This weekend 75 years ago, the German city of Dresden was razed to the ground by British and American aerial bombardment. At least 25,000 mainly civilians were destroyed in raid after raid by over 1,200 heavy bombers, indiscriminately dropping high explosives and incendiaries. It took seven years just to clear the rubble.
[Ron: Jews always lie. Churchill's mother was a Jewess. Our world is full of Talmudic propaganda and this author is repeating some of it! Dresden was full of civilian refugees when Churchill arranged for the fire bombing of the civilians there. The death toll could never be fully known but Churchill's bomber command and the Eisenhower's air force probably incinerated 500,000 ethnic Germans in a 24 hour period there. The JOO dominated British and US authorities have gradually pretended that fewer and fewer Germans were immolated in Dresden until now they say that only 25,000 died that night. Barf! Barf!See eg:
The destruction of Dresden, a world-famous cultural center of Baroque majesty, has been long dogged by controversy. Official British and American military accounts claim it was necessary to hasten the collapse of the Third Reich; with a reasoning that resonates with US claims for dropping the atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945.
Critics say, however, that the mass bombing of Dresden was immaterial in the effort to defeat Nazi Germany. It was a wanton act of terror - a war crime - carried out by the British and Americans. Critics point out that most of the industrial and military targets on the outskirts of the beautiful city were largely left untouched by the bombing.British wartime leader Winston Churchill is even said to have expressed misgivings about the morality of this and other indiscriminate bombing of German civilian centers.
[Ron: He did and should have.
Churchill himself ordered the firebomb raid on the city of Dresden (David Irving The Destruction of Dresden (1966) pp. 96-100),
Jack Nicholas tells us:
A major awkwardness concerning Churchill's conduct of the war lies in the secret British policy of so-called 'area bombing', adopted early in 1942 and outlined by (Lord) CP Snow in the 1960 Godkin Lectures at Harvard University (published in his book Science and Government, Oxford University Press 1961). Snow had an insider's view of the development of this policy. He outlines how the sinister Professor FA Lindemann (later to become Lord Cherwell, Churchill's chief scientific adviser), persuaded the British Cabinet to adopt the policy of directing bombing campaigns primarily against German working-class housing.'Middle-class houses have too much space around them, and so are bound to waste bombs; factories and "military objectives" had long since been forgotten, except in official bulletins, since they were much too difficult to find and hit' (p 48).Snow asks, 'What will people of the future think of us?Will they say.. we were wolves with the minds of men?Will they think that we had resigned our humanity? They will have the right.' (p 49). Fortunately, Snow needn't have worried. There have been and remain such powerful vested interests committed to preserving the myths of World War II that even the history departments of universities have in most cases assisted with the cover-up.
The respected British military historian Martin Middlebrook says,'In some ways, Area Bombing was a three-year period of deceit practiced upon the British public and on world opinion.It was felt to be necessary that the exact nature of R.A.F. bombing should not be revealed. It could not be concealed that German cities were being hit hard, and that residential areas in those cities were receiving many of the bombs, but the impression was usually given that industry was the main target and that any bombing of workers' housing areas was an unavoidable necessity.Charges of 'indiscriminate bombing' were consistently denied..The deceit lay in the concealment of the fact that the areas being most heavily bombed were nearly always either city centres or densely populated residential areas, which rarely contained any industry..The vital links in the dissemination of this view were the press and the radio upon which the public depended for all wartime news..' See:Churchill And Hitler...And History -http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Churchill-And-Hitler-And-History.shtml
Ardent advocates of the terror-bombing campaign said it would exhaust German morale. A classic case of ends justifying means, no matter how vile the means.
There were also claims at the time that the damage to Nazi communication and transport lines would aid the advancing Soviet Red Army.
But there is good reason to believe that the rationale for the obliteration of Dresden was for an altogether more sinister reason.
It wasn't so much an act of terror aimed at Nazi Germany, but rather a show of maniacal power to the Soviet Union.
A British Royal Air Force memo on the Dresden operation noted that it would "show the Russians when they arrive what Bomber Command can do." (See caption 17 in this linked photo essay.)
By mid-February 1945, the front lines of the Western and Eastern allied forces were such that the American and British ground troops had not yet entered Germany territory, while the Soviet Red Army had crossed the Oder River and were a mere 70 kilometers from Berlin, the seat of the Third Reich. Such was the keen advance of the Soviets that the Western allies were concerned that the Red Army might take all of German territory.
Rather than aiding Soviet forces from the mass bombing of Dresden, Leipzig and other cities in the German east, it seems plausible that, as the above British RAF memo indicates, the Western allies were intent on demonstrating a shockingly brutal, raw power to Moscow. Not just military power, but a will power to use any means necessary to defeat enemies.
There is a direct analogy here with the subsequent atomic bombing of Japan. At the Potsdam conference in July 1945 following the defeat of Nazi Germany and the carve-up of Berlin, giving the Western allies shared control of the German capital way beyond their final front lines, the American president Harry Truman relished the ability to drop a sinister hint to Josef Stalin about a newly acquired secret weapon - the A-bomb.
As with the earlier British and American bombing of Dresden and other German cities,there was arguably little military justification for dropping the atomic weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and 9.[Ron: WTF?! There was absolutely NO justification for the bombing of Dresden OR of Hiroshima and Nagasaki]. Like Dresden, the military significance of those cities was dubious. The death of 200,000 civilians from the atomic inferno was not a military necessity for defeating imperial Japan, as Truman's top generals MacArthur and Eisenhower were advising him against.
So if the bombing of Hiroshima or Nagasaki was unnecessary from a military point of view to end the Pacific War, why was it done ?
[Ron: The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki AND of Tokyo and Dresden and ALL of the civilian areas of Berlin, Hamburg and a total of 60 German cities was a Talmudic blood sacrifice of gentiles organised by global Jewry and its Jewish and shabbos puppets. See eg:
As with Dresden, the point was a monstrous display of terror by Western powers tolet the Soviet Union know that nothing would be off-limits in the postwar geopolitical stand-off that was anticipated and which became the Cold War.
[Ron: I disagree as discussed below.].
When the A-bombs were dropped on Japan, Stalin was said to have been frozen by reports of the awesome new destructive power. The Soviet Union was not to develop its A-bomb until 1949.
The terror unleashed at Hiroshima and Nagasaki seems to have had the intended effect of halting Soviet Red Army advances that were being made into the Korean Peninsula and onwards to Japan. The American troop lines were relatively remote by comparison with their Soviet counterparts, yet after the A-bombing the US was catapulted to take over both Asian-Pacific territories in the postwar period. Not unlike the precocious territorial gains that were acquired by the Western allies in defeated Nazi Germany.
Thus the moral controversies about the British and American bombing of German and Japanese cities goes way beyond arguments about the right or wrong of mass murder for the supposed purpose of ending wars.That moral hazard is difficult enough.But even more fiendish is a bigger picture; one in which the cold, calculated use of terror and genocide is not about ending war, but rather to simply exert geopolitical power against [Ron: all goyem as well as]a perceived rival in the postwar era. Terror for terror sake, evil for evil sake.
[Ron: Yabba, yabba, disinformation yabba. In this context, all Talmudic activity was and always is, terror for terror's sake and evil for evil sake. WWII was created by Talmudists for the purpose of killing as many goyem as possible and weakening and demolising the survivors. The neo-Pharisees always intended the destruction wreaked by WWII as well as in WWI and the genocide of gentiles inflicted by the Anglo-US Empire and its allies in Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, China, Iraq, Afghanistan, Africa and everywhere else in the last 150 years. Albert Pike spelled out these intentions in his letter to Mazzini in August 1871. The JOOS created the Soviet Union in 1917 and the Rockefellers and Rothchilds were in secret alliance with the Bolsheviks until they were ousted from the Kremlin by Christian Russians who then defeated the Rockefeller controlled US in the Battle of the Harvest moon on 27 September 1977. See eg: Dr Peter Beter's Audio Letters - http://www.peterdavidbeter.com/
A final note: it has become fashionable to falsify the Soviet victory over Nazi Germany by claiming that the Red Army became an occupying tyranny in eastern Europe after the war's end. Suffice to say that if the Soviets committed even a fraction of the crimes that were actually carried out by the Americans and British from their aerial bombing of civilians in both Germany and Japan, one would never hear the end of deafening Western condemnations against Moscow to this day, and for decades to come.
[Colour fonts, bolding and comments in square brackets added.].