Can the systematic bullying of Alison Chabloz by the Jewish Lobby be a refined modern day version of ‘ritual murder'?
What exactly do we know about Alison Chabloz (pictured) and what is her alleged crime? Let me give you the bare details.
Alison Chabloz, an Englishwoman now in her early fifties, is a highly intelligent and musically talented lady who used to be a music teacher in Switzerland. She is probably fluent in French and German and speaks English with a very posh English accent. She is clearly one of the British intelligentsia, but would have to keep to the dark and shadowy side of the street among the intellectual pariahs, like David Irving.
You see, the trouble with Alison is that she is a Holocaust revisionist. That is her crime. She dares to question the three main tenets of the mainstream Holocaust narrative.
The three bedrock principles of the mainstream Holocaust narrative are as follows. If you deviate even a fraction of an inch from total acceptance of these three inflexible dogmas, you are a thought criminal who is subject to severe punishment in seventeen countries, including imprisonment for several years:
(1) The "Final Solution" of the Jewish Question was the mass extermination of the Jews and Adolf Hitler was the man who gave the order to carry out the said premeditated extermination.
(2) The extermination of the Jews was carried out mostly in various death camps in gas chambers, the chief of these being at Auschwitz.
(3) The number of Jews exterminated amounted to six million, give or take a few hundred; this figure is sacrosanct and must on no account be diminished.
Like so many other historical revisionists, Alison does not buy into the above narrative.
She questions its accuracy, as millions of other people do all over the world. Nor does she think anyone should have the right to apply coercion and intimidation as weapons against her, forcing her against her will to believe in something she sees as fundamentally erroneous.
If you question the existence of the historical Jesus, no one is going to put you in prison for Christ denial. That's allowed and even promoted by an underground army of Christ haters. Yet if you question the Holocaust and assert that it did not happen as described, you are guilty of Holocaust denialand can be hounded out of your job, as Alison Chabloz was. You can be fined or thrown into prison in seventeen countries: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, and Switzerland.
You can even have your face beaten into a bloody pulp by Jewish thugs, as French Holocaust scholar Robert Faurisson experienced a few years ago. Faurisson, I believe, has been subjected to physical violence on at least tenseparate occasions.
‘BLOOD ON THEIR HANDS' French scholar Faurisson beaten up by three Jewish thugs
- § -
The Jew behind the persecution of Alison Chabloz is called Gideon Falter, head of Campaign Against Anti-Semitism (CAA) in Britain. "Anti-Semites," he threatens, "will suffer devastating professional consequences for their actions."
"Devastating professional consequences". What does that mean?
It means the power invested in a particular Jew such as Gideon Falter, allegedly representing the Jewish community at large, to get a non-Jew dismissed from his job for saying things the Jew considers "offensive". It is apparently up to the Jew, and to his well-paid lackeys in the non-Jewish community, to decide what is sufficiently hateful as to merit punishment: loss of employment, stiff fines, imprisonment for several years, and, in the case of Robert Faurisson, grievous bodily harm by Jews who decide to take the law into their own hands.
What exactly does Mr Falter want? He wants to see Alison Chabloz punished for daring to "diss" the Jews by writing and performing her satirical song "Survivors". In what way can this one particular Jew be said to represent the interests of 15 million Jews worldwide? In this way: with the help and assistance of Jewish financiers, Mr Falter has managed to set up an organization with the impressive sounding name "Campaign Against Antisemitism" (CAA), giving the entirely false impression that whenever he opens his mouth to speak in an official capacity (ex cathedra) he is speaking in the megaphone voice of 15 million Jews.
Of course he is doing no such thing. The idea that he is speaking on behalf of 15 million Jews-that the entire world community of Jews is standing behind him and cheering him on enthusiastically, demanding gentile blood, is an elaborate con trick.
Mr Gideon Falter is a con artist, an Emperor without any clothes.
JEWISH LOBBYIST GIDEON FALTER DEMANDING HIS ‘POUND OF FLESH'
- § -
Let's now consider the allegedly offensive video song Alison Chabloz produced. What is so offensive about it? For one thing, Alison is not impressed by the tale of Irene Zisblatt, the Hungarian-born American Holocaust survivor and author of the book The Fifth Diamond. Having read Zisblatt's exciting adventure story and how she escaped from the Nazis, Alison probably thought that here was ideal material for a satirical song. Zisblatt's story, after all, is beyond ridiculous. It lends itself to parody.
Let Wikipedia fill in the fascinating details:
[Irene Zisblatt's] "entire family was gassed up in Gas Chamber No. 2, including her parents. Before leaving, her mother gave her four diamonds to purchase bread. However, not wanting to accept the soldiers' request to put valuables inside bags, Zisblatt swallowed the diamonds. She later stated that she then recovered the diamonds from her feces. She then would swallow them again. She did this numerous times.... She would rinse them off in her soup, or if there was no soup in the mud before ingesting them again."
Basically, here is a Jewish lady who eats her diamonds every day or on alternate days, retrieves them from her own excrement as soon as they have passed through her digestive tract, dunks them in her soup to wash them, and then pops them into her mouth again and swallows. This she does how many times? 10 times? 100 times? 200 times? I'm not sure, she doesn't say.
The reader will note that Irene washes her diamonds in mud if no soup is at hand. This raises some interesting questions: (1) How come no water is available for washing? (2) Since water appears to be in short supply, making it necessary for Irene to use her soup as a cleansing agent, it follows that the soup itself is vitally necessary as a source of fluid to prevent dehydration. So how can Irene eat her soup, which she needs to eat not only to prevent dehydration but to get essential nutrition, if she has just washed her four excrement-encrusted diamonds in it? She is now eating her own excrement enriched soup!
Hard to believe.
This is surely material that lends itself to satire. The best possible way to pick holes in an obviously mendacious story is to ridicule it in a satirical song, in precisely the way Alison Chabloz has done. This is not hate speech. It is art in the service of truth. Far from being prosecuted in a court of law, Alison should be given a medal for exposing yet another Holocaust hoax:
My name is Irene Zisblatt and I come from Hungary Can you believe what evil Nazi bastards did to me I was gassed not once but twice I managed to escape Over the electric fence Landed on the train
I saw them taking babies and tearing them in two And creepy Dr Mengele he removed my tattoo They tried to turn my brown eyes blue Make lampshades from my skin For months I swallowed diamonds And shat them out again
Tell us another Come on, my brother . . .
Friends, try and understand this: for writing those satirical lines, Alison Chabloz is now being threatened with severe punishment. Ask yourself: is this an example of hate speech? Are those lines so inflammatory that anyone who reads them is likely to go out and slit some Jew's throat?
I don't think so. Nor do I think Alison's satirical song is likely to trigger a second Holocaust. I don't think the Jews have the right to criminalize legitimate satire like this just because they happen to be the butt of it.
Is mockery a crime? Well then, why don't they lock up Sarah Silverman for mocking Jesus Christ? Doesn't Christ deserve some respect?
Why is hate speech against Christianity allowed when Jews are doing the hate speech? Why is Alison Chabloz being singled out for hate speech against Jews, but Sarah Silverman given free rein to practice hate speech against Christians? Perhaps Gideon Falter would care to answer these questions.
I don't think the Jews behind the persecution of Alison Chabloz can be aware of the grotesque double standards involved in the abuse of their power. About a year ago, I wrote an article called Mind Pollution - The Promotion of Sexual Perversion on National TV: The Case of Jenji Kohan. In this I related how it had become customary on America TV for Christianity to be held up to constant ridicule and contempt, including scenes of outrageous blasphemy, mostly at the hands of powerful American Jews.
Jenji Kohan, a well-know Jewish TV scriptwriter who is quoted as saying "I want fucking all the time", has a scene in one of her shows featuring an attractive nun offering to give a blowjob to a strange man in a Catholic church. Elsewhere in the same show, Ms Kohan, who openly advocates sexual perversion as a wholesome and life-enhancing recreational sport, has a disgusting little scene in which mother-and-son incest is normalized. A teenage boy is lectured by his mom on masturbation. She has caught him pleasuring himself over nude photographs of herself, so she tears up the pictures and flushes them down the toilet. Then she ticks him off gently in a jocular way, almost simpering with prissy prurience, as she advises him that masturbating over his mom is "possibly a bit quirky".
Here is my take on all this mindfilth:
This 3-minute video, "A Blowjob in Church", will show you what is being done to Christian America and its culture by sexually perverted Jewish writers whose fame is out of all proportions to their talents. Ask yourself: how many sons masturbate over their mother's nude photos? How many nuns fellate men in Catholic churches? The fact that these images are allowed to fester like poisonous weeds in the rich soil of the mass mind must give us cause for concern. This is mind pollution on a staggering scale.... the entire series is a product of the sleazy Jewish imagination:Jewish directors, Jewish producers, Jewish actors, Jewish scriptwriters.
Reader, pause for a moment and consider the appalling double standards on display here.
Alison Chabloz is being ritually persecuted in England right now by a Jew, Gideon Falter, and his thuggish Jewish organization Campaign Against Antisemitism, for producing a relatively harmless satirical video about the Holocaust called "Survivors", but in America there is not a single Christian nowadays who has the power to stop this foul-mouthed Jewesss, Jenji Kohan, from grossly insulting Christianity by featuring blowjob scenes in Catholic churches.
AMERICAN JEWESS JENJI KOHAN ("I want fucking all the time")
Why pick on Alison Chabloz when this sexually perverted Jewess is given free rein in America to insult Christianity with the full connivance of the Jewish Lobby? Truly, the impotence of Christianity-the cowering of helpless Christians under the iron heel of the Jewish boot-makes my blood boil and cry out for justice.
Where is our deliverer? Why is the Vatican silent? Isn't there a single Christian leader anywhere in the world with the guts to stand up and tell the Jews - "STOP!"
- § -
Here is Gideon Falter: "We have called for zero tolerance enforcement of the law against anti-Semitism and that is what politicians have promised, but the [Crown Prosecution Service] has failed to take action, so now we must act instead".
Let Wikipedia fill in the background:
At Westminster Magistrates' Court in December 2016, Alison Chabloz, a 52-year-old Derbyshire-based blogger and singer-songwriter, was sent for trial next March for posting a "grossly offensive" video on YouTube entitled "Survivors" which is effectively alleged to indulge in Holocaust denial. Chabloz rejected the accusation that she had made improper use of the Internet. Chabloz dismissed the prosecution on her blog as an attempt "to use the law to silence dissenters".
Originally on unconditional bail, Chabloz's use of the Internet was placed under some restrictions at the same court on 23 December after she had made information available online about people connected with her prosecution and the CAA [Campaign Against Antisemitism]. Chabloz is also unable to post anything racist online.
Take a look at that mealy-mouthed English so loved by legalistic liars and cheats: "Chabloz is also unable to post anything racist online." The way this is phrased assumes that Chabloz is a racist who needs to be told not to post racist material online. This is like warning a man who has never been convicted of pedophilia, "Stay away from children!" Such loaded phraseology carries the implicit suggestion that the innocent man has pedophile tendencies that need to be held in check. To tell Chabloz not to post racist material online is implicitly defamatory because it assumes she is a racist to begin with-a racist who needs to be warned to watch her step.
How would Mr Gideon Falter like it if a store detective sidled up to him in a department store and hissed: "I'm warning you! You'd better not steal anything!"
Warning Alison Chabloz not to publish anything racist online is a similar outrage, given that she is not a racist in the first place.
The very suggestion is defamatory.
- § -
Here is Alison Chabloz herself. Her abridged message comes to me in a private email from an unknown correspondent:
LONDON, ENGLAND. Friday, June 23, 2017. In court this morning. The original charge brought privately against me by Mr Faultfinder [Gideon Falter] was dropped.
Back on bail until October 25th.... This could drag on for months to come. The mainstream press aren't likely to say much, as the British people don't appreciate the idea of freedom of speech being under threat.
My original accusers will be upset that Judge Zani banned the press from publishing my address, with a severe caution of being in contempt of court if they do. However, I must alert my solicitor if I stay anywhere other than my official address for a period of more than ten days. Any offers of accommodation for nine days would be most welcome.
I have been charged with committing offences for which the prosecution has no evidence.
- Alison Chabloz
One final point that needs mentioning. Alison's satirical song "Survivors" was banned at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival in 2016. This is unprecedented, the first time the Edinburgh Fringe Festival has been forced to cancel an artistic performance in all its 70-year history. This just goes to demonstrate the formidable power of the Jewish Lobby to censor, suppress, and criminalize free speech.
I have watched the video below at least ten times, each time with mounting admiration. I have no hesitation in pronouncing this a work of satirical genius, comparable to the work of Juvenal and Jonathan Swift. A hundred years from now, when Gideon Falter is forgotten and all of us have gone to the Elysian fields, this song of Alison Chabloz will still be there. She herself will be dust and ashes, but her words will live on as a lasting memorial.