2009 - High Time for Clean Zero Point Energy?
Tom Bearden, Steven Greer and the Orion Project
in Orion Project newsletter. Orion Project seeks to develop energy from
the vacuum systems also known as zero point energy devices or "free
energy." Tom Bearden is the author of "Energy from the Vacuum ."
Plus excerpts from other articles.
Bearden talks about watergas, Dr. Kanzius, using negative energy to affect probabilities and engineer physical reality directly.
As noted in our October 14 Newsletter last year, retired Col. Thomas Bearden has described some of the physics mechanisms that will allow the extraction of energy from the vacuum. Recently he has written an easy-to-read briefing entitled "Precursor Engineering and the Falsification of Modern Physics" which describes some history of energy physics and why energy science is at a stalemate today.
Bearden article "Precursor.."
[also see other newsletter:
makes for very interesting reading and provides a clue as to why our
energy sector is in such a mess and how we may get out of the dilemma. Below are a few of the far-reaching ideas and scientific references Bearden presents to get you intrigued. Please see the original article to understand more fully the implications of what he is telling us.
He suggests that nothing less than "directly engineering physical reality at will." is possible using the physicist Paul Dirac's concept of "local vacuum tickling".
How might this happen? Well, in the classical concept of the "probabilities" vacuum,
there are positive energy/positive probabilities of ever-higher energy
interactions that ultimately result in the creation of every
"observable" in the universe. Basically, the observable universe is "continually being created and 'happening' at an incredible rate" by these positive energy/positive probabilities.
Now, what if there was a way to produce some sort of negative energy/negative probabilities (negative E)?
Dirac describes the removal of the negative energy from physics:
"One gets over the difficulty on the classical theory by arbitrarily
excluding those solutions that have a negative E. One cannot do this in
the quantum theory, since in general a perturbation will cause
transitions from states with E positive to states with E negative."
[Dirac, Proc. of the Royal Society A, Vol. 117, p. 610]. Here he
suggests that tiny perturbations will produce negative energy in the
affected region of the vacuum. In other words, tiny-energy sharp-gradient pulses will add "negative probabilities" into a specific region so that highest "positive probabilities" that create and hold together a physical structure start to "unhappen".
For example, if the correct sharp-gradient pulse were applied to water, the
OH-bond positive-probability that holds water together would start to
"unhappen" and the water molecules would just come apart as their OH bonds start to vanish statistically.
As our aware readers of The Orion Project may quickly realize, this suggests a powerful tool in the breaking apart of water to produce a combustible mixture of H and O or hydroxy (Brown's) gas. This is what might have been done by Stan Meyer, Dr. John Kanzius and other researchers, who used various pulsed electromagnetic energies to break apart water. They probably did this without an understanding of this potential mechanism. This
mechanism of negative energy "unhappening", as Bearden describes it,
can also be used in the "unhappening" of some diseases, another area of
Finally, it is interesting to note that the concepts of "negative
energy occur in the Schrödinger equation and in Dirac's relativistic
electron theory, and so there it is in the very foundations of
physics." Yet during the 1930's some
physicists, afraid of the implications of this negative energy, removed
as much of this knowledge as possible from classical physics.
As noted by Hotson, "I think if one had to point to a single place
where science went profoundly and permanently off the track, it would
be 1934 and the emasculation of Dirac's equation." [D. L. Hotson,
"Dirac's Equation and the Sea of Negative Energy," Part I, New Energy,
Issue 43, 2002, pp. 1-20. Quote is from p. 1.]
Bearden calls the application of these processes "precursor engineering, since one is directly engineering the ongoing creative bubble-set of an observable entity,
by not only "happening" the statistical processes involved in it but
also by selectively "unhappening" the entire set or selected parts of
The ultimate application of such technology will allow "humankind to enter into the "final physics" and allow direct engineering of physical reality itself",
hopefully for the overall betterment of mankind. At least as a start,
we at The Orion Project and others can use some of these concepts to
change our energy paradigm.
Here is a magic little formula (that only took me 35 years to write):
[space-time] = [virtual particle flux of vacuum] = [energy]
little formula, we suddenly have a completely unified physics, and we
have totally eliminated any idea of "empty" space. This formula is
engineerable by using an extraordinarily simple process: Dirac's local
the deltas of each term in the little "identity equation" also identify
the same way. So at long last we have finally found a resolution to one
of Feynman's stated major problems of physics: previously we have not
really known what energy itself identically is. E.g., quoting Nobelist Feynman: "It is important to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge of what energy is."
[Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands, The Feynman
Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Vol. 1, 1964, p.
With this more advanced understanding of what an "observable" actually is, then when we now introduce a bit of "sharp little gradient tickling" the vacuum in a local area, per P.A.M. Dirac, that tickling will produce negative energies in that tickled vacuum as well. And that means that we are adding in "negative probabilities" into that bubbling structure (say, a container of water, in each water molecule structure) so that the
entire bubble structure for the water molecule starts "backing back
down" its ongoing creation chain -- in short, it starts "unhappening"
at its "highest positive energy end".
statistically the water molecules in the tickled area start "falling
apart" as their OH bonds now have much less probability, and so they
just start "unhappening" statistically as their OH bonds start
intermixed bubbles of H2 and O2 gas (from those molecules whose OH bond
"unhappened") begin appearing throughout the vacuum-tickled "water".
But these mixtures are not very combustible or explosive because in
that altered (tickled) region now it is very difficult to form the OH
if we then pipe the resulting gas bubbles out of that local
tickled-vacuum region -- i.e., out of the water container itself-- and
a few inches away and into the combustion chamber of a nearby
combustion engine, then the vacuum in that combustion chamber is
"normal" and not being "tickled". Hence the OH bond is back in its full
normal probability, and so the mix of O2 and H2 will burn and power the
engine, giving no exhaust except water vapor.
the real secret of watergas, as rigorously shown by Dr. John Kanzius
and the results verified by a renowned water chemist. But neither of
them seem to realize the actual mechanism involved. This is also the
secret of Dr. Kanzius tremendous new cancer cure, now proceeding toward
human testing by a leading cancer research institute.
So the ability to (1) "unhappen" things like the OH bond in water molecules, (2) "unhappen" the cancerous growth in a region of normal flesh, (3) "unhappen" the lattice bonds in titanium so that the titanium liquefies at room temperature without heating and can then be "cold-molded"
in very large and thick forms such as submarine hulls (a Soviet
production process for some decades), and (4) produce certain nuclear
fusion bonds in a fluid by use of tickling by sonobubbles so that
sonofusion occurs, etc.
The eventual startling applications are unlimited, as comprehensive research develops and extends the technology. We
shall be able to "unhappen" essentially any disease quickly and
cheaply, by assembling the exactly required "tickling pattern" to
"unhappen" that specific disease in the diseased body. We
will also be able to turn anything into anything else (such as turning
the present hordes of carbon wastes from coal plants directly into
gasoline with no intermediate processing, etc. We will be able to clean
up the present horrendous nuclear wastes and the vast amount of
carbon-containing wastes from coal-burning plants.
The ability to directly engineer any and all "happening" bubble-sets, or any particular part of any of them, is the "final physics" because it leads to the final goal of physics and science itself: the ability to directly engineer observable physical reality itself, at will. The fact that we are radically departing from the accepted notions of "brute force tearing things apart" such as electrolysis, and instead we are letting the all-powerful and all-pervasive vacuum do all the functioning for us,
is a very radical and total departure from the present "mechanical
energy based" physics concepts and practice of physics and chemistry.
abject panic at their glimpse of this "monstrous" and unthinkable
portent, in 1934 the leaders of the physics community brutally
mutilated and murdered physics by ripping out negative energy vacuum
effects, totally arbitrarily.
give it a name, I call this process "precursor engineering" since one
is directly engineering the ongoing creative bubble-set of an
observable entity, by not only "happening" the statistical processes
involved in it but also by selectively "unhappening" the entire set or
selected parts of it.
Also see article with good simple explanation:
"Bearden states that present day electrical engineering has failed
to take advantage of the scientifically proven fact that 'all EM
(ElectroMagnetic) energy comes freely from the seething vacuum.' Stated slightly differently, 'all EM energy flowing in every EM field and potential in every EM system comes freely from the virtual state vacuum.
This is via the proven broken symmetry of the source dipole (and of the
source charge and its polarized vacuum charge of opposite sign).'
means that if one can set up a charged pair and separate them (positive
and negative) to make a dipole and maintain the separation, then real observable, usable EM energy will flow.
However, in 1892, Lorentz removed this possibility of a free energy
source from Maxwell's equations describing EM theory and produced a set
of EM equations that have been used by scientists and engineers since
that time leading to our energy problems today.
this source dipole is broken, then the energy flow will stop (until it
is reset, which takes more energy), which is what happens in our
present day electrical circuits and systems using the modified Maxwell's equations. The difficult engineering trick is to build a circuit that will catch some of this freely flowing EM energy (from a source dipole) and then separately dissipate that EM energy into loads to separately power them so that the source dipole is not destroyed."
Found at: http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=139807
[With thanks to billym at rumormillnews]