EXTRAORDINARY AH Teaching from Spiritual Hierarchy
  NEW READERS! Read Here First
  Supporting AH
  Leadership of AbundantHope
  Regional AH Sites
  Other Sites with AH material
  Contact Us
  Becoming A Messiah
  Mission Ideas
  System Busting
  Cleric Letter/English
  Translations of Cleric Letter
  AH Member Writings
  Brian's Poetry
  Telepathic Messages
  Jess Anthony
  Lucia G
  Targeted Messages
  Light Flower
  Changing The Face Of Religion
  - Phoenix Journals - PDF in German
  Candace on Religion
  Other Spiritual Pieces
  Gems from God Like Productions
  Spiritual Nuggets by the Masters
  Phoenix Journals
  Phoenix Journals - PDF
  Telepathic Messages PDF books
  Selections from the Urantia Book
  Illustrations For The Urantia Book
  CMGSN Pieces
  David Crayford and the ITC
  Health and Nutrition
  Podcasts, Radio Shows, Video by AH
  Political Information
  True US History
  Human/Animal Rights
  The Miracle That Is Me
  911 Material
  Books - eBooks
  government email/phone #'s
  Self Reliance
  Alternative News Sources
  Art and Music
  Foreign Sites
  Health and Healing
  Human/Animal Rights
  Vegan Recipes
  Translated Material
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Jess
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Candace
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Anderen
  Canal Jess
  Par Candace
  Other Channels
  Telepathische Nachrichten (Candace)
  Telepathische Nachrichten (Jess)
  Telepathische Nachrichten (div.)
  AH Mitgliederbeiträge (Candace)
  AH Mitgliederbeiträge (Jess)
  Spirituelle Schätze
  Translations - Candace
  Translations - Jess
  Translations - Others
  by Candace
  By Jess
  By Others
  Anfitriones Divinos
  Bitácoras Fénix
  Creadores-de-Alas (WingMakers/Lyricus)
  Escritos de Candace
  Escritos de Otros
  Telemensajes de Candace
  Telemensajes de Jess Anthony
  Telemensajes de Otros
  By Candace
  By Jess
  By Others
  Korean Translations
  Hungarian Translations
  Swedish Translations

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Environment/Science Last Updated: Mar 28, 2022 - 12:08:15 PM

Proof of a Mechanism for Cold Fusion
By Tom Bearden
Jul 5, 2011 - 9:31:26 PM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page Share/Bookmark

Proof of a Mechanism for Cold Fusion

From Tom Bearden


Bennett Daviss' article on cold fusion, "Reasonable Doubt" [[i]], is timely and a balanced coverage of a controversial area. There is, however, a mechanism for cold fusion, published in 2000 [[ii]], and the basis for it has been experimentally proven in independent thermodynamics experiments published in July 2002 [[iii]]. We give the background below.


As is well known, much of modern thermodynamics is based on statistical mechanics. Statistical phenomena are subject to fluctuations, and thermodynamic fluctuation theory was initiated by Einstein's application of it to blackbody radiation [[iv]]. Full formalism was completed by Green and Callen [[v]] and further extended by Callen [[vi]]. A useful transient fluctuation theorem was advanced by Evans and Searles [[vii]] and generalized by Crooks [[viii]].


In a transient fluctuation zone, reactions can and do run backwards. In 1999 the present author [[ix]] noted that, in such a zone, the law of attraction and repulsion of charged particles could potentially be reversed, at least momentarily. This meant that, in a transient fluctuation zone, like charges could momentarily attract, because of the Coulomb barrier changing to a Coulomb attractor. In an electrolyte, this meant that two H+ ions, for example, could be attracted so closely together that each entered the strong force region of the other, forming a quasi-nucleus. As the fluctuation excursion reversed and returned, decaying the transient fluctuation, reversed reactions would again reverse and the reactions would again run forward normally. But an already-formed quasi-nucleus could decay by various means (such as mere tightening or flipping a quark to change a proton to a neutron) into a proper transmuted and fused nucleus, at low temperature because of the change of the prohibiting Coulomb barrier into an attractor. The usual requirement of high temperature is because, for most transmutations, like charges have to be driven together at very high energy, to penetrate each other's Coulomb barrier to the strong force region, forming a quasi-nucleus which then can often decay into a normal fused and transmuted nucleus.

It remained to be experimentally proven that such reversal zones really do occur, at sufficient size level and duration for formation of the required quasi-nuclei to occur with a significant probability.


In July 2002 Wang et al. [[x]] experimentally proved that such reversal zones can occur for cubic micron level and for up to two seconds. A cubic micron of water contains some 30 billion molecules and ions, and two seconds can be quite sufficient time for Brownian motion to carry together two approaching and temporarily attracting like-charged ions, forming the required quasi-nucleus. Given such a quasi-nucleus formed, then the rest of it (decay of the reversal zone and decay of the quasi-nucleus into its indicated transmuted nucleus at low temperature) is very similar to what happens in conventional nuclear transmutation reactions using high temperature and high energy. The high temperature and high energy were only necessary to defeat the Coulomb barrier. If it is defeated by a fluctuation and reaction reversal of the Coulomb barrier, there is no need for the conventional use of high temperature and high energy.


So there exists a well-developed theory of transient fluctuations and experimental proof of reactions running backwards for up to two seconds in conglomerates of up to 30 billion ions. Together with the 600 or so cold fusion experiments by a variety of scientists in a variety of labs worldwide, this is provides a high probability that the cold fusion mechanism is explained by the momentary reversal of the Coulomb barrier between like-charged ions into a Coulomb attractor.


Several reactions that immediately suggest themselves do fit the reported phenomena detected in cold fusion experiments. The transmutation reaction itself represents a difference in total binding energy between the involved particles, which results in release of energy and therefore the anomalous extra heat produced in successful experiments. Further, the formation of two H+ ions in a quasi-nucleus, with a subsequent flip of one quark as the quasi-nucleus decays back to time-forward reactions, will yield deuterium. The same process for three H+ ions, or for one H+ and one D+ ion, with proper quark flipping will yield the anomalous appearance of tritium. The same process for two deuterons without quark flip, (or for four H+ ions with proper quark flips), will yield the anomalous appearance of alpha particles (helium 4 nuclei). All these anomalous transmutation products have been frequently reported in cold fusion experiments in multiple labs by multiple scientists worldwide.

The new process should also enable many other nuclear fusion reactions at low temperatures, and serious and significant scientific investigation in many laboratories is fully warranted. The only difference between the cold fusion mechanism and hot fusion is the use of Coulomb barrier reversal rather than using high energy and high temperature.


In cold fusion, successful experimental results have been obtained many times, and the only thing lacking has been a suitable theoretical mechanism that explains how the Coulomb barrier is overcome without high temperature and high energy. With the proof that fluctuations do provide reactions that run backwards in significant chemical zones for up to two seconds, the reaction for converting the Coulomb barrier into a Coulomb attractor—by reversal of the usual law for attraction and repulsion of charged particles—has a very solid basis, both theoretically and experimentally.


In applying scientific method, when there is a conflict between prevailing theory and replicable experiments, the experiment is supposed to be upheld and the theory changed. The experimental results are already known, and with an understandable mechanism now available, cold fusion is a process that must be considered established beyond any reasonable scientific doubt. It is time to develop this new and promising area to provide a much easier means of nuclear fusion at low temperatures. If so, the decades-old dream of cheap nuclear fusion energy and an expanded nuclear chemistry will be the result.

Huntsville, Alabama, US


[1]. B. Daviss, NewScientist 177, 36-43 (29 March 2003).

2. T. E. Bearden, J. New Energy 3(2/3), 12-28 (1998).

3. G. M. Wang, E. M. Sevick, Emil Mittag, Debra J. Searles, and Denis J. Evans, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89(5), (29 July 2002) 050601

4. A. Einstein, Ann. Phys. (IV Folge) 22, 569 (1907) and 33, 1275 (1910).

5. R. F. Green and H. B. Callen, Phys. Rev. 83, 1231 (1951).

6. H. B. Callen, Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics (Wiley, New York, 1985).

7. D. J. Evans and D. J. Searles, Phys. Rev. E 50, 1645-01648 (1994).

8. G. E. Crooks, Phys. Rev. E 60, 2721-2726 (1999).

9. T. E. Bearden, ibid.

10. Wang et al., ibid.

[i]. B. Daviss, NewScientist 177, 36-43 (29 March 2003).

[ii]. T. E. Bearden, J. New Energy 3(2/3), 12-28 (1998).

[iii]. G. M. Wang, E. M. Sevick, Emil Mittag, Debra J. Searles, and Denis J. Evans, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89(5), (29 July 2002) 050601.

[iv]. A. Einstein, Ann. Phys. (IV Folge) 22, 569 (1907) and 33, 1275 (1910).

[v]. R. F. Green and H. B. Callen, Phys. Rev. 83, 1231 (1951).

[vi]. H. B. Callen, Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics (Wiley, New York, 1985).

[vii]. D. J. Evans and D. J. Searles, Phys. Rev. E 50, 1645-01648 (1994).

[viii]. G. E. Crooks, Phys. Rev. E 60, 2721-2726 (1999).

[ix]. T. E. Bearden, ibid.

[x]. Wang et al., ibid.

[Colour font and bolding added.].


All writings by members of AbundantHope are copyrighted by
©2005-2022 AbundantHope - All rights reserved

Detailed explanation of AbundantHope's Copyrights are found here

Top of Page

Latest Headlines
Sitrep: UNSC On Biolabs In The Ukraine + Russia Transcript
VAERS Data ‘Unreliable,’ Fact-Checkers Say — Here’s Why That’s a Big Problem for CDC, FDA
US Tried To Fund Bio labs In Ukraine As Early As 2005, records show
CDC/FDA Smoking Gun of Smoking Guns 2
Deleted Web Pages Show Obama Led an Effort To Build a Ukraine-Based BioLab Handling ‘Especially Dangerous Pathogens’.
All Along the Watchtower
Tucker Carlson Outlines Biological Research Labs in Ukraine in Segment That Triggered State Department Response
Global Governments Begin Warning of Critical Food Shortages
THe Crude Hypocrisy And Rot Of Green politics
Ukrainian Nationalists Cut Power To Chernobyl, Russia says
BREAKING: Documents Reveal US Department of Defense Was Funding Ukrainian Biolabs — Russia Releases List of Biological Agents Tested in US BioLabs in Ukraine, Including Salmonella, E. Coli, Anthrax and The Plague
Russia To The U.S. – “We have found your biological weapons!”
Scientific Integrity Is Dead. Here's Proof.
A Story About Polio, Pesticides and the Meaning of Science
Glyphosate: What It Is, Where It Is … and What You Can Do About It
Francis Collins-led NIH Not Only Backed Research On Aborted Fetuses But sex-change Testing on Young Kids
Russia reveals documents of labs developing biological weapons in Ukraine funded by the US
Under Secretary Victoria Nuland Admits U.S. Funded Biological Research Labs Exist in Ukraine
Here Are The Documents The U.S. Embassy in Ukraine Scrubbed On 'biological threat reduction' Labs
'Brace for Rationing' - Food Crisis Escalates - EU Farmers Furious