Pure Fusion Neutron Bomb – 3 x normal ratio of Li7/Li6 mix, no fission products needed, tritium not necessary but only need be added for more power, and a palladium trigger
Here we go – Pure Fusion Neutron Bomb – 3 x normal ratio of Li7/Li6 mix, no fission products needed, tritium not necessary but only need be added for more power, and a palladium trigger – acts as a catalyst for electron transfer (Relatively weak chemical bond Ex: warmth of curing concrete) to start neutron out of the nucleus releasing nuclear energy and the neutron, ie, Li mix injected into palladium or vice versa – although it seems like Beryllium – used in inner bomb as deflectors would also work. Li 7 +e →He 7 →He 6 →Li 6 … Lithium 7 with the addition of an electron (a simple chemical bond will easily produce) the expulsion of a neutron and yield more Li 6. Shhh! It’s a secret. http://iccf9.global.tsinghua.edu.cn/4effort/5nuclear/PassellTransmutation.pdf
Note the Titled Scientific paper – Deuterium and Li7 Concordance in Inhomogeneous Big Bang Nucleosynthesis Models: Spoiler – Happens by itself under the right circumstances – “ABSTRACT Recent observational constraints on primodial deuterium and Li7 correspond to different values of the baryon-to-photon ratio when applied to the Standard Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (SBBN) model. In this article these constraints are applied to baryon Inhomogeneous (IBBN) models. A depletion factor of 3.4 applied to the Li7 constraints will bring Li7, deuterium and He4 constraints in concordance for both the SBBN and IBBN models. A depletion factor of 6.1 will bring concordance for the IBBN model alone.” (Note: This study uses ‘photons’ as the energy source for Li6, Li7 nuclear reaction to occur – ‘excited’ electrons release photons. The energy of an electron is significantly higher than a photon – which the excited electron also produces.) http://www.researchgate.net/publication/1796802_Deuterium_and_Li7_Concordance_in_Inhomogeneous_Big_Bang_Nucleosynthesis_Models
Li6/Li7 fusion reactor – Time: 1957 – “[Lithium-7 deuteride and lithium-6 deuteride fusion fuel] costs… – and with the advertised prices for heavy water [containing deuterium]. The latter sells for $28 per pound. … the separation cost for lithium-6 … should not be excessive since the isotopes Li-6 and Li-7 differ in mass by as much as 15 % and are therefore relatively easy to separate… Making conservative assumptions about the fission yield in the [dirty U-238 fission] jacket, one concludes that a ton of TNT equivalent can be produced in the jacket for a fraction of one cent. … It would undoubtedly be more expensive to construct a bomb without [a U-238 fission jacket]. And it would certainly be a much more difficult technical undertaking, since the success of Stage II [fusion of lithium deuteride] strongly depends upon the presence of the jacket. The neutron linkage and the cyclic nature of the multi-stage bomb make for a marriage between fission and fusion.” (Note: The reaction has been known for years as one can clearly see, but they are still at the ‘sledge hammer’ neutron pounding stage. The knowledge of Li7 only needing an electron or photon allows the easy substitution for the amount of energy needed. Chemical bonding and sharing of electrons with release of energy has been known for centuries. The only thing missing is Palladium – the only metal that allows H – Hydrogen to pass through it. So when cold fusion was discovered, it had to be ‘discredited’ or the secret of pure fusion nukes and triggers would be clearly seen. Enter ‘Dr’ Steven Jones who murdered it with ‘Muon’ BS.)
Dr Ralph E. Lapp, “The Humanitarian H-Bomb”, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, September 1956, p. 264. http://glasstone.blogspot.com/2006/03/clean-nuclear-weapon-tests-navajo-and.html
Micro Pure Fusion Known and Classified for years. “Micro-fusion work of Friedwardt Winterberg from the 1950′s-1970s was recently declassified [not sure when the declassification happened. It may have been some time ago. Classified status was mentioned in the paper but classified/declassified is not relevant]. Winterberg has several ideas for using micro-fusion without fission bomb triggers to generate nuclear energy or power spacecraft. Winterberg was proposing pure deuterium micro-explosions.” http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=15177.0
LENR Cold Fusion reference for Li6/Li7 – “Excess heat” and “heat after death” in a gas loading hydrogen/palladium system. in The 9th International Conference on Cold Fusion, Condensed Matter Nuclear Science. 2002. http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/TianJexcessheat.pdf
More from Dr. Samuel T. Cohen on Pure Fusion – Hitler’s (and current Nazi’s) Suppressed and Still Secret Weapons… “With the new type of explosive, the fission bomb is unnecessary. As nuclear bombs go, the pure fusion bombs have an extremely low blast, equivalent to 1 ton of TNT: a “pop, not a bang.” “The new type of non nuclear explosives are called ballotechnic materials. Cohen says that unlike other explosives, they produce no bang, no cloud, keep the same shape while they detonate, “but, Boy!, do they get hot!” Ballotechnics may have already led to very small fission bombs as well as pure fusion.” http://books.google.com/books?id=kckIOtfftzwC&pg=PA140&dq=secret+pure+fusion+bomb&hl=en&sa=X&ei=gjt1UcK3A7SK2QWF7YFI&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=secret%20pure%20fusion%20bomb&f=false
Related reference – Big Bang Nucleosynthesis – Extra Credit! – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang_nucleosynthesis
The US Wouldn’t Nuke Its Own People? WAKE UP AND GLOW! http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/13/the-us-wouldnt-nuke-its-own-people-wake-up-and-glow/
A nice nuclear comparison of Li6 – Li7: The Pea and the Beach-ball. http://energyfromthorium.com/2010/09/28/lisep1/
Rense Radio: Listen Download Hour 3 – Dr Ed Ward – Boston…What Do We Know? http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2013/04/jeff-rense-radio-show-20130418.html
Ed Ward, MD – http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/ ;
https://www.facebook.com/EdWardMD3 ; http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/messages
This article was written to expose the Boston government drills being hidden by government and to expose the science behind ‘ballotechnic fusion’. Unlike ‘Proven Nukes’ where we have massive data proving nukes, this is very early (days and in some cases hours) in the investigation, so the current working theory (same process used in proving of ‘Proven Nukes’ – part of the Scientific Method) R/O – (Rule Out – MD investigative theory of SOAP, where the most likely (per current symptoms or ‘evidence’) for the most deadly possibility must be considered FIRST. In essence a cross between SOAP and Scientific Method) Testing of the Newest, Smallest Ballotechnic Fusion Bomb-Burn on Its Own People. It has passed hypothesis stage and progressed to Main Current Theory stage. We have referenced proof of government and Nazi experiments on its own people. We have referenced proof ‘ballotechnic fusion’ occurring in nature in the appropriate conditions and the science behind it – a variant of Cold Fusion, Hot Cold Fusion. And a lot more… It’s NOT showing up anywhere in MSM or ‘Alternative Truth Media?’ The information in this article is significant on many levels. Please. Feel free to share and repost this article in its entirety with my Blessing and Thanks. Nothing new – as long as link credited to original source, all of my articles are Public Domain.
NOTE: Be sure and check out comments. For Latest: Click comments below or the title above.
Strange: Suddenly I don’t have access to my pretty maps on site stats. Seems I have to send the owner (me) ‘asking for permission’. to see them. I did like to see the different nations my information was seen in. Lately, virtually nothing in Russia, ,Areas of SA, Middle East – Seems like they are getting no exposure. Doing great in Canada, Oz, UK, US. F!ck the maps. I don’t need no stinking maps.. So far still have everything else, guess they decided to charge for it. Whatever. F!ck Em. SNAFU I guess. Got my pretty maps back. About 5 minutes later I was forced to resign into wordpress. This has happened at other sites, but never before on wordpress. R/O – Account taken over and monitored similar to f!ckbook. But, unless you are coming in from an anon site, rest assured they know who you are. And, if they want to find out who’s coming in on an anon site, they will. Troubling times for some – Couldn’t give a sh!t here – but only because we have no rights and the Nazi government does what it wants in spite of any individuals protests. A pick your battles kind of thing when dealing with fascists. Another recent snafu – Russia and Mexico disappeared from my 4/23 map – only 1 each, but poof just vanished on a later check. Enjoy the update. Best, Ed
Richard Wilcox Says:
Very interesting Ed. To ask a dumb question any chance it could have been claymore mines studded with ball bearings? Thanks.
- edwardmd Says:
April 21, 2013 at 3:09 am |
Thanks for the comment Richard Wilcox PhD reporting out of Tokyo. Was kind of hoping for someone of your impressive background regarding the nuclear information. Usually, I try and stick to the information in the article, but if you are asking my opinion based on the facts on an unrelated issue. Far to little damage – Claymore’s are pretty much going to cut down everything for 100 ft or so – we didn’t see that. Also remember, we are also in a government drill – part of drills are ‘casualties’. So some of what you see are ‘drill casualties, IMO. As for a claymore for the main charge – different angle of explosion – film shows concentration of blast in center, claymore starts in center and spreads out, no way a claymore has the power to make the follow up gusts, also not nearly the amount of heat we see. Thanks for your efforts on Fukushima. Ed
- Richard Wilcox Says:
April 21, 2013 at 3:44 am
Yes, sorry for the dumb question and my laziness in not researching it first, but your answer is much appreciated.
I ask because someone with military background was sure it was a claymore, but they said they also saw charring, but as you said on Jeff’s show there were no photos that indicated where the blast might have come from and charred or broken up the cement. I agree the photos are weird as it just looks like chaos but not really like a huge bomb blew up, as the kind you see in the Middle East when Israel drops huge bombs on Palestinian kindergartens and leaves a gigantic hole in the ground.
Yes, I would like to come up to speed on the micro nukes issue as it relates to your area of expertise and false flag operations. Just too many irons in the fire at the moment!
I would recommend Paul Zimmerman’s book, A Primer In The Art Of Deception as he goes into how nuclear technology, nuclear power and nuclear weapons are all part of an ongoing program to normalize radioactive pollution and use of such weapons as “mini nukes”.
By the way, when I teach the 911 issue to my students I tell them that a mini or micro or neutron nuke was used to flatten the twin towers 1, 2, although I am limited in how technical I can go. But if you look at the pictures at Don Fox’s slide show from last year (online) and your explanation (on Jeff’s show the other nite) about how neutrons bombard the steel and then soon turn it to dust, that pretty much is all I need to explain it for our purposes.
Thank you Ed for your support and interest, and your great work.
No problem, Thanks again for the comment. The best example of neutrons at work see the spire that withstood 1/2 a billion pounds then melts and vaporizes. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W0-W582fNQ
Re: Size – We know they can make a nuclear fusion explosion as small as 2 kg (kilograms not kilotons) of TNT in the lab with lasers. Doubtful they can go that small in the field- Think more like 500 lbs of TNT you could put in your coat pocket, except it goes off like 75 lbs of TNT and sends the rest out as neutrons.
BTW, You can teach them WTCs 1, 2, 6 and 7 – Neutron Nuked. http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/02/18/correction-9-11-wtcs-1-2-6-and-7-neutron-nuked/
BTW, Did any of the above you mentioned tell you about the pure fusion secret nuke sauce Li7 and how it works?
Proven 9-11 Nukes http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/
1. Three Massive WTC Craters – See us government LIDAR proof: – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.
http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm – Best,
2. Five Acres (1.2 Billion Pounds = Weight of Residue of 3 WTC Buildings (WTC 1, 2, and 6)) of WTC Land Brought to Searing Temperatures in a Few Hours by an ’Anaerobic, Chlorine Fueled “Fire” – Impossible by Basic Laws of Physics. See us gov Thermal Images proof – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm – Best,
3. Tritium Levels 55 Times (normal) Background Levels assessed a numerical value of ‘traces’ and ‘of no human concern’. See us government (DOE report) proof: – Nothing but a NUCLEAR EVENT can cause ‘tritium’ formation – basic physics fact – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.
4. An Impossible “Fire” (Combustion Process). See Laws of Physics for
Fire/Combustion Process and Dr. Cahill’s data on ‘anaerobic incineration’. – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://rense.com/general77/newlaws.htm
5. 3 Billion pounds of building instantly turned into 2 Billion pounds of
micronized dust. – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm – Best
6. 16 inch steel Spires that withstood 1/2 a Billion pounds of building falling on them and suddenly turn into limp noodles and partially vaporize. Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.
7. Hiroshima effect cancers in responders and locals. Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm , http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm
All of the above are facts are proven with referenced links of reputable data sources – many are from the government itself and more…
Music Stuff : US Is Moving On Up! http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/1SIdUk/reichrolld.com/
UpRISING – Muse http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8KQmps-Sog
Thanks again, Ed
Richard Wilcox Says:
April 21, 2013 at 2:13 pm |
Thanks for the incredible info, will do. OK, I see about the need to keep the site science oriented with links instead of idle chatter. In that vein my friend Bob Finnegan was one of the top investigators of the Bali Bombing and I believe it is thought a mini nuke was used in that case. The Patsies had some small bombs but nothing like what really happened and the president of Indonesia stated that they were essentially blameless and died shortly after making the statement. Search: Robert S. Finnegan, Bali Bombing.
- edwardmd Says:
April 21, 2013 at 2:35 pm
Bali and a couple other bombing information via covert op, Joe Viallis in this article of mine. http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm Many moons ago. Take some links and see where much reported by others has already been documented.
- edwardmd Says:
April 21, 2013 at 2:01 pm |
Thanks for the response. Normally, it would not have been posted – because it had no links. If one sends ‘comments’ here that make a statement – You need referenced data – a link, some quotes, whatever, but you need some kind of documentation.
Ex. VIDEO: Bomber suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev appears to be alive, naked and handcuffed
- zendeviant Says:
April 22, 2013 at 9:47 am
Did not know the protocol, please forgive. Dropped same comment on VT and they don’t want the links. Go figure.
Great stuff on lithium fusion, I will be sure to stop in again.
Ed Ward MD Says:
April 24, 2013 at 3:32 pm |
WTF? Why I’m ‘Hot’ for Bill quotes. 1. He’d be a perfect ‘test’ subject if testing for a focused (per ‘casing’) fusion test. Old, great shape, thin, little clothing and very close to the source. So, we know he’s in good general medical health. He posses all of the needed attributes for ‘detection’ of scattering of neutrons – if anyone is going to feel the effects he is the ‘Perfect Lab Rat’ – good shape, but the most likely candidate to show any ‘effects’. Sure doesn’t look like the blast blew him over. His lateral movement is minimal. He continues in the forward movement. He suddenly gets weak after stating ‘doing great’. See small to mod neutron damage. IMO, Bill was THE test subject for the government drill – R/O. BTW – This article now # 2 google of 42 million possible for – pure fusion – Awesome Exposure of Facts.
REST AT: http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/photograph-of-boston-fireball-2nd-explosion/