REC #1 HATONN
TUE., FEB. 17, 1998 7:31 A.M. YR. 11, DAY 185
TUE., FEB. 17, 1998
[Note from Doris: Please watch the non-news. There is no country other than Britain-Israel and the U.S.-Israel who want to touch Iraq and yet the threats go on, especially on the channel network watched in Iraq--CNN. We have come a long, long way into the Pits and please, God, if you will, give us more time and within this time we will try harder and work faster. We know more now and are working a lot smarter these days which allows for less working "harder". Perhaps one day soon the Antichrist controllers will OVERPLAY their hand and luck, and, Father, may this be the time.
Ok, I'm ready to hit the grinding wheel again.]
* * * *
QUOTING: PART 5. GLOBAL PARASITES
JEWISH HISTORY IN
THE UNITED STATES
The story of the Jews in America begins with Christopher Columbus. On August 2, 1492, more than 300,000 Jews were expelled from Spain, with which event Spain's prestige began its long decline, and on August 3, the next day, Columbus set sail for the West, taking a group of Jews with him. They were not, however, refugees, for the prophetic navigator's plans had aroused the sympathy of influential Jews for a long period previously. Columbus himself tells us that he consorted much with Jews. The first letter he wrote detailing his discoveries was to a Jew. Indeed, the eventful voyage itself which added to men's knowledge and wealth "the other half of the Earth" was made possible by Jews.
The pleasant story that it was Queen Isabella's jewels which financed the voyage has disappeared under cool research. There were three Maranos or "secret Jews" who wielded great influence at the Spanish court: Luis de Santagel, who was an important merchant of Valencia and who was "farmer" of the royal taxes; his relative, Gabriel Sanchez, who was the royal treasurer; and their friend, the royal chamberlain, Juan Cabrero. [H: Bet you didn't know all this!] These worked unceasingly on Queen Isabella's imagination, picturing to her the depletion of the royal treasury and the likelihood of Columbus discovering the fabulous gold of the Indies, until the Queen was ready to offer her jewels in pawn for the funds. But Santagel craved permission to advance the money himself, which he did, 17,000 ducats in all, about $20,000, perhaps equal to $160,000 today (1920). It is probable that the loan exceeded the expedition's cost.
Associated with Columbus in the voyage were at least five Jews: Luis de Torres, interpreter; Marco, the surgeon; Bernal, the physician; Alonzo de la Calle, and Gabriel Sanchez. The astronomical instruments and maps which the navigators used were of Jewish origin. Luis de Torres was the first man ashore, the first to discover the use of tobacco; he settled in Cuba and may be said to be the father of Jewish control of the tobacco business as it exists today.
[H: I am reminded here of the foolish play on the tobacco industry to meet the obligations of your "balanced budget". Isn't there something wrong with this picture today? Are you really going to have a shut-down of smoking and still have the tobacco industry pay for your deficits with that "fine" levied or agreed to or whatever--none of it makes any sense at all.
Now turn to the Lewinsky-Billy Zipper problem and see if you can make a connection. No, none other than Grandpa Lewinsky making a lot, LOT, of Democratic contributions? Why? Well, look a bit deeper and then go read Gary Wean's material from just topical investigation. Monica's FATHER is a leading Oncologist (cancer specialist). The leading Jewish male disease is COLON CANCER--which is not yet covered by Medicare or any other assistance program. The effort is to get "colon cancer" covered by Government Medical coverage and there will be specified Oncologists on a list for approved treatment physicians and clinics. Not a shabby effort! Sounds silly? No, sorry, it is both real and is working. I find it quite appropriate.]
Columbus' old patrons, Luis de Santagel and Gabriel Sanchez, received many privileges for the part they played in the work, but Columbus himself became the victim of a conspiracy fostered by Bernal, the ship's doctor, and suffered injustice and imprisonment as his reward.
From the beginning, Jews looked more and more to America as a fruitful field, and immigration set in strongly toward South America, principally Brazil. But because of military participation in a disagreement between the Brazilians and the Dutch, the Jews of Brazil found it necessary to emigrate, which they did in the direction of the Dutch colony of what is now New York. Peter Stuyvesant, the Dutch governor, did not entirely approve of their settling among his people and ordered them to leave, but the Jews had evidently taken the precaution to assure their being received even if not welcomed, because upon revoking the order of Stuyvesant, the Directors gave as one of the reasons for the Jews being received, "the large amount of capital which they have invested in the shares of the Company". Nevertheless they were forbidden to enter public service and to open retail shops, which had the effect of driving them into foreign trade in which they were soon exercising all but a monopoly because of their European connections.
This is only one of the thousand illustrations which can be given of the resourcefulness of the Jew. Forbid him in one direction, he will excel in another.
[H: You could all take lessons. It seems like God's team works best and loss in one direction means QUIT.] When he was forbidden to deal in new clothes, he sold old clothes--that was the beginning of organized traffic in secondhand clothing. When he was forbidden to deal in merchandise, he dealt in waste--the Jew is the originator of the waste product businesses of the world; he was the originator of the salvage system; he found wealth in the debris of civilization. He taught people how to use old rags, how to clean old feathers, how to use gall nuts and rabbit skins. He has always had a taste for the furrier trade, which he now controls, and to him is due the multitude of common skins which now pass under various alluring... [missing sentence].
The American Jew does not assimilate. This is stated, not to blame him, but merely as a fact. The Jew could merge with the people of America if he desired, but he doesn't. If there is any prejudice existing against him in America, aside from the sense of inquiry which his colossal success engenders, it is because of his aloofness. The Jew is not objectionable in his person, creed, or race. His spiritual ideals are shared by the world. [H: As expressed.] But still he does not assimilate; he cultivates by his exclusiveness the feeling that he does not "belong". This is his privilege, and from one point of view it may indicate excellent judgment, but he must not make it one of the grounds of his complaint against Gentiles in general, as he has a tendency to do. It is better that he should make it clear to Gentiles once and for all where true Jews stand in the matter, as when a young Jew said--"There is all the difference in the world between an American Jew and a Jewish American. A Jewish American is a mere amateur Gentile, doomed to be a parasite forever".
[H: RE-READ THAT PLEASE. There is more "meaning" in that one statement than perhaps in all the rest of the book assembled.]
The ghetto is not an American product but the Jews' own importation. [H: Note in modern times you will find the ghettos made up of areas such as Brentwood, Hollywood, New York business sections and high-income suburbs, Beverly Hills and other high-rent city places--not the recognized or "thought about" dark isolated ghettos of the poverty stricken Jew or any other minority grouping. The Jew, however, will whine and cry about his plight and those "against" him all the way to every MAJOR BANK IN THE WORLD.] They have separated themselves into a distinct community. Speaking of this matter the Jewish Encyclopedia says: "The social organization of the Jews resident in America has differed little from that in other countries...in the main, and without any compulsion, Jews preferred to live in close proximity to one another, a peculiarity which still prevails".
To make a list of the lines of business controlled by the Jews of the United States would be to touch most of the vital industries of the country--those which are really vital, and those which cultivated habit has made to seem vital. The theatrical business, of course, as everyone knows, is exclusively Jewish. Play-producing, booking, theater operation are all in the hands of Jews. This perhaps accounts for the fact that in almost every production today can be detected propaganda, sometimes glaringly commercial advertisement, which does not originate with playwrights, but with producers.
The motion picture industry.
The sugar industry.
The tobacco industry.
Fifty per cent or more of the meat packing industry.
Upward of 60 per cent of the shoemaking industry.
Men's and women's ready-made clothing.
Most of the musical purveying done in the country.
More recently, cotton.
The Colorado smelting industry.
The liquor business.
The loan business.
These, only to name the industries with national and international sweep, are in control of the Jews of the United States, either alone or in association with Jews overseas.
The American people would be vastly surprised if they could see a line-up of some of the "American business men" who hold up our commercial prestige overseas. They are mostly Jews. They have a keen sense of the value of the American name, and when in a foreign port you stroll up to the office which bears the sign, "American Importing Company", or "American Commercial Company", or other similarly noncommittal names, hoping to find a countryman, an American, you usually find a Jew whose sojourn in America appears to have been all too brief. This may throw a sidelight on the regard in which "American business methods" are held in some parts of the world. When 30 or 40 different races of people can carry on business under the name "American", and do it legally, too, it is not surprising that Americans do not recognize some of the descriptions of American methods which appear in the foreign press. The Germans long ago complained that the rest of the world was judging them by the German-speaking Jewish commercial traveler.
Instances of Jewish prosperity in the United States are commonplace, but prosperity, the just reward of foresight and application, is not to be confounded with control. The prosperity of the Jews can be had by any one who is willing to pay the price which the Jews pay for it--a very, very high price, as a rule, all things considered --but it would be impossible for any Gentile coalition under similar circumstances to attain the control which the Jews have won, for the reason that there is lacking in the Gentile a certain quality of working-togetherness, a certain conspiracy of objective, and the adhesiveness of intense raciality, which characterizes the Jew. It is nothing to a Gentile that another man is a Gentile; it is next to everything to a Jew that the man at his door is another Jew. So, if instances of Jewish prosperity were needed, the case of the Temple Emmanu-el, New York, might be cited, which in 1846 could scarcely raise $1,520 for its budget, but in 1868, following the Civil War, raised $708,755 from the rental of 231 pews. And the rise of the Jewish clothing monopoly as one of the results of the same Civil War might be cited as an instance of prosperity plus national and international control.
Indeed, it might be said that the Jew has succeeded in everything he has attempted in the United States, except farming. The explanation usually made in Jewish publications is that ordinary farming is far too simple to engage the Jew's intellect and therefore he is not enough interested in it to succeed, but that in dairy and cattle farming where the "brain" is more necessary he has made a success. Numerous attempts have been made in various parts of the United States to start Jewish farming colonies, but their story is a series of failures. [H: They have, however, over the years gained TOTAL BUSINESS CONTROL OF THE FARMING INDUSTRY.] Some have blamed the failure on the Jew's lack of knowledge of scientific farming, others on his distaste for manual labor, others on the lack of the speculative element in agriculture. In any case, he stands higher in the non-productive employments than in this basically productive one. Some students of the question state that the Jew never was a man of the land, but always a trader, for which assertion one of the proofs offered is the Jews' selection of Palestine as their country, that strip of land which formed a gateway between East and West and over which the overland traffic of the world passed. [H: How many of you realized that little tidbit of geography?]
Issue of June 5, 1920.
END OF QUOTING
My observation is that the misplaced documents with missing parts prior to this may well be a portion of this very writing, No. 5. I don't object if you, in placing the work into a journal, correct the error. Or, leave it as is for this is how it was presented for our use.
I hope you can see from this very writing that a slam against Jewish aggressiveness is NOT the issue for there must be business aggression if there is to be a successful industrial base upon which a society can be built, upon which all can earn a just living. But the objections have come through the total usurpation of government structure and fundamental movement AWAY from industry and into a controlled hyper-society of non-producers. Civilizations must have products and must have food and other basic necessities and when the balance is off, the nation will fold for there is nothing valid upon which to support the masses. It is through this terrible lack of balance that Antichrist shows his lust for inequality and his penchant for making a dollar off anything which comes along from welfare programs to the IRS. The CONTROL stemming from this power of manipulation and gain of oversight is that which constricts the very life-flow of nations and peoples.
You will have your things such as NAFTA orchestrated by these same giants to further debilitate the industrial base of a nation while shifting to and exploiting the more poverty-stricken nations for that industrial fabrication processing. Then when there are no more earners paying the incredible increases in tax demands--all the general assistance is removed into the pockets of the Jewish kings and the citizens are left with nothing save WARS in their future--for WARS MAKE MONEY FOR THE ELITE. High level Jewish boys and girls do not get SENT TO WAR--THEY HELP MAKE THE WARS and "acceptable losses" do not include THEM. The money flows back to the Elite gatherers and the bills go to the masses who must then experience one depression following on the heels of each war encounter. You do not need a war in Iraq to hide Billy's zipper problems--you need MONEY, America, for you are on the brink of total economic disaster!
Your Constitution was written by Masons and Jews and was built on the foundation of Native American constitutions. There was no intent of being totally honest or FAIR. The point was to structure something that sounded good, gave a foot in the industrial-age door, and then immediately THE AMENDMENTS WOULD TAKE CARE OF ANY UNDESIRABLE RESTRICTIONS ON THE RICH AND CONTROLLING GOVERNMENT. You have no "Constitution" left in operation for you, already, in America, function UNDER THE CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT. HOW ELSE DO YOU THINK YOU COULD GO FORTH AND HAVE A UNILATERAL WAR ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD WHILE ALL YOUR COUNCIL MEMBERS ARE AGAINST THE MOVE?
And how would your Attorney General rule on this matter? With the Big Boys of the World Order, of course. She, Reno, and your Treasurer, just as are other cabinet members of your President, ARE FULLY PAID BY THE IMF (INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND) OF THE UNITED NATIONS AND INCLUSIVE OF, THE WORLD BANK.
There, LAWFULLY, only is required the President's signature to the ORDER without any consideration of Congress AT ALL to go to war and invoke every domestic Executive Order to bring everything in America under total Government CONTROL, from your transportation to your food supply--EVERYTHING! The orders are in place and operative and the Elite controllers KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE DOING. THEY DON'T EVEN HAVE TO PULL OFF A WAR TO GET TOTAL CONTROL OF THE NATION AND THE UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION. Why in the world do you marvel at the tactics against your President today? But, Clinton knows that if he signs over to this war, he is finished. This is a pretty nasty place for anyone, even Billy Zipper.
By the way, Americans, how are you financing this massive build-up in the Gulf? This is not exactly like a maneuver exercise off the Gulf of Mexico. This is half a world away and the cost is enormous for this little show of power. WHO IS PAYING FOR IT THAT YOU CAN STILL CONSIDER CUTTING MILITARY BUDGETS, CLOSE MILITARY BASES AND CUT DEFENSE BUDGETS TO LESS THAN MAINTENANCE LEVELS? PAY ATTENTION: WHO IS PAYING FOR THIS MASSIVE PIECE OF MANIPULATION AND DESTRUCTION GAMES? BALANCED BUDGET? COME NOW, YOU CAN'T EVEN ASSIST THE PEOPLE IN YOUR CURRENT "NATIONAL DISASTERS".
Oh I see, well this "superfund" and thus and so? So the presses run out worthless paper notes triple-time, and that with new and doubled presses brought on line.
But you will stop this insanity? HOW ARE YOU GOING TO STOP THIS INSANITY? YOU DID NOTHING WHEN YOU COULD HAVE STOPPED IT
SO WHY THINK YOU THAT YOU CAN CHANGE IT NOW?
And no: all the praying you do for God to change it--will merit you NOTHING.
God only rebuilds and creates--He does not destroy and the bringing down of this government you have established is destruction. You are stuck with that which you have allowed and helped construct.
Will this mean the end of the world? As YOU know it, yes, but as the world knows it, it is the BEGINNING. NOSTRADAMUS WAS A JEW; JOHN'S REVELATION SCRIBE WAS A JEW; WOW!
The other religions of the world, EXCLUSIVE of your evangelical fundamentalist christians, DON'T EVEN CONSIDER YOUR REVELATIONS TO MATTER A WHIT--EXCEPT TO AGAIN OPEN THE POSSIBILITIES OF LIFE FLOW INTO THE MASSES OF HUMANITY--WHEN THE HEAD ANTICHRIST IS GONE. THEREFORE, AMERICA MAY GET VERY HOT AND BOTHERED PRETTY SOON NOW.
Dharma, get off this computer for that "singing" is for you! Adonai.
REC #1 HATONN
WED., FEB. 18, 1998 7:31 A.M. YR. 11, DAY 186
WED., FEB. 18, 1998
QUESTIONS ARE REAL AND
THERE SHOULD BE ANSWERS
To pretend there are no questions when the world is crying out for answers is foolishness. The facts are that, in every instance, you can trace back to source the reasons for the questions in the first place.
If you want to keep minorities in a minority category you have to keep the people in the group from easily reproducing and you MUST keep limits on immigration. Therefore, to increase numbers to become a majority you must have a government with these majority persons in power to be able to discard laws regarding same. The way this is accomplished is to gain CONTROL of the central law-making councils. You cannot have just one or two Islamics, or "a" Catholic, or "an" Asian in a high seat for they cannot accomplish much and will be absorbed and massively influenced by the Democratic RULE of "the most in power wields the power".
In the U.S., for instance, the major push for Jewish influence in Government came with the THEFT from the Constitution of the "first and original" 13th Amendment. Lawyers (Esquire) COULD NOT SERVE IN HIGH GOVERNMENTAL POSITION NOR COULD THEY BE JUDGES, ETC. THEY BORE TITLES OF NOBILITY AND BASICALLY THROUGH THEIR OATHS AND ALLEGIANCES SERVED FOREIGN POWERS.
You will note that today you HAVE TO BE A MEMBER OF THAT BAR ASSOCIATION TO EVEN GET SUCH POSITIONS. Hey, readers, it's your life and if you want this, go for it. However, I think you are seeing the errors of placing those people in high places for they move over into every other avenue of manipulation and power.
Then when reason is sought for "why" things happen and "how" a thing could just be "removed" (from the Constitution yet) there is need to look at why a thing would be removed and just who could arrange such a switcharoo. You are (WERE) a REPUBLIC--NOT A DEMOCRACY. When that was stolen from you, you were set up for the fall. You are exactly like the little test ground called Israel in your government structure, your democratic system is a staged and constructed system and holds neither democracy nor any form resembling a Republic.
Typical of your "democracy" you can have an innocent man but you decide that every Tuesday morning you will elect a man to have his legs broken. You have five people on the decision-making board so they choose whoever they wish, vote to break his legs and that's that! Is that democracy? No, and neither was taking from Palestine to make a State called Israel. Just the Big Five of the United Nations even HAD A VOTE--all of which, at the time, were controlled and operated by JEWS. The Jews who would settle in Palestine didn't really WANT to go to Palestine--but it was chosen as the best place to make a run for the world and set up the takeover plans. After the Bolsheviks (Jews) took over Russia and it became "Soviet" you had the perfect go-for-the-gold arrangement. Remember that, at that time in the 40s, you had China as a Communist State in transition as well.
So what of Israel, this so-called democracy in the middle of the Middle East? Even the location of the "State" was to get control of the wealth and oil network in that area, and it worked. While everyone felt pain for the struggling Jew and for Israel, workers were taking the U.S. for the Israeli Homeland as quickly as could be structured--and surely enough, the noose tightened, the Constitution was set aside (that is always a fact of WAR, good buddies), and now you have a Fascist-Socialistic State of the American-Israel. You object? Well, I didn't DO IT; I am simply pointing out to you what has happened to you.
You believe every poll offered to you, even about Clinton and the assault on Iraq. One channel speaker says there is a poll of 2,000 people and 78% want to go to war. Change to another channel before the numbers can be changed to suit the needs of propaganda and you will see that 78% don't want to bomb Iraq and the poll came from 5,000 people. THERE IS NOTHING REAL OR MEANINGFUL ABOUT ANYTHING FED TO YOU. IT IS FAR WORSE THAN EATING NOTHING BUT BROWNIES AND POTATO CHIPS AS YOUR ENTIRE DIET.
Now let's look at Iraq. You had great business going with Iraq. Well, actually, the Bush bunch had great business going with Iraq prior to the 1990s. You sold Saddam arms through your Agriculture Department and you sold Iran arms through your Agriculture Department while putting billions of dollars into the "insiders" own bank accounts, including Bush and Saddam as joint-venture depositors. The stuff was being shipped right through Britain. Bush will now sit with this worried face and tell you right out that Saddam's regime funnelled arms, drugs and you name it. But what made Bush REALLY UPSET? Well, Saddam was supposed to go into Kuwait and destroy all the records of these on-going unlawful transactions, from S&L stored documents to arms trades.
Saddam did go in and did ravage, pillage and plunder--BUT TOOK THE DOCUMENTS HOME WITH HIM FOR BLACKMAIL EVIDENCE. HE STILL HAS THEM AND HE KEEPS THEM IN THOSE "SECRET" PLACES WHERE HE IS SUPPOSED TO HAVE WEAPONS OF "MASS DESTRUCTION". Well, it would destroy some of the players--but those players are out of REAL POWER so Saddam waits. Then, after the war, and his Partner Bush froze the money accounts and lodged a war against him, Saddam attempted to kill Georgie and his family who were now gloating in Kuwait.
Is Saddam actually a good guy? Are you kidding me? Of course not, or he would not have been playing dirty games with George Bush in the first place. And always the little guys pay dearly.
So, where are the papers? Well, you have to understand the game. Papers don't "blow up" so this is why the FIXED UN team is run by a top-level US spy. These people were to go in, find and confiscate the records, claim weapons details, and get the blackmail material OUT AND AWAY. Saddam is NOT THAT STUPID. However, Britain and the US are going to be discovered in this BIG MESS OF A RIP-OFF and it will be ugly to say the very least. Of course the other "allies" now know what the game is about but they are so involved that they can't own up either. Zipper Billy is simply caught in the middle with enough material in Saddam's bunkers to get him hanged along with the other destroyers. The Zipper was working directly with Bush in CIA drug stuff all the way back to where he learned how to work his zipper in the first place. Billy is learning the hard way how his opposition works and can destroy a person over almost nothing, or anything, as the case may be--with the media.
Your military couldn't chase back to Baghdad in the early 90s and wipe out Saddam
--he sat with all the proof he needed to totally destroy the US, Britain AND ISRAEL.
He now has certified duplicates of the whole library of incriminating evidence and PLANS FOR TOTAL TAKEOVER of the MIDDLE EAST, AFRICA AND EUROPE.
Saddam is NOT impressed with you and NOTHING IS BEING DONE IN THE FACE OF IMMEDIATE ASSAULT. He has the trump cards, ladies and gentlemen, and enough "cause intent" to have nerves of steel in the face of the fire-fight. And no, he doesn't really care about a few expendable people for a "greater cause". After all, he believes in recycling, so it matters not too much if you help a few along their journey. It is called what you do every day for self--find justification. With you it may only be a glass of wine or a better deal, but with stakes like there are on the Middle East table--it is big.
Now again, let us look at what you DIE for, people: Democracy. Look right to your source of training--ISRAEL. Without further comment I will offer you a couple of the LAST TWO PAGES of a little book called DEMOCRACY IN ISRAEL, by Norman F. Dacey. Never mind who that might be but simply note that these comments I share are by HIGH LEVEL JEWS IN ISRAEL.
"WE DON'T GIVE A DAMN!"
Another severe critic of Israel's undemocratic posture is Ammon Rubenstein who charged shortly before the October 1973 War that "an atmosphere of haughtiness and boastfulness has come upon us; we don't care about the world; we will show them who is the master; we will have a military parade--unnecessary, senseless--through Jerusalem.... And in order to show that we don't give a damn, we will confiscate Arab lands; we will enclose areas and establish 'exceptions', we will settle everywhere without giving the right of self-determination to the Israeli Arabs; we will brawl with Muslims all over the world--for free, in vain--about praying hours at a place that has been for generations a Muslim mosque (the Mosque of Abraham in Hebron).
"We do all this and no one can stop us, yet the sedimentation of grudges against us is growing. But it is not only because of this that the negative image of Israel is growing. Our internal affairs are not secret; they are published through all the media; people in London, Paris and New York open the newspaper and read incomprehensible things about Israel.
"They read about the burning down of the (religious) missions and the governmental threat to expel Christians; about a ministerial committee meeting in order to decide how to fight the 'Jews For Jews', about decisions of the government to disengage itself from its promises about Biram and Ikrit because of the precedent'. They read and are astonished about the 'mamzerim' (bastard) issues, the 'Cohen' and women problems (under Israeli law, no man named Cohen can marry a divorced woman); They read about confusion over 'who is a Jew' and similar matters, things they associated with under-developed societies.
"They know that the Writers Union--supposedly intellectuals--refuses to accept Arab writers because of their origins; they hear that the Prime Minister speaks all day long against 'mixed weddings'; that the Israeli law defines the citizenship rights according to the test of the grandfather and grandmother, and that the Chief Rabbi declares that the rules of justice and equality do not apply to Gentiles. They read and start asking themselves what is happening to it, to the State of Israel.
"Whoever thinks that the world understands only the language of strength, that one way or another it is always against us, shouldn't come with complaints about the 'world'.... Only a paranoiac thinks that the world is plotting against him. Only a megalomaniac thinks that we could answer with war to such a plot. The Israeli who loves his country will fight--here, inside--in order to put out the wicked fire that has taken hold of part of us, the government and the Knesset....
"We have behaved sometimes with disregard for others; we have blown the horn more than was necessary; we have driven through the lawns; we have trodden some flowerpots".
"THE WHOLE WORLD IS AGAINST US!"
As Uri Avnery, editor and publisher of the news weekly Ha'olam Hazeh, wrote in an editorial in that journal: "The military bands which danced before the television cameras to the music of the Israeli song The Whole World is Against Us, the masochistic pleasure which we draw from the diplomatic disasters of Israel, the satisfaction we get from watching the absolute isolation of Israel in the United Nations... are all symptoms of a malignant psychological illness... The whole world is marching in one direction; Israel of today turns her back on this world and marches in the opposite direction." [H: Sound like any other country TODAY that you know?]
The dictionary defines a "democracy" as a state of society characterized by formal equality of rights, opportunity and treatment. Yitzhak Ben-Aharon, head of the powerful Histadrut, told the New York Times that Israeli society has lost its way amid a frenzied "rat race" for personal enrichment. "We have started to worship the golden calf", he warned. "Now we have to decide how to have equality in a society where the real desire of the people is against it. People are interested in equality with those who have more than they have--but--they don't care about those who have less".
Israeli journalist-author Amos Kenan has likened the ethical level of life in Israel to that of a "South American banana republic".
[H: Then there is a finishing sentence in the book:] The facts here presented should help the reader to distinguish between a democracy and the Zionist state.
END OF QUOTING
I don't know if we will get around to sharing more of this book; it is only about 70 pages, but is most powerful in its observations from that inside experience.
We do not know if the booklet is still available or anything about the source. You can try: INSTITUTE FOR HISTORICAL REVIEW, 1822-1/2 Newport Blvd., Suite 191, Costa Mesa, CA 92627. It seems to have been printed in 1976. ISBN 0-911038- 68-X. I will ask someone to contact these people if possible and ask for permission to use more of the material. At present, however, we are going right back to Part 6 of GLOBAL PARASITES.
I only ask that as things break before you in news, in war, in scandal--really LOOK AT CONNECTIONS because it will be in these "connections" that you will find the cause, for the obvious is only an "effect" of something else.
QUOTING: PART 6, GLOBAL PARASITES
THE JEWISH QUESTION--FACT OR FANCY?
"The Jewish Question still exists. It would be useless to deny it. The Jewish Question exists wherever Jews live in perceptible numbers. Where it does not exist, it is carried by Jews in the course of their migrations. We naturally move to those places where we are not persecuted, and there our presence produces persecutions... The unfortunate Jews are now carrying anti-Semitism into England; they have already introduced it into America".
Theodore Herzl, A Jewish State, p. 4.
The chief difficulty in writing about the Jewish Question is the supersensitiveness of Jews and non-Jews concerning the whole matter. There is a vague feeling that even to openly use the word "Jew", or to expose it nakedly in print, is somehow improper. Polite evasions like "Hebrew" and "Semite", both of which are subject to the criticism of inaccuracy, are timidly essayed, and people pick their way gingerly as if the whole subject were forbidden, until some courageous Jewish thinker comes straight out with the good old word "Jew", and then the constraint is relieved and the air cleared. The word "Jew" is not an epithet; it is a name, ancient and honorable, with significance for every period of human history, past, present and to come. [H: And note that even Ford was writing without full research or investigation or he would know that "Jew" is NOT an "ancient" name but, rather, a very recent term coined to fit a need of the self-styled Khazarian Serpent People. As the government comes under control of the Jews and the press, media and most great business corporations, the term Jew is utilized more and more as if breaking ice, by such as speakers in the media mostly at gatherings of old comedians on various programs where they can openly talk about being Jewish and speak of "the Jews". Larry King is an excellent example of being a Jew himself and bringing full recognition of the high status of that label on his guests.]
There is extreme sensitiveness about the public discussion of the Jewish Question on the part of Gentiles. They would prefer to keep it in the hazy borderlands of their thought, shrouded in silence. Their heritage of tolerance has something to do with their attitude, but perhaps their instinctive sense of the difficulty involved has more to do with it. The principal public Gentile pronouncements upon the Jewish Question are in the manner of the truckling politician or the pleasant after-dinner speaker; the great Jewish names in philosophy, medicine, literature, music and finance are named over, the energy, ability and thrift of the race are dwelt upon, and everyone goes home feeling that a difficult place has been rather neatly negotiated. But nothing is changed thereby. The Jew is not changed. The Gentile is not changed. The Jew still remains the enigma of the world.
Gentile sensitiveness on this point is best expressed by the desire for silence--"Why discuss it at all"? is the attitude. Such an attitude is itself a proof that there is a problem which we would evade if we could. "Why discuss it at all"?--the keen thinker clearly sees in the implications of such a question the existence of a problem whose discussion or suppression will not always be within the choice of easy-going minds.
Is there a Jewish Question in Russia? Unquestionably, in its most virulent form. Is it necessary to meet that Question in Russia? Undoubtedly, meet it from every angle along with light, and healing may come.
Well, the percentage of the Jewish population of Russia is just one per cent more than it is in the United States. The majority of the Jews themselves are not less well-behaved in Russia than they are here; they lived under restrictions which do not exist here; yet in Russia their genius has enabled them to attain a degree of power which has completely baffled the Russian mind. Whether you go to Rumania, Russia, Austria or Germany, or anywhere else that the Jewish Question has come to the forefront as a vital issue, you will discover that the principal cause is the outworking of the Jewish genius to achieve the power of control.
Here in the United States it is the fact of this remarkable minority--a sparse Jewish ingredient of three per cent in a nation of 110,000,000--attaining in 50 years a degree of control that would be impossible to a ten times larger group of any other race, that creates the Jewish Question here. Three per cent of any other people would scarcely occasion comment, because we could not meet with a representative of them wherever we went in high places--in the innermost secrecy of the councils of the Big Four at Versailles, in the supreme court, in the councils of the White House, in the vast dispositions of world finance--wherever there is power to get or use. Yet we meet the Jew everywhere in the upper circles, literally everywhere there is power. He has the brains, the initiative, the penetrative vision which almost automatically project him to the top, and as a consequence he is more marked than any other race.
And that is where the Jewish Question begins. It begins in very simple terms--How does the Jew so habitually and so resistlessly gravitate to the highest places? What puts him there? Why is he put there? What does he do there? What does the fact of his being there mean to the world?
That is the Jewish Question in its origin. From these points it goes on to others, and whether the trend becomes pro-Jewish or anti-Semitic depends on the amount of prejudice brought to the inquiry, and whether it becomes pro-Humanity depends on the amount of insight and intelligence.
The use of the word Humanity in connection with the word Jew usually throws a side-meaning which may not be intended. In this connection it is usually understood that the humanity ought to be shown toward the Jew. There is just as great an obligation upon the Jew to show his humanity toward the whole race. The Jew has been too long accustomed to think of himself as exclusively the claimant on the humanitarianism of society; society has a large claim against him that he cease his exclusiveness; that he cease exploiting the world; that he cease making Jewish groups the end and all of his gains, and that he begin to fulfill, in a sense his exclusiveness has never yet enabled him to fulfill, the ancient prophecy that through him all the nations of the Earth should be blessed.
The Jew cannot go on forever filling the role of suppliant for the world's humanitarianism; he must himself show that quality to a society which seriously suspects his higher and more powerful groups of exploiting it with a pitiless rapacity which in its wide-flung and long drawn-out distress may be described as an economic pogrom against a rather helpless humanity. For it is true that society is as helpless before the well-organized extortions of certain financial groups, as huddled groups of Russian Jews were helpless against the anti-Semitic mob. And as in Russia, so in America, it is the poor Jew who suffers for the delinquencies of the rich exploiter of his race. [H: Note that this is the same type of exploitation, but inclusive of violence, that has happened to the Blacks. Those high-level Blacks who seem to "succeed" in such as Congress, etc., are mostly simply symbolic showpieces and THEY HAVE JOINED THE THRUST IN GREED, POWER WISHES AND DESIRES FOR ACHIEVING WHAT THE "WHITE" MAN HAS ACCOMPLISHED. The major difference is the pure tolerance of the "handlers" of these Blacks. The Blacks are not "accepted", they are USED, for they sell out their very own people and race in the process.]
This series of articles is already being met by an organized barrage by mail and wire and voice, every single item of which carries the wail of persecution. One would think that a heartless and horrible attack were being made on a most pitiable and helpless people--until one looks at the letterheads of the magnates who write, and at the financial ratings of those who protest, and at the membership of the organizations whose responsible heads hysterically demand retraction. And always in the background there is the threat of boycott, a threat which has practically sealed up the columns of every publication in America against even the mildest discussion of the Jewish Question.
The Jewish Question in America cannot be concealed forever by threats against publications, nor by the propagandist publication of matter extremely and invariably favorable to everything Jewish. It is here and it cannot be twisted into something else by the adroit use of propaganda, nor can it be forever silenced by threats. The Jews of the United States can best serve themselves and their fellow-Jews all over the world by letting drop their far too ready cry of "anti-Semitism", by adopting a franker tone than that which befits a helpless victim, and by seeing what the Jewish Question is and how it behooves every Jew who loves his people to help solve it.
There has been used in this series the term "International Jew". It is susceptible of two interpretations: One, the Jew wherever he may be; the other, the Jew who exercises intentional control. The real contention of the world is with the latter and his satellites, whether Jew or Gentile.
Now, this international type of Jew, this grasper after world-control, this actual possessor and wielder of world-control is a very unfortunate connection for his race to have. The most unfortunate thing about the international Jew, from the standpoint of the ordinary Jew, is that the international type is also a Jew. And the significance of this is that the type does not grow anywhere else than on a Jewish stem. There is no other racial nor national type which puts forth this kind of person. It is not merely that there are a few Jews among international financial controllers; it is that these world controllers are exclusively Jews. That is the phenomenon which creates an unfortunate situation for those Jews who are not and never shall be world-controllers, who are the plain people of the Jewish race. If world-control were mixed, like the control, say, of the biscuit business, then the occasional Jews we might find in those higher financial altitudes would not constitute the problem at all; the problem would then be limited to the existence of world-control in the hands of a few men, of whatever race or lineage they might be. But since world control is an ambition which has only been achieved by Jews, and not by any of the methods usually adopted by would-be world conquerors, it becomes inevitable that the question should center in that remarkable race.
This brings another difficulty: In discussing this group of world-controllers under the name of Jews (and they are Jews), it is not always possible to stop and distinguish the group of Jews that is meant. The candid reader can usually determine that, but the Jew who is in a state of mind to be injured is sometimes pained by reading as a charge against himself what was intended for the upper group. "Then why not discuss the upper groups as financiers and not as Jews"? may be asked. Because they ARE Jews. It is not to the point to insist that in any list of rich men there are more Gentiles than Jews; we are not talking about merely rich men who have, many of them, gained their riches by serving a System, we are talking about those who Control--and it is perfectly apparent that merely to be rich is not to control. The world-controlling Jew has riches, but he also has something much more powerful than that.
The international Jew, as already defined, rules not because he is rich, but because in a most marked degree he possesses the commercial and masterful genius of his race, and avails himself of a racial loyalty and solidarity the like of which exists in no other human group. In other words, transfer today the world-control of the international Jew to the hands of the highest commercially talented group of Gentiles, and the whole fabric of world-control would eventually fall to pieces, because the Gentile lacks a certain quality, be it human or divine, be it natural or acquired, that the Jew possesses.
[H: It is LACK OF CHRIST VALUES. By doing lip service only to goodness and Christ's recognition of GOOD MORALS AND ETHICAL BEHAVIORS the anti-Christ can gain control of worldly manifestation. He can do that by playing to the non-Christ attitudes within every human being. He is, however, not bound by such shackles in his living expression. He prays to Lucifer as Jehovah and asks not for Godly creation in goodness but to overcome, become, and displace any above him through any means appropriate at a given time in experience. Jews simply are not bound by CHRISTIAN rules and it makes it EASY to gain control, for the usual Gentile has no desire for CONTROL but only to express. This difference is utilized constantly to bewilder and confound--and bring into control --the Gentile of any race, color or, actually, creed.]
This, of course, the modern Jew denies. There is a new position taken by the modernists among the Jews which constitutes a denial that the Jew differs from any other man except in the matter of religion. "Jew" they say is not a racial designation, but a religious designation like "Episcopalian", "Catholic", "Presbyterian". This is the argument used in newspaper offices in the Jews' protests against giving the Jewish designation to those of their people who are implicated in crime--"You don't give the religious classifications of other people who are arrested", the editor is told, "why should you do it with Jews"? The appeal to religious tolerance always wins, and is sometimes useful in diverting attention from other things.
Well, if the Jews are only religiously differentiated from the rest of the world, the phenomenon grows stranger still. For the rest of the world is interested less in the Jew's religion than in anything else that concerns him. There is really nothing in his religion to differentiate the Jew from the rest of mankind, as far as the moral content of that religion is concerned, and if there were he would have overcome that by the fact that his Jewish religion supplies the moral structure for both of the other great religions. Moreover, it is stated that there are among English speaking nations 2,000,000 Jews who acknowledge their race and not their religion, while 1,000,000 are classified as agnostic--are these any less Jews than the others? The world does not think so. The authoritative students of human differences do not think so. An Irishman who grows indifferent to the Church is still an Irishman, and it would seem to be equally true that a Jew who grows indifferent to the Synagogue is still a Jew. He at least feels that he is, and so does the non-Jew.
A still more serious challenge would arise if this contention of the modernists were true, for it would necessitate the explanation of these world-controlling Jews by their religion. We should have to say, "They excel through their religion", and then the problem would turn on the religion whose practice should bring such power and prosperity to its devotees. But an other fact would intervene, namely, that these world-controlling Jews are not notably religious; and still another fact would hammer for recognition, namely, the most devout believers and most obedient followers of the Jewish religion are the poorest among the Jews. If you want Jewish orthodoxy, the bracing morality of the Old Testament, you will find it, not among the successful Jews, who have Unitarianized their religion to the same extent that the Unitarians have Judaized their Christianity, but among the poor in the side streets who still sacrifice the Saturday business for their Sabbath keeping. Certainly their religion has not given them world-control; instead, they have made their own sacrifices to keep it inviolate against modernism.
Of course, if the Jew differs from the rest of mankind only when he is in full accord with his religion, the question becomes very simple. Any criticism of the Jew becomes sheer religious bigotry and nothing else! And that would be intolerable. But it would be the consensus of thoughtful opinion that the Jew differs less in his religion than in anything else. There is more difference between the two great branches of Christianity, more conscious difference, than between any branch of Christianity and Judaism.
[H: This is because you are not dealing with RELIGION--you are dealing with Spiritual righteousness and thus you bring down moral standards, which produces the very thing you would rather not be: ANTICHRIST.]
So that, the contention of certain modernists notwithstanding, the world will go on thinking of the Jew as a member of a race, a race whose persistence has defeated the utmost efforts made for its extermination, a race that has preserved itself in virility and power by the observance of those natural laws the violation of which has mongrelized so many nations, a race which has come up out of the past with the two great moral values which may be reckoned on monotheism and monogamy, a race which today is before us as the visible sign of an antiquity to which all our spiritual wealth harks back. Nay, the Jew will go on thinking of himself as the member of a people, a nation, a race. And all the mixture and intermixture of thought or faith or custom cannot make it otherwise. A Jew is a Jew and as long as he remains with his perfectly unassailable traditions, he will remain a Jew. And he will always have the right to feel that to be a Jew is to belong to a superior race.
These world-controlling Jews at the top of affairs, then, are there by virtue of, among other things, certain qualities which are inherent in their Jewish natures. Every Jew has these qualities even if not in the supreme sense, just as every Englishman has Shakespeare's tongue but not in Shakespeare's degree. And thus it is impracticable, if not impossible, to consider the international Jew without laying the foundations broadly upon Jewish character and psychology.
We may discount at once the too common libel that this greater form of Jewish success is built upon dishonesty. It is impossible to indict the Jewish people or any other people on a wholesale charge. No one knows better than the Jew how widespread is the notion that Jewish methods of business are all unscrupulous. There is no doubt a possibility of a great deal of unscrupulousness existing without actual legal dishonesty, but it is altogether possible that the reputation the Jewish people have long borne in this respect may have had other sources than actual and persistent dishonesty.
We may indicate one of these possible sources. The Jew at a trade is naturally quicker than most other men. They say there are other races which are as nimble at a trade as is the Jew, but the Jew does not live much among them. In this connection one may remember the famous joke about the Jew who went to Scotland.
Now, it is human nature for the slower man to believe that the quicker man is too deft by far, and to become suspicious of his deftness. Everybody suspects the "sharper" even though his sharpness be entirely honest. The slower mind is likely to conceive that the man who sees so many legitimate twists and turns to a trade, may also see and use a convenient number of illegitimate twists and turns. Moreover, there is always the ready suspicion that the one who gets "the best of the bargain" gets it by trickery which is not above board. Slow, honest, plain-spoken and straight-dealing people always have their doubts of the man who gets the better of it.
The Jews, as the records for centuries show, were a keen people in trade. They were so keen that many regarded them as crooked. And so the Jew became disliked for business reasons, not all of which were creditable to the intelligence or initiative of his enemies.
Take, for example, the persecution which Jew merchants once suffered in England. In older England the merchant class had many easy-going traditions. One tradition was that a respectable tradesman would never seek business but wait for it to come to him. Another tradition was that to decorate one's store window with lights or colors, or to display one's stock of goods attractively in the view of the public, was a contemptible and underhanded method of tempting a brother tradesman's customers away from him. Still another tradition was that it was strictly unethical and unbusinesslike to handle more than one line of goods. If one sold tea, it was the best reason in the world why he should not sell teaspoons. As for advertising, the thing would have been so brazen and bold that the public opinion would have put the advertiser out of business. The proper demeanor for a merchant was to seem reluctant to part with his goods.
One may readily imagine what happened when the Jewish merchant bustled into the midst of this jungle of traditions. He simply broke them all. In those days tradition had all the force of a divinely promulgated moral law and in consequence of his initiative the Jew was regarded as a great offender. A man who would break those trade traditions would stop at nothing! The Jew was anxious to sell. If he could not sell one article to a customer, he had another on hand to offer him. The Jews' stores became bazaars, forerunners of our modern department stores, and the old English custom of one store for one line of goods was broken up. The Jew went after trade, pursued it, persuaded it. [H: I jest not--YOU could take lessons. Why does God always have to take hind post while you allow and follow along like slaves to the master's whip? What is WRONG with honorably and honestly becoming successful and then PROTECTING your acquisitions? Why do you put such a cheap and stingy price for God Creator? You can succeed in beautiful manner and live within the laws of God and within the laws of the land. You do not give up INTEGRITY or good MORALITY by succeeding--you discount God by your failure to even try to achieve.] He was the originator of "a quick turnover and small profits". He originated the installment plan. The one state of affairs he could not endure was business at a standstill, and to start it moving he would do anything. He was the first advertiser--in a day when even to announce in the public prints the location of your store was to intimate to the public that you were in financial difficulties, were about to go to the wall and were trying the last desperate expedient to which no self-respecting merchant would stoop. [H: Perhaps you should hold in your mind the picture illustrated by the Jew WEEPING all the way to the bank with YOUR MONEY.]
It was as easy as child's play to connect this energy with dishonesty. The Jew was not playing the game, at least so the staid English merchant thought. As a matter of fact he was playing the game to get it all in his own hands--which he has practically done.
The Jew has shown that same ability ever since. His power of analyzing the money currents amounts to an instinct. His establishment in one country represented another base from which the members of his race could operate. Whether by the natural outworking of innate gifts, or the deliberate plan of race unity and loyalty, all Jewish trading communities had relations, and as these trading communities increased in wealth, prestige and power, as they formed relations with governments and great interests in the countries where they operated, they simply put more power into the central community wherever it might be located, now in Spain, now in Holland, now in England. Whether by intention or not, they became more closely allied than the branches of one business could be, because the cement of racial unity, the bond of racial brotherhood cannot in the very nature of things exist among the Gentiles as it exists among the Jews. Gentiles never think of themselves as Gentiles, and never feel that they owe anything to another Gentile as such. Thus they have been convenient agents of Jewish schemes at times and in places when it was not expedient that the Jewish controllers should be publicly known; but they have never been successful competitors of the Jew in the field of world-control.
From these separated Jewish communities went power to the central community where the master bankers and the master analysts of conditions lived. And back from the central community flowed information of an invaluable character and assistance wherever needed. It is not difficult to understand how, under such a condition, the nation that did not deal kindly with the Jews was made to suffer, and the nation that yielded to them their fullest desire was favored by them. And it is credibly stated that they have made certain nations feel the power of their displeasure.
This system, if it ever existed, exists in greater power today. It is today, however, threatened as it has never been. Fifty years ago, international banking, which was mostly in control of the Jews as the money brokers of the world, was on top of business. It exercised the supercontrol of governments and finance everywhere. Then came the new thing, Industry, which expanded to a degree unguessed by the shrewdest prophets and analysts. As Industry gathered strength and power it became a powerful money magnet, drawing the wealth of the world in its train, not, however, merely for the sake of possessing the money, but of making it work. Production and profit on production, instead of loans and interest on loans, became the master method for a time. The war came, in which the former broker-masters of the world had undoubtedly their large part. And now the two forces, Industry and Finance, are in a struggle to see whether Finance is again to become the master, or creative Industry. This is one of the elements which is bringing the Jewish Question to the bar of public opinion.
[H: Boy, and I guess you know who won!]
To state this and prove it may be nothing more than to establish the superiority of Jewish ability. Certainly it is not a tenable position to say that the Jew is extraordinarily successful and therefore must be curbed. It would be equally aside from the truth to say that the co-ordination of Jewish activity has been, on the whole, a harmful thing for the world. It may be possible to show that up to this point it has been useful. Success cannot be attacked nor condemned. If any moral question arises at all, it must concern the use made of the success which has been attained. The whole matter centers there, after the previous fact is established. May the Jew go on as he has gone, or does his duty to the world require another use of his success?
This inquiry obviously leads to further discussion, as well as a gathering up of the remaining threads of the present discussion, which future articles will attempt to do.
Issue of June 12, 1920
END OF QUOTING
To fully appreciate the true definition of "JEW" you have to know background and how the very term came into being. An Irishman can be a Jew for it defines a state of activities, morality and beliefs that are not of any "religion", save perhaps Satanism or Luciferianism. Further, these people look out for one another, and if a job is open, the boss will hire his buddy or his relative, good or bad. But what happens is that when you place "hookers" onto definitions such as "race", "creed", "color". "language", etc., you can't find a PLACE to stick this shrewd manager of worldly THINGS. You have just drawn the line between Spiritual Right and Physical Experience. You don't have to work in the shadows, but the tricks are so much more effective in secret--aren't they? Even if a thing be legal and grand the assumption is that if the "other" person gets it--
it is somehow unlawful, unethical or immoral. However, the point is that with the One World Order--all three attributes are actually PRESENT.
I am usually asked what should go on the "Hotline" when outrageous things come past our desks. Anything and everything you find that MAY BE SO. DISINFORMATION is the name of the game, so you can't KNOW, and I am not going to be put into the position of being a guru or a fortune teller. If you hear that there will be a war with nuclear bombs in four days, my attitude is to share it and then you check out your gear and food supplies. Then, FIND OUT WHAT YOU CAN; don't depend on the Nostradamus prophecies to MAYBE give you a clue--Nostradamus was a Catholic Jew. Quit your silly games or you are going to get blown totally away.
What are you going to do differently IF THE GERMANS IN NEW MEXICO COME OUT IN FULL DOOR-TO-DOOR INSPECTIONS? SHOOT THEM? What a bunch of hogwash.
The last document that just arrived is nothing but misinformation to rally the militias and make restless the sheeple, a last ditch effort to alert and wake up some of you sleepers waiting for war. That part is good; the explanations are not shrewd, they will get you killed.
One militia leader states: "If some foreign power came into Kansas and put a gun to our head and demanded that we hand over all the grain we have there (oops, that's right, they HAVE been doing that), YOU WOULDN'T LET THEM GET AWAY WITH IT, EVEN THOUGH SOME OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE".
What would YOU do TODAY if the above happened? Well, what makes the "visitors" think you might have grain to confiscate? What is the matter with you Gentiles? Shocked? Angry? You have even better insight if you have been anywhere near our TRUTH for these years. You do NOT become your enemy to cooperate with that enemy. Don't be silly. You act up and you become one less problem for the bad boys because they now have a reason to shoot you dead when you threaten them back. Dead martyrs or patriots are worthless. We need people to LIVE FOR FREEDOM, not keep dying in false reasoning to lessen the enemies' problems.
So, any of you around here think of pulling out your pop-guns and cocking them had best think again. You have waited too long to keep the thugs from over-running you, so you hold your fire and live to THINK of some better way to manage the circumstances. You can be GODLY in ANY setting. You have to be an idiot to be STUPID in the Antichrist movement. Those Germans will be doing exactly what they are brought here to do--whatever they are ordered to do in the absence of your own military.
This is WHY we don't have a "GROUP" of ANY KIND. You shall not place blame for your bad behavior on any of us here. We keep the law--of the land and of God. And, if the Germans arrive, ask them in, give them coffee and cake and share the journals! And if they have come to seize the journals--GIVE THEM ALL TO THEM. Remember the Teacher: "If a man takes your coat and you have two--offer him the other one as well." I have no interest in psychics, fortune tellers, spooks or kooks, remote viewers or any other kind of mystical hocus-pocus. If this displeases you, then I am sorry FOR YOU. It is this very nonsense which brings you to the stoop of disaster constantly without any kind of ability to counter it save wring your hands, prattle about it and get out your pop-guns. Shame on you for calling yourself Christ-believers. Adonai.