EXTRAORDINARY AH Teaching from Spiritual Hierarchy
  NEW READERS! Read Here First
  Supporting AH
  Leadership of AbundantHope
  Regional AH Sites
  Other Sites with AH material
  Contact Us
  Becoming A Messiah
  Mission Ideas
  System Busting
  Cleric Letter/English
  Translations of Cleric Letter
  AH Member Writings
  Brian's Poetry
  Telepathic Messages
  Jess Anthony
  Lucia G
  Targeted Messages
  Light Flower
  Changing The Face Of Religion
  - Phoenix Journals - PDF in German
  Candace on Religion
  Other Spiritual Pieces
  Gems from God Like Productions
  Spiritual Nuggets by the Masters
  Phoenix Journals
  Phoenix Journals - PDF
  Telepathic Messages PDF books
  Selections from the Urantia Book
  Illustrations For The Urantia Book
  CMGSN Pieces
  David Crayford and the ITC
  Health and Nutrition
  Podcasts, Radio Shows, Video by AH
  Political Information
  True US History
  Human/Animal Rights
  The Miracle That Is Me
  911 Material
  Books - eBooks
  government email/phone #'s
  Self Reliance
  Alternative News Sources
  Art and Music
  Foreign Sites
  Health and Healing
  Human/Animal Rights
  Vegan Recipes
  Translated Material
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Jess
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Candace
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Anderen
  Canal Jess
  Par Candace
  Other Channels
  Telepathische Nachrichten (Candace)
  Telepathische Nachrichten (Jess)
  Telepathische Nachrichten (div.)
  AH Mitgliederbeiträge (Candace)
  AH Mitgliederbeiträge (Jess)
  Spirituelle Schätze
  Translations - Candace
  Translations - Jess
  Translations - Others
  by Candace
  By Jess
  By Others
  Anfitriones Divinos
  Bitácoras Fénix
  Creadores-de-Alas (WingMakers/Lyricus)
  Escritos de Candace
  Escritos de Otros
  Telemensajes de Candace
  Telemensajes de Jess Anthony
  Telemensajes de Otros
  By Candace
  By Jess
  By Others
  Korean Translations
  Hungarian Translations
  Swedish Translations

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Political Information Last Updated: Mar 15, 2021 - 10:28:00 PM

Chutzpah in Modern Germany
By Dr. Ingrid R. Zundel
Dec 16, 2012 - 1:02:38 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page Share/Bookmark

Chutzpah in Modern Germany

by Dr. Ingrid R. Zundel

On Jan 2, 2013, a German citizen named Günter (sometimes spelled Guenther) Deckert will once again report to the gates of yet another penitentiary to be disciplined for his incurable devotion to Truth in History.

Michael Hoffman II, a former Associated Press wire writer turned Historical Revisionist, ( explains some of the details of this case:

In the World War II revisionist history movement in Germany, Günter Deckert is among the most hard-working and humble of its martyrs.

Günter Deckert, former leader of Germany’s struggling political party, NPD

I say “martyr” because any resident of Germany who persists in actively and publicly doubting the existence of execution gas chambers in Auschwitz-Birkenau — the holy relic of the West’s most sacred religion (Holocaustianity) — will be fined and likely imprisoned.

Günter Deckert has been to prison before in Germany for this reason – five years’ imprisonment, 1995 to 2000 – and he is about to be imprisoned again.

His “crime”? Translating from Italian into German historian Carlo Mattogno’s treatise, “Auschwitz: The First Gassing” (überarbeiten, deutsche Endbearbeitung/ -fassung).

Actually, “überarbeiten” means, in essence, only editing. Not translating or writing, much less agreeing! In fact, I double-checked, and Günter, a long-time friend of many noted European dissidents, who served as a note-taker and freelance reporter in my husband’s bizarre, drawn-out political show-trial in 2007 in Mannheim, explained:

By 1995, I had accumulated 11 years, This was reduced to five years, which I served to the last minute in JVS “Veste” Bruchsal, founded in 1948, a replica of a Pennsylvania prison model.

How did Deckert ran afoul repeatedly of “speech crimes” in ‘the free-est democracy that ever existed on German soil” – always held up as a bastion of “freedom of speech” to be emulated in countries like China and such? Here’s how:

• Having insulted entrenched mandarins of the establishment such as Foreign Minister Kinkel, several luminaries of the FDP, a political Party, and the illustrious Ignatz Bubis, the then Jewish leader of the Zentralrat der Juden in Deutschland, by accusing them in various ways of political hypocrisy.

• Having had the gall to call the Heidelberg Police Department “Stasi-West”.

Having dispensed helpful advice to Michel Friedman, then Vice President of said Judenrat, former CDU politician and talk show host, yammerer par excellence and President of the European Jewish Congress – before he was convicted of illegal drug use and what is described on the Net as “forced prostitution” of very young girls from the Ukraine. Deckert to Friedman:

“If you don’t like it here, why don’t you pack your suitcase and join your compatriots in Israel? There you can lecture and complain.”

Arguably Deckert’s worst political sin was for an impromptu (verbal) translation of the forensic Leuchter Report, based on an investigative expedition to Auschwitz, which documented for the first time, ever, that Auschwitz could never have been the scene of an industrial-type, assembly-line, politically motivated genocide of utterly innocent bipeds through gassing. That alone, recalls Deckert, cost him two years.

(Actually, urban lore has it that – as he stood next to Fred Leuchter at a small gathering of fellow Germans, translating from English to German – he smirked!)

Deckert suggests that the current judgment – 5 months in prison – are likewise attributed to his recidivist ways, despite his carefully distancing himself explicitly on page 3 by stating that the author’s (Mattogno’s) theses and conclusions are not his (Deckert’s) own.

Paul Eisen, a free speech activist living in Britain, sent me the following comments:

“I’m glad to say I’ve had no experience of Germany’s ‘Incitement of the Masses’ laws (Holocaust denial to you and me) and quite honestly, I found it all a bit hard to believe. Surely Mr Deckert must have done something worse than just translating a revisionist document into German to merit such a sentence.

Then, some days later, I received the following exchange which does clarify things a bit. It’s between a Mr William Henderson of Toronto, Canada and Georg Jürgens, Minister-Counsellor and Deputy Head of Mission to the German Embassy in Canada.

Mr Henderson wrote:

Your Excellency:

I note from an RSS feed that I subscribe to that Gunther Deckert is due to report to prison for a five month term early in the new year.

Further inquiry reveals that his crime was to translate a document from Italian into German.

It seems to me that a jail sentence for the mere translation of a document is somewhat ridiculous.

Could you please advise me what harm a simple document could do and why the matter would even be of any interest to the German authorities?


William E. Henderson

And Mr Jurgens replied:

Dear Mr Henderson,

It exceeds the capacity of this Embassy to find out exactly what the notorious neo-nazi Deckert did this time.

To get an idea about this man you might want to check him out on Wikipedia:

Just let me add that if you translate foreign documents to deny the Holocaust or to incite racial hatred you are punishable under German law.

Kind regards,
Georg Jürgens
Minister-Counsellor and Deputy Head of Mission
Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany

So, it’s true. “If you translate foreign documents to deny the Holocaust or to incite racial hatred you are punishable under German law.”

Two questions remain:

1. Why is questioning the Holocaust “incitememt to racial hatred”?

2. In this globalised, internet age, when national boundaries mean nothing and English reigns supreme, what possible purpose can this serve other than to further cow a terrified population?

Show trials and vicious speech crime convictions are extremely painful for victims of the current political system involved, but they are one fine vehicle to illuminate said system’s corruption. When will the ever-so-obedient – because politically terrorized – German judiciary ever learn and rip the Jewish muzzle from their faces? It ought to dawn on them that doing so would be in their own interest – especially now that they have a legal directive from highest international quarters, which they gutlessly choose to ignore!

A recent United Nations document, titled “International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights”, dated July 11, 2011 contains some marvelously gleaming paragraphs. Most cogent for dissident historians engaged in scuffle after scuffle with the insufferably pushy Holocaust Lobby are the following gems:

Freedom of opinion and freedom of expression are indispensable conditions for the full development of the person. They are essential for any society. They constitute the foundation stone for every free and democratic society. The two freedoms are closely related, with freedom of expression providing the vehicle for the exchange and development of opinions.

Freedom of expression is a necessary condition for the realization of the principles of transparency and accountability that are, in turn, essential for the promotion and protection of human rights. (…) The freedoms of opinion and expression form a basis for the full enjoyment of a wide range of other human rights.

The obligation to respect freedoms of opinion and expression is binding on every State party as a whole. All branches of the State (executive, legislative and judicial) and other public or governmental authorities, at whatever level – national, regional or local – are in a position to engage the responsibility of the State party. (…) The obligation requires States parties to ensure that persons are protected from any acts by private persons or entities that would impair the enjoyment of the freedoms of opinion and expression to the extent that these Covenant rights are amenable to application between private persons or entities.

Paragraph 1 of article 19 requires protection of the right to hold opinions without interference. This is a right to which the Covenant permits no exception or restriction. Freedom of opinion extends to the right to change an opinion whenever and for whatever reason a person so freely chooses. No person may be subject to the impairment of any rights under the Covenant on the basis of his or her actual, perceived or supposed opinions.

All forms of opinion are protected, including opinions of a political, scientific, historic, moral or religious nature. It is incompatible with paragraph 1 to criminalize the holding of an opinion. The harassment, intimidation or stigmatization of a person, including arrest, detention, trial or imprisonment for reasons of the opinions they may hold, constitutes a violation of article 19, paragraph 1.

Any form of effort to coerce the holding or not holding of any opinion is prohibited. Freedom to express one’s opinion necessarily includes freedom not to express one’s opinion.

Paragraph 2 requires States parties to guarantee the right to freedom of expression, including the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds regardless of frontiers. This right includes the expression and receipt of communications of every form of idea and opinion capable of transmission to others (…) It includes political discourse, commentary on one’s own and on public affairs, canvassing, discussion of human rights, journalism, cultural and artistic expression, teaching, and religious discourse. (…)

Paragraph 2 protects all forms of expression and the means of their dissemination. Such forms include spoken, written and sign language and such non-verbal expression as images and objects of art. Means of expression include books, newspapers, pamphlets, posters, banners, dress and legal submissions. They include all forms of audio-visual as well as electronic and internet-based modes of expression.

Defamation laws must be crafted with care to ensure that they comply with paragraph 3, and that they do not serve, in practice, to stifle freedom of expression. All such laws, in particular penal defamation laws, should include such defences as the defence of truth and they should not be applied with regard to those forms of expression that are not, of their nature, subject to verification. (…)

In any event, a public interest in the subject matter of the criticism should be recognized as a defence. Care should be taken by States parties to avoid excessively punitive measures and penalties. (…)

States parties should consider the decriminalization of defamation and, in any case, the application of the criminal law should only be countenanced in the most serious of cases and imprisonment is never an appropriate penalty. (…)

Laws that penalize the expression of opinions about historical facts are incompatible with the obligations that the Covenant imposes on States parties in relation to the respect for freedom of opinion and expression. The Covenant does not permit general prohibition of expressions of an erroneous opinion or an incorrect interpretation of past events. (…)

Might there be a lesson for the Minister-Counsellor and Deputy Head of Mission to the German Embassy in Canada – so that, next time, he won’t be embarrassing himself by resorting to name-calling – and even referencing his gutter behavior by citing Wikipedia?

On free-speech matters, or lack thereof in Germany, I have yet more to say. I came across a nifty little video showcasing Sylvia Stolz.

A small snippet of a girl, known affectionately by fellow European dissidents as “Germany’s Joan of Arc”, Sylvia is a young lawyer by trade. She acted as co-counsel at Ernst Zundel’s show trial in Mannheim. She volunteered as yet another German martyr for Truth in History.

Sylvia knew perfectly well that to offer a proper defense is now itself a crime in Germany in Holocaust-related trials. By offering scientific evidence on behalf of a “Denier” she would be implicitly guilty of being a “Denier” herself. Imagine a court stonewalling exculpatory evidence of, say, a murder case by accusing a lawyer defending a client accused of a murder that he, the lawyer, might be a murderer himself! And yet, in “Holocaust Denial” cases that is precisely what happens!

Sylvia decided to set an example. She engineered hilarious drama by chirping away about illegal tactics of Germany’s Zionist-beholden government and its judiciary, to the hysterical objections of Judge Meinerzhagen, ignoring his furious pounding and pontifications, insisting cheerfully that she had every right on earth to a legal defense of her client by submitting evidence for the scientific basis of his heretical beliefs! Even a Frankfurter Allgemeine reporter, Volker Zastrow, fell for her charms and wrote a tongue-in-cheek piece on Fräulein Stolz’s repeated assaults on Meinerzhagen’s “limbic system” – that part of the brain that controls one’s emotions – to the point where the frustrated judge was forced to flee his own courtroom to hide out and cool off. That was petite Sylvia – goading him and goading him, to peels of laughter from the audience! It’s a classic!

In the end, Sylvia Stolz paid dearly for her gallant effort – as she knew from the start that she would. One merry morning, four sentinels in the employ of Germany’s own shadow government grabbed Fräulein Stolz and bodily carried her out of the courtroom. In due course, she found herself sentenced for three-and-a-half years for insubordination against a judge’s orders – and bravely served all but three months of that sentence. As far as I know, she also lost her license to practice law in what Ernst Zundel calls a “… geographical piece of land that people still call Germany – where speaking the Truth is now a crime enshrined in law.”

I have two brief tapes for you I offer for comparison.

The first features Sylvia’s last words before she, too, reported to the Political Inquisition so as to be caged for three years of her life with the dregs of the Vaterland’s scum.

Sylvia Stolz Speaks Shortly Before her Trial (10' 03" video 27/1/2010):

Uploader's comments:

The person depicted in this video, Sylvia Stolz is the lawyer who initially represented Ernst Zundel at his trial in Mannheim Germany. Sylvia Stolz was relieved of her mandate as the defence lawyer of Ernst Zundel and under protest physically carried out of the courtroom. Sylvia Stolz is at present serving a 3½ year prison sentence [Comment Dec. 2011: Sylvia Stolz was released from prison in April 2011]. During this process she tried to apply the German legal position that a defendant should be judged according to his intentions, that is regarding the reason and the circumstances of his action. However, this was not only prohibited, but in so doing the court considered she had also herself committed a punishable offence. In this way the rulers of Germany give a warning to all not to contradict but to submit, otherwise arrest and punishment is imminent. Sylvia Stolz's parting words: „Das hat mit Recht nicht mehr zu tun und wir werden uns diesem Unrecht nicht beugen!" "This has nothing to do with justice and we will not yield to this injustice!"

Prison address:
Sylvia Stolz,
Münchener Straße 33,
D-86551 Aichach,


The second video clip is my definition of Chutzpah:


Jews Demand a Jewish State Within Germany (3' 51" video):

Published on Jul 13, 2012

Jews Want To Create Jewish State On German Land.

Jews are seeking to establish a Jewish state in Thuringia, Germany, with the city of Weimar as its capital" . According to the project website,

According to Jewish source "We want to make Thüringen a state of art and feminism, what more can you expect from a state."

"Such a state will relieve the 'Jews trauma' after Adolf Hitler and World War II."

The National Socialists saw Weimar and Dresden* as two of Germany's most important cities, and had magnificent plans for both of them . NSDAP's first major manifestation was held in Weimar.

[* Ron: Have a look at what the jews did to Dresden: A Real Holocaust: Dresden, 13 February 1945:

These lying parasites never know when enough is enough.].

[Colour fonts, bolding and comments in square brackets added.].

All writings by members of AbundantHope are copyrighted by
©2005-2021 AbundantHope - All rights reserved

Detailed explanation of AbundantHope's Copyrights are found here

Top of Page

Political Information
Latest Headlines
Christian Atrocities: Centuries Of Pagan Persecution
The World Gone Mad: The Covid Vaccine Derangement Syndrome
Washington Pushes Ukraine to Relaunch Donbass Conflict While Accusing Russia of Wanting to Attack
President Biden Pledges to Provide Billions in Economic Benefit to Russia Through the Build Back Better Climate Change Program
EXCLUSIVE (AUDIO): TGP Interviews Jan. 6 Political Prisoner, “Q-Shaman” Jacob Chansley – “I’m Not An Extremist. I’m Not An Insurrectionist. I’m Not A Domestic Terrorist”
How Congress Loots the Treasury for the Military-Industrial-Congressional Complex
Russia’s Greatest Weapon is Not a Weapon
Oppose This Evil, Or All That Was Once Great And Good in This World Will Be Gone
Los Angeles School District Vaccinates Students Without Parents Knowledge or Consent
Panicked Biden Regime Holds Secret Meetings With Corporate Media To 'Reshape' Negative Coverage
TV Show Deletes Poll After 89% Oppose Mandatory Vaccination
Africa Has 17.46% of World’s Population, Only 3% of World’s COVID Deaths. Scientists Want to Know Why.
No Jab, No Food: Canadian Province Imposes New Regulations to Ban Unvaccinated from Grocery Stores
Abp. Viganò: Scientists, Physicians Must Join ‘anti-globalist alliance’ to Fight COVID Control Of Humanity
Judge Blocks Biden's Nationwide Vax Mandate For Federal Contractors
New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Arden Declares There Will Never Be an Endpoint to the Vaccination Program Due to the Need For Boosters
5 Key Takeaways From Putin-Biden Online Summit
German Man Kills His Entire Family In Murder-Suicide Motivated By Vaccine Passport Penalties
'Stick Your Vaccine Mandate Up Your A**' Anthem Spreads
Parents of 9/11 Victims Put Up Billboard Next to NY Times, Accusing Them of ‘Lying About 9/11’