The Collapse of Intellectual Standards in Science
By Norman Rogers with comments by Ron
Mar 7, 2020 - 6:49:10 PM

March 5th 2020

Each year approximately $25 billion dollars is wasted paying for so-called renewable energy, overwhelmingly wind and solar. This is the excess cost of the renewable energy versus what it would cost to generate the same amount of electricity in existing fossil fuel plants. Because many states have accelerating legal quotas for renewable energy, called renewable portfolio laws, the money wasted each year will approximately double in the next 10-years to $50 billion each year. If the states fail to come to their senses and continue to pursue these laws, another doubling by 2040 to $100 billion per year is likely. In the state of Nevada, for example, the increasing cost of electricity will likely be equivalent to a 4% state income tax by 2030.

The renewable energy industry has powerful sources of support for its program to make money by fooling the public. There are many effective lies, repeated over and over. Long term contracts for wind or solar electricity at $25 or $30 per megawatt hour are touted as proving that renewable electricity is replacing "more expensive" fossil fuel electricity. A close examination of the cost of renewable electricity, either wind or solar, shows that the real cost of this electricity is not $25 per megawatt hour, but around $80 per megawatt hour. The difference is the federal and state subsidies. A good chunk of those federal subsidies are set to go away by 2022.

Then there is the matter of replacing fossil fuel electricity. Wind or solar electricity displaces some fossil fuel electricity, but they never replace the plants used to generate fossil fuel electricity. The fossil fuel plants are throttled back when the wind or solar is generating electricity. But sometimes wind and solar are asleep. At those times the fossil fuel plants have to power the grid without any help from the wind or solar plants. Nothing is replaced by building wind or solar plants. A dual system is created with dependable fossil fuel plants supplemented by erratically operating wind or solar plants. When fossil fuel plants are replaced, they are replaced by newer fossil fuel plants. Often natural gas replaces coal.

The idea that introducing renewable electricity in the USA will reduce CO2 emissions and thus save the world from a global warming catastrophe makes no sense because most CO2 emissions, by a wide margin, are coming from other countries, especially China and India. Further, U.S. emissions are declining due to energy conservation and switching from coal to natural gas. Emissions in Asia are skyrocketing. If the U.S. fans of wind and solar really believed in the coming climate catastrophe they would be worrying about what China and India are doing, not what the U.S. electric utility industry is doing.

The real believers in the climate catastrophe, if they are also numerically literate, point out that nuclear electricity is the only serious road to reducing CO2 emissions. Some of these climate alarmists are: James Hansen, Michael Shellenberger, Stewart Brand and before he ran for president, Michael Bloomberg. For a lengthy list of prominent persons supporting nuclear to prevent climate change look here. The environmental organizations have a problem with nuclear in that it was their fund-raising scare catastrophe back in the 70's and 80's. It's hard for them to reverse their position and face the reality that nuclear is the only way to really reduce emissions at reasonable cost.

My own opinion, based on considerable study,  is that global warming, now called climate change, is something between science fiction and a hoax. The side effect of the alleged catastrophe is turning obscure academics, in obscure disciplines, into rock stars. Predicting a catastrophe is a really good method of getting attention. The temptation to cut scientific corners to get in on the bonanza is irresistible. On the other hand, if a scientist refuses to go along, he is seen as killing the goose that lays golden eggs and he may well be purged. Open global warming skeptical scientists are are vastly outnumbered by those that are closeted.

The only economic benefit of wind or solar energy is a reduction in fuel consumption in the existing fossil fuel plants. The marginal cost of fuel in a natural gas generating plant is around $15 per megawatt hour. Wind or solar electricity costs, without subsidies, about $80 per megawatt hour. The $65 difference has to be made up by a subsidy from someone, in practice the taxpayers or the consumers of electricity. Because the renewable portfolio laws mandate increasing use of renewable electricity, if the federal subsidies go away, the price of electricity will increase.

The saddest thing about the response to the renewable energy scandal, or the global warming hoax, is that the people and institutions that know better lack the courage to speak up. Or, in some cases, they even join perpetrators of the scandal for their own profit.

The international oil companies have vast financial resources. They employ thousands of scientists. It is not in their stockholders' financial interest to be made into villains supposedly trying to destroy the Earth via global warming. At one time, before the eco-left gained huge political influence, the oil companies were open skeptics. In 1997 Exxon's CEO Lee Raymond, himself a Ph.D., made a speech clearly pointing out the scientific weaknesses in the predictions of a global warming catastrophe. But now, Exxon and other oil companies are careful not to criticize global warming and they constantly publish propaganda concerning their attempts to reduce CO2 emissions. Of course, their product, oil, is one of the main sources of CO2 emissions. If they dared to be openly critical of global warming theory, or if they made donations to skeptical organizations, they could expect serious political attacks. These companies with vast wealth and knowledge have been intimidated into keeping quiet. They also give what is, in my opinion, protection money, to various organizations that push global warming alarmism, for example the American Geophysical Union. It may be too much to expect that companies whose purpose is to make money will take a principled stand, even if only to protect their long-term interests. These companies also build solar and wind generating facilities. But due to government subsidies and policies, these projects may actually be profitable for the developer. It's the public that is screwed.

Members of the academic and scientific communities that write about global warming, or renewable energy, cower in fear that they might say something that sounds skeptical. It is difficult to do good scientific work if you are afraid of countering the dominant conventional wisdom. The few public skeptics are ornery types with good pensions or fat bank accounts. They are usually depicted as being slightly daffy or as being in the pay of oil companies. The oil companies probably would probably be hesitant to issue a gas credit card to these skeptics, much less actually hire one for any reason. These public skeptics are the real scientists. The other are charlatans.

There is reason for optimism. The danger of global warming ranks low in the public mind. If Trump is reelected there is a good chance that the fake science will be faced with greater skepticism. The federal subsidies for renewable energy could be entirely eliminated. But, if Trump is defeated, all the prospective democrat candidates are fully loony tunes on the subject of global warming and renewable energy.

[Ron: No one ever seems to wonder ALOUD, how the totally irrational and loony belief that human (or any) CO2 emissions are responsible for significant let alone harmful global warming or climate change. Similarly, no one seriously questions why governments around the world are legislating to reduce power production using coal, oil and natural gas. WHY is that? The manufacturers of alternative energy sources cannot possibly have enough universal economic and political clout to be able to cow the entire planet into accepting such nonsense. Sooo, who does? The answer is obvious but never mentioned, just as no one with real political power ever mentions the fact that the Holocaust is bullshit or that the global money creation and usurious banking system is a privately owned and operated monopolistic criminal enerterprise. Nor do our global leaders ever  acknowledge that the current usurious banking system enslaves 99.9% of the global population while enforcing a false mentality of scarcity and want on almost everyone; and actual poverty on half the global population.

The only people you cannot criticise are your rulers, pilgrims. And the only things you cannot criticise are the ideas those rulers decree cannot be criticised on pain of ostracism, imprisonment or death.].

[Colour fonts, bolding and comments in square brackets added.].

Norman Rogers is the author of the book: Dumb Energy: A Critique of Wind and Solar Energy. He is a member of the CO2 Coalition.



Central Bankers' Core Mission Now Includes Climate Change -

Global Warming's 50 Years of Fraud -

Professor Ian Plimer book launch - not For Greens -

Climate change? A professor analyses the situation Interview with Professor Ernst D. Döhler -

Climate Change Quotes -

Climate crimes must be brought to justice -

The Renewable Green Energy MYTH: 50,000 Tons Of Non-Recyclable Wind Turbine Blades Dumped In The Landfill -

Another Expensive Solar Scheme Bites the Dust -

How to Destroy the Climate Change Hoax -

Climate-alarmist Group Creates Blacklist to Discredit Climate “Deniers” -

Jeff Bezos Launches $10 Billion "Bezos Earth Fund" To Fight Climate Change -

30 Years Ago Officials Predicted The Maldives Would Be Swallowed By The Sea. It Didn’t Happen -

Progressive Eco-Group Admits It: Renewable Energy is a Hoax that Benefits its Greenie Elmer Gantries like Al Gore -

Climate-alarmist Group Creates Blacklist to Discredit Climate “Deniers” -

UNESCO: Climate Denial To Be Criminalized And Prosecuted -

Anti-Greta Knocks 'Climate Alarmists' During CPAC Speech -

Kids Suffering Nightmares, Lost Sleep Over Climate Fears -

“We’re NOT Paying !” BBC Gives Greta Thunberg Her Own Series And Viewers Are Furious -

David ‘Greta of the Third Age’ Attenborough Launches BBC’s Climate Bedwetting Blitzkrieg -

All Hail Greta, The Great Carbon Hypocrite -

St. Greta Exploits Australia's Bushfire Crisis, gets Rebuked by Prime Minister Morrison -

Greta "Put Them Against The Wall" Thunberg Nominated For Nobel Peace Prize -

Passing The Coal Hat At The Church Of Greta Thunberg -

Angry 17-Year-Old Girl Threatens World Leaders In Davos: "You Haven't Seen Anything Yet" -

More Chaos on Campus ? Soros Pumps $1bn into ‘global education network’ to fight ‘Climate change & Dictators’ like Trump, Xi & Modi -

Education Group Called “Dangerous” for Looking at Ways to “Fix Science” -

Gates Foundation to Target Climate Change, Gender Inequality -

Fake-Green Zero Carbon Fraud — “Destroying The World to Save It”-

Aussie Academic: 'Ethically Misguided & Downright Dangerous' NOT To Censor Climate-Deniers -

Follow the Real Money Behind the New Green Agenda -

1984 Was Not An Instruction Manual: Trying to memory-hole ‘climate hysteria’ will only create more climate change skeptics -

German Language Police Group Decides To 'UnWord' The Term "Climate Hysteria" -

UN Committee Rules That “Climate Refugees” Cannot Be Sent Home -

The Madrid Climate Disaster -

Follow the Real Money Behind the New Green Agenda -

David ‘Greta of the Third Age’ Attenborough Launches BBC’s Climate Bedwetting Blitzkrieg -

‘Doctor, Help Me, I Have Ecological Grief’: Climate scientists should stop depressing themselves (and us !) with made-up disorders -

Save The Planet & Die Alone: Swedish prof says we should ditch pet cats & dogs, for climate’s sake -

Australia's Hottest Day on Record 1828 -

Environmentalists Made Australia’s Bush Fires Worse -

Global Warming is Not to Blame for the Horrific Bushfires in Australia -

Authorities in Australia have arrested close to 200 people for deliberately starting the bushfires that have devastated the country, yet the media and celebrities continue to blame “climate change” for the disaster. -

Trillion-dollar-valued Amazon Pays $0 in Income Taxes for 2018, Gets Multi-million Refund -

Who pays the lowest taxes in the US? -

Money Imperialism -

All writings by members of AbundantHope are copyrighted by
©2005-2017 AbundantHope - All rights reserved