Political Information
Putin Challenges Malthusians: Fusion Energy Is a National Priority for Russia
By Matthew Ehret with comments by Ron
Jul 17, 2019 - 2:54:10 AM


At a July 9 speech to the 2nd Global Manufacturing and Industrialization Summit in Yekaterinburg, Russia, President Putin presented a brilliant intervention into the visionless anti-growth (and anti-human) ethic characteristic of the neo-liberal world order when he made Russia's leadership in fusion energy a national priority.

Speaking to 2500 representative from the public and private sector, President Putin laid out the paradox of humanity's need for development which has often come at the expense of the health of the biosphere by saying: "It is not yet clear how to combine long term development and production build up while preserving nature and high living standards".

Attacking the anti-growth technocrats who are promoting a halt to progress and decrease of the world population, Putin said "it comes down to appeals to give up progress which will make it possible at best to perpetuate the situation and create local well-being for a select few. At the same time, millions of people will have to settle for what they have today, or it would be more appropriate to say what they don't have today: access to clean water, food, education and other basics of civilization".

Separating himself from that cynical worldview, Putin stated "it is impossible and pointless to try to stop human progress. The question is; which base can this progress realistically be built upon to achieve the millennium development goals set by the United Nations?" Answering his own question, Putin laid out the important role of fusion power as the foundation for a harmonization between the realm of nature (the biosphere) and the realm of creative reason (the technosphere): "super-efficient scientific, engineering and manufacturing solutions will help us establish a balance between the biosphere and the technosphere... fusion energy which in fact is similar to how heat and light are produced in our star, the sun, is an example of such nature-like technologies."

Putin went onto describe the driving role of the Kurchatov Institute which has already begun a project on a fission-fusion hybrid reactors which will be operational by 2020 and its role in driving advanced science which will be a creative force for the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) program in France which is scheduled to go online with its first plasma by 2025.

The Recovery of a Forgotten Paradigm

Once upon a time, such speeches as Putin's were a common thing in the west as scientific/technological progress was recognized as civilization's basis of existence.

That was before the "new morality" was created in the wake of the 1968 sex-drugs-rock and roll counterculture. The "old obsolete paradigm of the nuclear family" which Woodstock sought to replace recognized the simple truth that "since we will all someday be dead, what good is our lives if we have not left something better for our children and those yet unborn?" This was the foundation for the faith in scientific and technological progress that animated mankind's combat against fascism in WWII and the launching of humanity out of its limits by exploring space and the secrets of the atom.

Atomic Energy Commission Chairman Lewis Strauss expressed this ethic brilliantly in 1958 when he said: "I hope to live long enough to see the same natural force which powers the hydrogen bomb tamed for peaceful purposes. A breakthrough could come tomorrow as well as a decade hence. Out of our laboratories may come a discovery as important as the Promethean taming of fire."

Why have we not yet attained fusion?

The valid question yet remains: If statesmen and policy makers dominant during the post-WWII years believed in fusion power so deeply, why did we not attain those lofty objectives set down as national goals for fusion by the 1980s or earlier?

The simplest way to say it is that the Malthusians won.

The 1970s saw the west suffer a subtle coup d'état with the elimination of all nationalist leaders committed to defending their populations from the re-emergence of a financial oligarchy which had only recently failed to achieve world domination under Hitler and Mussolini.

[Ron: I disagree. Hitler and Mussolini were fighting for dominance in Europe, the Mediterranean and the Middle East, not the whole world. Moreover, the "financial oligarchy", ie the Rothschilds' dominated usurious Central Banking system, was aiming to dominate the whole world and nearly did as a result of WWII. The Talmudic banksters in London and New York actually caused WWII by financing Hitler and  supportng Bolshevik Russia as pressaged by Albert Pike in his letter to Massini in 1871. The result of WWIi was the global dominance of the Rothschilds' cabal and the Rockefeller cartel who were in secret alliance with the Soviet Bolsheviks until Christian Russians ousted the Bolsheviks from the Soviet Union in the late 1970s. The Rothschilds' supported Bolsheviks then took over the Vatican murdering Popes John Paul i and II while they also went to the US where they murdered the four Rockefeller brothers and took over much of the Rockefeller cartel there. See eg Dr Peter Beter's Audio Letters at Athough in-fighting between Talmudic factions has continued the Jewish banksters have virtually controlled our world until Donald Trump commenced his US presidency in 2017.].

After the last bastion of resistance to this coup was killed with the murder of Bobby Kennedy and MLK in 1968, non-governmental organizations were quickly formed to usher in a new ethic under the rubric of the 1001 Club, Club of Rome, and World Wildlife Fund. These organizations were stacked with former eugenicists and imperialists like Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands (founder of 1001 Nature Trust and Bilderberg Group), his friend Prince Philip Mountbatten, and Sir Julian Huxley. All three oligarchs were co-founders of the World Wildlife Fund.

These groups funded a new "science of limits" in order to promote the idea that mankind's biggest threat was mankind itself rather than scarcity, war, famine or any other by-product of imperialism as was previously believed. Prince Philip embodied this elitist ethic unabashedly when he said in 1980 "Human population growth is probably the single most serious long-term threat to survival. We're in for a major disaster if it isn't curbed...We have no option."

One early Malthusian who gained control of US policy making during this period was Henry Kissinger who moved the USA away from a policy of assisting former colonies' desire for industrial progress and towards a policy of "population control" under his NSSM 200 Report of 1974 which said: "The US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries. That fact gives the US enhanced interest in the political, economic, and social stability of the supplying countries. Wherever a lessening of population pressures through reduced birth rates can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resource supplies and to the economic interests of the United States... Although population pressure is obviously not the only factor involved, these types of frustrations are much less likely under conditions of slow or zero population growth."

Kissinger was joined by another Malthusian named George Bush Sr., then a congressman chairing a Task Force on Earth, Resources and Population who said on July 8, 1970: "It is almost self-evident that the greater the human population, the greater the demands for natural resources... The paramount question deals with an optimum human population. How many is too many people in relation to available resources? Many believe that our current environmental problems indicate that the optimum level has been surpassed."

As Sir Kissinger [Ron:Kissinger was killed by the Russians in February 1979 and replaced by a double. See Dr Peter Beter's Audio letterNo 43 at] and Sir Bush (knighted in 1995 and 1993 respectively) re-wired America towards an aggressive anti-growth foreign policy for third world countries, a policy of de-industrialization was underway within America itself as the productive machine tool sector and small/medium agro-industrial system was being dismantled in preparation for an age of neo-liberal globalization. To ensure that the new ethic of "adapting to limits" rather than attempting to transcend those limits with new discoveries was maintained, such programs as the Apollo space program were cancelled for "budgetary reasons" followed soon thereafter by a conscious undermining of the ambitious fusion energy programs which had been unleashed during the 1950s and whose budget had risen from $114 million in 1958 to $140 million by 1968. The budget would continue to rise with record breaking achievements led by Princeton's Plasma Physics Laboratory which broke the 44 million degree mark to initiate fusion in 1978 and broke international records by achieving a 200 million degree plasma by 1986.

Rather than fund fusion and encourage the construction of new designs and prototypes so necessary to this transformation of society, the opposite occurred, as a systemic underfunding, and collapse of vision led to a demoralization of nuclear scientists who could not carry out their experiments. Quitting his job as Director of Fusion of the US Department of Energy in protest of the sabotage, Ed Kintner said this "leave[s] the fusion program without a strategic backbone-it is a collection of individual projects and activities without a defined mission or timetable... The plan to increase industry involvement in fusion development is postponed indefinitely, and the industrial and economic benefits of high-technology spin-offs, surely an increasingly important by-product of an accelerated fusion technology program, will be lost."

Indicative of the dishonest philosophy used to justify America's rejection of fusion research, one of the fathers of the neo-Malthusian revival Paul Ehrlich who authored the Population Bomb in 1968 said in a 1989 interview that providing cheap, abundant energy to humanity was "like giving a machine gun to an idiot child".

A disciple and co-author of Ehrlich who went onto become "Science Czar" under Barak Obama was biologist John Holdren who wrote in 1969: "The decision for population control will be opposed by growth-minded economists and businessmen, by nationalistic statesmen, by zealous religious leaders, and by the myopic and well-fed of every description. It is therefore incumbent on all who sense the limitations of technology and the fragility of the environmental balance to make themselves heard above the hollow, optimistic chorus-to convince society and its leaders that there is no alternative but the cessation of our irresponsible, all-demanding, and all-consuming population growth."

[Ron: This discussion ignores the fact that US Black Budgets have funded space exploration and development of the patents of Nickola Tesla as regards the development of zero point enegy (however described) and other advanced technologies that have resulted in US and Russian bases on the Moon and Mars etc.].

The Immanent Death of Malthusianism

President Putin has recently made the point during a June 27 interviewwith the Financial Times that the neo-liberal order which has defined the west over the past several decades is obsolete. With his strong support for fusion power and a return to a global industrial growth policy alongside China's Belt and Road Initiative, President Putin has clearly identified the neo-Malthusian worldview as interwoven into the fabric of liberalism. Just as liberalism denies objective principled truths in favor of popular opinion, neo-Malthusianism can only thrive when a "consensus" of pessimism blinds its victims to the truth of humanity's natural ability to make constant willful discoveries and translate said discoveries into new technologies that bring our species into ever greater states of potential (material, moral and cognitive).

While the [Ron: Talmudic pseudo] Malthusian animal is committed to the belief that humanity may only adapt to scarcity under a closed system of fixed resources managed by privileged elites, humanists, like Putin and Xi Jinping, recognize that mankind's nature is found not in the flesh, but in the powers of mind which characterize us as a unique species capable of making unending discoveries in a growing creative universe which can be characterized in the same manner that Beethoven described his music: as rigorous as it is free.

[Ron: Arguably the Talmudic bankster cum corporatist global control cabal wants to drastically reduce the global population leaving only enough gentile slaves for their use and benefit, but that is primarily a matter of convenience as they see it. Malthus is not especially relevant in this context. Environmentalism is a propaganda ploy used as part of the mind control methdology used by the Talmudic oligopolists. However, it is true that this planet is grossly over populated and Universe Management will be transferring many inhabitants to other places after the coming magnetic pole reversal and stasis period. The planet cannot sustain its current gross ovepopulation.].

This simple statement reflects a powerful truth which liberals and Malthusians cannot stand: The universe's natural power of creative change - discoverable by the matured power of creative reason allows for the co-existence of lawfulness and freedom under the sole condition that we harmonize our wills and reason to a love of truth and our fellow beings.

[Colour fonts, bolding and comments in square brackets added.].

The views of individual contributors do not necessarily represent those of the Strategic Culture Foundation.


Dr Peter Beter's Audio Letters  -

Why Nuclear Energy Is Critical For Russia -

No nuclear waste: Fuel of future produced at Russia's high-tech underground plant. See:

Russia develops hybrid fusion-fission reactor, offers China role. See:

Russia: a global energy powerhouse that's much more than a petro-state -

Russia’s Rosatom Ready to Produce Fresh Water Using Nuclear Energy. See:

What does Russia produce? 1 -

What does Russia Produce? 2 -

What does Russia produce? 3 -

Russian Economic Resilience -

Russia’s Top 10 Exports -

Russian Family Farming Food Security - Humanity's Future. -

Russia's small-scale organic agriculture model may hold the key to feeding the world -

Russia earns more from agriculture than arms sales -

Putin’s Pragmatic Agricultural Policy: The Value of “Stomach Diplomacy” -

Russian Farmers Feeding Half the World Thanks to Biggest Grain Harvest Ever -

Russian officials propose bill to grant every citizen one hectare of farm and forest land to use for self-sufficiency -

Russia, China Deepen Win-Win -

World View: Russia Makes a Controversial Deal to Lease Siberia Land to China -

Iran 2.0? Russia to Loan Egypt $25 Billion to Build NUCLEAR Power Plant. See:

Meeting with Director of National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Mikhail Kovalchuk. See:

Israel Foaming at Mouth as Russia Announces Plan to Build 8 Reactors in Iran. See:

Russia’s Nuclear Energy Exports (Infographics). See:

Lockheed Martin's new fusion reactor might change humanity forever. See:

Old American Punishment, New Russian Strength: The Unintended Consequences -

OPEC, Russia and the New World Order Emerging -

" Bolshevising " Queering Science -

The Truth About Imperial Russia -

All writings by members of AbundantHope are copyrighted by
©2005-2017 AbundantHope - All rights reserved