported recipients any of the amounts reflected on the 1099 Forms. Because he knew he never paid the individuals, he could not have believed that the forms, which he signed under penalties of perjury, were in fact true and correct. The evidence also established that appellant acted corruptly in pursuing the retaliation scheme, in violation of 26 U.S.C. Sec. 7212(a)"). Roger was convicted for this activity; see United States v. Lorenzo, 995 F.2d 1448 (9th Cir. 1993). See also United States v. Hildrebrandt, 961 F.2d 116 (8th Cir. 1992); United States v. Rosnow, 977 F.2d 399 (8th Cir. 1992); United States v. Anderson, 353 F.3d 490 (6th Cir. 2003); and United States v. Salman, 05-10093 (9th Cir. 7-7-2008), for other Elvick victims.
While there, Roger developed this new argument. In essence, he contends that everyone's birth certificate constitutes ownership in "America, Inc." and we all have stock in this corporation, which stock is represented by these birth certificates (see Lodi v. Lodi, 173 Cal.App.3d 628, 219 Cal.Rptr. 116 (1985), where similar arguments were rejected; and Dose v. United States, 86 U.S.T.C. ¶ 9773 (N.D.Iowa 1986)("Petitioner * * * informs the Court of [his] 'notorious recission of [his] social security number' and recission of his birth certificate, which documents had previously made him a 'member of Corporate America (commune)' converting him into 'a slave of the commune subject to the regulation and control of the Federal Government' * * * the fact that Dose has attempted to rescind his social security number and birth certificate by sworn affidavit is irrelevant * * *")). According to Roger, the big banks and other financial institutions regularly trade in these birth certificates, buying and selling them to others. Of course according to this new argument, you can do the same thing.
From here, the argument goes down hill and becomes even more bizarre. I know precisely what are the major features of this argument because I have read the course material and even viewed a video tape of one meeting where this issue was discussed; this contention is utterly crazy. However, many people are studying this new issue and even issuing "sight drafts" based on this argument. But the promoters of this argument like Elvick, Wally Peterson, Ron Knutt and Dave DeReimer are really selling federal indictments. You are free to "buy into" this scheme, but be ready to face criminal charges, the maximum term of imprisonment of which is 25 years.
Comments for ""Strawman Recapture": Regaining Legal Freedom"
writings by members of AbundantHope are copyrighted by
AbundantHope - All rights reserved