Because the malleable minds of the lemming masses cannot detect the subtly manipulative media games being played upon them; Jewish-directed "reality shows" can do more to engineer public attitudes and behavior than any direct academic frontal assault ever could. Edward Bernays (cough cough) -- the advertising legend and nephew of famed psycho-babbler Sigmund Fraud (cough cough) who helped to sell the dumb-as-dirt public on the merits of female smoking and U.S. entry into World War I -- revealed this scary reality. From his 1928 book, Propaganda:
"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ...We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. ... In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons...who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind." (emphasis added)
Is the idea of mass manipulation still a "conspiracy theory" TM when well-connected men of Bernays' stature admit to doing it?
1. Sneaky specimens of scum like Bernays (cough cough) have been playing the American public for fools for more than a century.// 2. Broadway playwright Israel Zangwill (cough cough) was another early manipulator. His hyped-up 1908 play, "The Melting Pot" used theater to promote the concept of America's future as one in which all races blended together (White genocide).
Since the days of "Beatlemania," the script-writers of the modern world have added the tactic of using the "real lives" of celebrity "role models" TM as stealth cultural weapons of mass degeneration. The Beatles were introduced to America as four innocent, relatively clean-cut young lads in nice suits from Liverpool, England who sang mindless yet harmless songs. Within five years, their Jewish handlers had completely transformed them into drugged-up, counter cultural, psuedointellectual hippies. And millions of the formerly clean living American teens, who had originally taken the innocent bait, copied their musical gods -- blindly following lead singer and admitted "One Worlder" John Lennon ("imagine there's no countries") into political and social radicalism.
A more recent example of this mass manipulation would be the shocking transformation of Miley Cyrus. From 2006-2011, Cyrus starred on the popular Disney Channel show "Hannah Montana." The show seemed innocent and harmless enough (though the character lived a double life). With their parents' blessing, millions of young girls grew up with Miley / Hannah.
In 2013, just two years after the show went off of the air, her handlers pulled the switch. Cute little innocent Miley Cyrus shocked the world with her pornographic "twerking" against the crotch of male singer Robin Thicke at the 2013 MTV Awards. And thus it came to be that a "dance" previously contained within the ranks of the skankiest of lowlife bar sluts soon became a "normal" part of the pop culture.
Then we have "The Kardashian" whores of "Reality TV" fame. Though there was no "bait & switch" tactic utilized here, the stupid show -- followed religiously by millions of silly young women and girls -- was used to heavily promote inter-racial marriage and trans-genderism (Bruce / Caitlyn Jenner was step dad to the Kardashian sluts.)
1964: The Liverpool lads seemed harmless when they debuted in America by appearing on the Ed Sullivan Show singing "I wanna hold your hand." // 1969: In less than five years, they had been transformed into long-haired bearded hippies singing about drugs and revolution.
2010: Miley Cyrus (Hannah Montana) was the "girl next door" type that parents allowed their young daughters to grow up with. // 2013: When Miley shockingly "twerked" her butt like a street-whore against a man's crotch (while playing with a giant foam finger between her own), the calculated bait & switch had been sprung upon millions of young fans.
With these historical precedents in mind, it is now clear that the ultimate "Reality Show" that is "The British Royal Family" TM is now being used to mentally rape the millions of boobs worldwide who have been captivated by this outdated and inbred clan of useless eaters. The unusual marriage of Prince Harry was scripted for the purpose of mainstreaming certain attitudes among the lemming masses. The tall handsome Prince could have married just about anyone. He was, we now believe, set up by the script-writers to marry second-rate actress Meghan Markle -- an outspoken feminist, bi-racial divorcee three years senior to himself and who has surely been mounted up by God-only-knows-how-many young Hollywood bucks and older Hollywood Sugar Daddies. How quintessentially "modern" of Harry the Global Warmist fanatic to throw out centuries of protocol and hook up with this peculiar tramp.
Just five months after their May 2018 marriage, the high profile couple announced that Meghan was pregnant with what will become Britain's first bi-racial heir to the throne -- albeit a few notches down the list of succession. Not only is all of libtardom giddy with self-righteous excitement over the coming of Britain's first mixed race prince or princess; now comes word from close friends of the dominating interloper herself that the unborn child (said to be male) is to be raised with a " fluid approach to gender" (here) -- that is,"free" of traditional male and females "stereotypes."
Don't be surprised if in as little as 7 years from now, "youse guys" see a little royal sissy prancing about Buckingham Palace with a bright colored afro, painted nails and eye-liner. And if indeed such a public affront to God and country as the full normalization of "gender fluidity" should materialize, know that it will be because Harry's handlers -- the true rulers of Britannia (cough cough) -- scripted it that way.
There's something not right about this "royal couple." -- Note Harry's constant Freemasonic hand signs in his jacket.
Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that Meghan Markle is defying tradition and protocol in her new role as princess.
Boobus Americanus 2: She's a good role model for today's young girls.
Editor: A big-mouthed, divorced, dominating harlot with extreme libtard political beliefs --- Yeah. That's about the ideal "role model" for theNew World Order.
TOMATOBUBBLE GETS KNOCKED DOWN --- BUT WILL GET UP AGAIN! CLICK HERE