Candace: I highly recommend paying attention to these chapters today, there is excellent information for thought. There are today several folks in prison in Germany for no crime other than telling the truth about the nature of the camps and the toll the “Jews” did not suffer in fullness as they state, and in these journals the story of those German prisoners of war who suffered TERRIBLY in Eisenhower’s camps.
The point is made here you can’t legislate wisdom and morality, which is what the New World Order is attempting to do and which you will see in my recent post about the upcoming Summit of the Americas. Morality comes by experience and self determination, and this world can’t enter light and life, except by ones who have come into true God knowing by experience, one by one by one. It is not otherwise possible.
This is also WHY some of you experience so much difficulty working these “new ideas” of ours with your circles and are rejected. This is not yet a God knowing world. The people in general of this world have approved the New World Order, following promised lies and wanting those above them to determine their course. This is why Obama was made by media efforts and on the Internet in Messiah Obama, and he has been busy running around Europe again now, pushing the agenda.
And we are entertained with the beauty of his wife Michelle, and entertained by pirate attacks and the like to cover the process. Regards the pirate attacks, commercial shipping vessels have the RESPONSIBILITY to carry arms and defend themselves again boats of people throwing grappling hooks onto the ships and boarding them by such. Knock them with bats back into the sea, for God’s sake. This was “heavy” discussion on CNN this morning. Why would any sailors on these ships not wish to be armed????? Where is the common sense in this world? You have every right, and responsibility to defend self.
Sometimes it is not advisable if you are accosted by several with big guns, to get our your bee bee gun, but let’s keep some sense in this. I have been also accosted several times, did not have a gun, and it might have been futile to use it and I waited my way out by being aware my guides or soul would provide help and it happened and I did take advantage. There are times to not Fight it out if you are on the short end of criminals and await higher help.
But to sail the high seas and allow LARGE commercial craft to be taken by thugs when a bunch of guns and baseball bats would prevent the taking of a ship, why NOT do this????? This ship supposedly was followed for hours, and these hours provided the time to prepare for self defense, and had there been obvious self defense aboard, the pirates would have moved on to a safer target for them.
I myself have bought the Anne Frank story, not realizing another wrote it. A movie remake was on TV since I became public (I think date wise anyway) and her father gave commentary about it on TV, so what else is to expect? I guess he “stole” another’s fiction story. It does get difficult to determine truth and at one time, particularly quite a number of years ago, I was accepting of the number of Jews killed, as the college I attended put large murals all over the walls of starving corpses and was encouraging a lot of false books on the story. I didn’t know at the time these pictures were from either Russian camps, or any camps where the failure of supplies happened at the ending of the conflict, or of Eisenhower’s camps at all.
I have posted a few pieces on this, as has Ron, and we still get letters from people angry with us. But the crematoriums were not numerous enough to cremate so many. I am a victim of Dachau in my last life. I explore religions on this plane and had a Jewish incarnation at that time. I was one of those sent early to Dachau which was a camp to hold dissidents primarily, as I was a dissident. I passed in that place in 1942, so I am told by my soul mate who is my major guide in this life. I have had some strong “memory” dreams of Dachau. I was at some point on a burial crew for example, and I have dreams of arriving there with family members and being separated as is common practice in prisons camps, from the male members of my family regards our housing, but having contact with them as we worked. The dreams include riding trains and of my mother at the time and my own toddler daughter dying en route on the trains. It also includes dreams of my discovery we were being fed meat from the dead humans as part of our sustenance. If I am told this occurred on occasion there.
Like any normal being I was appalled growing up in this life about the stories of 4 million vanquished at Auschwitz, and it seemed “unreal” something this horrible, in this quantity could occur, and indeed, this was not the common occurrence as is exposed in these journals and also plenty of other literature I have found on the internet. The crematoriums at Auschwitz could NOT handle this many people.
I too went to the film by Spielberg on the Holocaust. And I saw the series on TV too. Horrid to consider and there are people capable of this brutality that exist, but the story was greatly expanded to gain favor for the people’s banished from the universe and imprisoned on this world. There have been 10 BILLION such detainee’s here. The Jew’s, self named by themselves, are not the only detainee’s on this planet, just amongst the most successful in relative modern times at gaining dominance of the planet. There are several groups wanting dominance and behind the scenes the game continues as I write this morning on April 9, 2009.
I have lived my whole life amongst people who can pronounced the Jews God’s chosen people, and in the same breath, say God wanted them destroyed. I even had a friend who came to not like me after I told her I had been a Jew, for the purposes of studying religion and culture, on this planet. She is one who expounds the above, God’s chosen people must be destroyed by God.
We have a serious problem at least in America with the Christian Zionist’s who know not the story and serve the beast, believing that Israel is sponsored by God himself and will not be convinced otherwise. There is such poor understanding of God on this planet. The biggest misunderstanding, is that God is a big burley ruler, and is not seen as within all life.
REC #1 HATONN
FRI., NOV. 15, 1991 8:14 A.M. YEARS, DAY 091
FRIDAY. NOVEMBER 15. 1991
The most important thing of this day is probably missed by 99 & 9/10ths per cent of you-the-public.
Representative Gonzales of Texas made a speech before the House (totally empty) regarding “Special Orders”; this subject being in objection to the NEW WORLD ORDER EUROPEAN CURRENCY UNION. This is THE MOST IMPORTANT economic issue in your world and to the U.S. is without doubt the worst nightmare to ever strike if (WHEN) it comes into being. This is more important a “group” than the Committee of 7 and/or “10” and your nation cannot stand alone when this issue is brought into law. It deals with the one world currency which, in effect, will cause you to pay off all of your existing debts (trillions of dollars) in what amounts to a foreign currency--and you cannot do it.
(Candace: And yes this is before us NOW, here in 2009 and the rumors of the one world currency, NOW, is not the same HOLY idea of GESARA, which is a creation by the people, for the people. Worlds tend to come to one currency or just a few currencies when they are grown up and have holy Global Awareness, and not that which is stuffed top down on man right now. These banks are being bailed with taxpayer money, how can this ever be paid off through the works of your body and soul? And I have watched Dennis Kucinich make holy speeches about the nature of OIL in Iraq etc, before an also EMPTY HOUSE)
There was one gentleman in the “audience” for the speech and he left--having obviously been there to hear the rantings of a Representative from Louisiana denouncing David Duke.
Actually, that is worthy of note herein. What is this outrage against one, David Duke? Why don’t you look at this in its proper perspective? The people are sick and tired of the criminals who run your Governments. Further, just to say you are “...against quotas and hiring of incapable persons just because they are a specific ‘color” is intelligent, not bigoted. The point is to bring all “colors” and “creeds” into balance in equality and you will never legislate that balance through “laws” that require that “man” act in harmony. The young man took some foolish actions earlier which will better serve your nation NOW--for he will dare not act in bigoted manners for he knows the glass is upon him. My feeling is that the criminals in your Government and Political Parties protesteth far too loudly. They want no one in power that can uncover the lies to you-the-public. If you ones will deliberately elect a known and self-professing criminal into office then I suggest you deserve fully that which is coming down upon your nation. You cannot legislate “MORALITY”-- that comes from experience and dedication within. Criminality suggests total evasion of the laws to suit a “person’s” greedy selfish fulfillment. God does not judge, but you can expect to flow back unto you in each event--exactly in kind--that which you sow. The man with the “moral” issue at stake says he has changed and grown. The criminal laughs and says nothing about reform in any believable measure whatsoever. It is YOU who must be discerning in these instances for you know on the one hand you will simply have more and greater criminal corruption. The other man may have a few good points, after all.
Why do you object? Because you have been told by the media that he associates with Nazis, KKK, etc? In the first place you can only assume such from what he tells you for you cannot believe the media which is totally Zionist run. You cannot tell from the politicians who do not wish to lose their corrupted positions. So you must look at the facts.
Your First Amendment rights under the Constitution give you the right to express your opinion. When Duke says he is not in favor of interracial marriages and quotas but is in favor of lifting the minorities up from the poverty and into education, etc.--DOES HE NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO EXPRESS THAT OPINION? If you prefer “red” to “blue”, do you not have a right to that opinion? The point is, will the man stand in justice under the law? Until you ones get the important facts in view-- you will continue to be manipulated by the media adversaries to “common law” and freedom.
You must further come to know that the “activist” groups are arranged to totally destroy order. I know that ones must speak out--but these groups are to cause confusion and mass emotional reaction, not knowledgeable response. I am not here to tell you what to do or think--in freedom you have a right to do and think that which is within your rights as a citizen. My commission is to present the Truth to you, even if it brings great discomfort to my own crew to do so. I assure you that Dharma would like to resign her post. Bullets hurt, no matter who you are. Meanness brings pain to the target--I care not who you are. Disagreement is one thing but to threaten death if you continue to speak, in a so-called “free” nation, is without acceptable reason. You all must think hard on these things for you are about to come under rule by the sword. When you can no longer speak out in your opinion regarding possibility of incorrectness of given issues-- you are a lost people.
I remind you that the Zionists leagues have proposed legislation before your Congress to make it “illegal” to even disagree with their presentation of what happened at the so-called Holocaust. I remind you that in France, Germany, England, Canada and the Soviet Union (and several other European nations) IT IS NOW ILLEGAL TO EVEN HAVE AND VOICE AN OPINION THAT INFERS THE HOLOCAUST DID NOT OCCUR-- EVEN “DIFFERING” IN NUMBERS OR OTHERWISE SPECULATION AS TO POSSIBILITIES OTHER THAN GIVEN YOU BY THE ZIONISTS. This is the most vile and evil form of moral blackmail and financial extortion. The bill is in present argument before the Australian Law Reform Commission--to make denial of the orthodox version of the holocaust a “hate crime”. Who is that “hate” against? You better look again--it makes YOU the victim of “hate crime” IF YOU DISAGREE! Oh, you think I am bigoted and want to deny right to change laws to protect the public? The “public” is not bringing any of these suggestions, even before the United Nations (as is also under way), it is brought forth by the Jewish Leagues and announced through “Jewish” press. In Australia, for instance, in September (27), 1991 it is announced that the Secretary of the Executive Council of Australian Jewrv and Sydney (Australia) director of Australia/Israel publications, has asked “. . . the Australian Law Reform Commission to make denial of the orthodox version of the holocaust a ‘hate crime’.” I don’t know how you can better sum it up than in their own words.
How is it that these ones proudly announce themselves “Jews” and yet if another calls them “Jew” it is unacceptable? What are you doing, World?
We will continue to give you “facts”. For this deed, the people are continually under threat of death by the self-proclaimed Zionists. They identify their origin only leaving personal identification missing. The papers and books are publicly burned and a special packet of threats has gone from the ADL (Jewish Anti-Defamation League) to every known TV station and Radio station. IS THIS FREEDOM IN AMERICA? YOU
ALLOW YOUR GOVERNMENT TO PAY FOR MUSEUM PRODUCTIONS OF HOMOSEXUAL SEXUAL ACTS IN PICTURES, PORNOGRAPHIC PLAYS ARE PRESENTED THROUGH GOVERNMENT FUNDING, AND OTHER
PORNOGRAPHIC MATERIAL IS BLESSED--BUT WHEN SOMEONE SPEAKS OUT AND SAYS, “HEY. HERE IS EVIDENCE THAT SOMETHING MIGHT BE A BIT WRONG WITH NUMBERS AND PRESENTATION OF A THING CALLED THE HOLOCAUST”--YOU ARE THREATENED WITH DEATH! THIS THREATENING COMES FROM THE VERY GROUP WHO GAVE FORTH THE ORTHODOX VERSION !!! MIGHT IT BE A BIT WISE FOR YOU TO ALSO OUESTION INTENT?
Well, today it is still “legal” to write in differing opinion and therefore, we shall write as quickly as the little fingers can move--TO BRING YOU THE COMPILED FACTS SO THAT YOU CAN JUDGE ON FACTS AND NOT EMOTION. I ONLY ASK HEARING FOR IF YOU CANNOT COME INTO BALANCE THROUGH TRUTH THERE IS NOT MUCH GOD CAN OFFER UNTO YOU. SO BE IT.
Dharma, we have hundreds of pages to present on this matter and, therefore, we must attend it while we can do so. You of the world populace have been such “people-of-the-LIES” for so long that you have ceased to “think”. It is time to “reason” lest you never be given another chance upon this wondrous place called “Earth”.
This is the task I have been sent forth to do, and so shall it be done--what you do with the Truth is of your own choosing. Amen.
BEST-SELLER IS A HOAX
Of the other variety of memoirs, those which present a picture of frail Jewry caught in the vice of Nazism, the most celebrated is undoubtedly THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK, and the truth concerning this book is only one appalling insight into the fabrication of the propaganda legend. It has already been proven over and over again as a hoax, but the media and Zionists continue to deny the facts and continue to silence the truth-bringers. I only give that which has been presented to you over and over again. Why don’t YOU know about these things? Because the contradiction is NEVER ALLOWED ON THE MEDIA OR IN THE PRESS IN ANY WAY WHICH GAINS ATTENTION. BOOKS CONTAINING THE TRUTH ARE BANISHED AND A SPECIAL FOOTBALL GAME WILL BE AIRED IN THE SLOT WHEREIN SOMEONE MIGHT HAVE GIVEN YOU SOME TRUTH.
First published in 1952, THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK became an immediate best-seller; since then it has been republished in paper-back, going through 40 impressions, and was made into a successful Hollywood film. In royalties alone, Otto Frank, the girl’s father, has made a fortune from the sale of the book, which purports to represent the real-life tragedy of his daughter. With its direct appeal to the emotions, the book and the film have influenced literally millions of people, certainly more throughout the world than any other story of its kind. And yet only seven years after its initial publication A NEW YORK SUPREME COURT CASE ESTABLISHED THAT THE BOOK WAS A HOAX.
It is the way in which the book is presented that is the problem. If it had been presented as a novel of “fiction” and drama--excellent--for it is sensitive and emotionally captivating. But this is NOT that which happened. THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK has been sold to the public as the actual diary of a young Jewish girl from Amsterdam, which she wrote at the age of 12 while her family and four other Jews were hiding in the back room of a house during the German occupation. Eventually, they were arrested and detained in a concentration camp, where Anne Frank supposedly died when she was 14. When Otto Frank was liberated from the camp at the end of the war, he returned to the Amsterdam house and “found” his daughter’s diary concealed in the rafters.
The truth about the Anne Frank Diary was first revealed in 1959 by the Swedish journal Fria Ord. It established that the Jewish novelist Meyer Levin had written the dialogue of the “diary” and was demanding payment for his work in a court action against Otto Frank. A condensation of the Swedish articles appeared in the American Economic Council Letter, April 15, 1959, as follows:
“History has many examples of myths that live a longer and richer life than truth, and may become more effective than truth.
“The Western World has for some years been made aware of a Jewish girl through the medium of what purports to be her personally written story, Anne Frank’s Diary. Any informed literary inspection of this book would have shown it to have been impossible as the work of a teenager.”
[H: This is NOT the reasoning which is valid, however, for one does not “judge” on such opinion but on merit of facts presented]
“A noteworthy decision of the New York Supreme Court confirms this point of view, in that the well known American Jewish writer, Meyer Levin, has been awarded $50,000 to be paid him by the father of Anne Frank as an honorarium for Levin’s work on the Anne Frank Diary.
“Mr. Frank, in Switzerland, promised to pay to his race kin, Meyer Levin, not less than $50,000 because he had used the dialogue of Author Levin just as it was and ‘implanted’ it in the diary as being his daughter’s intellectual work.”
Further inquiries brought a reply on May 7th, 1962 from a firm of New York lawyers, which stated:
“I was the attorney for Meyer Levin in his action against Otto Frank, and others. It is true that a jury awarded Mr. Levin $50,000 in damages, as indicated in your letter. That award was later set aside by trial justice. Hon. Samuel C. Coleman, on the ground that the damages had not been proved in the manner required by law. The action was subsequently settled while an appeal from Judge Coleman’s decision was pending.
“I am afraid that the case itself is not officially reported, so far as the trial itself, or even Judge Coleman’s decision, is concerned. Certain procedural matters were reported in 141 New York Supplement, Second Series 170, and in 5 Second Series 181. The correct file number in the New York County Clerk’s office is 2241-1956 and the file is probably a large and full one...”
Here, then, is just one more fraud in a whole series of frauds perpetrated in support of the “Holocaust” legend and the saga of the Six Million. Of course, the court case bearing directly on the authenticity of the Anne Frank Diary was “not officially reported”.
A brief reference may also be made to another “diary”, published not long after that of Anne Frank and entitled: NOTES FROM THE WARSAW GHETTO THE JOURNAL OF EMMANUEL RINGELBLUM (New York, 1958). Ringelblum had been a leader in the campaign of sabotage against the Germans in Poland, as well as the revolt of the Warsaw Ghetto in 1943, before he was eventually arrested and executed in
It is a MUST to constantly remind yourselves of the facts herein regarding the REASON the “Jews” were in that Ghetto: The “Jews” had also declared to be in a State of War against Germany. America had already put all American Japanese citizens and any Japanese in the States into concentration (detention) camps. This was the same event in Germany only with Jews--who bad declared war against Germany and were, in fact, having constant war encounters. The gathering up of Jews didn’t “just happen”--the Jews declared a state of war.
The Ringelblum journal, which speaks of the usual “rumors” allegedly circulating about the extermination of the Jews in Poland, appeared under exactly the same Communist auspices as the so-called bess memoirs. McGraw-Hill, the publishers of the American edition, admit that they were denied access to the uncensored original manuscript in Warsaw, and instead faithfully followed the expurgated volume published by the Communist Government in Warsaw in 1952. All the “proofs” of the Holocaust issuing from Communist sources of this kind are worthless as historical documents.
Since the war, there has been an abundant growth of sensational concentration camp literature, the majority of it Jewish, each book piling horror upon horror, blending fragments of truth with the most grotesque of fantasies and impostures, relentlessly creating an edifice of mythology in which any relations to historical fact has long since disappeared. We have referred to the type already--Olga Lengyel’s absurd FIVE CHIMNEYS (“24,000 corpses handled every day”). The truth is terrible enough and to lie causes all respect to leave for that horror which was actually present.
You have to realize, dear ones, that this is part and parcel of the “plan” to deceive and thereby move into one world control over you-the-masses. It is directly accomplished through the traditions, such as the “Kol Nidre” whereby annually on Day of Atonement--the vows are rendered negated until the following Day of Atonement. The Protocols “order” that the Talmudists (Zionists) lie, cheat, steal and do anything necessary to accomplish the ends of World Domination. Another couple of books which represent the same type of issue are DOCTOR AT AUSCHWITZ by Miklos Nyiszli, apparently a mythical and invented person, THIS WAS AUSCHWITZ: THE STORY OF A MURDER CAMP by Philip Friedman, and so on ad nauseam.
Another in this same vein is FOR THOSE I LOVED by Martin Gray (Bodley Head, 1973), which purports to be an account of his experiences at Treblinka camp in Poland. Gray specialized in selling fake antiques to America before turning to concentration camp memoirs. The circumstances surrounding the publication of his book, however, have been unique, because for the first time with works of this kind, serious doubt was cast on the authenticity of its contents. Even Jews, alarmed at the damage it might cause, denounced his book as fraudulent and questioned whether he had ever been at Treblinka at all, while B.B.C. radio pressed him as to why he had waited 28 years before writing of his experiences.
You all must realize that it is only the few who know the truth of these lies. Ones who came out of the concentration camps to find family members still living never thought further than the ones who came out and found all missing. There was no way to KNOW what transpired in another place--even the next room. Circumstances were terrible at best and the stories would be accepted without question--just as YOU do that your Government is Pure and Works in your Behalf! Your senses tell you otherwise but it is easier and more comforting to believe the “orthodox” ideas. As these ones who escaped are shown pictures supposedly of Auschwitz--how can they know the pictures came from an Eisenhower prison camp of death? As you come into discernment, this is WHY you must attend facts as given and THEN, ONLY THEN, decide how it might have been other than given.
It was interesting to observe that the “Personal Opinion” column of the London Jewish Chronicle, March 29, 1973, although it roundly condemned Gray’s book, nevertheless made grandiose additions to the myth of the Six Million. It stated that: “Nearly a million people were murdered in Treblinka in the course of a year, 18,000 were fed into the gas chambers every day.” It is a pity indeed that so many people read and accept this kind of nonsense without so much as exercising their minds. If 18,000 were murdered every day, the figure of one million would be reached in a mere 56 days, not “in the course of a year”. This gigantic achievement would leave the remaining ten months of the year a total blank. 18,000 every day would in fact mean a total of 6,480,000” “in the course of a year”. Does this mean that the Six Million died in twelve months at Treblinka? What about the alleged three or four million at Auschwitz? This kind of thing simply shows that, once the preposterous compromise figure of Six Million had scored a resounding success and become internationally accepted, any number of impossible permutations can be made and no one would even think to criticize them. In its review of Gray’s book, the Jewish Chronicle column also provides a revealing insight into the fraudulent allegations concerning gas-chambers: “Gray recalls that the floors of the gas chambers sloped, whereas another survivor who helped to build them maintains that they were at a level...”
Occasionally, books by former concentration camp inmates appear which present a totally different picture of the conditions prevailing in them. Such is UNDER TWO DICTATORS (London, 1950) by Marguerite Buber. She was a German-Jewish woman who had experienced several years in the brutal and primitive conditions of a Russian prison camp before being sent to Ravensbruck, the German camp for women detainees, in August 1940. She noted that she was the only Jewish person in her contingent of deportees from Russia who was not straight away released from the Gestapo. Her book presents a striking contrast between the camps of Soviet Russia and Germany; compared to the squalor, disorder and starvation of the Russian camp, she found Ravensbruck to be clean, civilized and well- administered. Regular baths (showers) and clean linen seemed a luxury after her earlier experiences, and her first meal of white bread, sausage, sweet porridge and dried fruit prompted her to inquire of another camp inmate whether August 3rd, 1940 was some sort of holiday or special occasion. She observed, too, that the barracks at Ravensbruck were remarkably spacious compared to the crowded mud hut of the Soviet camp. In the final months of 1945, she experienced the progressive decline of camp conditions, the causes of which we shall examine later.
Another account which is at total variance with popular propaganda is Die Gestapo Lasst Bitten (The Gestapo Invites You) by Charlotte Bormann, a Communist political prisoner who was also interned at Ravensbruck. Undoubtedly its most important revelation is the author’s statement that rumors of gas executions were deliberate and malicious inventions circulated among the prisoners by the Communists. This latter group did not accept Marguerite Buber because of her imprisonment in Soviet Russia. A further shocking reflection on the post-war trials is the fact that Charlotte Bormann was not permitted to testify at the Rastadt trial of Ravensbruck camp personnel in the French occupation zone, the usual fate of those who denied the extermination legend.
You say, “Well, these discounters can’t be believed!” Why? You believe the exaggerated and totally impossible tales of the opposition which is far more heinous to believe! I don’t ask that you “believe” one against another--JUST LOOK AT TIlE FACTS!!!
Let us take a bit of a rest-break before we take up the subject of the nature and condition of those war-time concentration camps. I would remind all of you that concentration camps are exactly what their name implies and in war, it means a very tacky situation at best. There certainly were camps in which Death should have been the first name--but precious ones, they seem to all be found inside the control of the Iron Curtain Communist Zionists. It always comes back to haunt all of you--and MUST BE FACED! And still--NONE can begin to compare with the horror of the Eisenhower Death Camps--NONE!
Hatonn to clear.
Please summon me when you are ready to proceed with the writing.
REC #2 HATONN
FRI., NOV. 15, 1991 12:15 P.M. YEAR 5, DAY 091
THE NATURE & CONDITION OF WAR-TIME
In his recent book ADOLF HITLER (London, 1973), Colin Cross, who brings more intelligence than is usual to many problems of this period, observes astutely that “The shuffling of millions of Jews around Europe and murdering them, in a time of desperate war emergency, was useless from any rational point of view” (p. 307). How many of you can relate to just having family and relatives, say a large family of 20, to a special Thanksgiving dinner and they are there as your guests for the week-end. Taking this tiny little “blip” of possibility a bit further; now take this little gathering for three days of meals, bathing, sleeping, etc., etc., and multiply it to 50, 100, 1000-- now try a million--3 million--6 million! Now, while you are trying to fix this celebration dinner, you also have a full-blown bombing war going on, the power goes off and you have no cooking facilities, the dog kills the cat after it ate the pet canary, the babies are teething and have chicken pox and the in-laws find dust on the furniture. Now, you have to stop what you are doing and murder all these people and dispose (totally) of the bodies for you must not have any evidence of the act remaining! You may actually, at this point, feel like doing just that--but it becomes totally impractical to consider as a feasible course of action. Does it not leave consideration of possibilities of perceptions which are simply not true? You ones must begin to put these things into reasonable perspective and THEN look at possibilities and PROBABILITIES.
At the point above it becomes necessary to question the likelihood of this irrationalism, and whether it was even possible. Is it likely that, at the height of the war when the Germans were fighting a desperate battle for survival on two fronts, they would have conveyed millions of Jews for miles to supposedly elaborate and costly slaughter houses? To have conveyed three or four million Jews to Auschwitz alone (even supposing that such an inflated number existed in Europe, which it did not), would have placed an insuperable burden upon German transportation facilities which were strained to the limit in supporting the far- flung Russian front. To have transported the mythical six million Jews and countless numbers of other nationalities to internment camps, and to have housed, clothed and fed them there, would simply have paralyzed their military operations. There is no reason to suppose that the efficient Germans would have put their military fortunes at such risk.
On the other hand, the transportation of a reasonable 363,000 prisoners to Auschwitz in the course of the war (the number known to be registered there) at least makes sense in terms of the compulsory labor they supplied. In fact, of the 3 million Jews living in Europe, it is certain that no more than two million were ever interned at one time, and it is probable that the number was much closer to 1,500,000-- that is a LOT of people. You shall see later, in the “Report of the Red Cross”, that whole Jewish populations such as that of Slovakia avoided detention in camps, while others were placed in community “ghettos” like Theresienstadt. Moreover, from western Europe deportations were far fewer. The estimate of Reitlinger that only about 50,000 French Jews from a total population of 320,000 were deported and interned has been already noted.
The question must also be asked as to whether it could have been physically possible to destroy the millions of Jews that are alleged. Had the Germans enough time for it? Is it likely that they would have cremated people by the million when they were so short of manpower and required all prisoners of war for purposes of war production? Would it have been possible to destroy and remove all traces of a million people in six months? Could such enormous gatherings of Jews and executions on such a vast scale have been kept secret? This secrecy, you must remember, was kept from the very inmates in the orthodox view of this matter--there are NO witnesses to any gassing--not even
inmates of the camp! These are the kind of questions that the critical, thinking person should be asking. And he will soon discover that not only the statistical and documentary evidence given here, but simple logistics combine to discredit the legend of the Six Million.
Although it was impossible for millions to have been murdered in them, the nature and conditions of Germany’s concentration camps have been vastly exaggerated to make the claim plausible. William Shirer, in a typically reckless passage, states that “All of the thirty odd principal Nazi concentration camps were death camps” (ibid. p. 1150). This is totally untrue, and is not even accepted now by the principal propagators of the extermination legend. Shirer also quotes Eugen Kogon’s THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF HELL (N.Y. 1950, p. 227) which puts the total number of deaths at all of them at the ridiculous figure of 7,125,000, though Shirer admits in a footnote that this is “undoubtedly too high”.
“DEATH CAMPS” BEHIND THE IRON CURTAIN
It is true that in 1945 Allied propaganda did claim that all the concentration camps, particularly those in Germany itself, were “death camps”, but not for long. On this question, the eminent American historian Harry Elmer Barnes wrote: “These camps were first presented as those in Germany, such as Dachau, Belsen, Buchenwald, Sachsenhausen and Dora, but it was soon demonstrated that there had been no systematic extermination in these camps. Attention was then moved to Auschwitz, Treblinka, Beizec, Chelmno, Jonowska, Tarnow, Ravensbruck, Maughausen, Brezeznia and Birkenau, which does not exhaust the list that appears to have been extended as needed” (Rampart Journal, Summer 1967). What had happened was that certain honest observers among the British and American occupation forces in Germany, while admitting that many inmates had died of disease and starvation in the final months of the war, had found no evidence after all of “gas chambers”. As a result, eastern camps in the Russian zone of occupation such as Auschwitz and Treblinka gradually came to the fore as horrific centers of extermination (though no one was permitted to see them), and this tendency has lasted to the present day. Here in these camps it was all supposed to have happened, but with the Iron Curtain brought down firmly over them, no one has ever been able to verify such charges. The Communists claimed that four million people died at Auschwitz in gigantic gas chambers accommodating 2,000 people--and no one could argue to the contrary.
What is the truth about so-called “gas chambers”? Stephen F. Pinter, who served as a lawyer for the United States War Department in the occupation forces in Germany and Austria for six years after the war, made the following statement in the widely read Catholic magazine Our Sunday Visitor, June 14th, 1959:
“I was in Dachau for 17 months after the war, as a U.S. War Department Attorney, and can state that there was no gas chamber at Dachau. What was shown to visitors and sightseers there and erroneously described as a gas chamber was a crematory. Nor were there gas chambers in any of the other concentration camps in Germany. We were told that there was a gas chamber at Auschwitz, but since that was in the Russian zone of occupation, we were not permitted to investigate since the Russians would not allow it. From what I was able to determine during six postwar years in Germany and Austria, there were a number of Jews killed, but the figure of a million was certainly never reached. I interviewed thousands of Jews, former inmates of concentration camps in Germany and Austria, and consider myself as well qualified as any man on this subject.”
This tells a very different story from the customary propaganda. Pinter, of course, is very astute on the question of the crematory being represented as a gas chamber. This is a frequent ploy because no such a thing as a gas chamber has ever been shown to exist in these camps, hence the deliberately misleading term of “gas oven”, aimed at confusing a gas chamber with a crematorium. The latter, usually a single furnace and similar to the kind of thing employed today, were used quite simply for the cremation of those persons who had died from various causes within the camp, particularly infectious diseases. This fact was conclusively proved by the German archbishop, Cardinal Faulhaber of Munich. He informed the Americans that during the Allied air raids on Munich in September 1944, 30,000 people were killed. The archbishop requested the authorities at the time to cremate the bodies of the victims in the crematorium at Dachau. But he was told that, unfortunately, this plan could not be carried out; the crematorium, having only one furnace, was not able to cope with the bodies of the air raid victims. Clearly, therefore, it could not have coped with the 238,000 Jewish bodies which were allegedly cremated there. In order to do so, the crematorium would have to be kept going for 326 years without stopping and 530 tons of ashes would have been created.
CASUALTY FIGURES REDUCED
The figures of Dachau casualties are typical of the kind of exaggerations that have since had to be drastically revised. In 1946, a memorial plaque was unveiled at Dachau by Philip Auerbach, the Jewish State-Secretary in the Bavarian Government who was convicted for embezzling money which he claimed as compensation for non-existent Jews. The plaque read: “This area is being retained as a shrine to the 238,000 individuals who were cremated here.” Since then, the official casualty figures have had to be steadily revised downwards, and now stand at only 20,600, the majority from typhus and starvation only at the end of the war. This deflation, to ten percent of the original figure, will doubtless continue, and one day will be applied to the legendary figure of six million as a whole.
Does it now make sense WHY the Zionists are causing LAWS TO BE MADE TO MAKE IT UNLAWFUL TO EVEN SPEAK OUT IN THE POSSIBILITY THAT THE
ORTHODOX ZIONIST TALE OF THE HOLOCAUST IS IN ERROR? THE ONLY WAY TO SILENCE TRUTH IS TO COVER IT AND MAKE IT ILLEGAL TO SPEAK OF THE SUBJECT. This is also WHY ones who disagree with the
Phoenix material will effort to STOP YOU FROM SEEING IT AND WHY IT IS BURNED AND BANNED--TO KEEP YOU- THE-PEOPLE FROM FINDING TRUTH!!
Another example of drastic revision is the present estimate of Auschwitz casualties. The absurd allegations of three or four million deaths there are no longer plausible even to Reitlinger. He now puts the number of casualties at only 600,000; and although this figure is still exaggerated in the extreme, it is a significant reduction on four million and further progress is to be expected. Shirer himself quotes Reitlinger’s latest estimate, but he fails to reconcile this with his earlier statement that half of that figure, about 300,000 Hungarian Jews were supposedly “done to death in forty-six days”--a supreme example of the kind of irresponsible nonsense that is written on this subject.
Another thing that seems strange to me is WHY would ones who are so without mercy and so heinous bother with the middle step of providing gas chambers? You didn’t bother to even kill the troops you buried in the Eisenhower camp holes nor in the trenches in Iraq. Why, then, would not the people be placed directly into the ovens to be both killed and cremated? There seems to be totally illogical and inefficient methodology at play in this scenario. Do you suppose it was to insure that the Polish gas salesman, who later became Pope, could continue in business? Come, come, chelas--God gave you brains with which to REASON!
That several thousand camp inmates did die in the chaotic final months of the war brings us to the question of their war-time conditions. These have been deliberately falsified in innumerable books of an extremely lurid and unpleasant kind. The Red Cross Report, examined below, demonstrates conclusively that throughout the war the camps were well administered. The working inmates received a daily ration, even throughout 1943 and 1944, of not less than 2,750 calories, which was more than double the average civilian ration in occupied Germany in the years after 1945. The internees were under regular medical care, and those who became seriously ill were transferred to hospital. All internees, unlike those in Soviet camps, could receive parcels of food, clothing and pharmaceutical supplies from the Special Relief Division of the Red Cross. The Office of the Public Prosecutor conducted thorough investigations into each case of criminal arrest, and those found innocent were released; those found guilty, as well as those deportees convicted of major crimes within the camp, were sentenced by military courts and executed. In the Federal Archives of Kohlenz there is a directive of January 1943 from Himmler regarding such executions, stressing that “no brutality is to be allowed” (Manvell & Frankl, ibid. p. 312). Occasionally there was brutality but such cases were immediately scrutinized by S.S. Judge Dr. Konrad Morgen of the Reich Criminal Police Office, whose job was to investigate irregularities at the various camps. Morgen himself prosecuted commander Koch of Buchenwald in 1943 for excesses at his camp, a trial to which the German public was invited. It is significant that Oswald Pohl, the administrator of the concentration camp system who was dealt with so harshly at Nuremberg, was in favor of the death penalty for Koch. In fact, the S.S. court did sentence Koch to death, but he was given the option of serving on the Russian front. Before he could do this, however, Prince Waldeck, the leader of the S.S. in the district, carried out his execution. This case seems ample proof of the seriousness with which the S.S. regarded unnecessary brutality. Several S.S. court actions of this kind were conducted in the camps during the war to prevent excesses, and more than 800 cases were investigated before 1945. Did some go unaccounted for? Certainly, I would imagine--do you know what goes on in your prisons? What about Rodney King of Los Angeles? All we suggest is that you open your eyes and LOOK.
I FIND IT QUITE REMARKABLE THAT THE GERMANS HAVE CONTINUALLY URGED THOROUGH INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATIONS INTO THESE ACCUSATIONS AND THE EVIDENCE WAS TORN DOWN AND THE ZIONISTS ALWAYS ARE THE ONES WHO REFUSE TO ALLOW LOOKING INTO THE POSSIBILITY OF INACCURACIES. NOW, IT IS ILLEGAL TO EVEN SPEAK OF
THIS MATTER IN GERMANY--SO HOW SHALL JUSTICE BE FOUND? EVEN YOUR PRESIDENT BUSH HAS GIVEN SERVICE TO THE SHRINES--WHO WILL GIVE HEARING IF THE FACTS ARE DENIED PUBLIC SCRUTINY? DOES
THIS NOT SMACK OF “COVER-UP”--READ MY LIPS??
DHARMA, IN YOUR BLACKEST MOMENTS, CHELA, AS WE WRITE AND THE THREATS FLOW--KNOW THAT IF NOTHING MORE IN THIS LIFE-TIME--YOU ARE GIVING HEARING TO A NATION CONDEMNED FOR THAT WHICH THEY DID NOT COMMIT! THEY HAVE ASKED FOR HEARING AND THE TRIBUNALS OF “INJUSTICE” HAVE MADE IT ILLEGAL TO INQUIRE. WORLD, YOU ARE IN SERIOUSLY GRAVE CIRCUMSTANCE! AHO.
Morgen testified at Nuremberg that he discussed confidentially with hundreds of inmates the prevailing conditions in the camps. He found few that were undernourished except in the hospitals, and noted that the pace and achievement in compulsory labor by inmates was far lower than among German civilian workers.
The evidence of Pinter and Cardinal Faulhaber has been shown to disprove the claims of extermination at Dachau, and we have seen how the casualty figures of that camp have been continuously revised downwards. The camp at Dachau near Munich, in fact, may be taken as fairly typical of these places of internment. Compulsory labor in the factories and plants was the order of the day, but the Communist leader Ernst Ruff testified in his Nuremberg affidavit of April 18th, 1947 that the treatment of prisoners on the work details and in the camp of Dachau remained humane. The Polish underground leader, Jan Piechowiak, who was at Dachau from May 22nd, 1940 until April 19th, 1945 also testified on March 21st, 1946 that prisoners there received good treatment, and that the S.S. personnel at the camp were “well disciplined”. Berta Schirotschin, who worked in the food service at Dachau throughout the war, testifled that the working inmates, until the beginning of 1945 and despite increasing privation in Germany, received their customary second breakfast at 10 a.m. every morning.
In general, hundreds of affidavits from Nuremberg testify to the humane conditions prevailing in concentration camps; but emphasis was invariably laid on those which reflected badly on the German administration and could be used for propaganda purposes. A study of the documents also reveals that Jewish witnesses who resented their deportation and internment in prison camps tended to greatly exaggerate the rigors of their condition, whereas other nationals interned for political reasons, such as those cited above, generally presented a mote balanced picture. In many cases, prisoners such as Charlotte Bormann, whose experiences did not accord with the picture presented at Nuremberg, were not permitted to testify
The orderly situation prevailing in the German concentration camps slowly broke down in the last fearful months of 1945. The Red Cross Report of 1948 explains that the saturation bombing by the Allies paralyzed the transport and communications system of the Reich, no food reached the camps and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims, both in prison camps and among the civilian population of Germany. This terrible situation was compounded in the camps both by great overcrowding and the consequent outbreak of typhus epidemics. Overcrowding occurred as a result of prisoners from the eastern camps such as Auschwitz being evacuated westward before the Russian advance; columns of such exhausted people arrived at several German camps such as Belsen and Buchenwald which had themselves reached a state of great hardship. Belsen camp near Bremen was in an especially chaotic condition in these months and Himmler’s physician, Felix Kersten, an anti-Nazi, explains that its unfortunate reputation as a “death camp” was due solely to the ferocity of the typhus epidemic which broke out there in March 1945 (MEMOIRS 1940-1945. London 1956). Undoubtedly these fearful conditions cost several thousand lives, and it is these conditions that are represented in the photographs of emaciated human beings and heaps of corpses which the propagandists delight in showing, claiming they are victims of “extermination”.
WHAT EXCUSE DO YOU HAVE FOR YOUR NATION WHO CONTINUES TO STARVE AND KILL BY DISEASE. THE PEOPLE OF IRAQ? YOU CONTINUE TO REFUSE TO ALLOW FOOD AND SUPPLIES INTO A NATION DYING OF STARVATION AND LACK OF FACILITIES TO SUSTAIN LIFE. HOW WILL YOU DEAL WITH THIS HISTORICALLY? OH YES, I FORGOT --YOU WILL MAKE IT ILLEGAL TO SPEAK OF IT! SO BE IT.
A surprisingly honest appraisal of the situation at Belsen in 1945 appeared in Purnell’s HISTORY OF THE SECOND WORLD WAR (Vol. 7, No. 15) by Dr. Russell Barton, now superintendent and consultant psychiatrist at Severalls Hospital, Essex, who spent one month at the camp as a medical student after the war. His account vividly illustrates the true causes of the mortality that occurred in such camps towards the war’s end, and how such extreme conditions came to prevail there. Dr. Barton explains that Brigadier Glyn Hughes, the British Medical Officer who took command of Belsen in 1945, “did not think there had been any atrocities in the camp” despite discipline and hard work. “Most people,” writes Dr. Barton, “attributed the conditions of the inmates to deliberate intention on the part of the Germans.. Inmates were eager to cite examples of brutality and neglect, and visiting journalists from different countries interpreted the situation according to the needs of propaganda at home.”
However, Dr. Barton makes it quite clear that the conditions of starvation and disease were unavoidable in the circumstances, and that they occurred only during the months of 1945. “From discussions with prisoners it seemed that conditions in the camp were not too bad until late 1944. The huts were set among pine trees and each was provided with lavatories, wash basins, showers and stoves for heating.” The cause of food shortage is also explained. “German medical officers told me that it had been increasingly difficult to transport food to the camp for some months. Anything that moved on the autobahns was likely to be bombed...I was surprised to find records, going back for two or three years, of Large quantities of food cooked daily for distribution. At that time I became convinced, contrary to popular opinion, that there had never been a policy of deliberate starvation. This was confirmed by the large numbers of well-fed inmates. Why then were so many people suffering from malnutrition?.. .The major reasons for the state of Belsen were disease, gross overcrowding by central authority, lack of law and order within the huts, and inadequate supplies of food, water and drugs.” The lack of order, which led to riots over food distribution, was quelled by British Machine-gun fire and a display of force when British tanks and armored cars toured the camp.
Apart from the unavoidable deaths in these circumstances, Glyn Hughes estimated that about “1,000 were killed through the kindness of English soldiers giving them their own rations and chocolates.” As a man who was at Belsen, Dr. Barton is obviously very much alive to the falsehoods of concentration camp mythology, and he concludes: “In trying to assess the causes of the conditions found in Belsen one must be alerted to the tremendous visual display, ripe for purposes of propaganda, that masses of starved corpses presented ”. To discuss such conditions “naively in terms of ‘goodness’ and ‘badness’ is to ignore the constituent factor...”.
To be continued at the next writing. Thank you.