EXTRAORDINARY AH Teaching from Spiritual Hierarchy
  NEW READERS! Read Here First
  Supporting AH
  Leadership of AbundantHope
  Regional AH Sites
  Other Sites with AH material
  Contact Us
  Becoming A Messiah
  Mission Ideas
  System Busting
  Cleric Letter/English
  Translations of Cleric Letter
  AH Member Writings
  Brian's Poetry
  Telepathic Messages
  Jess Anthony
  Lucia G
  Targeted Messages
  Light Flower
  Changing The Face Of Religion
  - Phoenix Journals - PDF in German
  Candace on Religion
  Other Spiritual Pieces
  Gems from God Like Productions
  Spiritual Nuggets by the Masters
  Phoenix Journals
  Phoenix Journals - PDF
  Telepathic Messages PDF books
  Selections from the Urantia Book
  Illustrations For The Urantia Book
  CMGSN Pieces
  David Crayford and the ITC
  Health and Nutrition
  Podcasts, Radio Shows, Video by AH
  Political Information
  True US History
  Human/Animal Rights
  The Miracle That Is Me
  911 Material
  Books - eBooks
  government email/phone #'s
  Self Reliance
  Alternative News Sources
  Art and Music
  Foreign Sites
  Health and Healing
  Human/Animal Rights
  Vegan Recipes
  Translated Material
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Jess
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Candace
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Anderen
  Canal Jess
  Par Candace
  Other Channels
  Telepathische Nachrichten (Candace)
  Telepathische Nachrichten (Jess)
  Telepathische Nachrichten (div.)
  AH Mitgliederbeiträge (Candace)
  AH Mitgliederbeiträge (Jess)
  Spirituelle Schätze
  Translations - Candace
  Translations - Jess
  Translations - Others
  by Candace
  By Jess
  By Others
  Anfitriones Divinos
  Bitácoras Fénix
  Creadores-de-Alas (WingMakers/Lyricus)
  Escritos de Candace
  Escritos de Otros
  Telemensajes de Candace
  Telemensajes de Jess Anthony
  Telemensajes de Otros
  By Candace
  By Jess
  By Others
  Korean Translations
  Hungarian Translations
  Swedish Translations

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Political Information Last Updated: Mar 15, 2021 - 10:28:00 PM

A Simple Piece of Legislation – and The Growing Use of Woke Trans Terminology – Exposes the Irrationalism of Western Politics
By Graham Hryce with comments by Ron
Feb 27, 2021 - 1:41:03 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page Share/Bookmark

26 Feb, 2021 Get short URL

A simple piece of legislation - and the growing use of woke trans terminology - exposes the irrationalism of Western politics

FILE PHOTO: Rainbow flag flying on the rooftop of the Cabinet Office on Whitehall on 26th February 2020 in London, United Kingdom ©  Getty Images / Mike Kemp/In PIctures

Follow RT onRT

By Graham Hryce, an Australian journalist and former media lawyer, whose work has been published in The Australian, the Sydney Morning Herald, the Age, the Sunday Mail, the Spectator and Quadrant.

Replacing the word ‘mother' with terms like ‘birthing bodies', ‘uterus holder' and ‘chestfeeders' is not only an assault on women - it reveals the divided and parlous state of many liberal democracies.

This week debate commenced in the UK House of Lords over a bill dealing with paid maternity leave for members of parliament - an insignificant piece of legislation that would normally have attracted little or no attention.

The bill, however, includes provisions that compel the use of woke transgender terminology, and this has provoked a fierce debate in the Lords between supporters of the new globalised world order and defenders of the older nation-state based regime.

It is this intractable, ongoing clash - and its concomitant ideological manifestation, the so-called "culture wars" - that is the primary cause of the increasingly divided and parlous state of many liberal democracies - in particular the UK and America.

Think Remainers and Brexiteers; think Democrat elites and Trumpist populists.

So what caused this week's unseemly ruckus in the normally sedate, indeed sometimes soporific, House of Lords?

It was the provisions in the bill to erase the use of terms such as "women" and "mothers" and instead use words like "the person is pregnant" and "the person has given birth to a child" that provoked uproar, mirroring the fashionable woke jargon that panders to the trans lobby, like "birthing bodies", "uterus holder" and "chestfeeders".

Female peers from both sides of traditional politics reacted with unconcealed outrage.

ALSO ON RT.COMMr. Potato Head drops the title and is now just ‘Potato Head' finally giving gender neutral vegetables the visibility they deserve

Lady Noakes, a Tory, said: "There is no malice in wishing to maintain the biological facts of womanhood ..... if this bill passes unamended, there will be yet another precedent on the statute books for the elimination of women".

Baroness Helene Hayman, Labour, complained: "The price of so-called gender neutrality in this bill is an awkward and ugly distortion of the English language and an affront to common sense".

Baroness Claire Fox, an independent, warned: "Our laws and words must never treat people as non-human things. These new language codes and norms are mandating us to adopt doublespeak.... I am a woman, that is it - enough. I am not a uterus holder...... nor a chestfeeder. These are linguistic abominations".

The outcry eventually forced the government to amend the wording of the legislation, removing the word person from the bill and replacing it with "mother or expectant mother".

But how does such virtue-signalling ‘woke' language get to be in legislation put forward by a Conservative government in the first place? It is because the globalised elites comprise a significant faction within the Tory party (Boris Johnson is one, notwithstanding being a Brexiteer, a position people now forget he adopted very late in the day), and they dominate the post-Corbyn Labour party completely. They also control most large corporations, the bureaucracies, the NHS and the medical establishment, universities and schools, and the bulk of the media in the UK.

The problem with the so-called "culture wars" is that no matter how many intellectual debates defenders of the old liberal nation-state world order win, the new globalised elites are almost always victorious.

This should surprise no one, given that this entire process involves the protracted replacement of one elite by another, and that both elites are firmly opposed to any kind of fundamental economic reform in the West.

Some conservative critics of woke ideologies characterise them as "left-wing" doctrines. That view is completely mistaken. These ideologies are deeply conservative in their economic operation, which is why even the older ruling elites in Western democracies ultimately acquiesce in their dominance. Even this week's critics in the Lords will no doubt go quietly into the night.

[Ron: Arguably the reason that these ridiculously irrational WOKE ideologies prevail in the UK and western democracies is because the Talmudic banksters holed up in the City of London who have covertly controlled the UK since 1666, require ALL UK governments and most UK politicians to accept and promulgate them. The banksters have had the same death grip on all the other Western democracies BUT the Trump administration is removing that control as we speak.].

Despite their differences, the competing ideologies of both elites have much in common. In fact, the woke ideologies of the globalised elites are nothing more than the irrational progeny of the older liberal ideologies that they are so rapidly supplanting in the West.

And it is precisely in the irrationality of these ideologies that lies the danger for Western liberal democracies.

READ MORE Kermit-ing an offense? Disney lets the woke mob pull the strings again by designating The Muppets unsuitable for children

Kermit-ing an offense? Disney lets the woke mob pull the strings again by designating The Muppets unsuitable for children

Western liberal elites have always been prone to resort to irrationalism in order to preserve their economic interests. Richard Hofstadter, the American historian, wrote about this phenomenon in the USA in his 1944 book "Social Darwinism in American Thought, 1860-1915" and "The Paranoid Style in American Politics" in 1964, detailing how fringe groups can influence and derail the agendas of parties. Gyorgy Lukacs dealt with the same topic in relation to Germany in "The Destruction of Reason" in 1952. Perhaps one day a history of the decline of Western democracies from the 1960s to the present will be written.

But let us get back to the particular topic debated in the House of Lords this week.

What drives the compulsive need to replace traditional fixed gender categories and terms with fluid ones that permit the appearance of easy change between categories - facilitated in grim reality by invasive surgery and long-term drug treatments?

The answer to that question lies in the fact that, whereas the basic categories of traditional liberal ideologies were social and economic and focused on the individual, woke ideological categories are primarily biological (e.g., gender, race and sexual preference).

Progress in traditional liberal terms meant social and economic advancement for the individual, which presupposed genuine social and economic reform.

But progressively since the late 1960s, liberal elites in the West have completely turned their backs on genuine social and economic reform. Does anyone believe that "Davos man" really wants to improve the lot of anyone in the West other than himself?

In the late 1960s, after the collapse of the student revolts, biological categories were utilised by Western elites to confer privileges on particular disadvantaged groups that that had been excluded from full participation in Western societies in the past (e.g., feminism, the civil rights movement, gay rights and so on).

But woke ideologies today, in their most extreme form, have moved far beyond that kind of social engineering, which still had a progressive social and economic component and was grounded in the notion of individual rights.

The most extreme woke ideologies now define progress in purely biological terms. (This position, oddly enough, harks back to the discredited late nineteenth century liberal "science" of eugenics, which also redefined progress in purely biological terms).

Social and economic progress as a goal has, therefore, been replaced by gender transitioning, the latter goal being a more conservative, irrational variant of the former.

The irrationality of this ideology is confirmed by the fact that it seeks to abolish the category of "women" entirely. Not even the most rabid nineteenth century misogynists ever sought to do that, as many older feminists and lesbians are now realising to their cost and utter dismay.

ALSO ON RT.COMDemocrats' ‘Equality Act' that prioritises sexual preference over religion isn't interested in delivering equality at all

The issue of gender-inclusive terminology is one that arises in all contemporary Western democracies. This week in France an MP of President Emmanuel Macron's ruling party introduced a bill into parliament designed to outlaw such language (called "novlangue", after Orwell's newspeak, in French) in government communications. The Académie Française supported the bill, saying that gender-inclusive language "puts French in mortal danger".

The economic order in some Western democracies has been preserved, at least for the time being, by such irrational means - other woke ideologies like catastrophic climate change, identity politics and critical race theory also have irrational cores - but at what cost and for how long?

And "cancel culture", by abolishing intellectual debate altogether and destroying individuals who protest at this development, adds an additional layer of irrationality to this entire historical process. All totalitarian regimes, as Orwell pointed out long ago, are compelled to introduce some form of "cancel culture" in order to survive.

Nevertheless, it is very difficult to envisage Western societies in which the notion of social and economic progress has been completely replaced by fundamentally irrational doctrines surviving in any civilised fashion in the long term.

As an editorial in the Australian newspaper correctly stated this week, "If culture lives in language, the full-frontal assault against the natural order of childbirth and motherly affection posits a bleak future for Western civilisation".

[Some bolding and comments in square brackets added.].

Think your friends would be interested ? Share this story !

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT


All writings by members of AbundantHope are copyrighted by
©2005-2021 AbundantHope - All rights reserved

Detailed explanation of AbundantHope's Copyrights are found here

Top of Page

Political Information
Latest Headlines
Adrenochrome : The Leaked Documents (Video)
Jesus Doubles Down
The Lockdown Paradigm Is Collapsing
Chemtrail Generator - PATENT
Health& Freedom Conference Full Speeches
NY Times: Why Q Anon Flopped in Japan
Coercion is not consent’: Doctors, Attorney Slam Coronavirus Vaccine Blitz
Xi's Boao Forum Speech And The Messed Up Reporting Around It
The Endless War With Russia
Canada Reveals It Paid White Helmets $4 Million Annually After It Cuts Ties
Is This the BLM Prescription for Policing– Let Blacks Kill Blacks?
Protesters in NYC Demand Full Police Abolition, Harass Diners After Jury Finds Chauvin Guilty for Floyd murder
There’s No Way Americans Can Trust The Jury’s Chauvin Verdict
UK Uses Behavioural Blackmail To Push Jabs
Thousands Gather in Berlin to Protest More Covid Restrictions As Parliament Debates Giving Merkel’s Govt Power to Impose Lockdowns
How Russian Intel Foiled CIA Military Coup and Assassination of the President of Belarus
As Chemical Weapons Watchdog’s Credibility Crumbles, OPCW Member States Strip Syria’s Voting Rights
Amnesty International ‘upholds racism’ and Its Senior Staff Used the N-word, so Why Do Its Views Still Carry So Much Influence?
Beware Of Fact Checkers