Sorcha Faal: In what [Ron: the Talmudically controlled] Human Rights Watch calls "chilling", this report explains, the points earned by the "superstate" citizens of China for ratting out to "Big Brother" authorities the "Thought Police" crimes and misdeeds of others are accumulated in each of their "social credit system" files-and are points needed in this dystopian society for everything from gaining employment, to being able to travel, even to their being able to buy food, shelter, medical care and clothing-and whose "Big Brother" rulers in China, in true Orwellian fashion, say is "needed to restore morality" and "is beyond the understanding of Western countries".
Ron: Talk about the pot calling the kettle BLACK! The US Federal government is a CORPORATION covertly owned by unknown individuals. At least the real rulers of China are KNOWN individuals like Xi Jinping. Prior to the election of President Trump, the banksters and corporatists controlling the US were unknown, hiding behind their political puppets. The US is a FASCIST state, a corporation owned and controlled by the owners of banks and other corporations. Moreover, Orwellian control and double speak is nowhere more apparent than in the US, UK and EU which make the transparency of China's governance and its Social Credit System look positively sane and reasonable. Labelling China's rulers as Big Brother and Orwellian falsely demonises China and its government. Such propaganda is the rhetoric used by Big Brother all the time in Orwell's "1984" book.
This author is ignorant or has no sense of shame or irony. At best this is kneejerk 20th century propaganda-speak. It continues the "us and them" bullshit sooo common with Western commentators. Xi Jin Ping is a Christed individual and any objective view of what his government has done for China and its Second and Third World trading partners gives the lie to this pejorative rhetoric. Xi Jin Ping's government has lifted hundreds of millions of Chinese people out of poverty while the Bush and OBama governments in the US have plunged many millions of USans INTO poverty in the same period.
The core mechanism for criminal ownership of the US and most other governments and the planet's resources and infrastructure, is private ownership of corporations. See eg: How Interlinked Corporations Rule The World. - http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/How-Interlinked-Corporations-Rule-The-World.shtml
A tiny band of mega trans-national corporations, owned by giant banks and their Talmudic bankster and financial controllers have destroying the pseudo Capitalist US, using zero tax liabilities after credits and exemptions while their workers and employees paid between 25 - 30% in taxes. The rate for the minority of corporations, that paid any tax, was 14%.
James Petras says:
'According to the US Internal Revenue Service, billionaire tax evasion amounts to $458 billion dollars in lost public revenues every year - almost a trillion dollars every two years by this conservative estimate.The largest US corporations sheltered over $2.5 trillion dollars in overseas tax havens where they paid no taxes or single digit tax rates. Meanwhile US corporations in crisis received over $14.4 trillion dollars (Bloomberg claimed 12.8 trillion) in public bailout money, split between the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve, mostly from US tax payers, who are overwhelmingly workers, employees and pensioners.'
See eg: How Billionaires Become Billionaires - http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/How-Billionaires-Become-Billionaires.shtml
Currently our global banking and financial controllers have rigged the US legal system so that corporations are considered to have all the benefits and more, of PERSONHOOD, which is a unique characteristic of flesh and blood human beings. See eg: Citizens United v. FEC: Corporate Personhood Must be Eliminated if Humanity is to Survive. – http://abundanthope.net/pages/Ron_71/Citizens-United-v-FEC-Corporate-Personhood-Must-GO-if-Humanity-is-to-Survive.shtml
The humungous subsidies that are covertly extracted from the general population are being funnelled to a small cabal of banksters and corporatists enabling them to fund corporate takeovers and buybacks with the resultant mega corporations being used to electronically centralise information acquisition and exchange and the manufacture and distribution of goods and services so that they can replace human labour with robots. That process is occurring at an exponential rate which will soon replace so many employed workers that governments will be unable to tax the remaining wage and salary earners sufficiently to provise adequate welfare payments and services to those who are unemployed; let alone retirees, children and the sick and disabled. See eg: The Permanent Unemployment & Underemployment Economy – http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/The-Permanent-Unemployment-Underemployment-Economy.shtml
In Which Companies Have The Most Tax Havens? - http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Which-Companies-Have-The-Most-Tax-Havens.shtml, Niall McCarthy provides an example of how this is done.
‘Multinational companies based in the United States are able to avoid paying an estimated $100 billion in federal income tax every year through the use of tax havens. A recent report from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy has found that 366 of America's largest 500 companies maintain 9,755 tax haven subsidiaries holding over $2.6 trillion in accumulated profits. Despite only having three tax haven subsidiaries in Ireland, Apple stashes the most cash off shore by far, some $246 billion which helps the company avoid $76.7 billion in U.S. taxes.
The Goldman Sachs Group maintains the most tax havens of any large U.S. company by far with 905 in total. That includes 511 in the Cayman Islands (though the company does not have an office there), 183 in Luxembourg, 52 in Ireland and 41 in Mauritius. Morgan Stanley is in second place with 619 tax haven subsidiaries while ThermoFisher Scientific rounds off the top three with 199. Even though small island nations like Bermuda and the Cayman Islands are notorious for tax avoidance schemes, the Netherlands is actually the country most frequently used as a tax haven by American companies.'
Arguably China's Social Credit System (CSCS) is a reasonable initiative designed to assist the huge Chinese population to segue into a positive, equitable and abundant future in which everyone in the nation will be treated fairly without the secretive preferential treatment of insiders and prejudicial treatment of everyone else that typifies life in the US and the Euranglo-US Empire and most of the rest of the world today. In the run-up to achieving Light and Life on this planet humanity will need to develop honest and reliable, community activity auditing mechanisms to ensure that we never again fall into the current rampantly corrupt and unlawful Talmudic dystopia that Presidents Trump, Putin, Xi and others are arduously eliminating as we speak. China appears to be leading the way into our utopian future. So be it. For some discussion on this issue and comparison with the US, see eg: China Assigns Every Citizen A ‘Social Credit Score’ To Identify Who Is And Isn’t Trustworthy - http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/China-Assigns-Every-Citizen-A-Social-Credit-Score-To-Identify-Who-Is-And-Isn-t-Trustworthy.shtml
West attacks China’s Social Credit System to Deflect From its Fascist Panopticon - http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/West-attacks-China-s-Social-Credit-System-to-Deflect-From-its-Fascist-Panopticon.shtml
Big Brother Arrives: China Bans People With "Bad Social Credit" From Planes, Trains - http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Big-Brother-Arrives-China-Bans-People-With-Bad-Social-Credit-From-Planes-Trains.shtml
Facebook Has a File on You: Even If You Don’t Have an Account. - http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Facebook-has-a-File-on-You-Even-If-You-Don-t-Have-an-Account.shtml
Debra Nussbaum Cohen: The evangelical crusade making its way from Alabama to the Supreme Court will force American Jews to submit to their distinctly Christian anti-abortion dogma
Ron: Conforming to the laws of a host nation is not unreasonable. The Neo-Pharisee collective who call themselves Jews but are not, have been given their own "homeland" which they have transformed into an apartheid entity which they have called "Israel". If they don't want to accept US values and give allegiance to the laws of their host US nation they can always make Allyah.
Debra Nussbaum Cohen: When Alabama's governor this week signed into law the United States' most restrictive ban on abortion, making it illegal in nearly all circumstances, it set up a challenge to the U.S. Supreme Court's 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade, which made abortion up to 24 weeks a Constitutional right.
Ron: From the moment of conception a human zygot is a growing person with the potential to be a sovereign human being indwelt by a fragment of Creator consciousness. That potential should not be terminated except by natural causes. No human tribunal can change that reality or lawfully purport to terminate the existence of any human entity without just cause.
Debra Nussbaum Cohen: It also presented a threat to my religious freedom as a Jew.
Ron: Judaism is TALMUDISM, a belief system that is rooted in the TORAH which is an ancient political ideology, NOT a religion. Most Jews are atheists who worship the Jewish collective and those who don't, purport to worship an ethno-centric, jealous, genocidal entity who is no god at all. The Talmud and the Torah "say" gentiles, ie non Jews, are soulless, non human animals who can be used, abused and killed by Jews at whim.* WHY would ANY gentile society let alone a Christian nation give ANY credence to anything said on this issue by anyone professing to be a Jew?!
* Hatred of all gentile societies especially those having or originally derived from Christian cultural roots, is symptomatic of Talmudism which has spawned not only Bolshevism and Communism but also Jacobinism and Fascism as well as sub ideologies like Feminism (which fosters deep conflicts between males and females in non Judaic communities) and LGBTism and intersectionalism (which foster amorality and identity politics that seek to create conflicts between almost everyone in non Judaic communities). This is of course a recipe for the total destruction of those civilised societies and is meant to be a powerful adjunct to the Talmudist bankster controlled and funded Fascist corporations that currently control the West and most of the rest of this planet and its population.
Debra Nussbaum Cohen: More to the point, the new law refers to an embryo or fetus as "the unborn child." That language reflects a distinctly Christian view of when life starts.
Ron: From the moment of conception the potential unborn child is created. In most cases, if that potential life is not wanted, abstinence or birth control methods can be used to prevent it.
Debra Nussbaum Cohen: That view, like those embedded in new "heartbeat laws" in Georgia and several other states, reflects the institutionalization of Christian hegemony in America. They infringe on my religious freedom as a Jew.
Ron: The issue is not about religion. It is a moral issue. If this author doesn't want to conform to the moral, ethical and legal requirements of her host society she could and should remove herself from the jurisdiction. Presumably the collectivist Israeli entity was established (to the great detriment of the Palestinians previously living there) for the purpose of accomodating Jews offended by Christian spiritual, social and cultural norms. Accordingly this author could always go to Israel to be among those who think like her.
Debra Nussbaum Cohen: In other words, the government is not permitted to pass laws favoring one religion over another, or over no religion.
Ron: US states have a moral and legal duty to safeguard the lives of all persons within their jurisdiction. The said law is attempting to do that. The protection of human life is NOT a variable "religious" issue, It is an intrinsic moral and spiritual issue.
Debra Nussbaum Cohen: This is key, because according to classical Jewish text and most rabbinic interpreters, a developing embryo or fetus is not "an unborn child" or "person," but has the legal status of an appendage of the pregnant woman. It is part of her body, not a separate person, until the moment that a majority of a viable baby capable of independent life has been born.
Ron: Classical texts such as the Torah and Talmud DEMAND the murder of gentile men, women and children. In fact those texts call for the indiscriminate murder and genocide of non-Jews of all ages. Those textual injunctions are moral abominations that cannot be accepted by ANY genuine community. IF anyone wishes to adhere to such barbaric tenets they cannot expect a civilised society in the US or anywhere else to condone them on ANY grounds, let alone upon claims that they are religious beliefs.
Debra Nussbaum Cohen: Contemporary rabbis hold, of course, a range of views.
Ron: Neo-Phariseeism has its roots in Phariseeism which crucified Jesus the Christ. Phariseeism had it roots in Canaanite political ideology that evolved well over three thousand years ago. Eustace Mullins has explained the truth of the matter. He says:
'The Babylonian Talmud says: "Five things did Canaan charge his sons: love one another, love robbery, love lewdness, hate your masters, and do not speak the truth" - The Last Will of Canaan, Babylonian Talmud, Peshachim 113b.
These five points have been the modus operadi of the Canaanites for three thousand years. "the Will of Canaan today remains the operating instructions of the Canaanite heirs, who presently control the World Order. At the same time, it remains unknown to the peoples whom the Canaanites continue to rob, enslave, and massacre." The instructions are a command to commit genocide against the people of Shem (Genesis 27:39-41)'.
The fact that rabbis hold a range of views AS A MATTER OF COURSE, merely evidences that they adhere to the demand in Canaan's Will to " do not speak the truth"
Debra Nussbaum Cohen: Denying a woman and her family full access to the complete spectrum of reproductive healthcare, including contraception, abortion-inducing devices, and abortions, among others, on religious grounds, deprives women of their Constitutional right to religious freedom."
Ron: Killing unborn humans is NOT a "religious" question it is a moral and spiritual issue. Moreover, consideration and determination of that moral issue IS NOT subject to the barbaric dictates of a political ideology concocted thousands of years ago as a method for controlling barbaric Canaanite peoples.
Debra Nussbaum Cohen: The Supreme Court's decision in Roe was based not on a determination of when life begins but rather on a woman's right to privacy and autonomy through the first trimester. That jives with Judaism's classical understanding of when life begins. The first 40 days, or close to 6 weeks, are a period in which the Talmud says pregnancy is "like water."
Ron: This is rabbinical speak! From a spiritual AND scientific perspective, life begins at conception.
Debra Nussbaum Cohen: The Mishna states that even a woman who is nine months pregnant may be executed if that is the punishment meted out to her for committing a crime. Her execution may not be delayed to spare the pregnancy unless she has already begun to give birth since the fetus is not a person.
Ron: The Talmud is a demonic concoction and this is just another example of that fact.
Debra Nussbaum Cohen: Debating when life begins is an unwinnable fight. Each person's view depends on their religious and political positions.
Ron: Life begins at conception. The right to terminate a human life is NOT a debating issue. The constant references to this being a 'religious' AND a 'political' issue evidences mental confusion or, more likely, the fact that the author thinks it is really a political issue.
Debra Nussbaum Cohen: Instead, the legal battle over the new laws like Alabama's can be based on the Constitutional right to the free exercise of religion. Can government privilege one religion's view of when life begins over another's?
Ron: NOW we are beginning to see this author's rabbinical duplicity. This Jewess is postulating that the question of life or death for ANY unborn child is merely a subjective "religious" question, ie a matter for determination by EACH individual based on her alleged belief(s). That ideology might be acceptable to Jews but it isn't a viable alternative for any society that seeks to ensure its continued civilised existence.
Debra Nussbaum Cohen: Just as no law can obligate us to share the religious beliefs of evangelical Christians, neither should a law demand that we share their view of when life begins.
Ron: This is a non sequiter. The law complained of is NOT obliging this author or her tribal sisters to share 'the religious beliefs of evangelical Christians'. But it is requiring that any women CHOOSING to live within the relevant jurisdiction must not kill an unborn human life.
