EXTRAORDINARY AH Teaching from Spiritual Hierarchy
  NEW READERS! Read Here First
  Supporting AH
  Leadership of AbundantHope
  Regional AH Sites
  Other Sites with AH material
  Contact Us
  Becoming A Messiah
  Mission Ideas
  System Busting
  Cleric Letter/English
  Translations of Cleric Letter
  AH Member Writings
  Brian's Poetry
  Telepathic Messages
  Jess Anthony
  Lucia G
  Targeted Messages
  Light Flower
  Changing The Face Of Religion
  - Phoenix Journals - PDF in German
  Candace on Religion
  Other Spiritual Pieces
  Spiritual Nuggets by the Masters
  Phoenix Journals
  Phoenix Journals - PDF
  Telepathic Messages PDF books
  Selections from the Urantia Book
  Illustrations For The Urantia Book
  CMGSN Pieces
  David Crayford and the ITC
  Health and Nutrition
  Podcasts, Radio Shows, Video by AH
  Political Information
  True US History
  Human/Animal Rights
  The Miracle That Is Me
  911 Material
  Books - eBooks
  government email/phone #'s
  Self Reliance
  Alternative News Sources
  Art and Music
  Foreign Sites
  Health and Healing
  Human/Animal Rights
  Vegan Recipes
  Translated Material
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Jess
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Candace
  Gekanaliseerde berichten Anderen
  Canal Jess
  Par Candace
  Other Channels
  Telepathische Nachrichten (Candace)
  Telepathische Nachrichten (Jess)
  Telepathische Nachrichten (div.)
  AH Mitgliederbeiträge (Candace)
  AH Mitgliederbeiträge (Jess)
  Spirituelle Schätze
  Translations - Candace
  Translations - Jess
  Translations - Others
  by Candace
  By Jess
  By Others
  Anfitriones Divinos
  Bitácoras Fénix
  Creadores-de-Alas (WingMakers/Lyricus)
  Escritos de Candace
  Escritos de Otros
  Telemensajes de Candace
  Telemensajes de Jess Anthony
  Telemensajes de Otros
  By Candace
  By Jess
  By Others
  Korean Translations
  Hungarian Translations
  Swedish Translations

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Environment/Science Last Updated: Jan 29, 2020 - 8:06:35 AM

Education Group Called “Dangerous” for Looking at Ways to “Fix Science”
By James Murphy
Jan 28, 2020 - 7:15:35 PM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page Share/Bookmark

Education Group Called

January 28th 2020

The National Association of Scholars (NAS), a group that looks to foster intellectual freedom on the campuses of America, is under a left-wing and climate-hysteric attack for having the temerity to host a conference called Fixing Science: Practical Solutions for the Irreproducibility Crisis. Among the attacks is the absurd claim that the NAS is harboring a "white supremacy" agenda.

Irreproducibility, simply explained, means that a conclusion brought forth by scientists cannot be reproduced experimentally. As the event's description points out, "If you can't reproduce a result, it isn't science."

So, it's not surprising that many climate-hysteric types are now coming out of the woodwork to attack such an event.

Leonid Schneider of For Better Science accuses the NAS of not only climate-change denial, but also of having an agenda that supports white supremacy:

[The NAS] fight is against "political correctness," embodied by climate change science, but also by liberal values, by the state persecution of erotically-inclined male academics, and what drives NAS mad is any discussion on gender, feminism or racism. Instead, NAS would rather have students learn about the historic achievements of white Europeans, while firmly rejecting any insinuation that USA as the world's most prosperous nation was built on white supremacism.

Schneider also complained about the lack of female representation at the conference, but as NAS president Peter Wood pointed out in the Wall Street Journal, women were indeed invited to speak at the conference but all declined those invitations.

Another scientist, Leonid Teytelman (pronouns he/him), biologist and the co-founder of protocolsIO, a company that looks to assist scientists in making their methods reproducible, issued a warning on Twitter regarding the event: "Warning: I just got an invite to ‘Fixing Science' conference from NAS. This is not @theNASEM! It's @NASorg, a political organization that has weaponized reproducibility to derail science policy. They are cleaver and dangerous."

Wood responded, "Mr. Teytelman, who holds a doctorate in computational and experimental biology and who works in the field of replication, is someone who does worthy science and deserves to be taken seriously on matters within his competence," Wood wrote. "But he becomes unhinged at the thought of ‘conservatives' or ‘climate skeptics' getting a seat at the table. And he is far from alone."

Two of the original 19 speakers have backed out of participating in the conference. Wood described them as graduate students who feared that their careers would be damaged by the climate-hysteric mob. Those speakers who dropped out have been replaced and, as of now, the conference is still a go for February 7-8 in Oakland.

So, is irreproducibility in science an issue or not? On one hand, Teytelman would seem to say it is an issue, since the company he founded looks to assist researchers in how to make their science reproducible. On the other hand, he apparently only wants the "right people" looking into the issue. And a traditionalist organization with a mission statement that seeks to uphold "the standards of a liberal arts education that fosters intellectual freedom, searches for the truth, and promotes virtuous citizenship" is persona non grata in the discussion.

In 2005, John Ionnidis, now a professor of medicine, health research and biomedical data science at Stanford University, published a landmark paper entitled Why Most Published Research Findings are False. The study found, in essence, that most published research findings at the time were false owing to the fact that they could not be reproduced.

"Several methodologies have pointed out that the high rate of non-replication (lack of confirmation) of research studies is a consequence of the convenient, yet ill-founded strategy of claiming conclusive research findings solely on the basis of a single study assessed by formal statistical significance," he noted.

The main reason climate hysterics do not want the question of irreproducibility in science looked at closely is because science respectably done would rob them of their catastrophic headlines. The way things are, there is no penalty for publishing a report that later turns out to irreproducible. Climate-hysteric websites and newspapers get to have their catastrophic headlines but, later, if the study turns out to be wrong, who writes that story?

If future government policy - climate policy or otherwise - is to be made based on scientific studies, shouldn't those studies at least be correct, and reproducible?

Image: gan chaonan via iStock / Getty Images Plus

[Some colour fonts and bolding added.].

James Murphy is a freelance journalist who writes on a variety of subjects, with a primary focus on the ongoing anthropogenic climate-change hoax and cultural issues. He can be reached at

All writings by members of AbundantHope are copyrighted by
©2005-2020 AbundantHope - All rights reserved

Detailed explanation of AbundantHope's Copyrights are found here

Top of Page

Latest Headlines
Menace on the Menu in Post-EU Britain
EPA Isn’t Allowed To Do Anything About Effects From Electromagnetic Pollution From Cell Phones And WiFi
Globalism's Baron Of Bullshit
Jeff Bezos Launches $10 Billion "Bezos Earth Fund" To Fight Climate Change
“We’re NOT Paying !” BBC Gives Greta Thunberg Her Own Series And Viewers Are Furious
Harmony Becomes Cacophony: When Healthy Cells Become Cancerous
Ancient Civilizations Most Feared Enemy Unleashes Apocalyptic Plague On Modern World
Aussie Breakthrough Aids Quantum Computing
Renewable Power Theatre of the Absurd
Fossils From Animals And Plants Are Not Necessary For Crude Oil And Natural Gas, Swedish Researchers Find
Cancer And The New Biology Of Water
Veganism Bad for the Environment and Your Health, Say Farmers
Botswana to Allow Trophy Hunters to Kill Elephants for $43,000 Per Head
Brazil's  Bolsonaro Unveils Bill To Open Indigenous Lands To Mining Oil And Gas Exploration
Modern Man May Be Closer To The Discovery And Adoption Of An Anti-Aging Pill Than You Think; But You Have To Give Yourself Permission To Take It
Genetically Modified Seeds: Conceived as a Weapon Part III
The Geopolitical Deployment of Biological Weapons Part II
Biological Weapons: A Useful and Timely Factual Overview Part I
Brazilian Government Wants to Destroy the Culture of Native Peoples
The Lawyer Who Fought Chevron for ‘Chernobyl of the Amazon’ is Now a ‘Corporate Political Prisoner’