A Global Medical Tyranny: Vaccines are Destroying the Genetic Fabric of Society
25 September 2020
The Evidence that supports the Claim that Vaccines are Destroying the Genetic Fabric of Society In 1960 Australian Frank MacFarlane Burnet received the Nobel Prize for immunology. At this time he stated:
"Genetics, nutrition, psychological and environmental factors may play a more important role in resistance to disease than the assumed benefits of artificial immunity induced by vaccination".
He considered that "genetic deterioration of the population may be a consequence of universal mass vaccination and he postulated that in the long-term vaccination may be against the best interests of the state".
Many parents are now long-term carers for children who will never reach their potential in life. In addition, the incidence of autism is predicted to be 1 in 2 children by 2032; a disease that is 4-times more prevalent in boys than girls.
Yet governments globally have ignored these facts and the overwhelming science linking these diseases to vaccines for three decades. They have also ignored the well known contraindications to vaccines that are due to genetics (family history), by reducing all of these contraindications to just one - anaphylaxis. And family history is not enough - you must try the vaccine first.
On the advice of the medical-industry complex, governments and doctors are claiming that this significant increase in chronic illness in children is a ‘coincidence‘ after vaccination. Governments have ignored basic scientific principles of evidence-based medicine to provide this response to parents for decades.
My Publications on the Ethics of Mandatory and Coercive Vaccination Policies
‘A new strain of influenza or a change in surveillance?' After investigating the Swine flu ‘pandemic' of 2009, that did not turn out to be a ‘pandemic', I had this article published in the Australasian College of Environmental and Nutritional Medicine (ACNEM) Vol 28, No 4, Dec 2009. The article describes how increased surveillance of a disease can be used to give the appearance of an increased number of cases which can be misused by the media to create fear about a new virus. This can be achieved through statistical manipulation as we have observed in both 2009 and now in 2020 with COVID19.
Whilst it can be stated that there has been a serious outbreak of disease in some countries in 2020, this cannot be described as a "global pandemic" because this declaration was based on changing the definition of a pandemic in 2009 and on the flawed assumptions used in the mathematical modelling for this virus in all countries. This is explained in my video presentation here and in this document that has just been released - ‘Global Report 2019-nCOV: There is no global pandemic. The data is clear'.
Did you know that antibiotics are in most vaccines? Many people are allergic to antibiotics and using any vaccine carries the serious risk of anaphylactic shock to this and many other vaccine ingredients. Are you being informed of this before you give consent to your newborn baby being vaccinated ?
Please consider whether you want the substances listed below injected into the tissues of your new born infant before the the body systems are fully developed. These ingredients and many more are present in vaccines and the vaccination schedule has expanded to mandating 16 vaccines in Australian social services policies that require ~52 doses from birth to adolescence.
And the ‘new norm' - allergies, anaphylaxis, Kawasaki's Disease (vasculitis), Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), autoimmune disorders (diabetes, childhood rheumatoid arthritis, arthritis, multiple sclerosis etc.), thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP), autism, speech delay, neurological disorders, encephalopathy, meningitis, ADHD, childhood cancers, and many more that has increased in direct correlation to the vaccination program - a plausible cause of this illness.
But your doctor will inform you that this is ‘just a coincidence' because the Australian government and vaccine manufacturers have never funded a causality study that would disprove this association. That is, a study that uses an inert placebo in the unvaccinated trial group to prove the safety of each vaccine over an appropriate long-term time period that includes the delay in the appearance of these diseases - or the safety of the combination of vaccines on the government schedule:
Antibiotics: Neomycin, Polymxin, Gentamicin, Kanamycin Foreign Protein includes: Human Foetal Cells Chick embryo Cells and Bovine Serum Recombinant Human Albumin (genetically engineered DNA) Potassium Chloride Aluminium hydroxide Aluminium hydroxide/phosphate Aluminium phosphate Thimerosal (50% mercury compound) (flu vaccine multidose vials and infanrix-hexa and hep B 2013) Borax (‘sodium borate' - causes infertility and is found in HPV vaccines and hep A)
I have been studying the vaccination topic both formally and informally since 1993 when I vaccinated my first child. Like most people questioning vaccines, I have not come from an anti-vaccination position and the debate is not about pro or anti-vaccination. It is about safety, efficacy and necessity for each vaccine on the schedule. Are they all safe ? And are they all effective and necessary ?
In 2015 I completed a PhD at the University of Wollongong answering these questions.
My thesis is titled ‘A critical analysis of the Australian Government's rationale for its vaccination policy'. In Chapter 7, I present a discussion of the claims made by the government about the safety and efficacy of vaccines that are not supported by scientific evidence.
My book - Vaccination: Australia's Loss of Health Freedom - is now available. This book transforms my PhD into a more readable format and it includes three forewords that are written by health professionals and scientists who have endorsed my research.
The book describes the history of the control of infectious diseases in Australia plus the reasons for expanding the vaccination program. It also has an extra chapter (that is not in the PhD) that describes the strategies the Australian government and the medical-industry complex have used to censor the vaccination debate and to remove health freedom in Australia.
I would like to thank everyone who has supported my research and newsletters over the last 5-10 years. If you have appreciated this unfunded independent research and debate of children's health I hope you will consider a $5 donation for the up-keep of my website and continuation of my voluntary newsletters.
Only funded research is promoted to the public and universities do not promote student research. Hence the need for my website and newsletters to promote my independent research that is in the public interest.
My research has demonstrated that children's health has significantly declined as the Australian government's vaccination program has expanded. This is why the government and media have put so much effort into denigrating and censoring my research. Vaccination programs can not be described as ‘health policies' if they are not improving health outcomes in the population.
In the 23 years that Peter McIntyre was involved in the NCIRS (1997-2018) he did not ensure that the direct dose-response correlation between the 10-fold increase in chronic illness in children and the expanding vaccination program was investigated.
Proof of causality is essential before claiming to parents that vaccines are "safe and effective". This correlation is a strong indicator of causality, yet Peter McIntyre's response to parents, as Director of the NCIRS, for 23 years, was that it is a ‘coincidence‘ after vaccination. This is not evidence-based medicine.
The Australian government, under Scott Morrison, as Minister for Social Services in 2015, has committed acrime against humanity by implementing coercive vaccination into social services policies when there is no Health Law in any Australian Health Act to validate these policies as being for a "legitimate public health purpose".
Further, the Australian Prime Ministers Office, has refused to release the scientific advice, under the Freedom of Information Act, that it relied upon to mandate vaccines in social services policies in 2015. This evidence has been hidden from the public and the debate censored. That does not amount to "a consensus on the science' as governments are claiming.