Edward R Dougherty: Are those charged with the responsibility for our scientific educational and research capacity morally capable of answering Kennedy's call ?

[Ron: US education has been deliberately dumbed down ever since the Rockefellers began controlling teacher education at the beginning of the 20th century. See eg: Dumbing Down US Education: Part II – Wundtian Psychology & Rockefeller Finance. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Ron_71/Dumbing_Down_US_Education_Part_II_Wundtian_Psychol_3877.shtml

General Education Board, Occasional Papers, Issues 1-9, New York, 1913, 6, http://books.google.com/books?id=QzhDAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

US education, like all aspects of US life and society generally, will not return to spiritual, moral, psychological and intellectual health until the Talmudic controllers of US and global society are removed. Presidents Trump, Putin and Xi and their Administrations are currently undertakiing that task.

The Amadeu Antonio Foundation defended the booklet claiming that the case studies were based on real-life cases they had witnessed including a girl with braided hair whose parents turned out to be far-right extremists. They also admitted that since the release of the booklet their phones had been slammed with complaints. The case studies echo research presented by Antifa groups in 2016, which claimed that "Volkisch families," those who believe in countryside living and traditional German culture and values, posed a threat to Germany. Chris Tomlinson

The fundamental purpose of education is a great deal more significant and subtle than the aims championed by politicians; it underlies all other goals, is concerned with being rather than becoming something, and might be described as facilitating the understanding of oneself and the fulfillment of innate potential, or as Krishnamurti put it, the "flowering of goodness". He maintained that the purpose of education "is not to produce mere scholars, technicians and job hunters, but integrated men and women who are free of fear; for only between such human beings can there be enduring peace."  Graham Peebles

"I am here to tell you: All that time I said I wasn't indoctrinating anyone with my beliefs about gay and lesbian and bi and trans and queer people? That was a lie," wrote Canadian gay activist Sason Bear Bergman, a woman who identifies as a transgender man, in a March 2015 piece titled "I Have Come to Indoctrinate Your Children Into My LGBTQ Agenda (And I'm Not a Bit Sorry)." Bergman holds nothing back, stating she wants to make children "like us" even if that "goes against the way you have interpreted the teachings of your religion."

James Risdon: In 2011 U.S. gay activist Daniel Villarreal penned a column for Queerty.com stating that the time had come for the homosexual lobby to admit to "indoctrinating" schoolchildren to accept homosexuality.

"Why would we push anti-bullying programs or social studies classes that teach kids about the historical contributions of famous queers unless we wanted to deliberately educate children to accept queer sexuality as normal?"

"We want educators to teach future generations of children to accept queer sexuality. In fact, our very future depends on it. Recruiting children? You bet we are," he added.

Homosexual activist Michael Swift wrote in 1987 in the Gay Community News that school children would become explicit targets for homosexual indoctrination. "We shall seduce them in your schools...They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us," he wrote at the time.

Ms Papas said the "threat of legal action" meant she was unable to comment on Mrs Montague's case, but stated that the T-shirt worn by her daughter - a graduate student of ‘sports sociology and feminist theory' whose papers include "A Feminist Psychoanalytic Approach to the Roles of the Penis, the Phallus and Hegemonic Gender Norms in ‘Feminist Porn'" - was not in breach of the school's code of conduct. Virginia Hale

Rod Dreher: I use it here to refer to the sacrilege this insane woman has done to her body, which Christians believe is a "temple of the Holy Spirit" (1 Cor. 6-19). St. Paul explicitly instructs Christians that their body is not their own, that it belongs to God. Therefore, they are to use their bodies in ways consistent with God's will.

Ron: Ensouled humans are indwelt by a fragment of the consciousness of the Creator and so the human spirit can be said to be "a temple of the Spirit of God". Arguably though, the physical human body is merely a temporal meat suit overshadowed by the spirit of the individual human that is said to occupy it during an incarnation. The Creator gifts each human with personality and reason, the ability to think and make choices. This means material existence is an educational process in which spirits learn about life, the universe and everything and are able to evolve or devolve their thinking and hence their spirit, as a matter of choice. To evolve, each spirit need to learn and accept the divine laws that govern the operation of the universe and the Cosmos they inhabit. As the Creator creates the Cosmos with the energy we call love; and to exist everyone and everything has to be infused with an element of that conscious love, it follows that to evolve, spirits need to grow in understanding (consciousness) of that love and hence in an ever increasing ability to love.

Religions confuse and distort our thinking by failing to explain that what they call "God's will" is simply the way our world and the Cosmos conforms to energetic influences that are, and reflect, the love of the Creator. The so-called "laws" of God are simply the way spiritual and material existence is created and persists. In effect, devine law is life itself and not the rules of its conduct. Evil is a transgression of law, ie of life itself, not a violation of the rules of conduct pertaining to life.

Divine law requires balance. Balance is achieved when equal but opposite forces come together and unite to create unity, stability and wholeness. As the Creation reflects God's all encompassing love, everything in the Cosmos can be said to seek union and balance. This is described in Chinese philosophy by the concept of yin and yang which describes how seemingly opposite or contrary forces may actually be complementary, interconnected, and interdependent in the natural world, and how they may give rise to each other as they interrelate to one another. This is how we describe the existence in the Cosmos of the  male and female principles.

Arguably this is the truth behing St Paul's statement that the bodies of Christians (and in fact of everyone) 'is not their own, that it belongs to God. Therefore, they are to use their bodies in ways consistent with God's will.' In other words, the Creator has designed the Cosmos so that his energy (love) has created equal and opposite energy streams (which in human terms we define as male and female) that are interconnected, complementary and interdependent that must interrelate and combine to achieve balance and hence completion.

Failure to understand and accept divine law, ie the way that Creation is designed to operate, in respect of the nature and roles of males and females in human society, does indeed result in abominations in that the end result can be horrific as typified by the sad case of this New Zealand women and her intentions for her offspring.

Evolving humans must be fallible if they are to be free; and it is true that free and inexperienced intelligence cannot possibly at first be uniformly wise. The possibility of mistaken judgment (evil) becomes sin only when the human will consciously endorses and knowingly embraces a deliberate immoral judgment. This women's actions appear to seek to deny her role as a female and mother, contrary to divine law in her human reality.  They also appear to deny the rights of her offspring to have an independent life in accordance with the way Creation intended. Whether her decisions are deliberate immoral judgments or due to ignorance and/or mental defects is an open question. However, if, as seems likely, others in her community or doctors, psychiatrists or LGBTQ activists et al, have contributed to her irrational decisions and behaviour, they bear a responsibility, appropriate to their input, for the negative outcomes of her  behaviour.

Each human is responsible for self and must answer for his or her own intent. The idea that through his life, suffering and crucifixion Jesus saved anyone is a false doctrine inserted into the Christian religion by the Pharisees. Humans incarnate repeatedly, gradually learning from their mistakes until they develop some understanding of the truth about themselves and life, the universe and everything. Then they move on to higher spiritual realms, learning as they go until they finally meet with the Creator. Then they return to the Creation to assist with its administration, again learning as they go.

Be aware that anyone who is against the laws of God and the Creation -- IS  AN ANTI-CHRIST

Also, be aware that without the love of the Creator nothing can exist. This means, for instance, that if a human being unequivocally, implacably and irrecoverably chooses to cease to exist, ie to reject God's love, that choice will be fulfilled because a core gift of God's loving creation of every human individual is free will.

Rod Dreher: The divine logos is embedded in Creation, and finds its most complete expression in the Incarnation of God Himself in the form of a man, Jesus Christ. Because of the Incarnation, we cannot separate the body from God.

Ron: This seems to be false Christian dogma, presumably inserted into the Christian religion by Pharisees (who not only crucified Jesus the Christ but sought to eradicate his teaching by persuading Roman Emperors to create the Christian religion into which the Pharisees inserted false and misleading doctrines and ideas. Jesus didn't incarnate to create a religion and didn't. He came to teach divine truth that had been forgotten over aeons and replaced with distorted and corrupted ideas by the Pharisees and others. A major distortion inserted into Christian thinking was the idea that Jesus was the ONLY son of God whereas in fact EVERY ensouled human is a son or daughter of the Creator because each is indwelt by a fragment of the Creator's consciousness.

Also, as I understand it, each individual human being's spirit is indwelt by a God fragment, but the human spirit itself does not reside in the physical human body. The physical body is not actually indwelt by the human spirit, rather the spirit is the individual's mind and it overshadows the body and interacts with it through the brain which is merely a biological computer. The human body also has neurones in the heart that act as a second "brain" and is the spirit's more direct conduit for influencing spiritual behaviour. A third "brain" is also resident in neurones in the intestines and it also communicates with the brain. In effect, it is the human spirit that cannot be seperated from God. The physical body is merely the temporal vehicle used by the spirit to experience materiality. Moreover, humans incarnate innumerable times, each time in a new physical body, in order to garner experiences that assist them to learn about life, the universe and everything. It is the human spirit that is the real expression of God in incarnates. Jesus the Christ was a dual incarnation by Christ Michael Aton (the God of this universe) and Esu Immanuel Kamara. both those spirits overshadowed the physical incarnation known as Jesus the Christ.

The false doctrine that Jesus was the ONLY Son of God and that his life and suffering "saved" the rest of humanity from Original Sin; and that, because of his incarnation we cannot seperate the body from God is just another distortion inserted into the Christian religion by Pharisees. The doctrine about Original Sin is bogus as is the idea that humans were, or could be, "saved" by the life, {alleged) death on the Cross, and resurrection of Jesus. Each human spirit is a sovereign fragment of the Creator and each is responsible for his/her own salvation ie, actions, inappropriate inactions, and eventual understanding, acceptance and fulfillment of their destiny as a son or daughter of God.

Rod Dreher: Early Christianity's sexual teaching does not only come from the words of Christ and the Apostle Paul; more broadly, it emerges from the Bible's anthropology. The human being bears the image of God, however tarnished by sin, and is the pinnacle of an order created and imbued with meaning by God.

Ron: The Bible is a human, NOT a divine construct. A major part of the Pharisees' corruption of Jesus' teaching was accomplished by their insertion of the false, collectivist, ethno-centric, genocidal Torah into the Christian Bible. That has totally compromised Christian teaching to such an extent that evangelical Christians and many others falsely believe that Christ's teaching has Judaic roots. It doesn't!  Moreover, inclusion of the Torah into the Bible has also convinced many people that Jesus was a "Jew". Jesus was NOT a Pharisee nor was he a Hebrew, a Judean or a Judahite. Moreover, Jesus was NOT a Jew since the Khazarian neo-Pharisees did not start calling themselves Jews until around 1775AD. Jesus' mother was of Sumarian stock and his Father's seed was provided by Archangel Gabriel. See eg: ESU IMMANUEL, THE CHRIST, WAS NOT A JEW - http://abundanthope.net/pages/Phoenix_Journals_61/ESU_IMMANUEL_THE_CHRIST_WAS_NOT_A_JEW_4237.shtml And: CREATOR GOD ATON/HATONN: THE TORAH vs. THE TALMUD - http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/CREATOR-GOD-ATON-HATONN-THE-TORAH-vs-THE-TALMUD.shtml

The Torah is said to have been originally concocted and written by Levites about 1200 years after the time of Abraham and some 800 years AFTER the time of Moses. The Levites plagiarised and corrupted earlier Sumarian spiritual teachings in order to create a pseudo religious mind control mechanism for dominating, controlling and exploiting Judean tribal peoples. Accordingly it misrepresented and maliciously and salaciously distorted the alleged activities of historical figures like Abraham, Isaac and Moses. By the time that Jesus incarnated, control of the Torah based Temple religion had devolved into the clutches of an ideological political cabal known as Pharisees.

How the Jews must laugh whenever they contemplate the obvious contradiction between Jesus's teaching and the Old Testament. What could be more opposed to Jesus' teaching that we must love neighbour (everyone and everything) AS self, (ie we must learn to accept and love our selves) FOR the love of God (ALL), than the materialistic, collectivist, ethno-centric, genocidal political ideology set out in the Torah?

Rightly understood, Judaism is Phariseeism which is a God and gentile hating ethno-centric, collectivist, political ideology that elevates the Jewish collective to g-d-like status and considers all other humans to be, at best, animals that must be subjugated and sacrificed for the benefit and glory of the neo-Pharisees who now call themselves Jews. Obviously such nonsense is totally at odds with what Jesus taught.

The Talmud is said to have been written by Pharisees between about 500 BC and 500 AD. It claims to flesh out the Torah and to have corrected the words of the 'Jewish' g-d so it stands to reason they also have sought to corrupt genuine Christian consciousness by doing the same thing with the teachings of Jesus. Saul of Tarsus, a Pharisee who never knew Jesus, started the ball rolling, proclaiming such false ideas as Original Sin and the inferior status of women. Jesus' teaching was distorted and corrupted regularly thereafter.

Moreover the Pharisees ensured that virtually all references to reincarnation were removed from the Bible. This was finally achieved by the successful elimination from the Bible of Jesus's teachings about REINCARNATION. That was done during the Fifth Ecumenical Council in 554 AD. At that time Emperor Justinian arrested Pope Vigilius for 'Believing in Reincarnation' and had the Council declare:

If anyone asserts the fabulous preexistence of souls, and shall assert the monstrous restoration which follows from it: let him be anathema. (The Anathemas against Origen), attached to the decrees of the Fifth Ecumenical Council, A.D. 554, in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, 2d ser., 14: 318). See eg: Pope [Vigilius] Arrested for Believing in Reincarnation - http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Pope-Vigilius-Arrested-for-Believing-in-Reincarnation.shtml

The Christian religion and the Bible didn't exist in 325 AD when Emperor Constantine organized and presided over the Council of Nicea. In 331 Constantine commissioned fifty Bibles for the Church of Constantinople, but little else is known (in fact, it is not even certain whether his request was for fifty copies of the entire Old and New Testaments, only the New Testament, or merely the Gospels). In fact the Bible probably didn't get more or less settled until Emperor Justinian called the Fifth Ecumenical Council in 553-54 AD and arrested Pope Vigilius for 'Believing in Reincarnation'.

Eradication of the doctrine of Reincarnation, ie knowledge that the evolvement of life and hence MIND is based on the reincarnation process (which is essential to enable spirit beings to avail themselves of a sufficient number of physical incarnations to adequately explore and understand the immensity of life, the universe and everything) is the mechanism used by neo-Pharisees (Talmudists) who call themselves Jews to convince gentiles that they are merely physical creatures having one, only, lifetime which has no meaning, destiny or purpose. Concomitantly this LIE, reinforced by the Jews' funding and coercion of scientists to accept and promulgate false science about life, the universe and everything as typified by falsely promulgated Darwinian evolutionary theories about the Origin of Species, has made it easy for Talmudists and their puppet Christian religious controllers and materialists generally, to instil fear of death into congregations. This process has distorted human consciousness and science by having scientists, academics, educators and the mass media promulgate the false and ridiculous idea that people on this small planet on the edge of the universe are the most, and probably the only, consciously intelligent beings in the Cosmos. LOL.

However, the "King Hit" to Christian US believers was administered by the Talmudists when the Rothschilds funded the writing of the Schofield Bible in the US in the early 20th Century. That version of the Bible has thoroughly distorted the thinking of Evangelical US Christians and others to such an extent that they falsely believe that their "Christian" beliefs arise out of and accord with the teachings of Judaism when in truth Pharisaic beliefs are derived from the Talmud and Torah which are diametrically opposed to the loving divine truth taught by Jesus.

In all the circumstances it is not surprising that pseudo Christian USans and others are unable to distinguish between what Jesus taught and the decadent pseudo morality that the Talmudists believe and promulgate. As a consequence, many Evangelical Christians and others embrace decadent, incoherent, Judaic values and accept cultural Marxist and other atheistic collectivist beliefs and behaviours that are being aggressively imposed on Anglo-US and European social consciousness by Jew organised militant Libtards and "progressive" cultural Marxist, Communist elites.

The sad results of the imposition of these Talmudic values is very apparent in the case of the hopelssly confused New Zealand woman the subject of this article.

Rod Dreher: When Paul warned the Christians of Corinth that having sex with a prostitute meant that they were joining Jesus Christ to that prostitute, he was not speaking metaphorically. Because we belong to Christ as a unity of body, mind, and soul, how we use the body and the mind sexually is a very big deal.

Ron: this is confused thinking. Everything divine which the human mind grasps and the human soul acquires is an experiential attainment; it is a reality of personal experience and is therefore a unique possession. We do not "belong" to Christ in the way here described. The term "Christ" denotes a state of spiritual being, NOT a person. Jesus was a human person and we do not "belong" to that person 'as a unity of body mind and soul.' Each human being is indwelt by a spark of the Creator's consciousness and each has to pursue a sovereign individual destiny that ordinarily will ultimately culminate in union with the Creator.  That will incidentally entail union with Christ Michael Aton, the Creator of this universe, and ALL others in the Cosmos including Sananda, Esu Immanuel Kumara, who was a dual incarnate with Christ Michael Aton in the life of Jesus.

Saul of Tarsus (St Paul) was raised as a Pharisee and never knew Jesus the Christ. He distorted Jesus' teaching in various ways including by promulgating the false doctrine of 'Original Sin' and the notion that females are inferior to males. Jesus did not incarnate to create a religion and didn't. The Pharisees not only crucified Jesus but sought to eliminate his teachings. To that end they convinced Roman Emperors to create and impose the Christian religion on the peoples of the Roman Empire. The Pharisees then used the Christian religion to distort and corrupt Jesus' teachings and they, and the neo-Pharisees who call themselves Jews but are not, have effectively continued to do that up until today.

Rod Dreher: Anything we do that falls short of perfect harmony with the will of God is sin.

Ron: Religions use the word "sin" pejoratively. Human beings incarnate to learn from physical experience in the material world and that process involves making mistakes. That is what the word "sin" really represents. Eventually human beings will learn from their mistakes because: Sin is not merely rule breaking but failing to live in accord with the structure of reality itself.

Rod Dreher: If sex is made holy through the marriage covenant, then sex within marriage is an icon of Christ's relationship with His people, the church.

Ron: The term "Christ" denotes a state of spirituality NOT a person. Jesus did not establish a Church, the Pharisees and Roman emperors did that as a means for socio-political control of the general population. Sex is holy IF the two participants join together in unconditional love. Sex has nothing to do with religion which is a man made construct used for social control purposes.

The fact is that the pornography has taught an entire generation how to view sex-and that the majority of that pornography contains explicitly violent and degrading content (88% of top-selling porn content contains violence against women, and the top-ranked online porn for teen boys includes scenes where women and girls are virtually destroyed in a single shoot by multiple men simultaneously). Combine that with the relentless promotion of sexual violence as legitimate in the romantic context-the Fifty Shades of Grey torture porn trilogy sold well over 100 million copies, and the Hollywood films became smash hits-and we have created a culture where whipping, hitting, cruel restraints, and the intentional infliction of pain on a romantic partner is considered normal. It used to be considered wrong for a man to hit a woman. Now, apparently, it is okay if she's really asking for it.  - Jonathon Van Maren

One attorney cited by Baskerville describes the result as " a disciplinary procedure where students nearly always lack lawyers, no legally trained judge oversees the process, testimony is not under oath, hearsay is freely considered, relevant evidence or even proper notice of the charges may not be given to both parties, students may be forced to incriminate themselves, and whatever "jury" is empaneled may not be of one's peers. "  Such travesties of judicial procedure are now legally mandated at all colleges which receive federal funding, i.e., at nearly all of them. During the Obama presidency, Assistant Secretary of Education for civil rights Russlynn Ali even issued a directive to university officials demanding that campus tribunals adopt a lower standard of proof for cases of sexual misconduct than required by ordinary courts of law. This directive, by the way, included no period for public notice, comment, and possible amendment, as legally required for federal regulations: "it was simply an arbitrary order issued from the pen of a functionary." F Roger Devlin

A variety of scientific literature indicates that promoting gender fluidity within children's minds is unnecessary and destructive. Studies indicate that between 80-90% of children experiencing gender dysphoria outgrow it on their own by late adolescence, and that even full gender "reassignment" surgery often fails to resolve gender-confused individuals' heightened tendency to engage in self-harm and suicide. - Calvin Freiburger

Last Thursday, Scotland's Education secretary John Swinney told parliament that his country will become "the first country in the world to have LGBTI [lesbian, gay, bisexual, transsexual and intersex] inclusive education embedded within the curriculum".   All state schools, primary and secondary, will teach a pro-homosexuality, pro-transsexual philosophy to children of all ages under "various themes" including "LGBTI terminology and identities", so-called homophobia, biphobia and transphobia; and the history of the "LGBTI equalities and movements." Dorothy Cummings McLean

Silly professor. He's missing the point. These people don't want, expect, or need "an open discussion of topics." They want to promote tribalism. They don't want to find common ground. It's quite simple; you will think exactly as they tell you to think or you will be reprogrammed through "diversity training." Rick Moran

In this period of economic decay and parasitism, the narrow needs of the rich necessitate deregulated, unaccountable, marketized schools that annually siphon billions of dollars in public funds from public schools. The rich are constantly striving to maximize profit as fast as possible to satisfy their unlimited greed in the context of a continually failing economy, and they will not let the general interests of society get in their way. For them, deregulated marketized education arrangements that funnel a breath-taking amount of social wealth into their pockets every year are wise schemes that should be multiplied. Regulating charter schools would mean the loss of an enormous amount of social wealth for them.  Shawgi Tell

1. Lunatic Missouri professor screaming at conservatives   // 2. Open and proud Marxist demonstrations routinely take place at U.S. colleges. // 3. The college cancer has trickled down. Satantic trannies reading to small children!

The Arrogance of Tolerance

"It is made to appear that, whereas each man claims his freedom as a matter of right, the freedom he accords to other men is a matter of toleration. Thus, the defense of freedom of opinion tends to rest not on its substantial, beneficial, and indispensable consequences, but on a somewhat eccentric, a rather vaguely benevolent, attachment to an abstraction."

"So, if this is the best that can be said for liberty of opinion, that a man must tolerate his opponents because everyone has a ‘right' to say what he pleases, then we shall find that liberty of opinion is a luxury, safe only in pleasant times when men can be tolerant because they are not deeply and vitally concerned."

"We take, it seems to me, a naively self-righteous view when we argue as if the right of our opponents to speak were something that we protect because we are magnanimous, noble, and unselfish." - Walter Lippmann

Peterson's enemies are eager to destroy his rising brand, tagging it as alt-right, deplorable, proto-fascistic-and dangerous. In their script, Peterson is an avatar of retrograde white male Christian supremacy. He's a herald of the bad old days before intersectional power ruled the roost. "Is Jordan Peterson enabling Jew hatred?" The Forward asked in a particularly scurrilous article that labeled him a "public intellectual adored by white supremacists and conspiracy theorists." The New York Review of Books exclaimed, "Islamophobes will take heart," and concluded that Peterson's popularity constituted "a crisis that is at least as deep as the one signified by Donald Trump's unexpected leadership of the free world." Gilbert Sewall

Sweet warns that more shelters are needed to tackle the rise in homelessness. If de Blasio does not act soon, some shelters in the city could reach full capacity, thus creating a headache for children who would then have to seek temporary refuge with extended family or friends, and or even return to the streets.   According to Newsy, a school district in the Bronx had an unbelievable 10,000 homeless students. In one school alone, over 40% of the students had been homeless at some point.  Tyler Durden

Ten fifth-grade students at Windsor State Street School were asked to fill out a survey inquiring about their biological sex, how they "identify," their sexual preferences, and whether they had had a "romantic relationship" with a "sexual partner" within the last year. The survey was administered on behalf of Women's Information Services, a nonprofit domestic violence prevention and advocacy group. It was also linked to a research project at the University of New Hampshire.

Russia Today

Paying homage to feminism and multiculturalism, the face of CBC Kids News is 14-year-old girl actor Saara Chaudry. She says of the news site's "launch that, ‘Everyone deserves to know what's going on around the world and it shouldn't just be adults that know what's going on,'" reports the Post Millennial.

At every level of the education ecosystem, then, thanks in large measure to the viral influence of feminism, it is obvious that students are not being prepared for life in the real world of basic knowledge, work, and relationship.  Not only are cultural history, economic maturity, math and science, and functional literacy casualties of the curriculum, but their demolition is a harbinger of societal collapse. David Solway