Political Information
New study shows WWI-era Jewish spy network played key role in advancing the Balfour Declaration
By Israel National News- with comments by Ron
Jul 25, 2017 - 6:59:06 AM

New study shows WWI-era Jewish spy network played key role in advancing the Balfour Declaration

8 Votes

ed note–NOW REMEMBER, the notion that Jews operate with a hive mentality, are engaged in 5th column/state-within-a-state machinations in every country in which they reside is an ‘anti-Semitic canard’ that has no basis in reality, and not even when it is Jewish sources themselves saying it.

Israel National News

Aaron Aaronsohn and his friends at the NILI underground played a crucial role in the formation of the Balfour Declaration, former Mossad Chief Efraim Halevy claimed in a new study.

The Balfour Declaration is a diplomatic document signed in 1917, which paved the way for the establishment of the State of Israel.

The new study was published in the British-Jewish magazine Fathom, which is printed by the BICOM organization. The magazine’s current issue is dedicated to commemorating the 100 year anniversary of the Balfour Declaration.

Until today the Balfour Declaration was credited mainly to then-Jewish Federation of England President Dr. Haim Weizmann, who later became Israel’s first president. Aaronsohn’s Jewish underground was a controversial issue among the Jews at the time, and continued to remain so for decades after it ceased to exist.

Halevy quotes a number of references based on documents from the era, as well as statements from senior British officials of the period. These statements show that the Jewish underground’s assistance was crucial both in ensuring Jewish statehood and in aiding British efforts to conquer the Ottomans.

In an official publication by the British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS) and reviewing the intelligence activity of Britain in the years 1909-1949, the writer quotes documents from the First World War.

According to the documents, NILI spies collected “abundant military information through Palestine and South Syria” in an effort to recruit Britain to the cause of establishing a Jewish homeland in what was then known as “Palestine.”

Halevy further notes that in May 2017, a British Intelligence officer stationed in Paris wrote to the director of the Eastern Mediterranean Special Intelligence Bureau (EMSIB): “You certainly seem to be getting good stuff through Mack.”

“Mack” was the British intelligence’s code name for Aaron Aaronsohn.

Captain Sir George Mansfield Smith-Cumming (the legendary founder and first Director of the SIS from 1909-1923) provided additional testimony of Aaronsohn’s role when he noted that “they consider him (Aaronsohn) very valuable in Cairo.”

Twenty years later, Colonel Walter Gibbon, who was in charge of Near East intelligence in the War Office at the time, suggested that it was “largely owing to the information provided by the Aaronsohn network that General Allenby was able to conduct his campaign in Palestine so successfully.”

In light of this, Halevy notes that Cumming likely viewed the handling of NILI in a category that exceeded the bounds of an intelligence-gathering operation. It must have been at his behest, Halevy concludes, that Samuel Aaronsohn – Aaron’s brother – received a draft copy of the Balfour Declaration.

This draft was to be smuggled into Palestine to encourage NILI operatives on the ground to double their effort to gather more information.

Jeffrey rather cryptically tells us that “Cumming, too, liaised with the Zionist leader Haim Weizmann, meeting him several times in 1917 and 1918 to discuss Jewish affairs.”

Halevy also notes that the most prominent evidence of Aaronsohn and his men’s contribution is the fact he was one of only two Zionists (Weizmann was the other) invited to the British government session on October 31, 1917. According to Halevy, when the meeting hall’s door was opened, Sir Sykes announced “It is a boy” and the two were invited to shake hands and sit with British Prime Minister David Lloyd George, Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour and other ministers.

“The matter was first breached by Sir Mark Sykes in 1916 speaking to [the Chief Rabbi of the Spanish and Portuguese Jewish Community in Great Britain] Dr Gaster, and [Jewish Cabinet minister and later the first British High Commissioner for Palestine] Sir Herbert Samuel. Dr Weizmann was then unknown. Sykes was furthered [i.e. influenced] by General Macdunagh DMI (Director of Military Intelligence) as all the most useful and helpful intelligence from Palestine (then still occupied by Turkey) was got through and given with zeal by Zionist Jews who were from the first pro British,” noted Omsby Gore in 1922, when he was asked to prepare a document for incoming Secretary for the Colonies Winston Churchill.

‘As we approach the hundred year anniversary of the Balfour Declaration, we should also highlight those who helped bring it about,” Levy concluded, adding that NILI “proved how a handful of determined people can transcend their immediate condition, and through the power of their convictions, win over powerful international figures to support their cause.’

  1. #1 by lobro on 07/24/2017 - 11:32 am

    Jews operate with a hive mentality, are engaged in 5th column/state-within-a-state machinations in every country in which they reside
    which is why i rarely bother with the plural “jews”, saves a keystroke without any loss of meaning.
    They are as aligned as iron shavings in a magnetic field, it annoys me when people refer to “good jews” and “not all jews are bad” – yes they are, by the very definition, the ones that are not are no longer jews.

    Aside: i came across this very enlightening bit and am recommending to everyone to take a look:
    The roots of Torah canards are open to plain sight.
    Of course, the missing word is painfully obvious and it confirms the truth of it.
    Moreover, it also provides a viable link between the khazars and sephardi cesspools, rather than the “delegation of rabbis visiting the kagan” fairy tale.

  2. #2 by lobro on 07/24/2017 - 11:56 am

    AHA! moment, worth sharing …
    further on that Habiru link, there is a line that says

    Sumerian records

    The earliest recorded instance of the term is dated to the reign of king Irkabtum of the north Mesopotamian (Amorite) kingdom of Yamkhad (c. 1740 BC), who had a year named “Year when king Irkabtum made peace with Semuma and the Habiru.”

    so we are talking the region of Babylon (baghdad) … and now to our lovely and trusty reference into the hive mind (Deuteronomy 20:17)

    17 Completely destroy[a] them—the Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites—as the Lord your God has commanded you.

    right, nothing to see here folks, please move on, says Carol Redmount (should we cough discreetly?), a spurious coincidence.

  3. #3 by Lasse Karagiannis (@Amalek_) on 07/24/2017 - 1:37 pm

    Bandits and thieves, “borrowed” gold from the gullible Goyim, “just to be used in worship to Jahwe and then brought back after completed worship”.
    31 During the night Pharaoh summoned Moses and Aaron and said, “Up! Leave my people, you and the Israelites! Go, worship the Lord as you have requested. 32 Take your flocks and herds, as you have said, and go. And also bless me.”

    33 The Egyptians urged the people to hurry and leave the country. “For otherwise,” they said, “we will all die!” 34 So the people took their dough before the yeast was added, and carried it on their shoulders in kneading troughs wrapped in clothing. 35 The Israelites did as Moses instructed and asked the Egyptians for articles of silver and gold and for clothing. 36 The Lord had made the Egyptians favorably disposed toward the people, and they gave them what they asked for; so they plundered the Egyptians.

    The Jewish humanists Rabbi Jehiel Jacob Weinberg wrote:

    Page 112
    “The spiritual state in all circles brings sadness and hopelessness.
    I have bitter thoughts about the very existence of the nation and its hopes for the future.
    The entire world hates us.
    We assume that this hatred is due to the wickedness of the nations,
    and so no one stops to think that perhaps we also bear some guilt.
    We regard all the nations as similiar to an ass.
    It is forbidden to save a Gentile,
    it is forbidden to offer him free medical treatment,
    it is forbidden to violate the Sabbath to save his life,
    His sexual intercourse does not render a woman forbidden to her husband according to R. Tam, because their issue is like the issue of horses.
    Can the nations resign themselves to such a deprivation of rights?
    It is permitted to deceive a Gentile and cancel his debt as well as forbidden to return his lost object!
    What can we do? Can we uproot our Torah teaching with apologetic formulae or clever deceptions. God knows that I have written this with the blood of my heart, the blood of my soul”

    Page 118

    “In my opinion it is fitting to put an end to the hatred of religions for each other.
    More than Christianity hates Judaism, Judaism hates Christianity.
    There is a dispute if stealing from Gentiles is forbidden from the Torah, everyone holds that deceiving a Gentile and cancelling his debt is permitted, one is not to return a lost object to a Gentile,
    according to R. Tam intercourse with a Gentile does not render a woman forbidden to her husband,
    their issue is like the issue [of horses]. According to Maimonides,
    if a Jew has sex with a Gentile [woman], the Gentile is killed because the Jew stumbeled into sin through her.
    The law of the Gentile is the same as that of an animal. Maimonides derived this law on his own.
    It is not found in the Bavli or Yerushalmi. We must solemnly and formally declare that in our day this does not apply. Meiri wrote as such, but the teachers and ramim whisper in the ears of students that all this was written because of the censor”

  4. #4 by James Benn on 07/24/2017 - 7:23 pm

    Judaism is entirely predicated on the practice of usury. It is the animating principle behind ‘Judaism’ both as a ‘race’ and as a ‘religion’.

    Thing is, most people I meet still have no idea what usury is. They’ve either never heard of it, or they think it is some kinda obsolete practice from biblical times. They regard any discussion thereof with the same uncomfortable expression they reserve for ‘God’ or ‘Jesus Christ’. They are almost universally ‘atheist’. In other words, they’ve been Judaized.

    Indeed, they usually balk at any implied criticism of ‘interest’ because, if they have any money in the bank, they think it ‘reasonable’ that it should earn them interest … as long as it’s not ‘excessive’. And anything they have in the bank is guaranteed NOT to earn excessive interest. In fact, it won’t even keep pace with the inflation which is systemic to a usurious monetary system.

    People I meet simply can’t understand that usury is actually the creation of money out of thin air, backed by no collateral as such, but only by the borrower’s willingness to sign onto debt. Thus, every atomized individual spends their life running endlessly around the Hamster Wheel of Success generating ‘interest’ for the jewish banksters and chasing the disappearing dream of home ownership and comfortable retirement and a fine death.

    On the other side of the Ledger, of course, cluster the Big Jews. Backed by a veritable army of co-religionists. Hugely energized by their access to free money with which to buy up the entire world. Booted out of every European nation for that very reason, they have managed to get the entire world into a crushing headlock from which there seems to be no escape. The Trumpeter will not save us. He’s in the same headlock.

    When I am on a pedestal
    You did not raise me there
    Your laws do not compel me
    To kneel grotesque and bare
    I myself am the pedestal
    For this ugly hump at which you stare
    – Leanard Cohen

[Colour fonts, bolding and underlining added.].

All writings by members of AbundantHope are copyrighted by
©2005-2017 AbundantHope - All rights reserved